Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Prev Soc Med ; 2022 Dec; 53(4): 254-258
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224023

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pleural effusion is one of the manifestation of a malignant disease which may be malignant pleural effusion with demonstrable malignant cells in the fluid or para-malignant pleural effusion which is reactive response or due obstruction of lymphatic drainage rather than invasion of pleural cavity. Various modalities are there to investigate this condition including routine microscopy, cytology, biopsy etc. Objective: To understand and compare the utility of cancer ratio, tumor markers, malignant cytology in cases of suspected malignant pleural effusion. Material and Methods: This Case Control Cross sectional study was conducted among patients attending respiratory OPD at Sir Sunder Lal Hospital, BHU, Varanasi, diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion and non-malignant pleural effusion. Results: Significant association was found between Cancer Ratio-Carcinoembryonic Antigen, CEA (p = 0.0069), CEA-Cytology (p = <0.01801)

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-225709

ABSTRACT

Background:Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common clinical condition observed in patients suffering from malignant diseases. None of the tumour markers have both high sensitivity and specificity. A retrospective study on patients with pleural effusion was done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Cancer ratio (CR) in diagnosing MPE.Methods:A retrospective analysis of patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion was done. Results of serum Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pleural fluid Adenosine deaminase (ADA), pleural fluid analysis such as cytology and histopathology reports of pleural biopsy were analyzed. Serum LDH: pleural fluid ADA ratio (CR) was calculated and compared with histopathology report. Data were analyzed statistically.Results:A total of 102 patients were enrolled in the study (56 males and 46 females). The sensitivity and specificity of CR at the cut off level of >20 were 57.14% and 75.47% respectively. The positive predictive value was 68.29% and the negative predictive value was 65.57%. CR>20 (p<0.001) is statistically significant in predicting malignancy in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions. Conclusions:CR has a high sensitivity and specificity and is a novel tool in differentiating malignant from nonmalignant pleural effusions. Patients with unconfirmed diagnosis but higher CR will identify the need for early biopsy, follow-up and frequent or repeat chest imaging to assess the progression.

3.
Clinics ; 76: e2515, 2021. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1249577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compared the diagnostic potential of cancer ratio (CR, serum lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]/pleural fluid adenosine deaminase [pfADA]), cancer ratio plus (CR plus, cancer ratio/pleural lymphocyte percentage), and age/pfADA ratio with pfADA in malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: Data from 100 patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and 119 patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) were retrospectively collected. PfADA, age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus were compared between patients with MPE and those with TPE in two age groups (≤50 and >50 years). The best cut-off value was determined, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: PfADA was statistically significantly lower while age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus were significantly higher in the MPE group than in the TPE group in both age groups (p<0.05). For patients aged ≤50 years, the differential diagnostic value of pfADA for MPE was better than those of age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus. At a cut-off value of 13.0 U/L, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.9%, 100.0%, and 98.9%, respectively. For patients aged >50 years, the diagnostic performance of CR plus was superior to those of pfADA, age/pfADA ratio, and CR. At a cut-off value of 22.6, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CR plus for the diagnosis of MPE were 86.8%, 84.6%, and 86.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The best parameter for diagnosing MPE was different for patients aged ≤50 years and >50 years. For patients aged >50 years, CR plus was a good parameter for the differential diagnosis of MPE. For patients aged ≤50 years, pfADA was better.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child, Preschool , Middle Aged , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis , Adenosine Deaminase , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Diagnosis, Differential
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL