ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: The study aims to determine the correlation of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire with the pure tone audiometry (PTA) in the Malaysian older adult population. Methods: This cross-sectional study took a random sample of adults ≥60 years in a tertiary hospital. A total of 202 participants completed both the HHIE-S questionnaire and the PTA test. The total HHIE-S score and the PTA result were explored for the correlation using a Kruskal–Wallis and the validity using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: A Kruskal–Wallis analysis indicated a significant correlation for the level of hearing impairment (r =.704, p < 0.001) between the HHIE-S score and the PTA result. Comparison between HHIE-S score of 8 and the PTA >25db results gave sensitivity: 87.9%, specificity: 78.4%, positive predictive value: 80.3%, and negative predictive value: 86.6%. Conclusion: This study suggests that the HHIE-S questionnaire is a good and valid screening instrument for hearing impairment detection in the Malaysian older adult population.
ABSTRACT
Objective The study aimed to study and translate the English edition of HHIE-S into Chinese, and verify the reliability and validity of the scale.Methods The Chinese scale was formed by translation,back-translation,revision and other steps.A total of 170 elder sujbects with normal hearing and presbycusis were sur-veyed.One to two weeks later,they were resurveyed.ResuIts The Chinese version of HHIE-S included 10 entries which were completely retained for their strong correlations.The scale had two subscales:emotional and situation-al,the Cronbach's αcoefficient of the scale were 0.889 and 0.924,respectively,the total coefficient was 0.935;the split-half reliability outcomes of the two subscales were 0.836 and 0.903.The total split -half reliability was 0.836 and the test-retest reliabilities of the two subscales and the ten items were between 0.749 and 0.921.The total scale was was 0.963.For the validity test:the correlation between the ten items and two subscales were 0.750 and 0.927,the correlation between the ten items and the total were 0.659 and 0.878,respectively.The varimax ro-tation factor analysis identified two principal factors:emotional subscale and situational subscale.The two factors would be used to explain 73.874% of the ten items.The factor loadings of 10 entries in the scale were all between 0.684 and 0.871 and the factor loadings of all entries on the corresponding factors were greater than 0.60,consist-ent with the source scale.The average hearing threshold was considered as the gold standard,the two subscales and the total scale were positively correlated to the pure-tone average.ConcIusion The Chinese version of HHIE-S conformed to the characteristics of Chinese culture,and easily accepted by elderly people.The scale had stable structure,satisfactory reliability and validity,provided the basis for a preliminary hearing screening of elder Chinese.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the reliability and practicality of Chinese version the hearing handicap in-ventory for the elderly -screening version(HHIE -S) scale for elderly hearing screening in China .Methods We compared the HHIE -S scores with results of pure -tone audiometry test .A total of 840 Chinese individuals older than 60 years filled in the scale all by themselves first ,then refilled it according to explanations of each question translated by researchers .All participants finished pure -tone audiometry test with frequencies of 0 .25 ,0 .5 ,1 .0 , 2 .0 ,and 4 .0 kHz .Sensitivity ,specificity ,positive predictive value (PPV ) ,false-negative rate and false -positive rate were compared with HHIE -S cut -off points of >8 or >10 and pure-tone averages (PTAs) greater than 25 ,40 and 60 dB HL .Analysis the area under the curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each three PTA levels .Results Cronbach's α of the scale was 0 .85 .HHIE -S scale pre -explanatory score was 7 .6 ± 10 .6 ,and post-explanatory score was 10 .8 ± 16 .7(P 8 points higher than H HIE-S> 10 points in the sensitivity ,positive predictive value increase ,specificity ,false-positive rate ,false negative rate decreased ,paired samples t - test sensitivity and false -negative rate (P 8 when grouping with PTA> 25 dB HL ,PTA> 40 dB HL and PTA>60 dB HL ,conducted ROC curve analysis ,the AUC value was 0 .70 ± 0 .03 ,0 .84 ± 0 .01 and 0 .88 ± 0 .02 .Conclusion The score of HHIE-S scale>8 points can be used when PTA> 40 dB HL as goal for hearing loss of old people , it can be more accurate after explanations ,so HHIE-S scale can be used as a preliminary hearing screening method for Chinese elderly people .
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment is one of the most common physical handicaps of the aged. This diseases has recently attracted such amount of social attention and understanding as never attracted several years ago, and high degree of achievement was made with regard to screening test method, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation. However, unfortunately, even now, not enough attention is being paid upon early discovery hearing handicap for patients frequently encountered in clinics. Therefore, as a screening test method of senile hypacusis, we were to apply "Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening Version" (HHIE S) inquiries in Korea and studied the usability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value and cutoff point of this method. METHODS: This study was performed for 120 persons over the age of 60, who visited general health screening centers of one university hospital located in Seoul, during the period of October 1997 through to March 1999. HHIE S questionnaires were used and pure tone audiometry was performed to generate gold standard. RESULTS: Only 110 out of 120 initial subjects were included in the study because of incomplete questionnaire answers by excluded 10 subjects. We defined gold standard of hearing handicap to be (1) lower than 40 dB of hearing capability of both ears to frequency between 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz or (2) lower than 40 dB of hearing capability of an ear to frequency between 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz, as determined by pure tone audiometry. Assuming cutoff point of HHIE S as 4 points, the sensitivity and specificity resulted to be 80% and 67% each. Assuming cutoff point of HHIE S as 6 points, the sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 78% each. At 8 points, the percentages were 64% and 80%. At 10 points, the percentages were 64% and 85%. As a result of this study, the appropriate cutoff point is 6 points. In order to specify the correlation between questionnaire result and pure tone audiometry, we performed 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz audiometry which are within conversational range, calculated arithmetic mean from the results, and inspected correlation between the resultant mean of the better performing ear and questionnaire resultant points. The correlation coefficient was 0.612 and Chronbach's alpha, as a measurement of internal consistency of the questionnaire was 0.9044. CONCLUSION: HHIE S proved to be useful in screening hearing handicap in the Korean elderly.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Audiometry , Diagnosis , Ear , Hearing Loss , Hearing , Korea , Mass Screening , Rehabilitation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seoul , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The study conducted from May to September in 1994 to investigate applicability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version(HHIE-S) in parallel with the puretone audiometer to the initial screening test of noise-induced hearing loss(NIHL) in some noise-exposed workers. Subjects were selected by systemic sampling that took every fifth person from 6,700 workers taking the annual occupational health examination by the department of Health Maintenance of Dongsan Hospital Keimyung University in Taegu. The authors administered the pure-tone audiometric test and self-reported questionnaire of HHIE-S including items of sociodemographic and job-related variables concurrently. The final subjects analysed were 1,019(488 males and 531 females) excluding fourteen persons who had many missing values in their questionnaires. The reliability coefficients of HHIE-S scale by Cronbach's alpha were 0.84. In the univariate analysis of hearing handicap measured by the HHIE-S, work duration, military service and the hearing threshold loss at 1kHz and 4kHz was the only selected variable explaining the hearing handicap in males and hearing threshold loss at 1kHz and 4kHz, age, and work duration were selected in females. In ROC curves for HHIE-S scores against NIHL as gold standard which was defined by the follow-up audiogram as more than 30dB of the average of 0.5/1/2kHz and 50dB at 4kHz, the optimal cutoff for the parallel HHIE-S appeared to be 8. The results suggest that HHIE-S appeared to have some reliability and validity in this data and might be used in screening NIHL in parallel with pure-tone audiometer in noise-exposed workers.