Structural and Functional Relationships in Glaucoma Using Standard Automated Perimetry and the Humphrey Matrix

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare correlations between structural and functional loss in glaucoma as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC, as this was the model used in this study), standard automated perimetry (SAP), and the Humphrey Matrix (Matrix). METHODS: Ninety glaucomatous eyes identified with SAP and 112 eyes diagnosed using Matrix were independently classified into six subgroups, either S1/M1 (MD>-6dB), S2/M2 (-12

Longitudinal Analysis of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness With GDx-VCC in Glaucoma Suspect

PURPOSE: The changes of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness with GDx-VCC were analyzed to assess the use of this instrument for longitudinal follow-up of retinal nerve fiber layers. METHODS: From July 2004 to July 2007, patients suspected of glaucoma were measured with GDx-VCC at baseline and measurements were repeated at a minimum interval of 12 months. The medical records of 150 patients were reviewed and 42 patients that showed glaucomatous visual field progression in 36 months were classified into a "progression group" and 108 patients with no visual field loss were classified into a "nonprogression group". RESULTS: In the nonprogression group, the temporal superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) average and theinferior average showed statistically significant changes for the follow up periods. However, in theprogression group, there were no parameters with significant changes even though glaucomatous visual field loss was found. The visual field progressed at a rate of 0.1dB/year in the progression group but the relationship between MD, PSD and GDx-VCC parameters could not be established. CONCLUSIONS: GDx-VCC may not be sufficient for longitudinal assessment of the RNFL, especially during the early glaucomatous visual field changes. The progression of glaucoma only with GDx-VCC should be cautiously evaluated, and confirmation with the visual field which elucidates early glaucomatous changes is necessary. Further study is needed before GDx-VCC can be recommended as the instrument for longitudinal assessment.

Changes in RNFL Thickness According to the Myopia in Patients with Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness according to the degree of myopia in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (165 eyes) diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation (GDx-VCC) to analyze the correlation between the degree of myopia and the thickness of the RNFL. A partial correlation coefficient analysis was performed to adjust for various factors such as age, laterality, intraocular pressure, and the mean deviation from visual field test, which can influence the RNFL thickness. RESULTS: The average, nasal, superior, and inferior sectorial RNFL thicknesses measured by OCT significantly decreased with increasing myopia (p<0.05). However, RNFL thickness measured by GDx-VCC was not significantly correlated with the degree of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: The RNFL thickness measured by OCT decreased with increasing myopia in eyes with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Relationship between Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced Corneal Compensation and with Variable Corneal Compensation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the structure-function relationships between retinal sensitivity measured by Humphrey visual field analyzer (HVFA) and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured by scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) with variable corneal compensation (VCC) and enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) in glaucomatous and healthy eyes. METHODS: Fifty-three eyes with an atypical birefringence pattern (ABP) based on SLP-VCC (28 glaucomatous eyes and 25 normal healthy eyes) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. RNFL thickness was measured by both VCC and ECC techniques, and the visual field was examined by HVFA with 24-2 full-threshold program. The relationships between RNFL measurements in superior and inferior sectors and corresponding retinal mean sensitivity were sought globally and regionally with linear regression analysis in each group. Coefficients of the determination were calculated and compared between VCC and ECC techniques. RESULTS: In eyes with ABP, R2 values for the association between SLP parameters and retinal sensitivity were 0.06-0.16 with VCC, whereas they were 0.21-0.48 with ECC. The association of RNFL thickness with retinal sensitivity was significantly better with ECC than with VCC in 5 out of 8 regression models between SLP parameters and HVF parameters (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the structure-function association was higher with ECC than with VCC in eyes with ABP, which suggests that the ECC algorithm is a better approach for evaluating the structure-function relationship in eyes with ABP.

Diagnostic Ability of Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced Corneal Compensation in the Eye with Typical and Atypical Retadation Pattern

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the SLP-VCC parameters and the SLP-ECC parameters in the eyes with typical retardation pattern (TRP) and atypical retardation pattern (ARP), and the sensitivities and specificities of the SLP-VCC parameters and the SLP-ECC parameters in the eye with TRP and ARP. METHODS: In this prospective study, 72 eyes with TRP images (30 glaucomatous and 42 normal eyes) and 53 eyes with ARP images (28 glaucomatous and 25 normal eyes) were recruited. For each group, we analyzed relationship between each parameters of GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC and the diagnostic ability of GDx-ECC by using the ROC curve. RESULTS: In the eyes with TRP, TSNIT average was significantly lower by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in the control group. Inferior average was significantly higher by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both glaucomatous and normal group. TSNIT standard deviation was significantly higher by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. NFI was significantly lower by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. TSS (typical scan score) was significantly higher by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. In the eyes with ARP, TSNIT average was significantly lower by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. Superior and Inferior average was not different between GDx-ECC and GDx-VCC. TSNIT standard deviation was significantly higher by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. NFI was not different between groups. TSS was significantly higher by GDx-ECC than GDx-VCC in both groups. Comparison of ROC curve for the SLP parameters revealed no difference between VCC and ECC. TSNIT standard deviation, however, showed relatively high value in GDx-ECC compared with GDx-VCC. CONCLUSIONS: GDx-ECC has comparable diagnostic ability in discriminating glaucomatous and normal eyes with GDx-VCC and TSNIT standard deviation by the GDx-ECC algorithm could be a useful parameter in discriminating glaucomatous and normal eyes.

GDx-VCC Performance to Discriminate Normal, Pre-perimetric Glaucomatous Eyes

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value of scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx-VCC) in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma. METHODS: The study included 132 eyes of 132 patients with normal intraocular pressure, including 38 normal eyes, 60 eyes with pre-perimetric glaucoma, and 34 eyes with early glaucoma. The parameters of GDx-VCC were analyzed and compared in these groups using ANOVA. The parameter with the most powerful diagnostic value was defermirred by an ROC curve, and it's sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Among GDx-VCC parameters, NFI was the most valuable parameter that could detect pre-perimetric glaucoma in normal eyes. A cut-off value of 12 was the optimal NFI value, which offered the highest sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between normal and pre-perimetric glaucomatous eyes. However, there were no statistically significant differences in GDx-VCC parameters between pre-perimetric and early glaucomatous eyes. A statistically significant correlation was found between NFI and visual field indices in early glaucomatous eyes. CONCLUSIONS: GDx-VCC can be useful as a screening test for early detection of pre-perimetric and early glaucoma with normal intraocular pressure.

The Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Measurements in Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) in measuring peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: Fifty glaucomatous eyes were evaluated in this study. Evaluations were analyzed two ways. First, parameters of the Stratus OCT (average thickness, superior/ inferior average) and GDx VCC (TSNIT average, nerve fiber indicator (NFI), superior/ inferior average) were correlated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Secondly, comparison (r) of these parameters was completed using the mean deviation (MD) of visual field defect. RESULTS: The following parameters were found to be significantly correlated (P<0.005). TSNIT average/average thickness (r=0.673), NFI/average thickness (r=-0.742), superior average (r=0.841), and inferior average (r=0.736). In the correlation analysis using the severity of visual field defect, all these parameters had statistically meaningful correlations (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: GDx VCC and Stratus OCT are highly correlated in glaucomatous eyes. Therefore, peripapillary RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and GDx VCC may be equally helpful in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements between NTG and HTG using GDx-VCC

PURPOSE: To compare quantitative polarimetric measurements in eyes with NTG and HTG using GDx-VCC. Both groups were matched by age and glaucoma stage based on the Humphrey visual field test. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 146 patients who underwent Humphrey field analysis (HFA) and GDx-VCC. We compared outcomes of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters among the three groups by ANOVA and between each pair of groups using the Tukey-Kramer Post-Hoc test. We also evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of GDx-VCC in detecting glaucoma in each group. RESULTS: The mean age and HFA mean deviation (MD) were 55.6+/-9.5 years and -0.8+/-1.5 dB in 47 control patients, 59.4+/-9.0 years and -5.77+/-4.38 dB in 49 NTG patients, and 59.4+/-11.7 years and -8.09+/-6.77 dB in 51 HTG patients, respectively. All thickness parameters were lower in HTG patients compared to NTG patients, but there were no significant differences in ratio parameters between age-matched early HTG and NTG patients. The sensitivity of GDx-VCC was significantly higher in both early and total HTG patients compared to the respective groups of NTG patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to eyes with NTG, eyes with HTG showed reduced RNFL thickness and ratio parameters when patients were age and visual field matched. GDx-VCC appeared to be more sensitive in detecting RNFL damage in HTG patients.

Normal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in the Peripapillary Region of Koreans Measured by Scanning Laser Polarimeter

PURPOSE: To measure normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in the peripapillary region of Koreans using a scanning laser polarimeter, the nerve fiber analyzer (GDx VCC). METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine eyes of 299 healthy subjects (156 men, 143 women) were recruited for this study. No subject had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or any other neurologic disorders. All subjects were normal at ophthalmologic examination, which was assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy using a 90-diopter lens, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Humphrey visual field analysis. Using the GDx VCC, we analyzed the mean value of each parameter in GDx VCC (average at global, superior, inferior, superior maximum and inferior maximum) and evaluated the difference between men and women and each decade of age. RESULTS: Mean RNFLT parameters in GDx VCC were global 56.42 +/- 6.84 micrometer, superior 70.51 +/- 8.70 micrometer, inferior 67.55 +/- 9.04 micrometer, superior maximum 83.52 +/- 12.38 micrometer, and inferior maximum 82.64 +/- 12.70 micrometer. The parameters which showed a difference between men and women were superior average and superior and inferior maximum average RNFLT. The superior RNFLT was thicker than the inferior ones. RNFLT was not statistically different in each decade of age. CONCLUSIONS: We can make good use of the normal parameters of GDx VCC in Koreans for early diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma.

Diagnosis of Glaucoma in the Cases of the Opposed Results of GDx and OCT

PURPOSE: To investigate the coincidence of visual field loss in cases with different GDx VCC and Stratus OCT results, and to analyze the cause of these differences. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had visited our hospital for glaucoma evaluation from September 2003 to August 2005 for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of GDx and OCT. In order to analyze the cause of discrepancy between the GDx and OCT results, we divided patients into Group A, consisting of GDx abnormal and OCT normal eyes, and Group B, consisting of GDx normal and OCT abnormal eyes. We compared optic disc tilting, peripapillary atrophy, and cup-disc ratio between the two groups. RESULTS: In cases of differing results between GDx and OCT, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate and negative predictive rate were higher in Stratus OCT than in GDx. Peripapillary atrophy did not represent a statistically significant difference between group A and group B (p=0.601), where as the difference in cup-disc ratio between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: OCT parameters coincided better than GDx with cases having different results on GDx and OCT. In cases with a large cup/disc ratio, there was a tendency to be normal according to GDx and abnormal by OCT.