Corrección endoscópica del reflujo vesicoureteral. Revisión narrativa / Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux. Narrative review

En esta revisión narrativa se plantea como objetivo realizar una descripción amplia y específica acerca de los agentes abultantes utilizados para la corrección endoscópica del reflujo vesicoureteral disponibles en el mercado hasta la actualidad, sus tasas de éxito y de complicaciones. Este texto se realizó a partir de una búsqueda sistemática con las palabras clave enunciadas a continuación como términos MESH. Se describen los distintos tipos de sustancias y se exponen los resultados de los artículos revisados. Finalmente se plantean las conclusiones.

The objective of this narrative review is to describe in a broad and specific way all the bulking agents used in the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux currently available, their success and complication rates. This text was done by a systematic search with the keywords seen below in MESH terms. The different types of substances are described, and the results of the reviewed articles are presented. Finally, conclusions are made.

Long-term Results of Endoscopic Deflux(R) Injection for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term results of endoscopic Deflux(R) injection for treating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. METHODS: Between September 2004 and September 2014, 243 children (137 boys and 106 girls) with a mean age of 53 months underwent Deflux(R) injection. Our clinical protocol included radionuclide voiding cystography (RNC) at postoperative 3 months, 1 year and 3 years to assess the VUR resolution. RESULTS: The cure rates at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years by patients were 70.8%, 64.3%, and 65.6% for the total patients and 79.2%, 75.2%, and 76.4%, for the ureters, respectively. The recurrence rate of postoperative febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) was 20% in patients without VUR at postoperative 1 year. Twenty patients undergoing ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) significantly had younger age (P=0.003), higher VUR grade (P<0.001), and lower success rates of Deflux(R) injection (P<0.05). On univariate analysis, older age (P=0.014) and lower grade of VUR (P=0.031) were the significant predictors of a successful outcome. But there was none on multivariate analysis. Younger age, especially age of 0-12 month-old, was the only significant predictor of postoperative febrile UTI recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Deflux(R) injection is efficacious with a low complication rate for the anti-reflux procedure in children. There is low recurrence rate of UTI though VUR persists, and high probability of no VUR at 3 years if no VUR at 1 year. It is recommendable not to perform follow-up RNC at 3 years routinely if no VUR at 1 year.

Long-term Results of Endoscopic Deflux(R) Injection for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term results of endoscopic Deflux(R) injection for treating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. METHODS: Between September 2004 and September 2014, 243 children (137 boys and 106 girls) with a mean age of 53 months underwent Deflux(R) injection. Our clinical protocol included radionuclide voiding cystography (RNC) at postoperative 3 months, 1 year and 3 years to assess the VUR resolution. RESULTS: The cure rates at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years by patients were 70.8%, 64.3%, and 65.6% for the total patients and 79.2%, 75.2%, and 76.4%, for the ureters, respectively. The recurrence rate of postoperative febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) was 20% in patients without VUR at postoperative 1 year. Twenty patients undergoing ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) significantly had younger age (P=0.003), higher VUR grade (P<0.001), and lower success rates of Deflux(R) injection (P<0.05). On univariate analysis, older age (P=0.014) and lower grade of VUR (P=0.031) were the significant predictors of a successful outcome. But there was none on multivariate analysis. Younger age, especially age of 0-12 month-old, was the only significant predictor of postoperative febrile UTI recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Deflux(R) injection is efficacious with a low complication rate for the anti-reflux procedure in children. There is low recurrence rate of UTI though VUR persists, and high probability of no VUR at 3 years if no VUR at 1 year. It is recommendable not to perform follow-up RNC at 3 years routinely if no VUR at 1 year.

Endoscopic Subureteral Injection for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique(R)) versus Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux(R))

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare cure rates and complications of polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique(R)) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux(R)) in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2001 to March 2008, 29 boys and 42 girls (total of 115 ureters) with a mean age of 6 years who had undergone endoscopic subureteral transurethral injection for VUR were enrolled. A single subureteral injection of Macroplastique was performed in 31 ureters in 23 children (group I; grade II: 4; grade III: 12; grade IV: 9; grade V: 6), and a single subureteral injection of Deflux was performed in 84 ureters in 48 children (group II; grade II: 24; grade III: 14; grade IV: 25; grade V: 21). Renal ultrasound was done 1 day after injection, and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was done at 3 months. Successful reflux correction was defined as absent or grade I reflux on follow-up VCUG. RESULTS: No significant difference in success rates was observed between group I and group II [80.6% (25/31) vs. 78.6% (66/84), respectively, p>0.05]. The following postoperative complications developed: ureteral obstruction in 2 ureters of group I and 3 ureters of group II, asymptomatic urinary tract infection in 3 patients of group I and 2 patients of group II, and bladder calcification by erosion or mucosal necrosis in 2 patients of group I. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in material properties, both Macroplastique and Deflux were safe for the treatment of children with VUR. Because of the risk of bladder mucosal necrosis and substantial decreases in volume after implantation, long-term follow-up is required.

Efficacy of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux(R)) Injection for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic Deflux(R) submucosal injection in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical record was conducted on 38 children (59 ureters) who underwent endoscopic Deflux(R) injection due to primary VUR. Data were collected from March 2000 to February 2006. Mean infused amount of Deflux(R) was 0.77 cc. After Deflux(R) injection, patients were reassessed by voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) 6 months later. RESULTS: The success rate of endoscopic Deflux(R) submucosal injection 6 months later by VCUG was 100% for grade 1 VUR, 87.5% for grade 2, 60% for grade 3, 26.6% for grade 4, 16.6% for grade 5, respectively and there was negatively significant correlation between success rate and grade of VUR (P<0.01). Degree of improvement of VUR by endoscopic Deflux(R) submucosal injection was not related to age at diagnosis, time to operation, existence of voiding dysfunction or constipation and infused amount of Deflux(R). However, group with anticholinergics medication had significantly lower success rate than non-medication group (P<0.047). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic Deflux(R) submucosal injection is effective therapy in patient with primary VUR, especially low grade VUR. It can be not only a useful substitute for prophylaxis with antibiotics, but also an effective management prior to ureteroneocystostomy in children with primary VUR.

Overall Outcomes and Factors Predicting the Success of Endoscopic Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer Injection for Vesicoureteral Reflux / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the overall outcomes of endoscopic dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) injection for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and analyze the factors predicting success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total 99 patients (58 males, 41 females) and 154 refluxing ureter units were treated with a endoscopic Deflux injection for VUR. At 3 months, radioisotope-voiding cystograms were performed to evaluate treatment responsiveness; success was defined as a resolving of VUR to less than grade I. We evaluated various perioperative factors such as gender, operation age, preoperative antibiotics duration, urinary tract infection, relative renal function and cortical defect, preoperative VUR grade, maximal flow rate in uroflowmetry, laterality of reflux, voiding dysfunction, constipation, orifice shape and trabeculation, injection technique, injection volume, number of punctures, and learning curve. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 62.3% (96/154) in refluxing ureter units (50.5% in patients). According to grade of VUR, the success rate was 87.5% (8/9), 82.2% (37/45), 67.8% (38/56), 33.3% (13/39), and 16.7% (1/6) in grade I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, preoperative VUR grade and mound morphology were identified as predictive factors (p<0.05). No significant surgery-related complications developed. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic Deflux injection for VUR was effective for grade I-III VUR, although the cure rate was low for grade IV-V. The factors predicting success were preoperative VUR grade and mound morphology.

Risk Factors for Treatment Failure after Endoscopic Subureteral Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux(R)) for Vesicoureteral Reflux / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: Endoscopic subureteral injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux(R)) has become an established alternative to long-term antibiotic prophylaxis and open ureteral reimplantation for the management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. We retrospectively evaluated the risk factors for treatment failure after endoscopic correction of VUR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, 23 boys and 26 girls (total of 69 ureters) with VUR underwent endoscopic subureteral injection of Deflux(R) primarily. VUR was unilateral in 29 patients and bilateral in 20 patients. Of the 69 ureters, VUR was grade II to V in 13, 28, 20, and 8, respectively. Follow-up urinalysis and ultrasonography were performed 1 and 3 months after the procedure, and a voiding cystourethrogram was performed at 6 or 9 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Treatment failure was defined as persistent VUR of grade II or over grade II. Endoscopic correction failed in 22 of 69 refluxing ureters. Age, sex, laterality, number of preoperative urinary tract infections, time from diagnosis to operation, presence of renal scarring, and injection volume did not influence outcome. However, preoperative presence of voiding symptoms, high-grade reflux and hydronephrosis, and having a horseshoe or golf-hole shaped ureteral orifice had a negative influence on the treatment result by univariate analysis. Severe dilatation of the lower ureter was the only statistically significant factor by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of lower ureteral dilatation is the most significant factor influencing the failure of endoscopic subureteral injection of Deflux(R). Other factors significantly involved in failure are the presence of voiding symptoms, high-grade reflux and hydronephrosis, and a horseshoe or golf-hole shaped ureteral orifice. Success rates may improve if we carefully consider these influencing factors before choosing an operative method.

Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux(R)) Injection for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: the Efficacy and Safety / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Deflux injection for treating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and May 2006, 49 children (28 boys and 21 girls) with a mean age of 51 months (5-182) underwent Deflux injection. VUR was unilateral in 19 cases (38.8%) and bilateral in 30 (61.2%), affecting 79 ureters. VUR was grades II to V in 26 cases (32.9%), 24 (30.4%), 16 (20.3%), and 4 (5.1%), respectively. Our clinical protocol involved ultrasonography at 6 weeks to evaluate the development of hydronephrosis and the creation of submucosal mound, and VCUG or RIVCU at 3 months to assess the VUR. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 8.0 months (1-22). The cure rate at 3 months by the ureter was 81.6% (88.9% for grade I, 100% for grade II, 79.2% for grade III, 75.0% for grade IV, and 50.0% for grade V) and the cure rate was 84.8% for the total patients (100% for the unilateral cases and 80% for the bilateral cases). There were 16 patients with 1 year of follow-up and the cure rate was 88.5% by the ureter and 87.5% for the total patient. The severity of VUR (p=0.035) and the concomitant voiding dysfunction (p=0.001) were the significant predictors of a successful outcome. One patient complained of gross hematuria resolved within a few days. CONCLUSIONS: Deflux injection was safe and efficacious with a low complication rate. The severity of VUR and the concomitant voiding dysfunction had significant adverse effects on the cure rate.