Tissue Acquisition in Gastric Epithelial Tumor Prior to Endoscopic Resection

Endoscopic forceps biopsy is essential before planning an endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal epithelial tumors. However, forceps biopsy is limited by its superficiality and frequency of sampling errors. Histologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens are frequent. Factors associated with such histologic discrepancies are tumor size, macroscopic type, surface color, and the type of medical facility. Precise targeting of biopsies is recommended to achieve an accurate diagnosis, curative endoscopic resection, and a satisfactory oncologic outcome. Multiple deep forceps biopsies can induce mucosal ulceration in early gastric cancer. Endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer with ulcerative findings is associated with piecemeal resection, incomplete resection, and a risk for procedure-related complications such as bleeding and perforation. Such active ulcers caused by forceps biopsy and following submucosal fibrosis might also be mistaken as an indication for more aggressive procedures, such as gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Proton pump inhibitors might be prescribed to facilitate the healing of biopsy-induced ulcers if an active ulcer is predicted after deep biopsy. It is unknown which time interval from biopsy to endoscopic resection is appropriate for a safe procedure and a good oncologic outcome. Further investigations are needed to conclude the appropriate time interval.

The Histologic Discrepancy before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Adenoma and Early Gastric Cancer / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We wanted to investigate of discrepancy rate between the histology of the endoscopic biopsy and that of the resected specimen obtained from the same lesion by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: 69 gastric adenomas and 38 early gastric cancers (EGC) that were treated by ESD from July, 2004 to February, 2006 were reviewed to analyze the relation between the histologies of the endoscopic biopsy and the resected specimen. RESULTS: The discrepancy rate between the histology of the endoscopic biopsy and the resected specimen was 40.6% for the gastric adenoma and 23.7% for the EGC. Among the 43 cases of low grade dysplasia, 6 cases (14%) were confirmed as gastric cancer after ESD. CONCLUSIONS: The histologic discrepancy between the endoscopic biopsy and resected specimen was 40.6% for the gastric adenoma and 23.7% for the EGC. Though the endoscopic biopsy may reveal low grade dysplasia, gastric adenoma should be removed by endoscopic mucosal resection because of the histological discrepancy between the endoscopic biopsy and the resected specimen.

The Study of Pathologic Difference between Endoscopic Biopsy before EMR and Histology of Specimen after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) on Gastric Flat Adenoma or Early Gastric Cancer (EGC) / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is not uncommon to show discrepancy between the histology of the endoscopic biopsy and that of the resected specimen obtained from the same lesion by EMR. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether routine endoscopic biopsy specimens are sufficient to qualify the representative enough to reliable indication of EMR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 cases that could be compared the histologic results from the resected specimens by EMR to the tissue obtained by endoscopic biopsy. The histologic slides were reviewed by one pathologist. RESULTS: Of the 36 cases, 13 cases of EGC and 23 cases of gastric flat adenomas were included. Among 13 cases of EGC, 2 case (15.4%) revealed discrepancy between the histology of the endoscopic biopsy and that of a resected specimen by EMR. The histology of a resected specimen by EMR revealed moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma, while that of endoscopic biopsy was a well differentiated adenocarcinoma. Gastric flat adenoma revealed 47.8% (11/23) of discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: The histologic discrepancy between the result of endoscopic biopsy and that of the resected specimen obtained by EMR was about 8% in EGC and 47.8% in gastric flat adenoma.