Traumatismo anorrectal contuso. Reporte de un caso y revisión bibliográfica / Blunt anorectal trauma. Case reportand literature review

Introducción: El traumatismo anorrectal es una causa poco frecuente de consulta al servicio de emergencias, con una incidencia del 1 al 3%. A menudo está asociado a lesiones potencialmente mortales, por esta razón, es fundamental conocer los principios de diagnóstico y tratamiento, así como los protocolos de atención inicial de los pacientes politraumatizados. Método: Reportamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 47 años con trauma anorrectal contuso con compromiso del esfínter anal interno y externo, tratado con reparación primaria del complejo esfinteriano con técnica de overlapping, rafia de la mucosa, submucosa y muscular del recto. A los 12 meses presenta buena evolución sin incontinencia anal. Conclusión: El tratamiento del trauma rectal, basado en el dogma de las 4 D (desbridamiento, derivación fecal, drenaje presacro, lavado distal) fue exitoso. La técnica de overlapping para la lesión esfinteriana fue simple y efectiva para la reconstrucción anatómica y funcional. (AU)

Introduction: Anorectal trauma is a rare cause of consultation to the Emergency Department, with an incidence of 1 to 3%. It is often associated with life-threatening injuries, so it is essential to know the principles of diagnosis and treatment, as well as the initial care protocols for the polytrau-matized patient. Methods: We present the case of a 47-year-old man with a blunt anorectal trauma involving the internal and external anal sphincter, treated with primary overlapping repair of the sphincter complex and suturing of the rectal wall. At 12 months the patient presents good outcome, without anal incontinence. Conclusion: The treatment of rectal trauma, based on the 4 D ́s dogma (debridement, fecal diversion, presacral drainage, distal rectal washout lavage) was successful. Repair of the overlapping sphincter injury was simple and effective for anatomical and functional reconstruction. (AU)

Comparison of the efficacy between transperineal ultrasound and endoanal ultrasound in diagnosing obstetrics anal sphincter injury / 中华超声影像学杂志

Objective:To study the agreements between transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound in assessing obstetrics anal sphincter injury (OASI), and to analyse the diagnostic efficacy of OASI in predicting AI relationship between OASI and anal incontinence (AI).Methods:A total of 217 women were prospectively recruited from the clinic in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2021 to May 2022. Symptoms of AI were determined using the St Mark′s Incontinence Score (SMIS). TPUS and EAUS were performed by the same operator with the same machine on every participant for detecting OASI: OASI grades 3a, 3b, 3c, and 4 were performed according to the extent of the injuries in the anal sphincter complex. The angle of the defect in the external anal sphincter (EAS) was measured. A "significant EAS defect" was diagnosed as a defect affecting at least 2/3 of the length of the EAS with a defect angle of ≥30° in each slice.Ultrasound findings were compared between the two methods. The diagnostic efficacy of "ultrasound OASI" in predicting AI was analysed by logistic regression.Results:Of 217 women, twenty-eight (12.9%) suffered from AI with SMIS ranging from 5~20(11.9±4.5). On TPUS, 79 (36.4%) cases were suspected of OASI, that was 50 OASI 3a, 13 OASI 3b, and 16 OASI 3c/4. On EAUS, 78 (35.9%) cases were suspected of OASI that was 23 OASI 3a, 22 OASI 3b, 15 OASI 3c, and 18 OASI 4. Twenty-four "significant EAS defects" were diagnosed by TPUS and twenty-eight by EAUS, TPUS had excellent agreement with EAUS (weighted Kappa=0.91, P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that "ultrasound OASI" was associated with AI symptoms. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92, 0.87, 0.89, 0.92 for TPUS OASI 3b+ , EAUS OASI 3b+ , TPUS "Significant EAS defect" , and EAUS "Significant EAS defect" for predicting AI, respectively. Conclusions:TPUS has good agreement with EAUS in detecting OASI. OASI 3b+ and "significant EAS defect" on TPUS and EAUS had good performance in predicting AI symptoms.

El desgarro intraparto del esfínter anal ¿Puede prevenirse? / Intrapartum anal sphyncter tear: is it preventable?

Resumen OBJETIVO: determinar los factores de riesgo asociados con el desgarro intraparto del esfínter anal MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: análisis retrospectivo, de casos y controles con desgarro del esfínter anal y sin éste. Se aplicó análisis bivariante. RESULTADOS: se incluyeron 97 pacientes: 48 casos de desgarro del esfínter anal y 49 controles sin éste. La incidencia de desgarros fue de 1.6% (1.3% en primíparas y 0.3% en multíparas). En el análisis bivariante se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en primiparidad (p=0.003), parto inducido (p<0.001), parto instrumentado (p=0.006), duración de la dilatación (p=0.023), tiempo de expulsión (p=0.007), episiotomía (p<0.001), peso del recién nacido (p=0.006) e incontinencia urinaria (p=0.002). Con el análisis univariante se obtuvo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en las variables de primiparidad (RM de 3.833, p=0.004), parto instrumentado (RM de 3.214, p=0.007), episiotomía (RM de 6.101, p<0.001), peso del recién nacido (RM de 1.001 por cada gramo, p=0.009), duración de la dilatación (RM de 1.004 por cada minuto, p=0,012) y del tiempo de expulsión (RM 1.007 por cada minuto, p=0.016). En el análisis multivariado sólo se encontró asociación con la episiotomía (RM de 6.76 e IC 95% de 2.436-18.805) y peso del recién nacido (RM de 1.001 e IC 95% de 1.000-1.002); el área bajo la curva ROC fue de 0.762 (IC=0.667-0.856). CONCLUSIONES: el desgarro del esfínter es multifactorial y difícil de predecir. Para intentar reducir la incidencia debe intervenirse en los factores de riesgo modificables.

