Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 47(4): 747-752, Jul.-Aug. 2021. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286764

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To describe the otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of the main drugs used in urological practice. Materials and Methods: A review of the scientific literature was performed using a combination of specific descriptors (side effect, adverse effect, scopolamine, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, oxybutynin, tolterodine, spironolactone, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, doxazosin, alfuzosin, terazosin, prazosin, tamsulosin, desmopressin) contained in publications until April 2020. Manuscripts written in English, Portuguese, and Spanish were manually selected from the title and abstract. The main drugs used in Urology were divided into five groups to describe their possible adverse effects: alpha-blockers, anticholinergics, diuretics, hormones, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Results: The main drugs used in Urology may cause several otorhinolaryngological adverse effects. Dizziness was most common, but dry mouth, rhinitis, nasal congestion, epistaxis, hearing loss, tinnitus, and rhinorrhea were also reported and varies among drug classes. Conclusions: Most of the drugs used in urological practice have otorhinolaryngological adverse effects. Dizziness was most common, but dry mouth, rhinitis, nasal congestion, epistaxis, hearing loss, tinnitus, and rhinorrhea were also reported. Therefore, doctors must be aware of these adverse effects to improve adherence to the treatment and to minimize damage to the health of patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Prazosin , Doxazosin , Adrenergic alpha-Agonists , Tadalafil , Tamsulosin
2.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 252-259, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-718570

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Naftopidil ((±)-1-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazinyl]-3-(1-naphthyloxy) propan-2-ol) is prescribed in several Asian countries for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Previous animal experiments showed that intrathecal injection of naftopidil abolished rhythmic bladder contraction in vivo. Naftopidil facilitated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons in spinal cord slices. These results suggest that naftopidil may suppress the micturition reflex at the spinal cord level. However, the effect of naftopidil on evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in SG neurons remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats at 6 to 8 weeks old were used. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made using SG neurons in spinal cord slices isolated from adult rats. Evoked EPSCs were analyzed in Aδ or C fibers. Naftopidil or prazosin, an α1-adrenoceptor blocker, was perfused at 100 μM or 10 μM, respectively. RESULTS: Bath-applied 100 μM naftopidil significantly decreased the peak amplitudes of Aδ and C fiber-evoked EPSCs to 72.0%±7.1% (n=15) and 70.0%±5.5% (n=20), respectively, in a reversible and reproducible manner. Bath application of 10μM prazosin did not inhibit Aδ or C fiber-evoked EPSCs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that a high concentration of naftopidil reduces the amplitude of evoked EPSCs via a mechanism that apparently does not involve α1-adrenoceptors. Inhibition of evoked EPSCs may also contribute to suppression of the micturition reflex, together with nociceptive stimulation.


Subject(s)
Adult , Animals , Humans , Male , Rats , Animal Experimentation , Asian People , Baths , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials , In Vitro Techniques , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials , Injections, Spinal , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated , Neurons , Prazosin , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reflex , Spinal Cord , Substantia Gelatinosa , Urinary Bladder , Urination
3.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 356-362, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-44714

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term therapeutic effects and patient adherence to a combination therapy of a 5α-reductase inhibitor and an α-blocker and to identify causes of withdrawal from medication in patients with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: BPH patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) receiving combination therapy with follow-ups for 1–12 years were retrospectively analyzed. Therapeutic effects were assessed at baseline and annually by measuring International Prostatic Symptoms Score, quality of life index, total prostate volume (TPV), maximal flow rate, voided volume, postvoid residual volume and prostate-specific antigen level. Causes of discontinued combination therapy were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients, aged 40–97 years (mean, 73 years) were retrospectively analyzed. All measured parameters showed significant improvements after combination therapy. Three hundred sixty-nine patients (59%) discontinued combination therapy with a mean treatment duration of 2.2 years. The most common reasons for discontinued treatment were changing medication to monotherapy with α-blockers or antimuscarinics (124 patients, 19.8%), receiving surgical intervention (39 patients, 6.2%), and LUTS improvement (53 patients, 8.5%). Only 64 patients (10.2%) were loss to follow-up and 6 (1.0%) discontinued combined treatment due to adverse effects. Smaller TPV after short-term combination treatment caused withdrawal from combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: BPH patients receiving long-term combination therapy showed significant improvement in all measured parameters. Changing medication, improved LUTS and choosing surgery are common reasons for discontinuing combination herapy. A smaller TPV after short-term combination treatment was among the factors that caused withdrawal from combination therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Follow-Up Studies , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Medication Adherence , Muscarinic Antagonists , Patient Compliance , Prostate , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Quality of Life , Residual Volume , Retrospective Studies , Therapeutic Uses
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1049-1057, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-769758

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Urinary lithiasis is the main urologic cause of emergency treatment in adult patient. In the past years, the incidence in children population has increased. However, literature about the use of alpha-1 adrenergic blockers in pediatric population with distal ureterolithiasis is still scarce. The drug acts by decreasing ureter contractions, especially in the distal portion, facilitating calculus expulsion. Objective: This review has the objective to evaluate the use of alpha-1 adrenergic blockers as medical expulsive treatment in children with distal ureterolithiasis. Evidence Acquisition: An electronic literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and LILACS databases. We further searched manually the references of the primary studies. Searches were concluded on October 4th, 2014. Articles were selected, independently and in pairs, by the respective titles and summaries. Any divergence was resolved by consensus. Evidence Synthesis: Alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists increased the probability of calculus expulsion by 27% (NNT=4). Calculi smaller than 5mm, increased by 33% (NNT=3). Larger than 5mm, increased by 34% (NNT=3). Conclusion: Alpha-1 adrenergic blocker use is related with a greater incidence of expulsion of ureteral calculi, smaller or greater than 5mm, and fewer episodes of pain when compared to ibuprofen. However it is necessary larger samples to enhance the power analysis of the expulsion of ureteral calculi larger than 5mm and the episodes of pain. Patient Summary: This review analyzed the outcome of alpha adrenergic antagonist in children with ureteral calculi. We conclude that it is the best medicine for use, since it helps the expulsion of the stone.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ureterolithiasis/drug therapy , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev. colomb. ciencias quim. farm ; 44(3): 276-281, Sept.-Dec. 2015. ilus, graf, mapas, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-781916

ABSTRACT

A case of a 76 year old Colombian patient who developed an episode of postural hypotension, after using 4mg of doxazosin for treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is presented. Because of his age and severity of symptoms (asthenia, weakness, adynamia), the patient was hospitalized. Changing doxazosin by tamsulosin allowed control of symptoms of BPH with no further episodes of orthostatic hypotension.


Se presenta el caso de un paciente colombiano de 76 años quien sufrió un episodio de hipotensión postural, después de tomar doxazosina de 4 mg para el manejo de la hiperplasia prostática benigna (HPB). Debido a la severidad de los síntomas (astenia, debilidad y adinamia), el paciente fue hospitalizado. El cambio de doxazosina por tamsulosina permitió el control de los síntomas de la HPB sin episodios ulteriores de hipotensión ortostática.

6.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 248-252, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-33895

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We compared the effects of alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker (alpha-blocker) monotherapy with those of combination therapy with alpha-blocker and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression for over 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 620 patients with BPH who received alpha-blocker monotherapy (alpha-blocker group, n=368) or combination therapy (combination group, n=252) as their initial treatment were enrolled from January 1989 to June 2000. The incidences of acute urinary retention (AUR) and BPH-related surgery were compared between the two groups. Incidences stratified by follow-up period, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume (PV) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The incidence of AUR was 13.6% (50/368) in the alpha-blocker group and 2.8% (7/252) in the combination group (p2.0 ng/ml or PV >35 ml, combination therapy promises a better effect for reducing the risk of BPH progression.


Subject(s)
Humans , 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Follow-Up Studies , Incidence , Prostate , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Urinary Retention
7.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 187-190, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-209788

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether intravesical protrusion of the prostate (IPP) is related to the treatment effect of alpha-1 receptor antagonist in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with a prostate size of less than 40 g. METHODS: A total of 77 BPH patients over 50 years of age treated with alfuzosin (alpha blocker) were enrolled prospectively. The study included only patients with BPH of 40 g or less. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence of IPP at baseline: the IPP group (41 patients) and the non-IPP group (36 patients). Prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life (IPSS/QoL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual (PVR) volume were compared between the groups. The clinical significance of IPP was evaluated after the patients had been taking alfuzosin for 8 weeks. RESULTS: PSA and IPSS (total and voiding subscore) showed significant correlations with IPP (P<0.05). Comparison of parameters before and after 8 weeks showed that alfuzosin improved the total IPSS and all subscores (P<0.001), QoL (P<0.001), Qmax (P<0.001), and PVR (P=0.030) in the non-IPP group. CONCLUSIONS: Alfuzosin may be less effective in improving symptom scores, PVR, and Qmax in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in the presence of IPP.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Indoles , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prospective Studies , Prostate , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Quality of Life , Quinazolines , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction , Urinary Tract
8.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 216-221, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-173980

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We analyzed the prescriptions of alpha-blockers and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) in the urology department as well as in other departments of the general hospital. METHODS: We investigated the frequency of prescription of alpha-blockers and PDE5Is from 3 general hospitals from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009. For alpha-blockers, data were collected from patients to whom alpha-blockers were prescribed from among patients recorded as having benign prostatic hyperplasia according to the 5th Korean Standard Classification of Diseases. For PDE5Is, data were collected from patients to whom PDE5Is were prescribed by the urology department and by other departments. Alpha-blockers were classified into tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin, and terazosin, whereas PDE5Is were classified into sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, udenafil, and mirodenafil. RESULTS: Alpha-blockers were prescribed to 11,436 patients in total over 3 years, and the total frequency of prescriptions was 68,565. Among other departments, the nephrology department had the highest frequency of prescription of 3,225 (4.7%), followed by the cardiology (3,101, 4.5%), neurology (2,576, 3.8%), endocrinology (2,400, 3.5%), pulmonology (1,102, 1.6%), and family medicine (915, 1.3%) departments in order. PDE5Is were prescribed to 2,854 patients in total over 3 years, and the total frequency of prescriptions was 10,558. The prescription frequency from the urology department was 4,900 (46.4%). Among other departments, the endocrinology department showed the highest prescription frequency of 3,488 (33.0%), followed by the neurology (542, 5.1%), cardiology (467, 4.4%), and family medicine (407, 3.9%) departments in order. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of prescriptions of alpha-blockers and PDE5Is were from other departments. For more specialized medical care by urologists is required in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Carbolines , Cardiology , Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5 , Doxazosin , Endocrinology , Erectile Dysfunction , Hospitals, General , Imidazoles , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Nephrology , Neurology , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors , Piperazines , Prazosin , Prescriptions , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Pulmonary Medicine , Purines , Pyrimidines , Quinazolines , Sildenafil Citrate , Sulfonamides , Sulfones , Tadalafil , Triazines , Urology , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL