Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Korean Journal of Dermatology ; : 58-61, 2015.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-9529

ABSTRACT

Various treatment modalities are available for mycosis fungoides including topical steroids, topical chemotherapy, phototherapy, and spot radiation therapy. However, these modalities do not always result in optimal effects, with efficacy depending on lesion size, number, and location. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a recently introduced therapeutic modality that proved effective in patients with unilesional mycosis fungoides. A 58-year-old woman presented with a seven-year history of a pruritic erythematous scaly patch on her right thigh. Through skin biopsy, we verified the lesion as mycosis fungoides. The lesion did not respond well to a topical steroid. We opted for topical PDT with methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL). MAL cream was applied for 4 hours following irradiation with a red light. Four sessions were administered, separated by five weeks. The lesion clinically improved after treatment without severe side effects. PDT using MAL could be considered an effective and tolerable treatment for mycosis fungoides.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Biopsy , Drug Therapy , Mycosis Fungoides , Photochemotherapy , Phototherapy , Skin , Steroids , Thigh
2.
Annals of Dermatology ; : 321-331, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-58742

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the efficacy, cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events between 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) and methyl aminolevulinate-PDT (MAL-PDT) for actinic keratoses (AKs) in Asian ethnic populations with dark-skin. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the long-term efficacy, recurrence rates, cosmetic outcomes, and safety of ALA-PDT versus MAL-PDT for facial AKs in Koreans. METHODS: A total of 222 facial AKs in 58 patients were included in this study. A total of 153 lesions (29 patients) were treated with 5-ALA, and 69 lesions (29 patients) with MAL. ALA and MAL creams were applied for 6 hours and 3 hours, respectively; the lesions were then illuminated with a halogen lamp at 150 J/cm2 for ALA-PDT and a diode lamp at 37 J/cm2 for MAL-PDT. RESULTS: The complete response rates of ALA-PDT and MAL-PDT were 56.9% and 50.7%, respectively, with no significant difference at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between the 2 PDT modalities at either 6 or 12 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcomes between the 2 treatment modalities at 12 months after PDT. However, ALA-PDT caused significantly more painful than MAL-PDT (p=0.005). The adverse events were mild to moderate, transient, and self-limiting for both modalities. CONCLUSION: MAL-PDT was similar to ALA-PDT in terms of long-term efficacy, recurrence rates, cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events; however, it was a significantly less painful procedure than ALA-PDT in our study.


Subject(s)
Humans , Asian People , Follow-Up Studies , Keratosis, Actinic , Photochemotherapy , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies
3.
Korean Journal of Dermatology ; : 757-758, 2014.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-49159

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.


Subject(s)
Photochemotherapy , Porokeratosis
4.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2013 Jan-Feb; 79(1): 77-82
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-147397

ABSTRACT

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to be an effective alternative for acne. However, there is little information comparing the efficacy of red light alone and methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL)-PDT. Aims: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of red light alone and MAL-PDT in patients with mild to moderate facial acne. Methods: Thirty six patients with mild to moderate acne were enrolled. Eighteen patients recieved MAL-PDT and 18 received red light alone in two sessions, 2 weeks apart. Acne grade and lesion counts were assessed by blinded evaluators at baseline, 2, 4 and 10 weeks. Results: At week 2, clinical improvement from acne grade II-IV to 0-I was observed in 82.3% of MAL-PDT group and 14.2% of red light alone group. Red light alone group had a gradual clinical improvement over time with a 77% response at week 10. In contrast, MAL-PDT group had a rapid clinical improvement with total response at week 10. Both treatments were significantly effective for improving acne lesions. However, MAL-PDT group had a greater response (P < 0.001). Histologically, decreased amounts of sebocytes and lipids along with atrophic sebaceous glands were observed after MAL-PDT. Conclusion: MAL-PDT has a quicker onset of action with a higher response than red light alone. MAL-PDT may induce a reduction in the size of the sebaceous glands and then long-term acne remission.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aminolevulinic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Aminolevulinic Acid/therapeutic use , Face , Female , Humans , Light , Male , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Rev. chil. dermatol ; 27(2): 177-187, 2011. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-645027

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El acné es una dermatosis inflamatoria frecuente. Habitualmente requiere tratamientos sistémicos no exentos de riesgos. La terapia fotodinámica (TFD) ha demostrado efectividad en el tratamiento del acné. Material y método: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado, y controlado, comparando la TFD con metil-aminolevulinato (MAL) al 16 por ciento con la aplicación de luz roja sola en el tratamiento del acné inflamatorio leve a moderado. Se aleatorizaron los pacientes a dos grupos; en el primer grupo se realizó TFD con luz roja, previa aplicación de crema de metil-aminolevulinato 16 por ciento (MAL), a las semanas 0 y 2. Resultados: se incluyeron 36 pacientes con acné inflamatorio leve y moderado localizado en región facial. Se determinaron los cambios de grados de acné existiendo diferencias significativas en los cambios de grado a las semanas 2, 4 y 10 (p<0.001), siendo mayor la mejoría clínica del acné en el grupo TFD-MAL comparado con el grupo luz roja sola, pero observable en ambos grupos. Discusión: la fototerapia con luz roja, con o sin fotosensibilizante, representa una opción de tratamiento no invasivo, seguro y eficaz para el acné vulgar. Al combinar la fototerapia con sustancias tópicas, por ejemplo MAL, resulta de una acción sinérgica aditiva.


Introduction: Acne is a frequent inflammatory dermatoses. It usually requires systemic treatments that are not free of adverse events. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) had been shown to be effective in acne. Methods: a prospective, randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the effectiveness of PDT with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) compared with red light alone. Patients were randomized in two groups. In the first group PDT-MAL was applied at week 0and 2; and in the second groupred light alone was applied. Results: 36 patients were incluided with facial acne. Effectiveness was evaluated at weeks 2, 4 and 10 for both groups. A statistically significant difference (p<0.001) was found favoring PDT-MAL group. Both groups showed and improvement in cane severity. Discussion: PDT-MAL and red light therapy are an effective and safe treatment option for acne. Combining PDT with MAL is more effective than red light alone.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Aminolevulinic Acid/administration & dosage , Acne Vulgaris/therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Light , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Phototherapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
Rev. chil. dermatol ; 26(1): 25-29, 2010. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-570364

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La terapia fotodinámica (TFD) con ácido 5-aminolevulínico (ALA) y metil aminolevulinato (MAL) ha mostrado utilidad en el manejo del acné inflamatorio. Métodos: Dos grupos de cuatro pacientes cada uno, portadores de acné inflamatorio leve o moderado. Se realizaron dos sesiones de TFD separadas por dos semanas: un grupo fue tratado con MAL y luz roja y el otro, con ALA y luz azul. Se midió la severidad del acné con escala de 6 puntos y se consideró éxito clínico los grados 0 y 1. Resultados: En ambos grupos se observó éxito clínico a las 12 semanas post tratamiento, quedando con pigmentación residual, escasos comedones y menos de 10 pápulas. Se observaron efectos adversos tolerables, siendo los más importantes el eritema y la descamación. Conclusión: La TFD con ALA y MAL es una buena alternativa terapéutica para aquellos pacientes con acné inflamatorio leve y moderado que no responden o tienen contraindicación a los tratamientos convencionales.


Introduction: Photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) and 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has shown to be useful in the management of inflammatory acne. Methods: Two groups of 4 patients each with mild to moderate inflammatory acne. Two PDT sessions were performed within a 2 week interval; one group was treated with MAL and red light, and the other with ALA and blue light. Acne severity was measured with a 6-point scale and clinical success was considered between grades 0 and 1. Results: In both groups, clinical success was observed at 12 weeks post treatment, leaving residual pigmentation, scarce comedones and less than 10 papules. Tolerable side effects were observed, being the most important erythema and desquamation. Conclusion: PDT with ALA and MAL is a good therapeutic option for patients with mild to moderate inflammatory acne who do not respond or have contraindications to conventional treatments.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Aminolevulinic Acid/administration & dosage , Aminolevulinic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Photochemotherapy/methods , Acne Vulgaris/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
7.
Korean Journal of Dermatology ; : 796-799, 2008.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-94759

ABSTRACT

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) via topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is potentially useful for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. However, as a photosensitizer used in PDT, methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) can replace ALA, because MAL has more advantages than ALA. We treated two patients with basal cell carcinoma using MAL-PDT. Topical MAL-PDT may be a safe and effective treatment modality for basal cell carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Humans , Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Photochemotherapy , Triazenes
8.
Korean Journal of Dermatology ; : 835-838, 2008.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-215773

ABSTRACT

Actinic cheilitis is a pathologic condition affecting mainly the lower lip caused by long term exposure of the lips to UV radiation in sunlight. Analogous to actinic keratosis of the skin, actinic cheilitis is considered as a precancerous lesion and may develop into squamous cell carcinoma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality involving the use of a photosensitizing agent, oxygen, and light of a specific wavelength to produce controlled cell death. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using the new highly selective photosensitizer methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) (Metvix(R), Galderma, U.K.) is a promising new treatment modality for premalignant and malignant skin lesions. We report a case of actinic cheilitis treated with PDT using MAL, with satisfactory outcome in both clinical and pathological aspects.


Subject(s)
Actins , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Cell Death , Cheilitis , Keratosis, Actinic , Light , Lip , Oxygen , Photochemotherapy , Skin , Sunlight , Triazenes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL