Reacciones de hipersensibilidad a alglucosidasa alfa en enfermedad de Pompe: dos casos de desensibilización exitosa / Hypersensitivity reactions to alglucosidase alfa in Pompe disease: two cases of successful desensitization

La enfermedad de Pompe es un desorden neuromuscular autosómico recesivo de baja prevalencia, causado por la deficiencia total o parcial de la enzima alfa glucosidasa ácida (GAA), cuya única terapia de reemplazo enzimático disponible es la alglucosidasa alfa recombinante. Las reacciones adversas asociadas a la infusión se presentan con frecuencia. Se reportan dos casos de desensibilización exitosa con alglucosidasa alfa utilizando protocolos con dosis meta de 20 mg/kg, administrados quincenalmente; el primero de ellos, en una niña con historia de reacción adversa grave a los 15 meses de edad, en quien se utilizó un esquema con una dilución inicial de 1/10.000.000 de 28 pasos y una duración total de 13,1 horas. En el segundo caso, la paciente tuvo una reacción adversa grave a los 4 años de edad, se utilizó el protocolo de 22 pasos, concentración inicial de 1/1.000.000 y duración total de 7,2 horas. Se concluye que en pacientes con enfermedad de Pompe que presentan reacciones adversas durante la terapia de reemplazo enzimático, es posible realizar la desensibilización cada dos semanas con la dosis estándar de 20 mg/kg de forma exitosa, y progresivamente lograr la administración usual de la infusión

Pompe disease is a low prevalence autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder, caused by total or partial deficiency of the acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme, and its only available enzyme replacement therapy is the recombinant alglucosidase alfa. Infusion-associated adverse reactions occur frequently. Two cases of successful desensitization with alglucosidase alfa using protocols with a target dose of 20 mg/kg administered biweekly are reported; the first was a girl who had a history of serious adverse reaction at the age of 15 months, and undergone to a scheme with an initial dilution of 1/10,000,000 with 28 steps and a total duration of 13.1 hours. In the second case, the patient had a severe adverse reaction at the age of 4 years, a 22-step protocol was used with an initial concentration of 1/1,000,000 and a total duration of 7.2 hours. In conclusion, in patients with Pompe disease who presented adverse reactions during enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa, it is possible to perform desensitization every two weeks with the standard dose of 20 mg/kg, and progressively achieve the usual administration of the infusion

Posicionamento da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia sobre o manejo da imunoterapia específica com alérgenos (ITA) em pacientes vacinados contra COVID­19 / Position statement of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology on the management of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) in patients vaccinated against COVID­19

A pandemia de COVID-19 representa um grande desafio para todas as especialidades médicas. A imunoterapia com alérgenos (ITA) é considerada o único procedimento terapêutico capaz de modificar a história natural das doenças alérgicas, e caracteriza o estado da arte na área de Alergia e Imunologia. Esta estratégia terapêutica de imunomodulação é capaz de promover a remissão e controle das doenças alérgicas por períodos prolongados, mesmo após o seu término. Existem poucos dados em relação ao emprego da ITA em pacientes vacinados contra COVID-19, e até o momento não há um posicionamento oficial das sociedades internacionais da área de Alergia e Imunologia Clínica. Este documento tem como objetivo estabelecer recomendações práticas para o manejo da ITA em pacientes que receberam a vacina contra COVID-19. Os fenômenos imunológicos envolvidos na imunoprofilaxia vacinal e no mecanismo de ação da ITA foram comparados, proporcionando o estabelecimento de recomendações precisas.

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a serious challenge for all medical specialties. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is considered the only therapeutic procedure capable of modifying the natural history of allergic diseases and characterizes the state of the art in the field of allergy and immunology. This therapeutic strategy of immunomodulation is able to promote remission and control of allergic diseases for prolonged periods, even after cessation. There are few data regarding use of AIT in patients vaccinated against COVID-19 and, to date, there is no official position statement published by international allergy and clinical immunology societies. This document aims to establish practical recommendations for the management of AIT in patients who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. The immunological mechanisms involved in immunoprophylaxis with vaccines and the mechanism of action of AIT have been compared to provide a solid basis for establishing precise recommendations.

Segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente alérgicos à proteína do ovo / Safety of yellow fever vaccine in egg allergic patients

Introdução: A vacina de febre amarela, recomendada em áreas endêmicas, é contraindicada em alérgicos à proteína do ovo (APO) por ser cultivada em ovos de galinha embrionados. Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi mostrar a segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente APO. Método: Foi realizado estudo prospectivo em hospital quaternário, no período de janeiro a outubro de 2018. Foram incluídos pacientes com APO confirmada por teste de provocação oral (TPO), reação anafilática à proteína do ovo nos últimos 6 meses, ou reação de APO nos últimos 2 meses associada à IgE específica positiva. Todos foram submetidos ao teste de puntura com a vacina na apresentação pura. Se negativo, realizado teste intradérmico (ID) com a vacina na diluição de 1:100. Se ID negativo, vacina aplicada em dose plena. Se teste de puntura ou ID positivo, vacina aplicada fracionada segundo protocolo de dessensibilização. Resultados: Dos 78 pacientes com história presumida de APO, confirmou-se o diagnóstico em 43 (30M:13F, mediana idade 2,7 a): 30 por TPO, 7 com anafilaxia em menos de 6 meses da vacina, e 6 com reação imediata após ingestão do ovo há menos de 2 meses e IgE específica positiva. Durante o TPO, 12 apresentaram anafilaxia, e os demais (18) apresentaram urticária e/ou angioedema ou vômitos. Todos os testes de puntura (43) foram negativos. ID foi negativo em 37 pacientes, que receberam a dose plena da vacina, sem reações. Apenas 6 apresentaram ID positivo e necessitaram dessensibilização para vacina. Metade desses pacientes (3/6) apresentou reações de hipersensibilidade leves e foi tratada com anti-H1 e/ou corticoide oral. O ID positivo foi significativamente relacionado à reação à vacina (p = 0,0016). Conclusão: Concluiuse ser possível vacinar alérgicos a ovo, com um protocolo seguro, mesmo em paciente comprovadamente anafilático. É necessária uma unidade especializada para sua realização, com capacidade de controlar possíveis situações de risco.

Introduction: The yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is recommended in endemic areas, but represents a risk for egg allergic (EA) patients, as it is cultivated in chicken embryos. Objective: This study aimed to describe the outcomes of YFV in patients with confirmed egg allergy. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, from January to October 2018. EA was diagnosed through oral food challenge (OFC) or recent history of anaphylaxis following egg contact in the past 6 months or allergic reaction in the past 2 months with positive specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Skin prick testing (SPT) with YFV was performed in all participants. If SPT was negative, an intradermal test (IDT) was performed at 1:100 dilution. If IDT was negative, a full dose of YFV was administered. If SPT was positive, the YFV was administered using a graded-dose protocol. Results: Among 78 patients with prior history of EA, 43 were confirmed (30 male to 13 female, median age of 2.7 years). Thirty patients had a positive OFC, seven reported recent anaphylaxis, and six had reactions in the past 2 months with positive specific IgE. During OFC, 12 patients had anaphylaxis and 18 had urticaria and/or angioedema or vomiting. SPT with YFV was negative in all patients (43). IDT was negative in 37 patients, who received a full dose of YFV, uneventfully. Six patients had a positive IDT and received the YFV in graded doses; half of them had a mild reaction controlled with antihistamines and three patients received the vaccine without reactions. Positive IDT was significantly related to vaccine reaction (p=0.0016). Conclusion: The YFV using a specific protocol was safe even in anaphylactic patients. An appropriate setting is required in order to control possible adverse events.

A case of rapid desensitization for rituximab-induced delayed hypersensitivity reaction

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions to rituximab is well known, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to rituximab are also reported. Desensitization is commonly used to prevent immediate hypersensitivity reactions, but recently there have been cases of successful desensitization therapy for delayed hypersensitivity reactions. A 66-year-old patient who underwent rituximab treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showed repeated rituximab-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions with whole body rashes. Intravenous rapid desensitization was performed by using a 1-bottle, 11-step protocol for 6 cycles and thereafter hypersensitivity reaction did not recur. We herein reported a case of delayed hypersensitivity reaction caused by rituximab, which was successfully desensitized using our 11-step protocol.

Incidência aumentada de haplótipo de HLA de classe II na anafilaxia grave secundária à carboplatina / Increased incidence of a class II HLA haplotype in severe anaphylaxis secondary to carboplatin

Objetivo: O papel de biomarcadores nas reações de hipersensibilidade a platinas tem sido estudado, e é conhecido que a presença da mutação do gene BRCA1/2 é fator de risco para reações de hipersensibilidade à carboplatina. A genotipagem de HLA de classes I e II auxilia na identificação de pacientes de risco para reações IgE-mediadas e mediadas por linfócitos T associadas a beta-lactâmicos e abacavir, respectivamente. Não são conhecidos alelos ou haplótipos de HLA mais prevalentes em pacientes alérgicos à carboplatina. O objetivo principal do estudo foi avaliar se alelos específicos de HLA de classe II são mais prevalentes em pacientes alérgicos à carboplatina submetidos à dessensibilização (DS). Método: Genotipagem de HLA de classe II realizada em 11 pacientes portadoras de neoplasias malignas tubo-ovarianas, alérgicas à carboplatina, e submetidas à DS, e em 12 pacientes tolerantes à carboplatina, por no mínimo oito ciclos. Analisou-se também a prevalência da mutação BRCA1/2 nos dois grupos estudados. Resultados: O alelo HLA-DRB1*15:01 foi mais prevalente entre as pacientes alérgicas (5/11; 45%) do que nos controles (1/12; 8,3%) (p = 0,06). O haplótipo de classe II DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02-DRB1*15:01 foi mais expresso no grupo de pacientes alérgicas. A mutação do BRCA1/2 mostrou-se mais prevalente no grupo alérgico. Conclusões: A identificação de pacientes de risco para reações alérgicas à carboplatina é de extrema importância com o uso crescente da medicação. A genotipagem de HLA e a pesquisa da mutação BRCA1/2 mostramse ferramentas promissoras que podem aumentar a segurança durante infusão regular de carboplatina e DS.

Objective: The role of biomarkers in hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to platinum compounds has been studied, and the presence of BRCA1/2 gene mutation is known to be a risk factor for carboplatin HSR. Class I and II HLA genotyping helps identify patients at risk for IgE-mediated and T lymphocyte-mediated reactions associated with beta-lactams and abacavir, respectively. Associations between HLA alleles or haplotypes and carboplatin HSR are not known. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate whether specific class II HLA alleles are more prevalent in patients allergic to carboplatin who underwent rapid drug desensitization (RDD). Methods: Class II HLA genotyping was performed in 11 carboplatin-allergic patients with tubo-ovarian malignancies who were submitted to RDD, and in 12 patients who tolerated carboplatin, for at least eight cycles. The prevalence of the BRCA1/2 mutation was also analyzed in both groups. Results: The HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele was more prevalent among allergic patients (5/11; 45%) than in controls (1/12; 8.3%) (p = 0.06). Class II haplotype DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02-DRB1*15:01 and the BRCA1/2 mutation were also more prevalent in the allergic group. Conclusions: The identification of patients at risk for carboplatin HSR is of utmost importance, as the use of this medication is increasing. HLA genotyping and screening for the BRCA1/2 mutation are promising tools that may increase safety during regular carboplatin infusion and RDD.

Successful desensitization of a patient with albumin hypersensitivity

There have been few cases of albumin hypersensitivity reported, and there is limited information on this condition. When a patient is anaphylactic to a certain drug and no alternative drug is available to treat the underlying condition, desensitization is a reasonable option and can be performed successfully to treat the patient. A standard 12-step, 3-solution rapid desensitization protocol allows the safe readministration of a medication after certain types of immediate hypersensitivity. However, we demonstrated that a new 10-step, 1-solution desensitization protocol using antihistamine and leukotriene receptor antagonist as premedications, which was effective and safe in a patient with hypersensitivity. We report a 13-year-old boy with Gorham-stout syndrome who was presented with newly acquired albumin anaphylaxis and successfully treated with the 10-step rapid drug desensitization protocol.

A case of oral desensitization for hypersensitivity to exogenous progesterone

Hypersensitivity reaction to progesterone is a rare pathologic condition which consists of autoimmune response to endogenous progesterone, known as autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, and hypersensitivity reaction to exogenous progestogen. We report the case of a 31-year-old woman with a history of whole body urticaria during exogenous progesterone supplementation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). She was admitted to the hospital for the diagnosis and management of progestogen hypersensitivity. An intradermal test with progesterone revealed positivity to 5 mg/mL of progesterone. For her next IVF, progesterone desensitization was performed in a method combining oral and intramuscular progesterone administration. After successfully achieving a target dose of 100 mg per day, the route of progesterone administration was converted to intravaginal tablet (90 mg twice a day) without any hypersensitivity reactions.

Successful sequential desensitization in a patient with drug hypersensitivity to three kinds of antiplatelet agents

Antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, are essential for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular diseases. A 53-year-old male with aspirin hypersensitivity developed dizziness, which was caused by severe stenosis of the left vertebral artery. Clopidogrel was administerted, but discontinued due to generalized urticaria and angioedema. As an alternative drug, cilostazol was administered, but discontinued again because of the same adverse reactions. Desensitization was planned as other alternative antiplatelet agents were not available. Initially, aspirin desensitization was successfully performed. One day after aspirin desensitization, clopidogrel desensitization was sequentially done successfully. After a few months, cilostazole desensitization was performed. During the follow-up period, he had to stop aspirin and cilostazol twice to prevent the risk of bleeding after a procedure and an operation. After discontinuing medicines, sequential desensitization of aspirin and cilostazol was successfully performed. Physicians should be aware that drug hypersensitivity could be induced by various kinds of antiplatelet agents and that desensitization could be the treatment of choice unless alternative medicines are available.

Rapid desensitization to isoniazid and rifampin in an adolescent with active pulmonary tuberculosis

Hypersensitivity reactions to antituberculosis medicine are obstacles to the treatment of tuberculosis. However, rapid drug desensitization can secure successful treatment with essential antituberculosis medicines in pediatric patients. A 17-year-old boy with active pulmonary tuberculosis complained of generalized erythematous rashes, pruritus on the 11th day of tuberculosis treatment. He was diagnosed with hypersensitivity reactions to isoniazid and rifampin by the oral provocation test. After desensitization, the patient continued to take antituberculosis treatment with isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. We report here a case of successful desensitization in an adolescent with hypersensitivity to isoniazid and rifampin.

Successful rapid desensitization to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced delayed hypersensitivity

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is an antibiotic used for the treatment or prophylaxis of Pneumocystis pneumonia and other infectious conditions. Sulfonamide derivatives have been reported to cause delayed hypersensitivity reactions, resulting in switch to less effective second-line antibiotics. Although desensitization is traditionally known to be effective in patients with immediate hypersensitivity, it is also applied to the treatment of delayed hypersensitivity in recent years. A 66-year-old female who had a history of repeated TMP-SMX-induced delayed hypersensitivity presenting as whole body rashes needed to take prophylactic dose of TMP-SMX (80/400 mg daily) before initiation of chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Intravenous rapid desensitization was performed by using a 11-step, 4-bottle protocol from 1:1,000 to 1:1 solution for 3 hours to reach the target dose for prophylaxis. After successful rapid desensitization of TMP-SMX, 1-month prophylaxis was completed without any complications until the patient recovered normal immunity. We herein reported a case of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to TMP-SMX in an about-to-be immunocompromised host with planned chemotherapy who successfully completed 1-month prophylaxis with the drug without any complications through rapid desensitization.

Effectiveness of premedication and rapid desensitization in hypersensitivity to L-asparaginase

PURPOSE: L-asparaginase is a crucial chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, hypersensitivity to L-asparaginase is common which limits its clinical use. METHODS: We performed 44 cases of premedication and 3 cases of desensitization in 16 patients with hypersensitivity to L-asparaginase. RESULTS: With premedication, 33 cases completed L-asparaginase injection with no hypersensitivity reactions. Eleven cases showed mild hypersensitivity reactions, such as urticaria. Desensitization was performed in 3 cases: in 2 cases, desensitization was successful, and in 1 case the medication was switched to Erwinia asparaginase. CONCLUSION: Premedication and desensitization appear to be useful in helping patients receive desired doses of L-asparaginase in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Successful rapid desensitization for cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis

Cetuximab, a chimeric mouse-human immunoglobulin, is an antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. It has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic colorectal and head/neck cancer, but can cause fatal hypersensitivity reactions in some patients. A 66-year-old male with metastatic sigmoid cancer had cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis when the first dose of cetuximab was administered. Cetuximab was safely readministered for another 15 cycles based on the rapid desensitization protocol. We experienced a case of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis on the first exposure which was successfully managed by rapid desensitization.

Successful readministration of second-line antituberculous agents in a patient with near-fatal drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome

For the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, maintenance of appropriate antituberculous agents is essential because of its low cure rate and high dropout rate. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity response resulting in cessation of causative agents. In cases of second-line antituberculous agent-induced DRESS, it is extremely difficult to find other replacement medications to cure MDR tuberculosis. A 53-year-old male who had taken the second-line antituberculous agents (cycloserine, streptomycin, p-aminosalicylic acid, and prothionamide) as well as pyrazinamide for 5 weeks experienced DRESS syndrome accompanying hepatic coma. His symptoms improved with discontinuation of antituberculous agents and administration of high-dose methylprednisolone for 1 month. To resume the antituberculous medication, second-line antituberculous agents were administered one by one using a rapid desensitization protocol. While kanamycin, levofloxacin, and cycloserine were successfully readministered, p-aminosalicylic acid- and prothionamide-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity symptoms were relatively mild compared to previous reactions. Herein, we report a case of successfully treated MDR tuberculosis having a history of fatal DRESS syndrome to antituberculous agents using the rapid desensitization protocol.

Successful wheat-specific oral immunotherapy in highly sensitive individuals with a novel multirush/maintenance regimen

We reported a successful oral immunotherapy (OIT) in 2 children with high wheat sensitivity (4 and 14 years old boys). Oral challenges indicated eliciting doses of 300 mg, and wheat flour of 30 mg. The OIT protocol includes 5 days of build-up phase in the hospital, intervening with 2 to 5 months of home maintenance phase. Patients could tolerate 45 g, and 60 g of wheat flour per day, respectively. We have demonstrated that OIT to a large amount of wheat in extremely sensitized patients could be achieved with a stepwise multi oral/maintenance regimen.

Successful desensitization of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in Stenostrophomonas maltophilia osteomyelitis

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging pathogen associated with morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The treatment of S. maltophilia infection is challenging because clinical isolates are frequently resistant to most antimicrobial agents except trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). S. maltophilia osteomyelitis is a rare disease and requires a prolonged treatment with TMP-SMX. Here, we report an interesting case of a patient with S. maltophilia osteomyelitis who developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction during TMP-SMX treatment and successfully treated after desensitization. TMP-SMX desensitization should be considered in patients with hypersensitivity to TMP-SMX, especially when there are no effective alternative drugs in S. maltophilia infection.

Successful desensitization for cytarabine induced anaphylaxis

Cytarabine is a very important chemotherapeutic agent for leukemia and lymphoma patients and is prescribed more frequently than before. Cytarabine-induced delayed-onset hypersensitivity may rarely present as non-IgE mediated anaphylaxis. However, we do not know yet whether desensitization therapy in adults may be effective in cytarabine-induced delayed-onset anaphylaxis. A 78-year-old woman who was diagnosed with acute myeloblastic leukemia had chemotherapy including cytarabine. In spite of premedication with hydrocortisone and chlorpheniramine, the patient had anaphylaxis a few hours after cytarabine infusion. We decided to perform desensitization therapy. After desensitization therapy using a newly designed protocol, the patient was tolerable to cytarabine infusion without hypotension or high fever. Desensitization therapy was successfully performed on an adult patient with delayed-onset anaphylaxis caused by cytarabine.

Alérgenos recombinantes: papel no diagnóstico e na imunoterapia alérgeno-específica / Recombinant allergens: role in diagnosis and in allergen-specific immunotherapy

