ABSTRACT
AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the level of feeding performance among and determine the effectiveness of oral motor intervention on feeding performance among preterm babies. METHODS: One group pre-test and post-test pre-experimental design was used and 30 samples were selected using non-probability convenient sampling technique. The modified early feeding assessment scale was used to evaluate the feeding performance. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The pretest mean was 22.6 and the post-test mean was 38.8. the mean difference was 16.2. The standard deviation of the pretest was 3.8 and the post -test was 2.8. The calculated paired 't' value 19.12 was highly significant than the table value (2.6) at 0.05 level. CONCLUSION: It was inferred that oral motor intervention was effective in improving feeding performance among preterm babies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Premature infants often have feeding difficulties leading to morbidity or developmental co-morbidities. Premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI), has shown the positive effects on feeding progression of the premature infants. PIOMI with the massage technique, may help in improving oral motor activity, weight gain in preterm infants along with better neurobehavioral organization. The study was done to analyse effect of this combined protocol on achieving oral motor control and Neurobehavioral state regulation and evaluate its efficacy against PIOMI.Methods: A total 72 clinically stable infants admitted in premature care unit, fulfilling inclusion criterion were enrolled. They were allocated in control and experimental group. Infants from control group received PIOMI and experimental group received PIOMI with massage therapy (M technique), for 10 minutes each day. Data was collected for oral motor abilities, behavioural assessment, weight and day of achieving full feeds.Results: Gestational age at full feeds was 33.65 weeks and 32.89 weeks in control and experimental groups respectively with ‘p’ value 0.002. The number of days of full feed in experimental group was 3.7 days earlier (p=0.04). Infants from experimental group showed higher oral motor score and more weight gain with significant difference The behavioral regulation in infants of both the groups improved after 8 day.Conclusions: PIOMI with M technique was well tolerated by preterm infants. The modified protocol has resulted in achieving early oral feeds and reducing hospital stay. It has also shown the benefit of behavioural regulation along with better oral motor control.
ABSTRACT
Objective? To? explore? the? clinical? significance? of? early? oral? intervention? measures? in? the?prognosis?of?premature?infants.? Methods? 151?preterm?infants?admitted?to?neonatal?intensive?care?unit?(NICU)?of?Liaocheng?People's?Hospital?from?January?2015?to?January?2017?were?enrolled.?Premature?infants?were?divided?into?intervention?group?and?control?group?according?to?random?number?table?method?and?with?the?consent?of?legal?guardian.?Both?groups?received?routine?treatment?of?preterm?infants?after?stable?vital?signs.?The?intervention?group?received?the?oral?massage?method?adopted?by?none-nutritive?sucking,?stimulating?swallowing?function?and?SandraFucile?on?the?basis?of?routine?treatment,?once?a?day?for?14?consecutive?days.?Both?groups?were?followed?up?for?6?months.?The?oral?feeding?ability?of?premature?infants?was?evaluated?by?the?proficiency?(PRO),?rate?of?transfer?(RT),?feeding?process?and??non-nutritive?suction?(NNS).?At?40?weeks?of?postmenstrual?age?(PMA),?neonatal?behavioral?neurological?(NBNA)?was?used?to?assess?neonatal?brain?development;?Infanib?was?used?for?early?motor?development?evaluation?at?3?months?and??6?months?after?birth.? Results? Finally,?151?premature?infants?were?enrolled,?including?78?in?the?intervention?group?and?73?in?the?control?group.?The?time?to?complete?oral?feeding?of?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?shorter?than?that?of?the?control?group?(days:?18.1±3.7?vs.?23.4±5.8,?P?<?0.05).?Compared?with?the?control?group,?at?the?time?of?complete?oral?feeding,?the?PMA?of?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?decreased?(weeks:?33.4±0.9?vs.?35.9±1.9,?P <?0.05),?the?feeding?efficiency?was?significantly?increased?(mL/min:?10.6±5.1?vs.?8.1±4.7,?P?<?0.05),?and?PRO?was?significantly?increased?[(95±8)%?vs.?(72±28)%,?P <?0.05],?and?the?body?weight?was?significantly?decreased?(g:?1?836.0±193.0?vs.?2?000.8±204.5,?P?<?0.05).?The?NNS?scores?of?the?intervention?group?and?the?control?group?were?increased?gradually?with?time?(F?values?were?86.21?and?75.23,?respectively,?both?P?<?0.01),?and?the?NNS?scores?of?the?intervention?group?at??10?days?and?14?days?were?significantly?higher?than?those?of?the?control?group?(52.89±6.26?vs.?46.74±6.24,?73.90±7.01? vs.?63.53±6.80,?both?P?<?0.01).?The?NBNA?scores?of?the?two?groups?were?lower,?but?there?was?no?significant?difference?between?the?intervention?group?and?the?control?group?(32.7±3.6?vs.?32.0±4.1,?P?>?0.05).?Infanib?evaluation?at?3?months?of?age?showed?that?the?proportion?of?normal?children?in?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?higher?than?that?in?the?control?group?[67.95%?(53/78)?vs.?49.31%?(36/73),?P?<?0.05],?and?at?6?months?of?age,?the?proportion?of?normal?children?in?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?higher?than?that?in?the?control?group?[84.62%?(66/78)?vs.?58.90%?(43/73),??P <?0.01].? Conclusion? Early?oral?exercise?intervention?can?shorten?the?transition?time?from?tube?feeding?to?full?oral?feeding?in?NICU?premature?infants?and?improve?the?performance?of?infants?during?feeding.