ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the value of automatic breast volume scanner (ABVS) with enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in the diagnosis of breast masses.Methods Seventy-four patients with 80 breast masses underwent preoperative ultrasound examinations including ABVS and MRI.The values of ABVS and MRI in the diagnosis of breast masses were comparatively analyzed.Results Among the 80 breast masses that were surgically removed,37 masses were benign and 43 masses were malignant.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ABVSin the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 94.6％,79.1％,86.3％,79.5％ and 94.4％,respectively,those of MRI were 94.6 ％,86.0 ％,90.0 ％,85.4 ％ and 94.9 ％,respectively,and those of the combination of ABVS and MRI were 94.6％,93.0％,93.8％,92.1％,and 95.2％,respectively.The sensitivity and specificity were not significant difference between ABVS and MRI in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses(P ＞0.05).The specificity of the combination ABVS and MRI in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were significantly higher than that of ABVS (x2 =4.17,P =0.04).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of convergence sign in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 64.9 ％,97.7 ％ and 82.5 ％,respectively.Conclusions ABVS and MRI are both valuable in the diagnosis of breast masses,and the combination of ABVS and MRI is the most valuable due to high specificity.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the multi-mode ultrasound manifestation of male breast cancer, and to discuss its value in clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Methods: The clinical data of 15 male patients with pathologically-confirmed breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were examined by multi-mode ultrasound (including 2D, 3D, color Doppler flow imaging [CDFI], and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound [CEUS]). The ultrasonic characteristics of the 8 patients were compared with those of 7 patients with hyperplasia. The diagnostic values of the ultrasonic characteristics were summarized. Results: (1) 2D sonogram: 6 of 7 cases with ultrasonically diffused masses, which were all initially interpreted as hyperplasia on ultrasound, were confirmed pathologically, with an accurate rate of 86%. All the 8 patients had unilateral focal masses (ipsilateral in 3 of 8). They were all diagnosed as having breast cancer by ultrasound, with hypoechoes and irregular shape. Three of them had micro-calcification. All the 8 patients were confirmed to have breast cancer pathologically, with the accurate rate of ultrasound being 100%. (2) CDFI and CEUS: hyperplasia patients had weak blood flow signal and breast cancer patients all had rich blood flow signal. High frequency CEUS showed that only 3 breast cancer patients had marked micro-vascular enhancement, while low-frequency CEUS showed prominent enhancement in all cancer cases. (3) 3D reconstruction: coronary display of 2 focal masses showed "convergent sign". Conclusion: Multi-mode ultrasound imaging can provide comprehensive information of male patients with breast disorders; it may facilitate the early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment for male breast cancer.