ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the differences and similarities among the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP) V1.0, the quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) from Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE) of America.@*Methods@#Based on literatures and our measuring data from patients at hospitals, the constructs, characteristics and psychometrics of the systems above were analyzed and compared. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach α coefficient for each domain, and test-retest reliability through calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient r between the first and second assessments as well as intra-class correlation (ICC). Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient r (item-domains correlations) and factor analysis. The criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating corresponding domains of two instruments. Responsiveness was assessed through comparing the mean difference between the pre-treatment and post-treatment with standardized response mean (SRM).@*Results@#The instruments of three systems were of different outstanding characteristics with all psychometrics meeting requirements. Measurements for 12 types of cancers showed that the internal consistency reliability Cronbach α coefficient for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.67-0.92, and for FACT was 0.79-0.98. The test-retest reliability (r or ICC) for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.61-0.99, and for FACT was 0.60-0.98. The SRM for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.25-1.28, and for FACT was 0.11-0.83. However, the QLICP was of better construct (clear hierarchical structure with items→facets→domains→overall) and Chinese culture.@*Conclusion@#The instruments of three systems can be used as the instruments to assess quality of life for patients with cancer with selections basing on different settings.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the differences and similarities among the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP) V1.0,the quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) from Center on Outcomes,Research and Education (CORE) of America.Methods Based on literatures and our measuring data from patients at hospitals,the constructs,characteristics and psychometrics of the systems above were analyzed and compared.Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach α coefficient for each domain,and test-retest reliability through calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient r between the first and second assessments as well as intra-class correlation (ICC).Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient r (item-domains correlations) and factor analysis.The criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating corresponding domains of two instruments.Responsiveness was assessed through comparing the mean difference between the pre-treatment and post-treatment with standardized response mean (SRM).Results The instruments of three systems were of different outstanding characteristics with all psychometrics meeting requirements.Measurements for 12 types of cancers showed that the internal consistency reliability Cronbach α coefficient for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.67-0.92,and for FACT was 0.79-0.98.The test-retest reliability (r or ICC) for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.61-0.99,and for FACT was 0.60-0.98.The SRM for the overall scale of QLICP (V1.0) was 0.25-1.28,and for FACT was 0.11-0.83.However,the QLICP was of better construct (clear hierarchical structure with items→facets→domains→overall) and Chinese culture.Conclusion The instruments of three systems can be used as the instruments to assess quality of life for patients with cancer with selections basing on different settings.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: se encuentra reportado que a pesar de obtenerse buenos resultados de agudeza visual con los lentes multifocales, algunos pacientes no se encuentran a gusto con su visión; son pocos los artículos que describen de manera objetiva la satisfacción de los pacientes después del implante de éste tipo de lentes. Objetivo: describir los resultados de la encuesta NEI-RQL-42 en pacientes que han sido operados mediante facoemulsificación e implante de lente trifocal FineVision en ambos ojos. Diseño del estudio: estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Método: se incluyeron pacientes operados de catarata e implante de lente trifocal FineVision en ambos ojos. Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados con Pentacam prequirúrgico y cumplieron con los criterios descritos por el doctor Maeda. Posteriormente se les aplicó la encuesta NEI-RQL-42 y se realizó una comparación de medias y proporciones, utilizando el programa SPSS, versión 19. Resultados: Los puntajes promedio para cada una de las categorías de la encuesta NEI-RQL-42 son los siguientes: "Claridad de visión": 93,75, "Expectativas": 75, "Visión cercana": 92,81, "Visión lejana": 94,83, "Fluctuaciones diurnas": 81,87, "Limitación de actividades": 95,1, "Glare/deslumbramiento": 68,75, "Síntomas": 73,56, "Dependencia de la corrección": 99,58, "Preocupación": 45, "Corrección subóptima": 100, "Apariencia": 92 y "Satisfacción con la corrección": 93. Conclusión: los 20 pacientes obtuvieron un buen puntaje en la mayoría de las categorías de la encuesta. Tener en cuenta los criterios descritos por el doctor Maeda podrían mejorar los resultados de la cirugía de catarata y facilitar la decisión del tipo de lente a implantar en cada paciente.
Background: it is reported that despite obtaining good visual results with multifocal lenses, some patients are not comfortable with their vision; There are few articles that objectively describe the satisfaction of patients after the implantation of this type of lens. Objective: To describe the results of the NEI-RQL-42 survey in patients who underwent cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and implant of a trifocal lens (FineVision) in both eyes. Study Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. Method: We included patients who underwent cataract surgery and a trifocal lens implant in both eyes (FineVision). All patients were evaluated with Pentacam before the surgery to ensure compliance with the criteria described by Dr. Maeda. Subsequently, the NEI-RQL-42 survey was completed and a comparison of means and proportions was made using the SPSS program version 19. Results: The average score for each category of the NEI-RQL-42 survey were the following: "Clarity of vision": 93.75, "Expectations": 75, "Near vision": 92.81, "Far vision": 94.83, "Diurnal fl uctuations": 81.87, "Activity limitations": 95.1, "Glare": 68.75, "Symptoms": 73.56, "Dependence on correction": 99.58, "Worry": 45, "Suboptimal correction": 100, "Appearance": 92 and "Satisfaction with correction": 93. Conclusion: The 20 patients interviewed obtained good results in most of the categories of the NEI-RQL-42 survey. Following the criteria described by Dr. Maeda could improve the results of cataract surgery and could facilitate the decision about the type of lens to implant in each patient.
Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Cataract Extraction/methodsABSTRACT
Objective To systemically analyze family burden,quality of life of chronic hepatitis B and C patients in Shanghai and related influencing factors.Methods A representative sample of chronic hepatitis patients (n=1 478) and their family members (n=1 478) was randomly selected through a multi-stage cluster sampling from 30 communities in 10 districts of Shanghai.One patient and one family member of each family were interviewed using different questionnaires to collect related information.Based on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems,psychological measurement,two-level random intercept model and multivariable structural equation model were applied to determine the effects and directions of the factors between life quality of chronic hepatitis patients and family burden.Results The mean score of quality of life of chronic hepatitis patients in Shanghai was 78.70 ± 13.25,the score of "specific module" was highest and the score of "social function" was lowest.Additionally,the mean score of burden reported by the family members was 12.62 ± 10.74,the score of"financial burden" was highest,and the score of"effect on family member's health" was lowest.Multivariable structural equation model indicated that eight factors were related with life quality and family burden of patients with chronic hepatitis.Among them,HCV infection,elevated serum alanine aminotransferase level,average monthly cost for patient ＞3 000 yuan (RMB) and poor health of family members were the direct risk factors for the life quality of the patients as well as family burden.The factor of drinking more than once a week influenced the patients' life quality directly and family burden indirectly.On the contrary,the factors of local household registration,hospitalization and family member's indifferent attitude to hepatitis B vaccination influenced the family burden of the chronic hepatitis patients directly and the life quality of the patients indirectly.Conclusion The findings could be used in the development of community based management and intervention of chronic hepatitis patients in Shanghai.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systemically analyze family burden,quality of life of chronic hepatitis B and C patients in Shanghai and related influencing factors.Methods A representative sample of chronic hepatitis patients (n=1 478) and their family members (n=1 478) was randomly selected through a multi-stage cluster sampling from 30 communities in 10 districts of Shanghai.One patient and one family member of each family were interviewed using different questionnaires to collect related information.Based on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems,psychological measurement,two-level random intercept model and multivariable structural equation model were applied to determine the effects and directions of the factors between life quality of chronic hepatitis patients and family burden.Results The mean score of quality of life of chronic hepatitis patients in Shanghai was 78.70 ± 13.25,the score of "specific module" was highest and the score of "social function" was lowest.Additionally,the mean score of burden reported by the family members was 12.62 ± 10.74,the score of"financial burden" was highest,and the score of"effect on family member's health" was lowest.Multivariable structural equation model indicated that eight factors were related with life quality and family burden of patients with chronic hepatitis.Among them,HCV infection,elevated serum alanine aminotransferase level,average monthly cost for patient ＞3 000 yuan (RMB) and poor health of family members were the direct risk factors for the life quality of the patients as well as family burden.The factor of drinking more than once a week influenced the patients' life quality directly and family burden indirectly.On the contrary,the factors of local household registration,hospitalization and family member's indifferent attitude to hepatitis B vaccination influenced the family burden of the chronic hepatitis patients directly and the life quality of the patients indirectly.Conclusion The findings could be used in the development of community based management and intervention of chronic hepatitis patients in Shanghai.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This paper aims to present a comprehensive literature review of Quality of Life (QOL) in patients who are suffering from serious medical illness as evidenced by receiving treatment in the intensive care setting. By examining the instruments used to measure QOL, as well as the factors that influence it, this review will explore the relevance of QOL to patient care and management. Data Sources: From Medline and other online resources, over 467 articles were identified, of which 73 articles were selected for inclusion in this review by three independent reviewers. The reviewers reached a consensus using pre-defined selection criteria. Study Selection Criteria: Articles had to: 1) be written in English or have an available published English translation, 2) be published in a peer-reviewed journal, 3) study adult humans, 4) focus on serious medical illnesses, such as sepsis and MI (myocardial infarction), rather than focusing exclusively on terminal illnesses (any study design was accepted), and 5) use at least one QOL measure. Data Extraction: The study selection process yielded 73 articles. Research methodology and key findings were derived from the full text and tables of the selected studies. Data Synthesis: QOL is very poor in gravely ill medical patients and continues to decline with further deterioration of medical status. A model that incorporates QOL and the severity of the medical illness, in addition to the patient’s wishes, might have the potential to improve overall QOL for patients and their families and guide end-of-life decisions. Conclusions: A formal assessment of the patient's QOL and final wishes could assist the patient, their loved ones, and the treating physician in making critical decisions about how to improve QOL through comfort/palliative care.
ABSTRACT
Resumen El propósito de este estudio es presentar una aproximación sobre el constructo calidad de vida relacionada con la salud infantil. Para esto se menciona el desarrollo histórico del concepto de calidad de vida hasta llegar al constructo CvRs en niños y adolescentes, retomando los instrumentos de medida que han sido adaptados y validados para evaluar la CVRSI en idioma español en muestras poblacionales de niños con alguna patología y los dominios que lo conforman, enfatizándose un modelo conceptual que describe las dimensiones y factores asociados con la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en las etapas de la niñez a la adolescencia para luego describir las temáticas que recientemente se han estudiado en el área. Por último, se plantea la necesidad del desarrollo de más investigaciones, especialmente en América Latina abordados desde las ciencias sociales, ya que la investigación ha estado focalizada en el ámbito de la medicina pediátrica con énfasis en las manifestaciones físicas.
Abstract The following is a review of evidence-based literature on the construct health-related quality of life infantile. There is described the historical and conceptual development of this term up to coming to the first studies in the infancy. It mentions the development of measuring instruments that have been adapted and validated to assess the health-related quality of life infantile in Spanish language so much generic as specifics and the domains that shape them. There is defined a conceptual model who describes the dimensions and factors associated with health-related quality of life in the stages of the childhood and the adolescence. And there are described the subject matters that recently have been studied in the field. Finally, there is a need of researches development, especially in Latin America approached from the social sciences, since the research has been focused in the field of the pediatric medicine, with emphasis on the physical manifestations.