ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction In stroke survivors, the prevalence of upper motor disability remains high. There has not been much report on the success of post-stroke mirror therapy, especially in developing countries. Objective The focus of this research is to see how mirror therapy, in addition to standard rehabilitation for hand paresis, affects upper limb motor recovery and level of independence in self-care after stroke at an Indonesian teaching hospital. Method This was a randomized controlled trial with no assessor blinding. The study included 18 subacute stroke patients who did not have cognitive or visual impairment. The mirror group received a 20-minute mirror therapy session in addition to conventional rehabilitation, while the control group received only the standard program for 5 weeks (2 times per week). The Brunnstrom score and self-care level of independence elements of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were used as outcome measures. Results Baseline comparisons of lesion type and Brunnstrom score showed significant between-group differences. The ANACOVA test showed the difference had no effect on the FIM change in scores (P > 0.05). One patient (mirror group) was dropped out from the study. After 5 weeks (n=17), the mirror group showed improvement in both the Brunnstrom and FIM scores (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Conclusions Mirror treatment improves upper limb motor recovery and level of independence in self-care after stroke when combined with standard hand paresis rehabilitation 2 times a week for 5 weeks.
Resumo Introdução Em sobreviventes de AVC, a prevalência de deficiência motora nos membros superiores permanece alta. Não há muitos relatos sobre o sucesso da terapia do espelho pós-AVC, especialmente em países em desenvolvimento. Objetivo O foco desta pesquisa é ver como a terapia do espelho, além da reabilitação padrão para paresia da mão, afeta a recuperação motora do membro superior e o nível de independência no autocuidado após o AVC em um hospital universitário da Indonésia. Método Ensaio clínico randomizado sem cegamento do avaliador. O estudo incluiu 18 pacientes com AVC subagudo que não tinham deficiência cognitiva ou visual. O grupo de espelho recebeu uma sessão de terapia de espelho de 20 minutos além da reabilitação convencional, enquanto o grupo de controle recebeu apenas o programa padrão por 5 semanas (2 vezes por semana). O escore de Brunnstrom e os elementos do nível de independência do autocuidado da Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF) foram usados como medidas de desfecho. Resultados As comparações da linha de base do tipo de lesão e do escore de Brunnstrom mostraram diferenças significativas entre os grupos. O teste ANACOVA mostrou que a diferença não teve efeito na mudança da MIF nos escores (P> 0,05). Um paciente (grupo espelho) foi retirado do estudo. Após 5 semanas (n = 17), o grupo espelho mostrou melhora em ambos os escores de Brunnstrom e FIM (P <0,05) em comparação com o grupo de controle. Conclusão O tratamento com espelho melhora a recuperação motora dos membros superiores e o nível de independência no autocuidado após o AVC quando combinado com a reabilitação de paresia de mão padrão 2 vezes por semana durante 5 semanas.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To provide an objective cost–utility evaluation of a colorectal cancer screening program in a hypothetical general population. Materials and Methods: A cost–utility analysis was conducted comparing screened individuals with the general population. Patients were evaluated as part of the screening program which conducted colorectal cancer risk assessments and performed colonoscopies from October 2012 to May 2013. Data were compared to a hypothetical group of the same size, consisting of the general population in which no cancer screening had been conducted. The cost and utility data have been published previously. Results: The average cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of colorectal cancer screening population was 84,092 CNY, while the average cost per QALY of the general population was 122,530 CNY. The colorectal cancer screening program saved 43,530 CNY per additional QALY. Conclusion: The colorectal cancer screening program could improve health-related quality of life and reduce medical expenditure
ABSTRACT
Background@#Nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) in combination with peginterferon (PegIFN) therapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) shows better effectiveness than NA monotherapy in hepatitis B surface antigen loss, termed "functional cure," based on previous published studies. However, it is not known which strategy is more cost-effective on functional cure. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of first-line monotherapies and combination strategies in HBeAg-positive CHB patients in China from a social perspective.@*Methods@#A Markov model was developed with functional cure and other five states including CHB, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death to assess the cost-effectiveness of seven representative treatment strategies. Entecavir (ETV) monotherapy and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy served as comparators, respectively.@*Results@#In the two base-case analysis, compared with ETV, ETV generated the highest costs with $44,210 and the highest quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with 16.78 years. Compared with TDF, treating CHB patients with ETV and NA - PegIFN strategies increased costs by $7639 and $6129, respectively, gaining incremental QALYs by 2.20 years and 1.66 years, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $3472/QALY and $3692/QALY, respectively, which were less than one-time gross domestic product per capita. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results.@*Conclusion@#Among seven treatment strategies, first-line NA monotherapy may be more cost-effective than combination strategies in HBeAg-positive CHB patients in China.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the effectiveness and cost of breast cancer screening strategy that is suitable for the current econom-ic conditions in China. Methods: We collected clinical and cost information of breast cancer screening for Chinese women based on previous screening programs conducted from February 2008 to December 2011 and collected the same information about breast can-cer cases diagnosed in hospitals at the same time. Markov models were developed to analyze the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for 132 breast cancer screening strategies compared to no screening for Chinese women. Results: In 2010, as compared to no screening, the most cost-effective breast cancer screening strategy was biennial screening with clinical breast examination (CBE) and breast ultrasound, in parallel, for women aged between 40 to 64. This screening strategy could save 1,394 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) per 100,000 women, and the cost of saving breast-cancer related QALY would be 91,944 RMB. Sensitivity analysis indicated that in 2016, the most cost-effective breast cancer screening strategy was biennial screening with CBE and mammography (MAM), in parallel, for women aged 40 to 64, with ICER of 159,637 RMB per QALY. Conclusions: Population-based breast cancer screening would be acceptable in the current conditions in China. As the Chinese economy and level of medical care improve, breast cancer screening would be more cost-effective.
ABSTRACT
Annual medical expenditure in Japan is continuously increasing. This may be caused by technology advancement as well as population ageing. Some new and high cost technologies, including new drugs, have been introduced. In order to balance technology advancement with medical expenditure, economic evaluation of new technologies is one way to approach the issue. In 2016 a pilot program stared at the Central Social Insurance Medical Council to evaluate cost effectiveness of some drugs and medical devices. In the pilot program, companies of selected products were asked to submit primary data and analyses to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The ministry, together with some experts, reviewed the submitted data and re-analyzed if necessary. After these assessment process, not only cost effectiveness of each product, but also ethical or social aspects are considered in the appraisal phase. Finally results will be used to adjust reimbursement prices in the 2018 price revision. In the council, some issues toward full implementation of the new system will be discussed by 2019.
ABSTRACT
Context: Cost‑effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery. Aims: To compare the cost effectiveness of phacoemulsification (PE) versus manual small‑incision cataract surgery (MSICS). Settings and Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Tertiary care hospital setting. Subjects and Methods: A total of 52 consenting patients with age‑related cataracts, were prospectively recruited, and block randomized to PE or MSICS group. Preoperative and postoperative LogMAR visual acuity (VA), visual function‑14 (VF‑14) score and their quality‑adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained, and the change in their values calculated. These were divided by the total cost incurred in the surgery to calculate and compare the cost effectiveness and cost utility. Surgery duration was also compared. Statistical Analysis Used: Two group comparison with Student’s t‑test. Significance set at P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) quoted where appropriate. Results: Both the MSICS and PE groups achieved comparative outcomes in terms of change (difference in mean [95% CI]) in LogMAR VA (0.03 [−0.05−0.11]), VF‑14 score (7.92 [−1.03−16.86]) and QALYs (1.14 [−0.89−3.16]). However, with significantly lower costs (INR 3228 [2700–3756]), MSICS was more cost effective, with superior cost utility value. MSICS was also significantly quicker (10.58 min [6.85–14.30]) than PE. Conclusions: MSICS provides comparable visual and QALY improvement, yet takes less time, and is significantly more cost‑effective, compared with PE. Greater push and penetration of MSICS, by the government, is justifiably warranted in our country.
ABSTRACT
Objective To summarize the progress of research on the influence of nutrition support on quality adjusted life year (QALY) in elderly patients with nutritional risk, and to evaluate the feasibility of QALY as an outcome indicator.Methods Literature in Chinese, English and Japanese relating to the feasibility of QALY and cost-utility in evaluating the influence of nutrition support on the outcomes of patients with nutritional risk published from 1980 to 2013 were searched in Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure,PubMed, Nature databases.The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using Jadad scale combined with Schulz allocation concealment, and the quality of cohort studies with Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results Totally 10 articles were fotnd, in which 8 were selected, including 6 randomized controlled trial and 2 cohort studies, covering 1 130 patients;the other 2 were excluded for not conforming to inclusion criteria.Four of the 6 randomized controlled trial indicate that QALY is higher and all-cost is lower in the treatment group compared with the control group (or cost-utility is higher in the treatment group).The 2 cohort studies indicate that total parenteral nutrition support at home could improve the QALY of malnourished patients and could save cost compared with nutrition support at hospital when necessary.Conclusions Nutrition support for patients with nutritional risk can improve prognosis, reduce cost, and increase QALY.More large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effect of nutrition support on the QALY of elderly patients with nutritional risk.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: No country can afford to provide all necessary healthcare for its citizens, so prioritization among interventions must feature in all health systems. Resources in health should be allocated among interventions/facilities/patients in such a way as to be in line with the objectives of the health system. To achieve this, resource allocation decisions must be informed by the relative contributions that prospective interventions will make to societal health and to costs. Internationally, the EQ-5D based quality adjusted life year (QALY) now dominates this kind of analysis. This paper reports on a pilot study to develop an EQ-5D-3L value set for Trinidad and Tobago based on a protocol that avoids some of the issues that are associated with other approaches to developing such value sets such as the complex elicitation tasks that respondents must carry out, and the large respondent samples required for collecting multiple valuation subset values using blocked designs. METHODS: An orthogonal discrete choice experiment design was used to elicit a set of choices from a sample of respondents. RESULTS: The choice data were analysed using mixed multinomial logistic regression to produce an internally valid model that predicts well. CONCLUSION: This paper marks an important milestone in the development of health resource allocation in the Caribbean. It sets out the importance of incorporating the impact of health interventions to inform health resource allocation decisions, describes the elicitation and analysis methods used in the pilot and provides an illustration ofthe use ofthe EQ-5D value set.
OBJETIVO: Ningún país puede permitirse ofrecer toda la atención a la salud necesaria para sus ciudadanos, de modo que la necesidad de establecer prioridades en las intervenciones constituye un rasgo característico de todos los sistemas de salud. Los recursos de salud deben asignarse entre las intervenciones/instalaciones/pacientes de tal manera que se correspondan con los objetivos del sistema de salud. Para lograr esto, las decisiones en cuanto a la asignación de recursos deben reportarse en términos de las contribuciones relativas que las intervenciones prospectivas representarán para la salud social y los costos. Internacionalmente, el EQ - 5D basado en el año de vida ajustado por calidad (AVAC), domina ahora este tipo de análisis. El presente trabajo reporta un estudio piloto para desarrollar un conjunto de valores EQ - 5D - 3L para Trinidad y Tobago, basado en un protocolo que evite algunos de los problemas asociados con otros enfoques usados para desarrollar estos conjuntos de valores, tales como tareas complejas de obtención de datos, que los encuestados tienen que llevar a cabo, y las grandes muestras de respuestas requeridas para recoger varios subconjuntos de valoración múltiple utilizando diseños bloqueados. MÉTODOS: Un diseño de experimento de elección discreta ortogonal se utiliza para obtener un conjunto de opciones de una muestra de encuestados. RESULTADOS: Los datos de la elección se analizaron mediante regresión logística multinomial mixta para producir un modelo internamente válido que predice bien. CONCLUSION: Este documento marca un hito importante en el desarrollo de la asignación de recursos de salud en el Caribe. El mismo establece la importancia de incorporar el impacto de las intervenciones de salud para informar las decisiones de asignación de recursos de salud, describe los métodos de obtención y análisis utilizados en el programa piloto, y proporciona una ilustración del uso del conjunto de valores EQ - 5D.
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Care Rationing , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Resource Allocation , Trinidad and Tobago , Pilot Projects , Models, StatisticalABSTRACT
Objetivos. Determinar y comparar las razones de costo-utilidad de los trasplantes renales con donante cadavérico (TRDC) practicados en el Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen los años 2000-2001, frente a hemodiálisis (HD), cinco años después del inicio del tratamiento. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio de costo utilidad, estudiando a todos los pacientes continuadores cinco años post TRDC, a quienes se asignó como controles, dos pacientes con cinco años de HD pareados por edad, sexo y tiempo de enfermedad. Se evaluaron los costos de cada procedimiento, los años de vida ajustados a la calidad (AVAC) utilizando el cuestionario SF-36v2TM y se calcularon las razones de costo utilidad (CU) y costo utilidad incremental (CUI). Resultados. Se realizaron 58 TRDC los años 2000-2001. Cinco años después, 17 (29 por ciento) pacientes fallecieron y 27 (47 por ciento) continuaron con su tratamiento post-TRDC. Treinta y uno (53 por ciento) TRDC fracasaron; 26 por ciento por rechazo al trasplante, 55 por ciento por complicación y 19 por ciento por tratamiento irregular. Los puntajes SF-36v2TM promedio obtenidos por los TRDC y HD fueron 95±13 y 87±18 puntos respectivamente. En ambos años, los AVAC obtenidos por los TRDC y HD fueron de 251 y 229 puntos respectivamente; las razones de CU para los TRDC y los HD fueron de USD 11 984 y USD 9243, y la razón de CUI fue de USD 40 669. Conclusiones. Los TRDC realizados los años 2000-2001, cinco años después resultaron menos costo útiles que las HD; y los TRDC realizados el 2000 tuvieron una menor razón de costo utilidad incremental que los efectuados el 2001, probablemente por su mayor razón de tratamientos irregulares.
Objectives. To assess and compare the cost utility of the cadaveric donor renal transplant (CDRT) at the Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen between 2000 to 2001, against haemodialysis (HD), 5 years after treatment initiation. Materials and Methods. A cost utility study design was used, which evaluated every patient continuing treatment after 5 years of having the CDRT done, and 2 controls consisting in patients having received HD for 5 years, matched by age, sex and disease duration. The costs of each procedure and their Quality-adjusted life years (QALY´s) were evaluated using the questionnaire of quality of life SF-36v2TM, finally calculating the cost utility (CU) and incremental cost utility (ICU) ratios. Results. Fifty-eight CDRT were performed between 2000-1. Five years later, 17 (29 percent) patients died and only 27 (47 percent) continued the treatment after CDRT. Out of the 31 patients (53 percent) having treatment failures, 26 percent rejected the transplant, 55 percent presented a complication and 19 percent were irregular. The mean SF-36v2TM scores obtained by the CDRT and HD patients were 95±12 and 87±18 points, respectively. The QALYs obtained by the CDRT and HD groups were 251 and 229 points, respectively; the CU ratios for the CDRT and HD were USD 11,984 and USD 9,243; and the ICU ratio for the period was USD 40,669. Conclusions. CDRTs performed during the years 2000-1 at the HNGAI, were 5 years later surprisingly less cost effective than the HD and CDRT´s performed at year 2000 had a lower incremental cost utility ratio that those performed the 2001, probably because of the highest rate of irregular treatment.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Kidney Failure, Chronic/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Renal Dialysis/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitals , PeruABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study estimated the expected cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the incremental cost per seizure-free day (SFD) gained and the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained when using levetiracetam (LEV) as add-on therapy from a third-party payer perspective. METHODS: A 1-year dose-escalation decision-tree model comparing LEV plus standard therapy (ST) with ST alone was designed to combine transition probabilities, costs and outcomes. The short-term outcomes and probabilities were derived from a prospective, open-label clinical trial with 100 Korean adults with refractory partial epilepsy. All data for the direct medical costs were derived from Korean cost data extracted from reports published by the National Health Insurance Corporation. RESULTS: The average gain in SFDs attributed to LEV add-on was 18.3 days per patient per year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for LEV add-on were US$ 44 per SFD per patient and US$ 11,084 per QALY gained. All sensitivity analyses showed that the model was robust to the assumptions made. CONCLUSION: The economic evaluation indicates that, given a wide range of assumptions, the increased cost of treating patients having refractory partial epilepsy with LEV may be partially offset by a reduction in other direct medical costs. This reduction is a consequence of an increase in the number of SFDs and improved quality of life.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Korea , National Health Programs , Piracetam , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life YearsABSTRACT
Quality of life (QOL) evaluated by patients themselves has become one of the important outcomes in clinical practice as well as clinical trials. Recently clinicians have attempted to gather QOL evaluation data in their clinical practice setting and integrate the findings into the medical decision-making process. To date, several multidimensional generic questionnaires consisting of multiple domains such as functional, physical, mental and social well-being, have been developed and utilized for generic QOL evaluation in clinical trials, especially in the oncology area. To develop a well-constructed and valid QOL questionnaire, its psychometric characteristics such as reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility must be adequately assessed in the research setting.<BR>In clinical trials, QOL data are generally measured in a longitudinal fashion and there are two prominent embarrassing statistical problems : one is the multiplicity due to replication (in time) of statistical tests and the other is the occurrence of missing data due to a variety of reasons. Non-random missing data which occurs because of any reasons related to a patient's present status and/or future prognosis possibly leads to bias and misinterpretation of the results of a trial. To solve the multiplicity problem, the repeated-measures ANOVA-type data analysis or summarization of a repeated measures into an appropriate summary measure can be applied. Missing data can be prevented to some extent by allocating/training coordinators at each participating institute and establishing a communication network between a data center and participating institutes. However, missing data will occur inevitably due to the deterioration of a patient's physical status in the area of life threatening diseases suchas advanced cancer or other diseases with poor prognosis. Although several statistical approaches to cope with missing data even including non-random one have been proposed, there is no single complete analytical solution that can handle the non-random missing problem. The best remedy would be to collect information about reasons why the missing data occurred so that we can identify the missing mechanism and take it into account in a statistical analysis. A so-called “sensitivity analysis” of comparing the results of several analytical methods suchas different imputation techniques or newly proposed ideas would also be a useful approach. The QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) used the idea of weighting life time by utility evaluated by patients themselves and is coined for incorporating a patient's judgment into the treatment selection. Ultimately, an assessment of QOL should be utilized for “individualized” or “tailor-made” treatment and statistical methodology should be developed further for gathering, analyzing and utilizing QOL data.