Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. cuba. obstet. ginecol ; 40(1): 48-57, ene.-mar. 2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-706660

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Chlamydia trachomatis es el principal agente bacteriano que produce infecciones de transmisión sexual.Objetivo: detectar la presencia de C. trachomatis utilizando una prueba de diagnóstico rápido y compararla con la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (RCP).Métodos: se procesaron 50 muestras de exudado endocervical, de mujeres sintomáticas del municipio 10 de Octubre. A las muestras se les aplicó la prueba Chlamy-check-1, un ensayo de RCP del gen del plásmido críptico y una RCP en tiempo real (RCP-TR) de la proteína mayor de la membrana externa (MOMP) de C. trachomatis, que fue utilizada como referencia. Se calculó, sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo (VPP) y negativo (VPN).Resultados: de las muestras estudiadas, 44 resultaron positivas por la prueba rápida, mientras que por la RCP del plásmido críptico solo 3 muestras (6 porciento) amplificaron. Al aplicar la RCP-TR, 4 muestras (8 porciento) se confirmaron como positivas, coincidiendo 3 por los tres métodos de diagnóstico. Al evaluar la prueba Chlamy-check-1 frente a la prueba de referencia se observó una sensibilidad de 100 porciento, mientras que la especificidad fue de 13 porciento, así como un VPP de 9,1 porciento y VPN de 100 porciento. Por el contrario, la RCP del plásmido críptico mostró una sensibilidad y especificidad de 75 y 100 porciento, respectivamente; un VPP de 100 porciento y VPN de 97,9 porciento.Conclusiones: se obtuvo diferencia entre los porcentajes de positividad detectados con la prueba rápida, y las técnicas de RCP. La baja especificidad de la prueba rápida indica la necesidad de realizar estudios de evaluación de este estuche diagnóstico.


Introduction: Chlamydia trachomatis is the leading bacterial agent that causes sexually transmitted infections.Objective: to detect the presence of C. trachomatis using a rapid test and compare it with the chain reaction (PCR).Methods: 50 endocervical exudates taken from symptomatic women were processed in Diez de October municipality. The samples were applied the Chlamy-check-1 test, a PCR assay of the cryptic plasmid gene and a real-time PCR (RT-PCR) of major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of C. trachomatis which was used as reference. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value were calculated.Results: 44 samples were positive by the rapid test, whereas only three samples (6 percent) amplified by cryptic plasmid PCR. Applying RT-PCR, 4 samples (8 percent) were confirmed as positive, 3 samples matched with three diagnostic methods. In assessing the Chlamy-check-1 versus the reference test, 100 percent of sensitivity was observed, while the specificity was 13 percent> Also PPV was 9.1percent and NPV was 100 percent. On the contrary, the cryptic plasmid PCR had 75 and 100 percent of sensitivity and specificity respectively, 100 percent PPV and 97.9 percent NPV.Conclusions: the difference was obtained between the percentages of positivity detected with both the rapid test, and CPR techniques. The low specificity of the rapid test indicates the need for further studies to evaluate this diagnostic kit.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Chlamydia trachomatis/enzymology , Chlamydia trachomatis/pathogenicity , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
2.
Chinese Journal of Zoonoses ; (12): 1139-1142,1161, 2009.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-598384

ABSTRACT

Two pairs of primer targeting to the genes encoding the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) and the polymorphic membrane protein (PMP) of Chlamydophila psittaci (Cps) designed and used in the fluorescent quantitative PCR assay in the detection of this microorganism were compared in the their sensitivity and specificity.It was demonstrated that both pairs of primer could be used successfully to detect the presence of Cps of the epidemic strains isolated in China.The specificity of PMP primer used was higher than that of MOMP primer. In case of high target concentration in samples, the sensitivity of the former was also superior to that of the latter, but the amplification efficiency of the former was lower than that of the latter. The MOMP primer seemed to be more suitable to detect Cps by using the real-time quantitative assay.As demonstrated by the real-time quantitative PCR assay, great difference in the genomic copy numbers of the PMP gene existed in the epidemic strains of Cps isolated in China.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL