ABSTRACT
A vasculite leucocitoclástica é uma patologia cujos mecanismos estão associados ao processo de inflamação vascular. Estima-se que até 24% dos casos de vasculite estão relacionados ao uso de fármacos, sendo os antimicrobianos beta-lactâmicos um dos grupos farmacológicos comumente associados a este desfecho adverso. A oxacilina, uma penicilina semissintética, possui um anel beta-lactâmico que confere atividade biológica e está associada com maior frequência a relatos de vasculite leucocitoclástica. No entanto, casos semelhantes relacionados a esse antimicrobiano são raros, sendo identificados apenas três casos na literatura. Diante desse contexto, relatamos um quarto caso de vasculite leucocitoclástica em um homem de 56 anos, em tratamento com oxacilina, que desenvolveu a vasculite no 3º dia de uso do antimicrobiano. Além da suspensão da oxacilina, ele foi tratado com 125 mg/dia de metilprednisolona endovenosa por sete dias, seguido de 20 mg/dia de prednisona oral por quatro dias, resultan-do em remissão satisfatória das lesões cutâneas e ausência de novos desfechos adversos. Este caso corrobora a possível relação causal entre o uso de oxacilina e o desenvolvimento da vasculite leucocitoclástica, apesar de sua ocorrência ser rara. A resposta favorável às intervenções terapêuticas, incluindo a suspensão da oxacilina e o uso de corticosteroides, destaca a eficácia dessas abordagens no tratamento dessa complicação (AU).
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis is a pathology whose mechanisms are associated with the process of vascular inflammation. It is estimated that up to 24% of the cases of vasculitis are drug-related, with beta-lactam antimicrobials be-ing one of the pharmacological groups commonly associated with this adverse outcome. Oxacillin, a semisynthetic penicillin, has a beta-lactam ring that confers biological activity and is most frequently associated with reports of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. However, similar cases related to this antimicrobial are rare, with only three cases identified in the literature. Against this background, we report a fourth case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in a 56-year-old man, on oxacillin treatment, who developed the vasculitis on the 3rd day of antimicrobial use. In addition to oxacillin suspension, he was treated with 125 mg/day of intravenous methylprednisolone for seven days, followed by 20 mg/day of oral prednisone for four days, resulting in satisfactory remission of the skin lesions and no new adverse outcomes. This case provides further evidence supporting the potential causal relationship between the use of oxacillin and the development of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, albeit a rare occurrence. The positive response to therapeutic interventions, such as oxacillin suspension and corticosteroid treatment, underscores the effectiveness of these approaches in addressing this complication (AU),
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxacillin/adverse effects , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous , beta-LactamsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Antimicrobial compounds are associated with a wide range of adverse events (AE) and some of them can be potentially preventable. Aim: To characterize AE associated with antimicrobial compounds. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of AEs reported to the National Pharmacological Surveillance System from 2014 to 2017 in a regional hospital. Severity, causality and preventability were analyzed. Results: Sixty events were observed in 56 patients aged 2 months to 96 years. Cases were registered mostly in hospitalized patients. The most frequent AEs were skin disorders (56.7%), followed by hepatobiliary (13.3%), and CNS events (10%). Blood, kidney, respiratory gastrointestinal and immunological disorders were less frequently registered, including cases with anaphylactic shock and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). Causal analysis indicated a definitive association in 8.3%, probable in 70% and possible in 22%. Skin lesions were mostly associated with beta-lactams, hepatobiliary disorders with antituberculosis drugs and CNS manifestations with carbapenems. Cutaneous, neurological, and hepatobiliary events appeared at a median of 4, 2.5 and 10.5 days after starting the medication, respectively. AEs were managed with withdrawal of the suspected drug (83.3%) and other auxiliary therapies. AEs were categorized as severe in 22% and one case with SJS had a fatal outcome (1.7%). Preventability analysis revealed 25% of potentially avoidable events. Conclusions: Antimicrobial AE involved a wide diversity of compounds, occurred in different hospitalization units, affected patients of a wide age range and attacked different systems or organs. An important fraction was potentially avoidable.
Antecedentes: Los compuestos antimicrobianos están asociados a una amplia gama de eventos adversos (EA) y algunos de ellos pueden ser potencialmente prevenibles. Objetivos: Caracterizar los EA asociados a compuestos antimicrobianos. Pacientes y Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de EA reportados al Sistema Nacional de Farmacovigilancia desde 2014 la 2017 en un hospital regional. Se incluyó un análisis de gravedad, causalidad y de posible prevención. Resultados: Se observaron 60 eventos en 56 pacientes de 2 meses a 96 años. Los casos se registraron principalmente en pacientes hospitalizados. Los EA más frecuentes fueron los trastornos de la piel (56,7%), seguidos de los hepatobiliares (13,3%) y del sistema nervioso central (10%). Los hematológicos, renales, respiratorios, gastrointestinales e inmunológicos se registraron con menos frecuencia, incluidos casos con shock anafiláctico y síndrome de Stevens-Johnson (SSJ). El análisis de causalidad indicó una asociación definitiva en 8.3%, probable en 70% y posible en 21.7%. Las lesiones cutáneas se asociaron principalmente a betalactámicos, los trastornos hepatobiliares a fármacos antituberculosos y las manifestaciones del SNC a carbapenémicos. Los eventos cutáneos, neurológicos y hepatobiliares se presentaron en una mediana de 4, 2,5 y 10,5 días después de iniciar el medicamento, respectivamente. Los EA se manejaron con el retiro del fármaco sospechoso (83,3%) y otras terapias auxiliares. Los EA se clasificaron como graves (21,7%) y un caso con SSJ tuvo un desenlace fatal (1,7%). Un 25% de los eventos fue potencialmente evitable. Conclusiones: Los resultados de este trabajo revelan que los AE por antimicrobianos involucran una amplia diversidad de compuestos, ocurren en diferentes unidades de hospitalización, afectan a pacientes de un amplio rango de edad y atacan diferentes sistemas u órganos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hospitals, General , Anti-Infective Agents , Chile/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , HospitalizationABSTRACT
Las reacciones adversas a medicamentos son una de las principales causas de muerte en el mundo, producen muchos ingresos hospitalarios y aumentan los costos de atención. Dentro de los medicamentos que más se asocian con estas reacciones están los antibióticos y de estos los más comunes son los betalactámicos, ampliamente utilizados en las instituciones de salud. Las manifestaciones más frecuentes de las reacciones adversas a betalactámicos son alérgicas, dermatológicas, gastrointestinales, renales, hepáticas y neurológicas. Se realiza una revisión general de las reacciones adversas de estos medicamentos, se mencionan los distintos antibióticos betalactámicos con su clasificación y espectro de acción y más precisamente se explican las distintas reacciones adversas por uso de betalactámicos según el sistema comprometido.
Adverse drug reactions are one of the leading causes of death in the world. They are also responsible for an increase in hospital admissions and higher care costs. Among the most associated drugs with these reactions are antibiotics and of these the most common are beta-lactams, which are widely used in health institutions. The most fre-quent manifestations of adverse reactions to beta-lactams are allergic, dermatological, gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic and neurological reactions. A general review of the adverse reactions to these drugs is carried out. Also, the different beta-lactam antibiotics are described along with their classification and spectrum of action, and an accurate explanation of the different adverse reactions due to the use of beta-lactams according to the compromised system is made.
As reações adversas a medicamentos são uma das principais causas de morte no mundo, resultam em muitas admissões hospitalares e aumentam os custos do atendimento. Entre os medicamentos que mais se associam a essas reações estão os antibióticos e, destes, os mais comuns são os beta-lactâmicos, amplamente utilizados em instituições de saúde. As manifestações mais frequentes de reações adversas aos beta-lactâmicos são alérgicas, dermatológicas, gastrointestinais, renais, hepáticas e neurológicas. Faz-se uma revisão geral das reações adversas desses medicamentos, são mencionados os diferentes antibióticos beta-lactâmicos com sua classificação e espectro de ação, e mais precisamente explicam as diferentes reações adversas devidas ao uso de beta-lactâmicos de acordo com o sistema comprometido
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Cause of Death , beta-Lactams , Anti-Bacterial AgentsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Betalactams are the most frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions to drugs mediated by a specific immune mechanism. Immediate reactions occur within 1 to 6 hours after betalactam administration, and are generally IgE-mediated. They clinically translate into urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis. Non-immediate or delayed reactions occur after 1 hour of administration. These are the most common reactions and are usually mediated by T cells. The most frequent type is the maculopapular or morbilliform exanthematous eruption. Most individuals who report allergies to penicillin and betalactams can tolerate this group of antibiotics. To make diagnosis, a detailed medical history is essential to verify whether it was an immediate or non-immediate reaction. Thereafter, in vivo and/or in vitro tests for investigation may be performed. The challenging test is considered the gold standard method for diagnosis of betalactam hypersensitivity. The first approach when suspecting a reaction to betalactam is to discontinue exposure to the drug, and the only specific treatment is desensitization, which has very precise indications. The misdiagnosis of penicillin allergy affects the health system, since the "penicillin allergy" label is associated with increased bacterial resistance, higher rate of therapeutic failure, prolonged hospitalizations, readmissions, and increased costs. Thus, it is essential to develop strategies to assist the prescription of antibiotics in patients identified with a label of "betalactam allergy" at hospitals, and to enhance education of patients and their caregivers, as well as of non-specialist physicians.
RESUMO Os beta-lactâmicos constituem a causa mais frequente de reações de hipersensibilidade a fármacos mediadas por mecanismo imunológico específico. As reações imediatas ocorrem em 1 até 6 horas após a administração do beta-lactâmico, sendo geralmente IgE-mediadas. Elas se traduzem clinicamente por urticária, angioedema e anafilaxia. As reações não imediatas ou tardias ocorrem após 1 hora da administração. São as reações mais comuns, sendo geralmente mediadas por células T. O tipo mais frequente é o exantema maculopapular ou morbiliforme. A maioria dos indivíduos que refere alergia aos beta-lactâmicos pode tolerar esse grupo de antibióticos. No diagnóstico, uma história clínica detalhada é fundamental para verificar se a reação foi do tipo imediato ou não imediato. A partir daí, podem ser realizados testes in vivo e/ou in vitro para investigação. O teste de provocação é considerado o método padrão-ouro no diagnóstico de hipersensibilidade aos beta-lactâmicos. A primeira conduta diante da suspeita de uma reação ao beta-lactâmico é suspender a exposição ao medicamento, e o único tratamento específico é a dessensibilização, que possui indicações bem precisas. O diagnóstico equivocado de alergia à penicilina afeta o sistema de saúde, pois o rótulo de "alergia à penicilina" está associado a aumento da resistência bacteriana, maior índice de falha terapêutica, hospitalizações prolongadas, readmissões e aumento dos custos. Assim, torna-se fundamental elaborar estratégias com o objetivo de auxiliar na prescrição de antibióticos em pacientes com rótulo de "alergia aos beta-lactâmicos" nos hospitais e melhorar a educação dos pacientes e seus responsáveis, além de médicos não especialistas.
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Anaphylaxis , Penicillins/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective. To describe bacterial resistance and antimicrobial consumption ratio at the subnational level in Argentina during 2018, considering beta-lactams group as a case-study. Methods. Antimicrobial consumption was expressed as defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 inhabitants. Resistance of Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus to beta-lactams was recorded. Resistance/consumption ratio was estimated calculating "R" for each region of Argentina, and this data was compared with other countries. Results. The most widely consumed beta-lactams in Argentina were amoxicillin (3.64) for the penicillin sub-group, cephalexin (0.786) for first generation cephalosporins, cefuroxime (0.022) for second generation; cefixime (0.043) for third generation and cefepime (0.0001) for the fourth generation group. Comparison between beta-lactams consumption and bacterial resistance demonstrated great disparities between the six regions of the country. Conclusions. The case-study of Argentina shows that antimicrobial consumption and resistance of the most common pathogens differed among regions, reflecting different realities within the same country. Because this situation might also be occurring in other countries, this data should be taken into account to target local efforts towards better antimicrobial use, to improve antimicrobial stewardship programs and to propose more suitable sales strategies in order to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance.
RESUMEN Objetivo. Determinar la razón entre la resistencia bacteriana y el consumo de antimicrobianos a nivel subnacional en Argentina en el 2018, considerando el grupo de los betalactámicos como estudio de caso. Métodos. El consumo de antimicrobianos se expresó como una dosis diaria determinada (DDD) por 1000 habitantes. Se registró la resistencia de Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae y Staphylococcus aureus a los betalactámicos. Se determinó la razón entre la resistencia y el consumo calculando "R" para cada región de Argentina, y estos datos se compararon con los de otros países. Resultados. Los betalactámicos más consumidos en Argentina fueron la amoxicilina (3,64) para el subgrupo de la penicilina; la cefalexina (0,786) para las cefalosporinas de primera generación; la cefuroxima (0.022) para las de segunda generación; la cefixima (0.043) para las de tercera generación, y la cefepima (0.0001) para el grupo de la cuarta generación. La comparación entre el consumo de betalactámicos y la resistencia bacteriana demostró que había grandes disparidades entre las seis regiones del país. Conclusiones. El estudio de caso en Argentina indica que el consumo de antimicrobianos y la resistencia a los patógenos más comunes difería entre las regiones; esto demuestra que hay distintas realidades dentro del mismo país. Como esta situación también se puede dar en otros países, estos datos se deben tener en cuenta para definir las actividades locales destinadas a fomentar un mejor uso de los antimicrobianos, para mejorar los programas de manejo de los antimicrobianos y para proponer estrategias de venta más adecuadas con el fin de prevenir y controlar la resistencia a los antimicrobianos.
RESUMO Objetivo. Descrever a relação entre o consumo de antimicrobianos e a resistência bacteriana no nível subnacional na Argentina em 2018, considerando o grupo dos betalactâmicos no estudo de caso. Métodos. O consumo de antimicrobianos foi representado por doses diárias definidas (DDD) por 1.000 habitantes. Foi registrada a resistência de Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae e Staphylococcus aureus aos betalactâmicos. A relação entre consumo e resistência foi calculada com base no "R" para cada região do país e os dados da Argentina foram comparados aos de outros países. Resultados. Os betalactâmicos de maior consumo na Argentina foram amoxicilina (3,64) no grupo das penicilinas, cefalexina (0,786) no grupo das cefalosporinas de primeira geração, cefuroxima (0.022) no grupo das cefalosporinas de segunda geração, cefixima (0.043) no grupo das cefalosporinas de terceira geração e cefepima (0.0001) no grupo das cefalosporinas de quarta geração. Ao se comparar o consumo de betalactâmicos e a resistência bacteriana, observou-se grande disparidade entre as seis regiões do país. Conclusões. O estudo de caso revela diferenças no consumo de antimicrobianos e na resistência dos patógenos mais comuns entre as regiões da Argentina, refletindo realidades distintas dentro do mesmo país. Como esta mesma situação pode estar ocorrendo em outros países, estes achados devem servir para direcionar os esforços locais a uma melhor utilização dos antimicrobianos, aperfeiçoar os programas de gestão do uso destes medicamentos e propor estratégias de venda mais apropriadas, visando a prevenir e controlar a resistência aos antimicrobianos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , beta-Lactam Resistance , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Argentina , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN. La resistencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae a carbapenémicos ha aumentado con los años, reduciendo opciones terapéuticas. Puede deberse a dos mecanismos principales, como: la producción de carbapenemasas y alteración de la permeabilidad de la membrana. OBJETIVO. Analizar la frecuencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae resistente a carbapenémicos, junto al mecanismo de resistencia informado por el Laboratorio Nacional de Referencia y la sensibilidad a antibióticos usados para uso terapéutico. MATERIA-LES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio retrospectivo, de población y muestra conocida. Se determinó la sensibilidad/resistencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae: todos los datos aislados de Klebsiella pneumoniae. Se reportaron 11 809 bacilos gram negativos pertenecientes a la familia Enterobacteriaceae. Se utilizó el sistema Whonet 5.6 2017 y BacLink2, así como la revisión de los resultados enviados al Centro Nacional de Referencia para la Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación de Salud Pública Izquieta Pérez para investigación de carbapenemasas en el Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín,en el período abril 2016 a mayo 2018. RESULTADOS. El 20,5% (2 421; 11 809) correspondieron a Klebsiella pneumoniae y de estos, 32,9% (797; 2 421) mostraron resistencia a Meropenem. Existió mayor frecuencia en muestra de orina, secreción, sangre y aspirado traqueal. Predominó en varones de más de 61 años. Se clasificó en 15 grupos fenotípicos según los perfiles de resistencia a los antibióticos utilizados como alternativa terapéutica. CONCLUSIÓN. La presencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae produjo una carbapenemasa resistente a los medi-camentos utilizados como tratamiento, llevó a pensar en el uso de otros medicamentos como: fosfomicina o ceftazidima/viabactam; sin embargo, se desarrolló medidas de control y prevención de infecciones, así como programas para el uso de antibióticos.
INTRODUCTION. The resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to carbapenems has increased over the years, reducing therapeutic options. It can be due to two main mechanisms, such as: the production of carbapene-mases and alteration of membrane permeability. OBJECTIVE. Analyse the frequency of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, along with the resistance mechanism reported by the National Reference Laboratory and sensitivity to antibiotics used for therapeutic use. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective study, po-pulation and known sample. The sensitivity / resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was determined: all isolated were Klebsiella pneumoniae. 11 809 gram negative bacillus belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family were reported. The Whonet 5.6 2017 and BacLink2 system was used, as well as the review of the results sent to the National Reference Center for the Antimicrobial Resistance of the National Institute of Public Health Research Izquieta Pérez for carbapenemases research at the Carlos Andrade Marín Speciality Hospital, in the period april 2016 to may 2018. RESULTS. 20,5% (2 421; 11 809) were Klebsiella pneumoniae and of these, 32,9% (797; 2 421) showed resistance to Meropenem. There was a higher frequency in urine sample, secretion, blood and tracheal aspiration. Predominance in males over 61 years old. It was classified into 15 phenotypic groups according to antibiotic resistance profiles used as a therapeutic alternative. CONCLUSION. The pre-sence of Klebsiella pneumoniae produced a carbapenemase drug-resistance used as treatment, leading to thought on the use of other medicines such as phosphomycin or ceftazidima/avibactam; however, infection control and prevention measures were developed, as well as programs for the use of antibiotics.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Phenotype , Carbapenems , beta-Lactams , Enterobacteriaceae , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Therapeutics , R Factors , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Intensive Care Units , MicrobiologyABSTRACT
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli, a species that is a leading cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and is a major global public health concern. This study was designed to detect the differences in antibiotic resistance patterns, the production and type of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and the clonal relationships among E. coli isolates from UTIs and fecal samples. METHODS: Antibacterial resistance was determined by the disk diffusion method. ESBL, carbapenemase, and AmpC-producing isolates were detected phenotypically. Then, the ESBL genes were sequenced to detect the type. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) was performed on the ESBL-positive isolates. RESULTS: The most common effective antibacterial agents were colistin, imipenem, and amikacin. Among the isolates, 204 (56.6%) were MDR. Of the 163 ESBL-positive isolates, 11 (6.7%) produced AmpC, and the frequencies of beta-lactamase-positive genes were as follows: bla CTX-Mgroup1, 76%; bla TEM1, 74.8%; bla SHV12, 1.2%; and bla OXA1, 12.88%. ERIC PCR showed a diverse pattern, suggesting that clonal spread of E. coli in this area is uncommon, and that most of the infecting strains are endogenous. CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of antibacterial-resistant and MDR isolates are quite important since these strains can act as source of resistant bacteria that can be spread in the community. Controlling antibiotic use, against inappropriate use and abuse, in the community and continuous surveillance of emerging resistance traits are critical to controlling the spread of resistance.