ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the efficacy of different unipolar electrocoagulation power on pathological injury of porcine kidney suffering suture-free partial nephrectomy (SFPN).Methods:From April 2018 to July 2018, nine Guizhou pigs were selected, with an average age of 3 years and an average weight of 48 kg. According to different hemostatic power of unipolar electrocoagulation during open partial nephrectomy, they were divided into three groups(60W group, 80W group, and 100W group), with 3 in each group. The left kidney was exposed with a surgical incision, parallel to the lumbosacral muscle.The left renal artery was clamped and about 2 cm renal tissue was excised at the middle pole of the left kidney. 60W, 80W and 100W were used by unipolar electrocoagulation for hemostasis until no bleeding occurred after the artery clamp was released. The total ischemia time was controlled within 20 min. Temperature was measured by a multi-channel thermometer probe which was inserted into the healthy kidney tissue at a distance of 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm away from the unipolar electrocoagulation hook, and the upper pole of the kidney far away from the operation area. The time of operation, the volume of renal bleeding, the time of hemostasis and the temperature were recorded. On the 7th day after operation, the left kidneys were taken and the pathological changes were observed by toluidine blue staining.Results:All operations were completed safely and successfully. The operation time in 60W group, 80W group, and 100W group was (41.2±5.5)min, (35.1±3.7)min, (31.3±2.2)min , respectively. There was no significant difference of operation time among those group ( P>0.05). The blood loss of renal was (35.3±4.1)ml, (21.4±4.7)ml, (15.3±4.1)ml, respectively. The blood loss in the 100W group and 80W group was less than that in the 60W group ( P<0.05). And the blood loss in the 100W group was less than that in the 80W group ( P<0.05). The hemostasis time was (15.2±1.9)min, (10.1±1.4)min, (6.4±0.8)min. The hemostasis time in the 100W and 80W groups was less than that in the 60W group ( P<0.05). And the hemostasis time in the 100W group was less than that in the 80W group ( P<0.05). At the place of 10 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook, the temperature in the three groups were (33.1±1.1)℃, (34.0±1.0)℃, (34.3±0.6)℃, which was not significantly different from that of the respective upper poles. And there was no significant difference between the three groups( P>0.05). At the place of 5 mm and 2 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook, the temperature in the 100W group (41.7±1.3)℃, (61.4±6.4)℃ and the 80W group (38.6±2.4)℃, (50.3±6.0)℃ was higher than that in the 60W group (36.9±4.1)℃, (42.0±4.7)℃, and the temperature in 100W group is higher than that in 80W group ( P<0.05). When the power was 60W, 80W or 100W, the temperature in the place 10 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook was less than that in the place 5 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook ( P<0.05), and the temperature of the place 5 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook was lower than that of the place 2 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook ( P<0.05). The total pathological injury depth of wounds in 60W, 80W, 100W group was (7 323±50)μm, (8 119±100)μm, (8 896±40)μm, respectively. The depth in 100W group and 80W group was deeper than that in 60W group ( P<0.05), and the depth in 100W group was deeper than that in 80W group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:In SFPN, the hemostatic effect of three different monopolar electrocoagulation output power is satisfactory. With the increase of power, the hemostasis speed is faster. However, the temperature of surrounding healthy renal tissue would be higher, and the total pathological injury depth would be deeper.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of selective segmental renal artery clamping ( SSRAC) on the solitary-kidney, providing a foundamental basis for the using of SSRAC in partial nephrectomy. Methods A total of 18 pigs were randomized equally into 2 groups according to the method of renal artery clamping such as main renal artery clamping ( MRAC) group or SSRAC group.Each case underwent right radical nephrectomy and either MRAC or SSRAC for 60 minutes on the left kidney.Serum creatinine ( SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were measured before surgery and at 6 time points thereafter (the 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 90th day).Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before surgery and at 4 time points thereafter (the 1st, 7th, 28th, 90th day) and T2 relaxation time and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were determined.Inflammatory cell infiltration and interstitial fibrosis were detected using renal histology on the 1st and 90th day after operation.Results SCr and BUN of the two groups increased to peak value on the 1st day, and then decreased gradually to normal on the 90th day after the operation.On the 1st day, SCr [(266.43 ±31.12)umol/l] and BUN [(13.63 ±2.54)mmol/l)] of SSRAC group were significantly lower than that of MRAC [(386.37 ±40.40)umol/l,(26.83 ±5.96)mmol/l] (P0.05) on the 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 90th day.In the MRAC group, the T2 relaxation time of upper, middle and lower pole of the left kidney increased and the ADC decreased on the 1st day after operation.It arrived to the peak value on the 7th day, and decreased or increased respectively from then on to normal level on the 90th day.In the SSRAC group, there were no significant changes of T2 relaxation time and ADC in the upper and middle pole of left kidney (P>0.05), but it was similar to that in the MRAC group for lower pole.On the 1st, 7th, 28th day after operation, the T2 relaxation time of upper and middle pole of the left kidney in the MRAC group [(45.50 ±1.87),(51.82 ±2.27), and(40.37 ±1.93)ms ) ] were significantly higher than those in the SSRAC group [(36.67 ± 1.33),(35.15 ±1.27), and(37.48 ±1.37)ms](P0.05).On the 1st, 7th, 28th day after operation, the ADC of upper and middle pole of the left kidney in the MRAC group [(2.29 ±0.08) ×10 -3 mm2/s, (2.10 ±0.08) ×10 -3 mm2/s, (2.41 ±0.09) ×10 -3 mm2/s] were significantly lower than that of the SSRAC group [(2.69 ± 0.08) ×10 -3 mm2/s, ( 2.63 ±0.06 ) ×10 -3 mm2/s, ( 2.68 ±0.05 ) ×10 -3 mm2/s ] ( P <0.05 ) . However, on the 1st,7th, 28th, 90th day after operation, the ADC of lower pole of the left kidney in the SSRAC group [(1.93 ±0.08) ×10 -3mm2/s,(1.91 ±0.09) ×10-3mm2/s,(2.33 ±0.07) ×10 -3mm2/s, and (2.43 ±0.07) ×10 -3 mm2/s] were significantly lower than those of the MRAC group [ (2.37 ±0.05) ×10 -3 mm2/s, (2.06 ±0.07) ×10 -3 mm2/s, (2.46 ±0.09) ×10 -3 mm2/s, (2.61 ±0.08) ×10 -3 mm2/s](P<0.05).The whole left kidney in MRAC group experienced extensive tubular hydropic degeneration and limited inflammatory cell infiltration on the 1st day after operation.Moreover, renal tubular hydropic degeneration alleviated and no glomerular changes, fibrous tissue hyperplasia or inflammatory cell infiltration was found on the 90th day after operation.In SSRAC group, no changes were found in upper and middle pole of left kidney at the two time points, while the pathological injury of the lower pole of left kidney was more severe.Conclusions SSRAC has obvious protective effect on renal function in the early stage. However, compared with MRAC, the renal tissue injury in the ischemic area was more serious.Therefore, to protect renal function in partial nephrectomy, the ischemic renal area should be reduced as much as possible, even to zero-ischemic, when adopting SSRAC.