ABSTRACT
Objective:Based on the analysis of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine from 1946 to present, summarize key factors of biomedical research management at universities, to provide suggestions for the improvement of biomedical research management in China.Methods:Using the official website of Nobel Foundation as database, combined with documents and literature review, data of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, which including the nationality of the winners, the age at which the Nobel Prize were made, the employer as well as the discipline were analyzed.Results:An evaluation system based on peer review plays important roles in scientific and technological innovation.The breakthrough works are usually achieved by the scientists in their youth, however, the time for the recognition of their work is gradually increasing.The interdisciplinary research is more and more important.Conclusions:By analyzing the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, China needs to establish a comprehensive talent evaluation system that focus on training young scholars and strengthen cross-disciplinary integration to improve the biomedical research management.
ABSTRACT
Por ocasião do sexagésimo aniversário da atribuição, em 1949, do prêmio Nobel da Medicina ou Fisiologia a Egas Moniz e a Walter Rudolf Hess, foram evocadas as circunstâncias que explicam a singular nobelização. Chama-se atenção para os traços biográficos de Egas Moniz, que são também os de muitos médicos da sua geração, asssim como dos pormenores que se prendem com o processo de nomeação e avaliação científica visando à candidatura ao prêmio Nobel. São também discutidos aspectos de ligação entre a cultura e a ciência, designadamente as controvérsias à volta do prêmio que lhe foi atribuído.
On the occasion of the sixtieth anniversary of the award in 1949, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine granted to Egas Moniz and Walter Rudolf Hess, the circumstances that explain the unique Nobel award require elucidation. Attention is drawn to the biographical traits of Egas Moniz, which are also those of many doctors of his generation, as well as the details which relate to the process of nomination and scientific appraisal to be eligible for the Nobel Prize. Aspects of the link between culture and science are also discussed, including the controversies surrounding the award conferred upon him.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Physicians/history , History of Medicine , Psychosurgery , Science/history , Cerebral Angiography , Culture , Nobel PrizeABSTRACT
Em 1978, nasceu Louise Brown, o primeiro bebê de proveta. Este nascimento histórico foi o resultado de pesquisas do biólogo Robert Edwards e do ginecologista Patrick Steptoe (1). Em 2010, Edwards recebeu o prêmio Nobel de Medicina/Fisiologia, pela importância desta técnica para a humanidade. Este artigo revisa as etapas envolvidas na fertilização in vitro (FIV), as dificuldades dos pioneiros, as soluções encontradas e os procedimentos clínicos utilizados atualmente.
Louise Brown, the first baby conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF), was born in 1978. This landmark was a result of research conducted by biologist Robert Edwards and gynecologist Patrick Steptoe (1). In 2010, Edwards was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in recognition of the importance of IVF to humanity. The objective of the present article is to review the steps involved in IVF, the difficulties faced by pioneers, the solutions found, and the clinical procedures currently employed.