Abstract OBJETIVE: to determinate the risk factors of intrapartum anal sphincter tear. MATERIAL AND METHOD: a retrospective case-control study which included a total of 97 patientes: 48 with anal sphincter tear and 49 without tear. RESULTS: There was an incidence of 1.6% of anal sphincter injury (1.3% in primiparous and 0.3% in multiparous). In bivariate analysis statistical significant differences was found in primiparity (p=0.003), labour induction (p<0.001), instrumental delivery (p=0.006), dilatation duration (p=0.023), duration of expulsive stage (p=0.007), episiotomy (p<0.001), fetal weight (p=0.006) and urinary incontinence (p=0.002). Univariate analysis showed a statistical difference in primiparous (OR 3.833, p=0.004), instrumental delivery (OR 3.214, p=0.007), episiotomy (OR 6.101, p<0.001), fetal weight (OR 1.001 for each grams, p=0.009), dilatation duration (OR 1.004 for each minute, p=0.012), duration of expulsive stage (OR 1.007 for each minute, p=0.016). In the multivariate analysis significant difference was found in episiotomy with an OR=6.76 and CI 95% of 2.436-18.805, and fetal weight with an OR=1.001 and CI 95% of 1.000-1.002; the discrimination index area under the curve (AUC) showed a value of 0.762, CI=0.667-0.856. CONCLUSIONS: the anal sphincter injury is multifactorial and difficult to predict. Intervention on modifiable risk factors should allow a reduction in its incidence.

Anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: experience from a tertiary care centre .

Aim Structural anal sphincter damage may be secondary to obstetric anal sphincter injury, perineal trauma or anorectal surgery. We reviewed the spectrum of anal sphincter injuries and their outcomes in a tertiary care colorectal unit. Methods Data of patients who underwent anal sphincter repair between 2004 and 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes were compared with respect to etiology, type of repair, previous attempts at repair and manometry findings. Outcomes were defined as good or poor based on patient satisfaction as the primary criteria. Results Thirty-four patients underwent anal sphincter repair. Twenty-two injuries were obstetric, eight traumatic, and four iatrogenic. All patients underwent overlap sphincteroplasty with six additional anterior levatorplasty and seven graciloplasty. Twenty-three (67.6%) patients had a good outcome while nine (26.4%) had a poor outcome. All patients who had augmentation anterior levatorplasty had a good outcome. Fifty percent of patients with a previous sphincter repair and 42.9% requiring augmentation graciloplasty had a poor outcome. Median resting and squeeze anal pressures increased from 57.5 to 70 cmH2O and 90.25 to 111 cmH2O in those with a good outcome. Conclusions Overlap sphincteroplasty has a good outcome in majority of the patients with incontinence due to a structural sphincter defect. Additional anterior levatorplasty may improve outcomes. Previous failed repairs or use of a gracilis muscle augmentation may have a worse outcome secondary to poor native sphincter muscle. Improvement in resting and squeeze pressures on anal manometry may be associated with a good outcome.

Diagnosis of Anal Sphincter Injuries by Manometric Radial Asymmetry

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate how well anorectal manometry diagnose anal sphincter injury, especially with regard to the parameter of radial asymmetry. METHODS: Anorectal manometry were performed in 27 male patients with anal fistula of transsphincteric type. The postoperative values of each manometric parameter including radial asymmetry (RA) were compared with preoperative ones. And also, the association between the sites of functional defect assessed by cross-sectional pressure data under station pull-through (SPT) technique and those of anatomical defect made by fistulotomy operation were determined. RESULTS: Under rapid pull-through (RPT) technique, maximum resting pressure (MRP); 113.1 21.3 mmHg (preoperative value) vs 68.0 18.5 mmHg (p=.000) (postoperative value), RA of MRP; 16.7 3.7% vs 24.1 7.5% (p=.002), Maximum squeeze pressures (MSP); 199.0 35.2 mmHg, 169.6 48.7 mmHg (p=.006), RA of MSP; 15.5 3.7%, 22.8 3.5% (p=.000). Under SPT technique, MRP; 100.4 39.5 mmHg vs 71.2 34.6 mmHg (p=.000), RA of MRP; 16.3 7.9% vs 24.2 10.8% (p=.026), MSP; 299.1 71.6 mmHg vs 231.4 90.3 mmHg (p=.004), RA of MSP; 13.0 6.1% vs 22.0 8.4% (p=.001). Sites of functional defects interpreted upon SPT data were coincidental with sites of anatomical defects made by fistulotomy in 88.9% (MRP) and 92.6% (MSP) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Manometric radial asymmetry could be a useful parameter in diagnosing anal sphincter injury and locating the site of defect.