Nos últimos 30 anos tem havido um avanço notável na identificação, purificação e expressão recombinante de alérgenos relevantes das mais variadas fontes, incluindo ácaros, insetos, mamíferos, polens, alimentos, fungos, látex e outras fontes. Estes avanços resultaram na utilização crescente de alérgenos purificados, naturais ou recombinantes, para melhorar o diagnóstico de alergia pelos métodos que dispomos, incluindo os testes cutâneos de hipersensibilidade imediata, e os métodos in vitro para medida de anticorpos IgE específicos, como ImmunoCAP, ImmunoCAP-ISAC, ELISA e MARIA. Mais recentemente, o uso de alérgenos recombinantes de pólen de bétula (rBet v 1) e de gramas (coquetel de 5 alérgenos) em imunoterapia foi relatado como seguro e eficaz, com resultados comparáveis aos obtidos usando extratos naturais, em pacientes com rinoconjuntivite alérgicos a polens. No presente artigo, apresentamos revisão atualizada do uso de alérgenos recombinantes em diagnóstico de alergia e em imunoterapia alérgeno-específica, incluindo novas estratégias de imunoterapia. Focalizamos na avaliação crítica de estudos que investigaram sensibilidade, especificidade, reatividade cruzada e valor prognóstico de métodos diagnósticos com uso de alérgenos recombinantes versus extratos naturais; nas recomendações atuais para o uso destes novos métodos na prática clínica; e na revisão de estudos clínicos com imunoterapia usando alérgenos recombinantes realizados até o momento.

Over the past 30 years, a great deal of progress has been made in the identification, purification,and recombinant expression of relevant allergens from various sources, including mites, insects,mammals, pollens, foods, fungi, latex, and other sources. These new developments have resultedin an increasing use of purified allergens, either natural or recombinant, to improve the diagnosisof allergy via the methods currently available, including skin tests and in vitro tests for measuringspecific IgE antibodies, e.g., ImmunoCAP, ImmunoCAP-ISAC, ELISA, and MARIA. More recently,the use of recombinant allergens from birch pollen (rBet v 1) and from grass pollen (a cocktailof five allergens) in immunotherapy has been reported to be safe and effective, with resultscomparable to those obtained with natural extracts in patients with rhino-conjunctivitis due topollen allergy. In the present article, we present an up-to-date review on the use of recombinantallergens in the diagnosis of allergy and in allergen-specific immunotherapy, including newstrategies for immunotherapy. We focus on the critical analysis of studies that have investigatedsensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, and the prognostic value of diagnostic methods that includerecombinant allergens versus natural extracts; on current recommendations for the use of thesenew methods in clinical practice; and on the review of clinical studies using immunotherapy withrecombinant allergens performed to date.

Updates on desensitization for hypersensitivity reactions related to chemotherapy

As the use of chemotherapeutic agents increased rapidly in recent years, more patients are under the potential risk of chemotherapy related adverse reactions. Multiple regular exposures to the same drug by chemotherapy protocol may increase the risk of sensitization to a chemotherapeutic agent, which can result in hypersensitivity reactions. Once severe hypersensitivity reactions occur, causative drugs should be avoided. However, a substitute with equal efficacy is not always available. When there is no effective alternative, desensitization is a safe tool for maintenance of chemotherapeutic agents causing hypersensitivity reaction. In this review, we introduce the latest knowledge about desensitization protocol for chemotherapeutic agents which are frequently used recently.

Reações de hipersensibilidade à insulina / Insulin hypersensitivity reactions

As reações de hipersensibilidade à insulina têm diminuído significativamente após a introdução da preparação de insulina humana. No entanto, alguns casos continuam sendo observados na prática clínica. Revisamos os principais aspectos relacionados à fisiopatologia, às manifestações clínicas, ao diagnóstico e ao tratamento das reações de hipersensibilidade a insulina. As reações à insulina podem estar relacionadas a qualquerum dos quatro mecanismos de Gell e Coombs. As manifestações clínicas surgem geralmente nas quatro primeiras semanas de tratamento e incluem mais frequentemente reações locais, mas também urticária, angioedema e anafilaxia. A sensibilização à insulina pode ser avaliada pelo teste cutâneo de leitura imediata, pesquisa de IgE sérica específica, teste intradérmico e pesquisa de IgG específica. O tratamento envolve o uso deadrenalina, anti-histamínicos e corticosteróides, dependendo do tipo e gravidade da reação. Em alguns casos a dessensibilização deve ser considerada.

Hypersensitivity reactions to the insulin have been decreesing significantly after the introduction of the preparation of human insulin. However, some cases continue being observed in clinical practice. We revised the main aspects related to the physiopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatmentof the insulin hypersensitivity reactions. Insulin reactions can be related with any one of the four mechanisms of Gell and Coombs. Clinical manifestations usually appear in the first 4 weeks of treatment and they more frequently include local reactions, but also urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis. Insulin sensitization can be evaluated by the prick test, serum specific IgE, intradermal test and serum specific IgG.