Papel de los estudios microbiológicos en la necrosis pancreática / Role of the microbiological studies in pancreatic necrosis / Papel dos estudos microbiológicos na necrose pancreática

RESUMEN Introducción: la infección de la necrosis pancreática es la complicación local más grave de la pancreatitis aguda. Ocurre aproximadamente en un 35% de los pacientes y presenta una mortalidad cercana al 80%. Objetivo: identificar el espectro microbiológico de la necrosis pancreática infectada Métodos: realizamos un estudio longitudinal, descriptivo, prospectivo en la Unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes de la ciudad de Bayamo, Cuba, en el periodo comprendido desde enero de 2012 hasta diciembre de 2018.Fueron incluidos 71 pacientes con el diagnostico o sospecha de pancreatitis aguda necrotizante infectada que requirieron necrosectomía con toma de cultivo intraoperatorio. Resultados: del total de pacientes de la serie la mayoría fueron masculinos representando el 56,3 % de la muestra. la etiología más frecuentemente encontrada fue la litiasica con 38 pacientes (53,5%). Mientras que 52 pacientes (73,2%) presentaban más del 50% de la glándula pancreática con necrosis. En 63 pacientes se confirmó la presencia de infección de la necrosis. Con predominio de la infección monomicrobiana en 48 casos (76,2%).El germen más frecuentemente encontrado fue E. coli (47,9%).La mortalidad post-operatoria fue de 15 pacientes (21, 1%).De ellos 14 pacientes (93,3%) con infección luego de la necrosectomía. Conclusiones: predominó la infección monomicrobiana por E. coli. Los pacientes con confirmación de crecimiento bacteriano post necrosectomía presentaron mayor mortalidad.

ABSTRACT Introduction: infection of pancreatic necrosis is the most serious local complication of acute pancreatitis. It occurs in approximately 35% of patients and has a mortality rate close to 80%. Objective: to identify the microbiological spectrum of infected pancreatic necrosis Methods: we carried out a longitudinal, descriptive, prospective study in the intensive care unit of the Carlos Manuel de Céspedes University Hospital in the city of Bayamo, Cuba, in the period from January 2012 to December 2018. 71 patients with the diagnosis or suspicion of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis that required necrosectomy with intraoperative culture taking. Results: of the total number of patients in the series, the majority were male, representing 56.3% of the sample. the most frequently found etiology was lithiasis with 38 patients (53.5%). While 52 patients (73.2%) had more than 50% of the pancreatic gland with necrosis. In 63 patients, the presence of necrosis infection was confirmed. With a predominance of monomicrobial infection in 48 cases (76.2%). The most frequent germ found was E. coli (47.9%). Post-operative mortality was 15 patients (21.1%). Of them 14 patients (93.3%) with infection after necrosectomy. Conclusions: monomicrobial infection by E. coli predominated. Patients with confirmed bacterial growth post necrosectomy had higher mortality.

RESUMO Introdução: a infecção da necrose pancreática é a complicação local mais grave da pancreatite aguda. Ocorre em aproximadamente 35% dos pacientes e tem mortalidade próxima a 80%. Objetivo: identificar o espectro microbiológico da necrose pancreática infectada Métodos: foi realizado um estudo longitudinal, descritivo e prospectivo na unidade de terapia intensiva do Hospital Universitário Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, nacidade de Bayamo, Cuba, no período de janeiro de 2012 a dezembro de 2018. 71 pacientes portadores de diagnóstico ou suspeita de pancreatite necrosante aguda infectada que exigiu necrosectomia com coleta de cultura intraoperatória. Resultados: do total de pacientes da série, a maioria era do sexo masculino, representando 56,3% da amostra. a etiologia mais encontrada foi a litíase com 38 pacientes (53,5%). En quanto 52 pacientes (73,2%) apresentavam mais de 50% da glândula pancreática com necrose. Em 63 pacientes, foi confirmada a presença de infecção de necrose. Com predomínio de infecção monomicrobiana em 48 casos (76,2%). O germe mais encontrado foi E. coli (47,9%). A mortalidade pós-operatória foi de 15 pacientes (21,1%). Destes 14 pacientes (93,3%) com infecção após necrosectomia. Conclusões: a infecção monomicrobiana por E. coli predominou. Pacientes com crescimento bacteriano confirmado após necrosectomia apresentaram maior mortalidade.

Evaluation of Revised Atlanta Classification and Determinant-based Classification for Acute Pancreatitis / 胃肠病学

Background: The revised Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC) are widely used in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). However, studies on comparison between RAC and DBC are scarce. Aims: To explore the accuracy of RAC and DBC in the assessment of AP severity. Methods: The clinical data of 481 AP patients from September 2015 to September 2019 at Taizhou People's Hospital were collected and severity were stratified according to RAC and DBC. The treatment and prognosis of each subgroup were compared. Results: On the basis of RAC, 269 (55.9%), 174 (36.2%) and 38 (7.9%) patients were classified as mild AP (MAP), moderate severe AP (MSAP) and severe AP (SAP), respectively. There were significant differences in mortality, ICU monitoring rate, ICU stay, operation rate and hospital stay among the above groups (P<0.05). On the basis of DBC, 319 (66.3%), 117 (24.3%), 34 (7.1%) and 11 (2.3%) patients were classified as MAP, MSAP, SAP and critical AP (CAP), respectively. There were significant differences in mortality, ICU monitoring rate, ICU stay, operation rate and hospital stay among the above groups (P<0.05). The ICU monitoring rate (100% vs. 63.2%, P=0.014), median ICU stay (35 days vs. 15 days, P=0.001), hospital stay [(50.36±21.54) days vs. (22.78±14.56) days, P=0.038] were significantly increased in CAP patients (classified by DBC) than those in SAP patients (classified by RAC), however, no significant differences in mortality and operation rate were found between the two groups (P=0.136; P=0.202). Conclusions: Both RAC and DBC can accurately stratify the severity of AP. SAP patients (classified by RAC) complicated with infected necrosis should be further classified into CAP.

Video assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected necrotizing pancreatitis / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Methods 48 infected necrotizing pancreatitis patients underwent video-assisted retroperitoncal debridement from Jan 2013 to Aug 2017.Results There were 30 males and 18 females.After operation,4 patients suffered from postoperative bleeding and underwent angiography.One patient had gastrointestinal fistula,4 patients had newly devoloped organ dysfunction altogether,7 patients had postoperative complications.The incidence of complications was 14.58％ (7/48).3 cases died,the mortality was 6.25％ (3/48).Conclusion The video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for pancreatic necrotic tissue is effective,safe and minimally invasive for the treatment of infected necrosis of the pancreas.

A comparison between the revision of Atlanta classification and determinant-based classification in acute pancreatitis / 中华内科杂志

Objective To compare the performance of the revision of Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC) in acute pancreatitis. Methods Consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to a single center from January 2001 to January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into mild, moderately severe and severe categories based on RAC and were simultaneously classified into mild, moderate, severe and critical grades according to DBC. Disease severity and clinical outcomes were compared between subgroups. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to compare the utility of RAC and DBC by calculating the area under curve (AUC). Results Among 1120 patients enrolled, organ failure occurred in 343 patients (30.6%) and infected necrosis in 74 patients (6.6%). A total of 63 patients (5.6%) died. Statistically significant difference of disease severity and outcomes was observed between all the subgroups in RAC and DBC (P<0.001). The category of critical acute pancreatitis (with both persistent organ failure and infected necrosis) had the most severe clinical course and the highest mortality (19/31, 61.3%). DBC had a larger AUC (0.73, 95%CI 0.69-0.78) than RAC (0.68, 95%CI 0.65-0.73) in classifying ICU admissions (P=0.031), but both were similar in predicting mortality(P=0.372) and prolonged ICU stay (P=0.266). Conclusions DBC and RAC perform comparably well in categorizing patients with acute pancreatitis regarding disease severity and clinical outcome. DBC is slightly better than RAC in predicting prolonged hospital stay. Persistent organ failure and infected necrosis are risk factors for poor prognosis and presence of both is associated with the most dismal outcome.

Recent Advances in Management of Acute Pancreatitis / 대한소화기학회지

Acute pancreatitis is common but remains a condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis achieved during the past few decades, there is no specific pharmacologic entity available. Therefore, supportive care is still the mainstay of treatment. Recently, novel interventions for increasing survival and minimizing morbidity have been investigated, which are highlighted in this review.

Outcome of Intensive Medical Treatments in Patients with Infected Severe Necrotizing Pancreatitis / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Infection of pancreatic necrosis is one of the leading cause of death in patients with severe necrotizing pancreatits. Because of high mortality rate up to 50%, immediate surgical debridement including pancreatectomy is recommended. However, early surgical treatment still showed high mortality rate and better treatment strategy is required. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of early intensive non-surgical treatments in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. METHODS: This study was based on retrospective analysis of 71 patients with acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis (APACHE II score>or=8, or Ranson's score>or=3, and pancreatic necrosis on CT scan), who were admitted to medical center during past 16 years. Infection of pancreatic necrosis was confirmed by fine needle aspiration, and early intensive medical treatments comprised of prophylactic antibiotics coverage, fluid resuscitation, organ preserving supportive measures, and percutaneous catheter drainage were carried out. RESULTS: Among the enrolled patients, infections were suspected in 46 patients, but fine needle aspirations were done only in 32 patients. In 21 patients, infections of necrotic tissue were confirmed by bacteriology, while other 11 patients showed no evidence of bacterial growth. Of 21 patients with infected necrosis, initial surgical interventions were performed in 2 patients, while initial medical treatments were performed in 19 patients. The success rate of medical treatment group in infected necrotizing pancreatitis was 79% (15/19). The mortality rate of medical treatment group and surgical treatment group was 5% (1/19) and 50% (1/2). CONCLUSIONS: Early intensive medical treatment seems to be a good therapeutic strategy, even if the infection has developed in pancreatic necrosis. Further prospective randomized studies are required to confirm this finding.