ABSTRACT
Resumo Este artigo é resultado de pesquisa de campo realizada junto aos coletores de sementes e frutos oleaginosos - Produtos Florestais Não Madeireiros (PFNMs) - em áreas rurais de Salvaterra e Bragança, no estado do Pará. O objetivo é contribuir com os estudos empíricos sobre saúde e segurança ocupacional no extrativismo, ainda incipientes no Brasil, por falta de amparo técnico-científico relacionado à atividade extrativista e por falta de regulamentação específica para a área. A pesquisa, realizada a partir da coleta de dados primários e observacionais, aponta os riscos de saúde e segurança aos quais os coletores estão expostos e os métodos de prevenção de acidentes, a fim de identificar possíveis melhorias nas condições de trabalho em um contexto onde a regulamentação de padrões trabalhistas para autônomos, informais e extrativistas na Amazônia é praticamente inexistente. A metodologia se caracteriza como estudo de caso em profundidade com coleta de dados primários com adoção de métodos mistos para sua sistematização. Os resultados demonstram que novas práticas e normas precisam ser adotadas para que os riscos à saúde e à segurança dos coletores sejam minimizados, além de garantir fiscalização, incentivo e monitoramento de práticas de segurança adequadas à atividade e específicas para cada região.
Abstract This article is the result of a field research conducted among collectors of oleaginous seeds and fruits - Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) - in the rural areas of Salvaterra and Bragança, in the state of Pará, Brazil. It aimed to contribute to empirical studies on health and occupational safety in extractivism, still incipient in Brazil due to the lack of technical-scientific support and the lack of specific regulation on the area. The research was conducted by the collection of primary and observational data that point out the risks to health and safety to which collectors are exposed to and the methods to prevent accidents in order to identify possible improvements to working conditions in a context in which labor regulation standards for autonomous, informal and extractive workers in the Amazon is practically inexistent. This paper's methodology is characterized as an embedded case study along with the collection of quantitative and qualitative data with the adoption of mixed methods for their systematization. The results show that new practices and norms should be adopted so the risks to health and safety of collectors are minimized, besides ensuring the inspection, incentives and monitoring of safety practices that are adequate to the activity and specific to each region.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rural Population , Working Conditions , Occupational Health , Forestry , Occupational RisksABSTRACT
Resumo O reconhecimento do trabalho infantil enquanto problema social que compromete saúde e educação das crianças começa a despontar juridicamente no final do século XVIII e prossegue por todo o século XIX estabelecendo, pouco a pouco, regramentos jurídicos para impedir ou atenuar sua continuidade. A construção de uma normativa jurídica de proteção à infância está histórica e intimamente atrelada ao processo de regulação e proibição do trabalho de crianças nas sociedades industrializadas. Esse processo culmina na configuração de uma concepção de infância apartada do mundo do trabalho, mas, contraditoriamente, a ele atrelada. Este texto tem como objetivo estabelecer uma relação entre a evolução da norma protetiva da saúde no trabalho e a mudança de concepção de infância, tendo como panorama de análise o contexto sócio-histórico do Reino Unido no período entre 1788 e 1879, em que importantes leis trabalhistas foram publicadas visando a impor regras ao emprego de crianças. Verifica e sublinha que o próprio avanço da norma trabalhista referente à saúde foi decorrente do olhar sobre o trabalho infantil nas indústrias. A metodologia utilizada foi a revisão bibliográfica sobre infância, trabalho infantil e análise de documentos oficiais, principalmente do período especificado. Os resultados demonstram a importância da infância na mudança do contrato social com foco na relação saúde-trabalho; a transição de um trabalho fabril para o trabalho escolar; e a evidência de que as crianças são sujeitos ativos e coprodutores da realidade social.
Abstract The recognition of child labor as a social problem that compromises the health and the education of children begins to emerge legally at the end of the eighteenth century and continues throughout the nineteenth century establishing legal regulations to prevent or mitigate its continuity. The construction of a legal framework for child protection is historically and closely linked to the process of regulation and prohibition of child labor in industrialized societies. This process culminates in the configuration of a conception of childhood that is separate from the world of work, but, contradictorily, linked to it. This text aims to establish a relationship between the evolution of the protective standard of health at work and the change of conception of childhood, having as a panorama of analysis the socio-historical context of the United Kingdom in the period between 1788 and 1879, in which important Labor laws were published in order to impose rules on the employment of children. It verifies and emphasizes that the very advance of the labor norm related to health was due to the look on child labor in industries. The methodology used was the bibliographical revision on childhood, child labor and analysis of official documents mainly of the specified period. The results demonstrate the importance of childhood in changing the social contract with a focus on the work-health relationship; the transition from factory work to school work; and the evidence that children are active subjects and coproducers of social reality.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Labor Relations , Right to Health , Child Advocacy , Occupational HealthABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of new labor standards on the intrapartum interventions and delivery outcome for gestational diabetes mellitus primiparas in labor by comparing with materal who were in accordance with the Friedman standards. Methods From May to November 2015, 319 singleton and full-term gestational diabetes mellitus primiparas whose labor treatment was according to new labor standards were selected as observation group. From November 2014 to April 2015, materal in accordance with the Friedman standards were selected as control group, a total of 292 cases, and then progress of labor, the usage of oxytocin, delivery way, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal hypoglycemia and asphyxia were all observed. Results There was no significant difference between two groups in the rate of postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal asphyxia and neonatal mobidities (P>0.05). The total labor stage, the first labor stage and the second labor stage was (10.73 ± 4.00), (9.97 ± 3.89), (0.60 ± 0.38) h in observation group and (8.86 ± 3.09), (8.19 ± 3.00), (0.53 ± 0.31) h in control group, there was significant difference between two groups (t=18.184, 17.799, 6.798, all P<0.01). The incidence of artificial rupture, the usage of oxytocin, caesarean section was 22.57%(72/319), 16.93%(54/319), 5.64%(198/319) in observation group, and 28.77%(84/292), 22.95%(67/292), 9.59%(28/292) in control group, and there was significant difference between two groups(χ2=3.079, 3.476, 3.410, all P<0.05). The incidence of episiotomy was only 29.47% (94/319) in observation group, significantly less than that in control group, which was 51.37% (150/292), there was significant difference (χ2=30.490, P<0.01). Conclusions For gestational diabetes mellitus primipara, the new labor standards effectively reduce intrapartum interventions, the rate of cesarean sections and episiotomy, and more, less influence on maternal and newborn, which is helpful to promote the maternal reproductive health and natural delivery.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the influence of new labor standards on the indications in the birth process and the prognosis of mothers and infants.Methods:186 cases treated in our hospital from January,2015 to January,2016 were divided into the observation group (85 cases) and the control group (101 cases),the observation group received new labor standards,the control group adopt Friedman labor standards.The clinical indications,pregnant complications,pregnant outcome,neonatal-perinatal outcome were compared between two groups.Results:The cesarean delivery rate,number of using oxytocin,forceps delivery rate of observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P＜0.05);the duration time of both first and second stage of labor were obviously longer than those of the control group (P＜0.05);the duration time of active phase,bleeding volume in birth process in both groups showed no statistical difference (P＞0.05);there was no adverse maternal and infant events in both groups;the incidence rate of pregnancy complications,fetal distress in uterus,asphyxia neonatorum and neonatal body weight were of no statistical difference (P＞0.05).Conclusion:The new labor standards prolong the duration time of birth and give women fully trial opportunities,could effectively reduce the rate of cesarean section,reduce the over intervention production.