Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair

INTRODUCTION@#The superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair of incisional hernias (IHs) in the elective setting is still controversial. Our study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open elective IH repair in an Asian population.@*METHODS@#This retrospective study was conducted in an acute general hospital in Singapore between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were IH repair in an elective setting, IHs with diameter of 3-15 cm, and location at the ventral abdominal wall. We excluded patients who underwent emergency repair, had recurrent hernias or had loss of abdominal wall domain (i.e. hernia sac containing more than 30% of abdominal contents or any solid organs). Postoperative outcomes within a year such as recurrence, pain, infection, haematoma and seroma formation were compared between the two groups.@*RESULTS@#There were 174 eligible patients. The majority were elderly Chinese women who were overweight. Open repair was performed in 49.4% of patients, while 50.6% underwent laparoscopic repair. The mean operation time for open repair was 116 minutes (116 ± 60.6 minutes) and 139 minutes (136 ± 64.1 minutes) for laparoscopic repair (P = 0.079). Within a year after open repair, postoperative wound infection occurred in 15.1% of the patients in the open repair group compared to 1.1% in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.0007). Postoperative pain, recurrence and haematoma/seroma formation were comparable.@*CONCLUSION@#Elective laparoscopic IH repair has comparable outcomes with open repair and may offer the advantage of reduced postoperative wound infection rates.

Impact of time to surgery from injury on postoperative infection and deep vein thrombosis in periprosthetic knee fractures / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

PURPOSE@#Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is a serious complication that occurs in 0.3%-2.5% of all total knee arthroplasties used to treat end-stage arthritis. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature that evaluate the association between time to surgery after PPF and early postoperative infections or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study tests our hypothesis that delayed time to surgery increases rates of postoperative infection and DVT after PPF surgery.@*METHODS@#Our study cohort included patients undergoing PPF surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2006-2015). The patients were dichotomized based on time to surgery: group 1 with time ≤2 days and group 2 with time >2 days. A 2-by-2 contingency table and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the association between complications and time to surgery groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and known risk factors.@*RESULTS@#A total of 263 patients (80% females) with a mean age of 73.9 ± 12.0 years were identified receiving PPF surgery, among which 216 patients were in group 1 and 47 patients in group 2. Complications in group 1 included 3 (1.4%) superficial infections (SI), 1 (0.5%) organ space infection (OSI), 1 (0.5%) wound dehiscence (WD), and 4 (1.9%) deep vein thrombosis (DVT); while complications in group 2 included 1 (2.1%) SI, 1 (2.1%) OSI, 1 (2.1%) DVT, and no WD. No significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between the two groups. However, patients in group 2 were more likely (p = 0.0013) to receive blood transfusions (57.5%) than those in group 1 (32.4%).@*CONCLUSION@#Our study indicates patients with delayed time to surgery have higher chance to receive blood transfusions, but no significant difference in postoperative complications (SI, OSI, WD, or DVT) between the two groups.

Estudio comparativo de cierre de cuero cabelludo en neurocirugías supratentoriales: intradérmica vs. surget / Comparative study of scalp closure in supratentorial neurosurgery: intradermal vs. surget

Introducción: El cierre de cuero cabelludo en neurocirugías supratentoriales mediante sutura intradérmica es una técnica poco difundida en la actualidad. En contraste, es común que se efectúen suturas de alta tensión con el fin de evitar dehiscencias, fístula de líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) y sangrado durante el período posquirúrgico, pero que no tienen buen resultado estético. Objetivo: Comparar las complicaciones relacionadas al cierre de cuero cabelludo que se presentaron en neurocirugías supratentoriales en un período de 19 meses, para determinar si utilizar un cierre de menor tensión y con mejor resultado estético, es igual de seguro que las técnicas de cierre habituales. Materiales y Métodos: Se incluyeron 84 casos de neurocirugías supratentoriales electivas. En 43 casos (control) se realizó el cierre mediante sutura continua tipo surget y en 41 casos (experimental) el cierre fue mediante sutura intradérmica. Resultados: Se presentaron 2 casos de infecciones, 1 en cada grupo (p= 0,97) y 1 caso de sangrado en el grupo control (p= 0,32). No se presentaron dehiscencias ni casos de fístula de LCR. Conclusiones: El cierre de cuero cabelludo mediante sutura intradérmica fue un método seguro que no generó una mayor incidencia de complicaciones y logró un mejor resultado estético a corto y largo plazo.

Background: Scalp closure by means of intradermal suture in patients who underwent supratentorial neurosurgeries is currently an uncommon technique. In contrast, it is usual to perform high tension sutures to avoid skin dehiscence, cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF) and postoperative bleeding; however it usually results in unsatisfactory aesthetic results. Aim: Comparing complications, over a two year period, related to scalp closure occurred in supratentorial neurosurgeries. The goal is to establish if the intradermal suture is as safe as the current high tension closure technique.Materials and Methods: Eighty-four patients were included. In forty-three cases (control) continuous high tension suture (surget) was performed. The other forty-one cases (experimental) underwent intradermal suture. Results: Two infection cases occurred, one from each group (p= 0, 97). There was one case of bleeding that took place in the control group (p= 0,32). Neither dehiscence nor CSF leak occurred in any of the trial cases.Conclusions: Intradermal suture performed for scalp closure was as safe as surget in terms of complications occurrence and obtained better cosmetic results in the short and long term.

Two methods of pre-operative hair removal and their effect on post operative period.

Background: Preparation for surgery has traditionally included the routine removal of body hair from the intended surgical wound site. Hair is removed as its presence can interfere with the exposure of the incision and subsequent wound, the suturing of the incision and the application of adhesive drapes and wound dressings. Hair is also perceived to be associated with a lack of cleanliness and hair removal is thought to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs are experienced by around 10% of patients in the UK each year and can result in delayed wound healing, increased hospital stays, unnecessary pain and in extreme cases the death of the patient. Three methods of hair removal are currently used: shaving, clipping and chemical depilation. When a surgical operation is to be conducted through a hair bearing part of the body, hair removal is often performed. Aims & Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of two methods (shaving and depilation cream) of preoperative hair removal to adequacy of hair removal, skin injury and reaction during hair removal, postoperative wound infection in a developing country where razor shaving is very popular. Material and Methods: Consecutive consenting patients scheduled to have such operations were randomized into two groups. One group had hair removal by shaving with a razor blade while the other had hair removed by depilatory cream. Adequacy of hair removal and presence of skin injuries and/or reactions were noted preoperatively. Details of the procedures were recorded and patients were then assessed for postoperative wound infection. Results: A total 215 patients were studied. Of the 103 patients who had hair removal by depilatory cream, hair was completely removed in 93 (91%) compared to 69 (62%) of the 112 patients who had razor hair shaving. Skin injuries were noted in 32 (29%) of the razor group and 4 (4%) of patients who had depilatory cream. 18 patients (8%) had postoperative wound infection including 3 (3%) in the depilatory cream group and 15 (13%) of the razor group. A significant association was found between preoperative skin injuries and postoperative wound infections. Conclusion: Preoperative hair removal with razor shaving predisposes to skin injuries which in turn significantly influence postoperative wound infection rates. Such injuries and resultant wound infection are fewer when depilatory cream is used for hair removal.