Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Niger. j. paediatr ; 49(3): 266-271, 2022. tales, figures
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1399086

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Alterations in blood glucose levels are common and an important determinant of a patient's admission outcomes, point-of-care glucometers, which are affected by a variety of factors, are increasingly used in clinical care. In this study we compared blood glucose levels determined by two commonly used glucometers (One Touch® and Accu-check® ) with those of a standard laboratory method and determined the effect of haematocrit on glucose readings Methods: Blood glucose levels were measured with One Touch® and Accu-Check® glucometers and the glucose oxidase method at the same time in 295 children aged 0 to 15 years over a 6-month period. Bland-Altman and correlation analysis were used to explore biases among the three methods. For all statistical tests, a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Most were males (51.2%) and the median (range) age was 1 year (1 day, 12 years). There was a significant correlation between each of the glucometer methods and laboratory blood sugar, and the correlation between the two glucometers was strong and significant. This correlation remained statistically significant even after controlling for haematocrit values. There was an acceptable level of bias (3.9 mg/dL) between the One Touch® and Accu-check® glucometers, but each had a remarkably large bias compared with the glucose oxidase method. Conclusion: The use of a tested glucometer in clinical settings can aid in rapid decision-making, but there is a need to periodically cross -check with the glucose oxidase method in the laboratory to optimise treatment outcomes for children with dysglycaemia


Subject(s)
Humans , Case-Control Studies , Laboratories , Glucose , Glucose Oxidase
2.
J. bras. patol. med. lab ; 45(5): 378-384, out. 2009. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-536888

ABSTRACT

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVOS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) é a mais importante patologia que envolve o pâncreas endócrino, sendo uma das principais causas de morbidade e mortalidade na população geral. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a determinação da glicemia em diferentes tipos de amostras e metodologias. MÉTODOS: Utilizando um equipamento Accu-Check Advantage (Roche), foi avaliada a glicemia em amostras de sangue capilar (GCG) e de sangue venoso (GVG), e a dosagem da glicemia venosa em plasma (GVE) foi realizada por método enzimático de rotina. RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÃO: Foi observada boa correlação entre a GCG e a GVG (r = 0,8742). Entretanto, houve diferença significativa entre a GCG e a GVE (r = 0,6543) e entre a GVG e a GVE (r = 0,5038) (p < 0,001). Essa diferença é maior considerando-se apenas os pacientes normoglicêmicos. O fato de haver diferentes estudos com resultados conflitantes entre si não depende somente da marca ou série específica do glicosímetro, já que uma mesma marca pode apresentar resultados inconsistentes em diferentes estudos.


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus is the most important pathology that affects the endocrine pancreas and one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality among the general population. The aim of this work was to evaluate the correlation of blood glucose determination in different types of samples and methodologies. METHODS: Using an Accu-Check Advantage glucometer (Roche), it was determined the blood glucose levels in capillary (CBG) and venous (VBG) samples, and plasma venous glucose was determined by routine enzymatic methodology (EVG). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: It was observed a good correlation between CBG and VBG (r = 0.8742). However, there was a significant difference between CBG and EVG (r = 0.6543) and between VBG and EVG (r = 0.5038) (p < 0.001). These differences are even more substantial considering only normoglycemic patients. The existence of different studies with inconsistent results does not depend only on the glucometer brand or its specific series, as the same device may present inconsistent results in different studies.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Blood Glucose/analysis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Diabetes Mellitus/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL