Application-of-the-proposed-sydney-system-in-reporting-of-the-lymph-node-cytopathology—a-retrospective-study

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted first line of investigation to diagnose the cause of lymphadenopathy. A standardized categorization and reporting system for lymph node cytology was proposed in 20th International Congress of Cytology at Sydney which consisted of 5 categories (L1, L2, L3, L4, L5) with management recommendations for each. Aims and Objective: To review the application of the Sydney system in achieving a uniform standardized approach for classifying and reporting lymph node cytology and to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. : A 2 year single institute retrospective study. Clinical details were collectedMaterials and Methods from the patient records and cytology smears were reviewed by 2 cyto-pathologists as per the Sydney system. Histological correlation was done wherever possible. Statistical analysis was performed. 437 cases were re-Results: evaluated, with mean age of 39.66 years, slight male preponderance and cervical lymph node being the most common site. L2/Benign was the most common category with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia being the most common diagnosis and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma was the most common L5/malignant diagnosis. Histopathological correlation was available for 40 (9.1%) cases and the highest calculated risk of malignancy (ROM) was for L4 and L5 categories (100% each). The diagnostic accuracy of the proposed Sydney system in our study was 96.66%. TheConclusion: proposed Sydney system improves the diagnostic accuracy and standardizes the reporting of lymph node cyto- pathology. It improves the patient care by giving management recommendation to the clinicians.

Evaluation of Efficacy of IAC Yokahama Reporting System For Breast Cytology – A Single Institutional Experience.

Purpose: Breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has a long history of providing accurate, rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of palpable breast lesions. Recently, International Academy of Cytology (IAC) at Yokohama proposed a new reporting system for breast cytology, in order to bring uniformity across the globe. Any new classification system needs to be validated for its practical applicability. Objectives: This study was conducted to categorize the breast lesions as per this classification and further determine the diagnostic efficacy and risk of malignancy in each category. Material and methods: This was a cross sectional observational analytical study. All the cases presenting to cytology OPD from Janurary 2020 upto December 2022, (N=296) with breast lesions for FNAC were included in the study. All the cases were divided into five categories as per the newly proposed IAC Yokohama reporting system. The risk of malignancy for each category was determined and diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.Results:The sample were distributed as follows: insufficient material 4.39%, benign 66.21%, atypical 10.47%, suspicious for malignancy 1.35% and malignancy 17.56%. Histopathology was obtained in 88 cases, out of which 82 (93.18%) showed concordant diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity were 85.71% and 98.11% respectively. Risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category was as follows-benign (0.01%), atypia (71.4%), suspicious (100%) and malignancy (96.66%) respectively.Conclusion:The high efficacy of FNAC obtained in the present study, when IAC Yokohama reporting system was applied, confirms the usefulness of this scheme in reporting breast lesions. A risk-based stratification is essential in the present era to guide and alert the clinician about the subsequent management plan and the ROM.

Risk of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules with diameters greater than 4 centimeters

ABSTRACT Objective: The risk of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules (TN) with diameters ≥ 3-4 cm remains controversial. However, some groups have indicated surgical treatment in these patients regardless of the FNAB results. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the FNAB in systematically resected ≥4 cm TN and if the risk of malignancy is higher in these patients. Subjects and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 138 patients (142 nodules) with TN with diameters ≥4 cm who underwent thyroidectomy. Results: The FNAB results were nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory (ND/UNS) in 2.1% of the cases and benign in 51.4%. They indicated atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) in 23.9% of cases, follicular neoplasia/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) in 9.2%, suspicion of malignancy (SUS) in 8.5%, and malignant in 4.9%. The histopathological analysis after thyroidectomy revealed a thyroid cancer rate of 100% in the FNABs classified as malignant, 33.3% in SUS cases, 7.7% in FN/SFN, 17.6% in AUS/FLUS, and 4.1% in benign FNABs. None of the ND/UNS FNABs were malignant. The global malignancy diagnosis was 14.8% (n = 21). However, the rate of false negatives for FNAB was low (4.1%). Conclusion: We showed that the risk of malignancy in nodules with diameters ≥4 cm was higher compared to the risk of thyroid cancer in TN in general. However, we found a low rate of false-negative cytological results; therefore, our data do not justify the orientation of routine resection for these larger nodules.

Rendimiento del sistema Bethesda en el diagnóstico citopatológico del nódulo tiroideo en un centro universitario (Hospital de Clínicas) de Uruguay, diez años de experiencia / Performance of the Bethesda SYSTEM in the cytopathological diagnosis of the thyroid nodule in a university center (Hospital de Clínicas) in Uruguay, ten years of experience / Desempenho do sistema Bethesda no diagnóstico citopatológico de nódulos tireoidianos em um centro universitário (Hospital de Clínicas) no Uruguai, dez anos de experiencia

Resumen: Introducción: el estudio citológico por punción ecoguiada se caracteriza por ser rápido, confiable, mínimamente invasivo y rentable. Permite reducir procedimientos quirúrgicos innecesarios y clasifica apropiadamente a los pacientes con nódulos sospechosos o malignos para una intervención quirúrgica oportuna. Objetivo: el objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la correlación citológica-anatomopatológica del sistema Bethesda en un centro universitario (Hospital de Clínicas) de Uruguay. Metodología: se realizó un estudio de tipo observacional, retrospectivo, descriptivo, basado el análisis de historias clínicas de pacientes sometidos a cirugía tiroidea en el Hospital de Clínicas, en el período comprendido entre enero de 2008 y diciembre de 2018. Resultados: del total inicial de 119 pacientes, 93 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. El rango de edad de la muestra fue entre 15 y 79 años. Del total de puncionados 49,5% (46) fueron informados como benignos y 50,5% (47) como malignos. Se calculó en forma global una sensibilidad de 96% (0,96) con IC 1,0-0,90, especificidad de 98% (0,97) con IC 1,0-0,93, un VPP de 98% y VPN de 96%. La sensibilidad diagnóstica para la categoría IV, V y VI fue de 96%, con una especificidad de 100, 94 y 100% respectivamente. Conclusiones: el sistema Bethesda aplicado a las PAAF de nódulos tiroideos potencia la certeza diagnóstica y asiste en la decisión terapéutica. En nuestra institución contamos con una buena correlación citopatológica, similar a otros trabajos reportados en la literatura, lo que permite predecir adecuadamente el riesgo de malignidad y facilitar la toma de decisiones.

Summary: Introduction: the ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) study is characterized by being fast, reliable, minimally invasive, and cost-effective. It reduces unnecessary surgical procedures and appropriately classifies patients with suspicious or malignant nodules for timely surgical intervention. Objective: the objective of this study is to evaluate the cytological-pathological correlation of the Bethesda System in a university center (Hospital de Clínicas) in Uruguay. Methodology: an observational, retrospective, descriptive study was carried out, based on the analysis of medical records of patients undergoing thyroid surgery at the Hospital de Clínicas, in the period between January 2008 and December 2018. Results: of the initial total of 119 patients, 93 met the inclusion criteria. The age range of the sample was between 15 and 79 years. Of the total of punctured, 49.5% (46) were reported as benign and 50.5% (47) as malignant. A sensitivity of 96% (0.96) with CI 1.0-0.90, specificity of 98% (0.97) with CI 1.0-0.93, a PPV of 98% and NPV of 96%. The diagnostic sensitivity for categories IV, V and VI was 96% with a specificity of 100, 94 and 100% respectively. Conclusions: the Bethesda system applied to FNA of thyroid nodules enhances diagnostic certainty and assists in the therapeutic decision. In our institution we have a good cytopathological correlation, similar to other works reported in the literature. This makes it possible to adequately predict the risk of malignancy and facilitate decision-making.

Resumo: Introdução: o estudo citológico por punção guiada por ultrassom caracteriza-se por ser rápido, confiável, minimamente invasivo e de baixo custo. Permite reduzir procedimentos cirúrgicos desnecessários e classificar adequadamente pacientes com nódulos suspeitos ou malignos para intervenção cirúrgica oportuna. Objetivo: avaliar a correlação citológico-patológica do Sistema Bethesda em um centro universitário (Hospital de Clínicas) no Uruguai. Metodologia: foi realizado um estudo observacional, retrospectivo, descritivo, baseado na análise de prontuários de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de tireoide no Hospital de Clínicas, no período janeiro de 2008-dezembro de 2018. Resultados: do total inicial de 119 pacientes, 93 preencheram os critérios de inclusão. A faixa etária da amostra foi entre 15 e 79 anos. Do total de punções, 49,5% (46) foram relatadas como benignas e 50,5% (47) como malignas. No geral, uma sensibilidade de 96% (0,96) com IC 1,0-0,90, uma especificidade de 98% (0,97) com IC 1,0-0,93, um VPP de 98% e VPN de 96%. A sensibilidade diagnóstica para as categorias IV, V e VI foi de 96% com especificidade de 100, 94 e 100%, respectivamente. Conclusões: o sistema Bethesda aplicado à PAAF de nódulos tireoidianos aumenta a certeza diagnóstica e auxilia na decisão terapêutica. Em nossa instituição temos uma boa correlação citopatológica, semelhante a outros trabalhos relatados na literatura. Isso permite prever adequadamente o risco de malignidade e facilitar a tomada de decisão.

Assessing the diagnostic performance of four ovarian malignancy prediction risk models in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian masses in a tertiary hospital / Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Introduction@#Ovarian cancer is considered the most lethal gynecologic malignancy because it is difficult to diagnose in its early stages. Ovarian malignancy prediction models may be useful in discriminating between benign and malignant masses, allowing for accurate and timely referral as well as proper therapeutic care@*Objective@#To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the four ovarian prediction models: Risk of Malignancy Index‑4 (RMI‑4), Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Copenhagen Index (CPH‑I), and International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA)‑Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the AdneXa (ADNEX) in identifying malignant and benign ovarian masses@*Materials and Methods@#This was a retrospective, cross‑sectional, analytical diagnostic study in a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curves (AUCs), sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were used to assess the diagnostic performance of the prediction models.@*Results@#We analyzed a total of 248 patients. One hundred and sixty‑one (65%) had benign tumors, 28 (11%) had borderline, and 59 (24%) had malignant tumors. The AUCs of all models were all above 90%, but when compared to the other models, CPH‑I had the best estimate. RMI‑4 had the highest sensitivity (98.3%) in diagnosing malignancy. For appropriately diagnosing benign disease, the IOTA‑ADNEX model exhibited the highest specificity (92.1%). Overall, RMI‑4 had the lowest diagnostic accuracy (74.6%), whereas IOTA‑ADNEX had the greatest (93.2%).@*Conclusion@#The four malignancy prediction models in this study were all useful tools in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. IOTA‑ADNEX, CPH‑I, and ROMA all demonstrated overlapping diagnostic performances indicating that they are equal in that regard. In terms of sensitivity in predicting malignancy, RMI‑4 was the most sensitive. CPH‑I is the predictor with the best overall estimate. Lastly, IOTA‑ADNEX was the most specific, and displayed highest diagnostic accuracy among the four

Role of risk of malignancy index 4 in evaluation of adnexal masses

Background: The discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses is important for clinical management and surgical planning in such patients. Various combined methods of evaluation adnexal mass have also been proposed. Risk of malignancy index (RMI) is a combined parameter which is simple, preclinical and highly sensitive, and more specific. Risk of malignancy index 4 (RMI 4) is calculated as a product of ultrasound score (U)×menopausal score (M)×CA 125×tumor size. Objective of this study was to determine if the RMI (RMI 4) can distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 30 women with an adnexal mass presenting in the OPD and emergency and RMI-4 calculated. Cut off level of 450 was set to differentiate between benign and malignant mass.Results: In this study, the value of RMI-4 is less than 450 in 17 patients with benign disease and 3 patients with malignant disease. The value is more than 450 in 2 patients with benign disease and 8 patients with malignant disease. RMI-4 >450 had a sensitivity of 72.73% and specificity is 89.47%. The positive predictive value is 80% and negative predictive value is 85%. The p-value for RMI-4 in this study is 0.001 which is highly significant.Conclusions: RMI is a reliable, simple, easy to use and cost-effective method in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.

Role of risk of malignancy index for evaluation and preoperative detection of pelvic malignancies compared with pathological diagnosis

Background: Risk of malignancy index (RMI) is widely employed in the developed world in predicting malignant pelvic masses. The present study designed to confirm the effectiveness of the RMI to identify cases with high potential of ovarian malignancy, among patients with an adnexal mass.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of two years in a government run tertiary healthcare centre of Srinagar, Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Study included 72 patients who underwent surgery due to adnexal mass and were evaluated for ovarian malignancy by comparing RMI with histopathological diagnosis. Data collected included demographic characteristics, ultrasound findings, menopausal status, CA125 levels, and histopathological diagnosis. For each patient, RMI was calculated as per the standard formula.Results: Analysis revealed ultrasound score had the highest sensitivity of 72.7%, while an RMI score ≥250 had the highest specificity of 88.5%. The latter also had the highest positive predictive value of 50%, while negative predictive value was highest for an ultrasound score of 3 (94%). The cut off points based on ROC analysis demonstrates significant predictive ability for ovarian cancer for both RMI and CA125 with AUC to the tune of 82.9% and 80.1% respectively.Conclusions: RMI is a simple score system which can be applied directly into clinical practice and might be of value in pre-operative assessment, and hence selecting patients who need surgical team including gynecologic oncologists.

Evaluation of risk of malignancy index in adnexal masses at a tertiary hospital: a prospective study

Background: The discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses is important in deciding clinical management and optimal surgical planning. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of risk of malignancy index (RMI) to identify cases with high potential of ovarian malignancy at a tertiary hospital.Methods: This prospective study was conducted over a period of two years from September 2017 to August 2019 at obstetrics and gynecology department of M. K. C. G. Medical College and Hospital, Berhampur. A total case of 130 patients with adnexal masses who underwent surgical treatment were included as histopathological report was taken as gold standard to calculate accuracy of RMI.Results: Of the total masses, 85 (65.4%) were benign and 45 (34.6%) were malignant. The mean age of patients was 41.03±14 years. The best cut off value for the RMI-3 was 225 with highest area under the ROC curve 87%, sensitivity of 75.55%, specificity of 98.82%, PPV of 97.14%, NPV of 88.42% and an accuracy of 90.76%.Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that RMI was a reliable method in detecting malignant ovarian tumors. The RMI is a simple and practically applicable tool in preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in non-specialized gynecologic departments, particularly in developing countries.

Study of validity of risk of malignancy index in perimenopausal women with ovarian mass in a tertiary care hospital in India

Background: Ovarian carcinoma is a silent killer because it presents in advanced stage. In India, it ranks third after carcinoma cervix and breast. Incidence of ovarian cancer is 5.4-8.0 per 100,000 in India. Various versions of risk of malignancy index have been studied to show its validity in different settings. We have studied third version of risk of malignancy index in a resource poor setting in India.Methods: In this prospective observational study 74 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with ovarian mass were recruited. Menopausal score (M), Ultrasonography score (U) and CA-125 are components of Risk of Malignancy Index 3. Patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography and CA-125 level was assessed. Scores of M 1-3, U 1-3 and absolute value of CA-125 was multiplied. This product was value of Risk of Malignancy Index 3. If it is less than 250 it suggests absence of malignancy and more than 250 strongly suggests malignancy. Results were confirmed by histopathology.Results: Fifty six percent women were cancer positive. Ovarian malignancy was more common in postmenopausal age group. Ultrasonography and CA-125 had high sensitivity of 90% but poor specificity. Risk of malignancy index 3 had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 90%, 91%, 78% and 96% respectively at a cut off value of 250.Conclusions: Risk of malignancy index was concluded to be a multimodal approach with better diagnostic scoring index in preoperative stage in women of ovarian masses. It is simple and easily applicable clinical tool in resource poor setting.

Risk of malignancy in Thyroid “Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance” and its subcategories – A 5-year experience

Context: Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS] is a heterogeneous category with a wide range of risk of malignancy [ROM] reported in the literature. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [TBSRTC], 2017 has recommended subcategorization of AUS/FLUS. Aims: To evaluate the ROM in thyroid nodules categorized as AUS/FLUS, as well as separate ROM for each of the five subcategories. Settings and Design: Retrospective analytic study. Methods and Materials: A retrospective audit was conducted for all thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from January 2013 to December 2017. Slides for cases with follow-up histopathology were reviewed, classified into the five recommended subcategories, and differential ROM was calculated. Statistical Analysis Used: z test for comparison of proportions was done to evaluate the difference in ROM among different subcategories of AUS/FLUS. The P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Total number of thyroid FNACs reported was 1,630, of which 122 were AUS/FLUS (7.5%). Histopathology was available in 49 cases, out of which 18 were malignant (ROM = 36.7%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) for nodules with architectural and cytologic atypia was higher (43.8%) than ROM for nodules with only architectural atypia (16.7%). Conclusions: The sub-classification of AUS/FLUS into subcategories as recommended by TBSRTC, 2017 may better stratify the malignancy risk and guide future management guidelines.

Comparison of efficiency between RMI1 and RMI2 in diagnosing ovarian malignancy

Background: This study was conducted in department of obstetrics and gynaecology, to know the efficiency of risk of malignancy index (RMI) to differentiate a malignant from a benign tumor and to compare the efficiency of risk of malignancy index 1 and 2 (RMI1 and RMI2). The study was conducted from June 2012 to August 2013 in women who got admitted with adnexal tumor.Methods: It was a prospective study. A proforma was designed for each patient which included, name, age, complaints, menopausal status, parity, past and family history and associated medical condition were asked. Indivisual parameters namely ultrasound score, CA125 and menopausal status and risk of malignancy index was calculated and compared with final histopathological diagnosis and sensitivity specificity and positive predictive value was calculated for each.Results: : The sensitivity of RMI1 is 87.95%, specificity is 75%, positive predictive value is 94.8%, negative predictive value is 54.54%, percentage of false negative is 12.04% and percentage of false positive is 25%. The sensitivity of RMI2 is 86.74%, specificity is 81.25%, positive predictive value is 96%, negative predictive value is 54.16%, percentage of false negative is 13.25% and percentage of false positive is 18.75%.Conclusions: The efficiency of RMI was definitely better than indivisual parameters and efficiency of RMI 1 and RMI2 are similar.

Diagnostic accuracy of the risk of malignancy index 1 compared to the more recent IOTA ADNEX model in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses: a multi-centric study

Background: Identification of the nature of an adnexal mass can ensure optimum management. Single parameters as well as diagnostic models using a combination of several parameters are in use. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) consortium has developed and published the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model, which differentiates between benign and malignant masses. Authors conducted this study with the aim of finding a cut off value for this model in the study population and comparing the diagnostic accuracy of this model to that of the risk of malignancy (RMI).Methods: Women with adnexal masses admitted to the 3 medical college affiliated hospitals for surgical management were included in this study. Appropriate investigations were done to calculate the RMI-I and ADNEX score for each participant. A cut off score for the ADNEX model was determined and diagnostic accuracy tests were done for comparison.Results: At a cut-off of 29 for the ADNEX model and 200 for RMI model the sensitivity was 75% and 77.8, specificity 100% and 80.6%; Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 100%and 60%; Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 91% and 90.6%; Positive Likelihood ratio of infinity and 4 and a negative Likelihood Ratio of 2.8 and 2.5 respectively.Conclusions: The ADNEX model rates higher than the RMI in almost all tests of diagnostic accuracy and can be used for triaging, framing a referral policy and prioritizing surgery.

Malignant risk index in evaluation of menopausal ovarian cystic and cystic-solid tumors / 中华全科医师杂志

Clinical data of 349 patients with postmenopausal ovarian cystic and cystic solid tumors undergoing surgical treatment in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from May 2013 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Postoperative pathology confirmed 100 cases of malignant tumor,228 cases of benign tumor,and 21 cases of borderline tumor.The malignant risk index (RMI) score was calculated based on the preoperative pelvic ultrasound and serum CA125 level,and the score＜200 was classified as benign tumors and ≥200 as malignant tumors.The postoperative pathological results were used as gold standard,the sensitivity,specificity,accurate rate of RMI in diagnosis of malignant tumors was 0.840(84/100),0.987 (225/228) and 94.2％ (309/328),respectively.The consistency of RMI with pathological diagnosis was high (Kappa=0.858,P＜0.05).The study suggests that RMI has a high degree of credibility for the evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian cystic and cystic solid tumors.

Comparison of ADNEX model, simple rules risk model and risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors / 中国医学影像技术

Objective To compare the value of ADNEX model, simple rules risk model and the risk of malignancy index (RMI) in diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Methods The preoperative ultrasonic images of 286 patients with ovarian tumors were retrospectively analyzed. ADNEX model, simple rules risk model and RMI were used to differentiate benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Taken histopathological results after surgery as golden standards, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared among 3 methods. ROC curve was used to obtain the area under the curves. Results Among 286 ovarian tumors, 142 were benign and 144 were malignant. The sensitivity of ADNEX model, simple rules risk model and RMI was 83.33% (120/144), 80.56% (116/144) and 65.97% (95/144), respectively, while the specificity was 89.44% (127/142), 92.96% (132/142) and 90.14% (128/142), respectively. There was no statistical difference of sensitivity nor specificity between ADNEX model and simple rules risk model (χ2=0.352, 1.784, P=0.554, 0.182). The sensitivity of ADNEX model and simple rules risk model was higher than that of RMI (χ2=16.691, 7.533, respectively, both P<0.001), while there was no statistical difference of specificity (χ2=0, 0.561, P=1, 0.454). The AUC of ADNEX model, simple rules risk model and RMI was 0.864, 0.868 and 0.788, respectively (all P<0.001). Conclusion ADNEX model and simple rules risk model are better than RMI in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

Cytologic Diagnosis of Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-like Nuclear Features and Its Impact on the Risk of Malignancy in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to analyze cytologic diagnosis of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and its impact on the risk of malignancy (ROM) in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). METHODS: Five thousand five hundred and forty-nine cases of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnosed between 2012 and 2014 were included in this study. Diagnostic categories based on TBSRTC were compared with final surgical diagnoses, and the ROM in each category was calculated both when NIFTP was included in malignant lesions and when excluded from malignant lesions. RESULTS: Of the 5,549 thyroid FNAC cases, 1,891 cases underwent surgical resection. In final diagnosis, 1,700 cases were revealed as papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and 25 cases were reclassified as NIFTP. The cytologic diagnoses of NIFTP were non-diagnostic in one, benign in five, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in 14, follicular neoplasm in two, and suspicious for malignancy in three cases. Collectively, NIFTP/encapsulated follicular variant of PTC (EFVPTC) were more frequently classified as benign, AUS, or follicular neoplasm and less frequently categorized as malignant compared to conventional PTCs. Exclusion of NIFTP from malignant diagnoses resulted in a slight decrease in malignancy rates in non-diagnostic, benign, AUS, follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy categories without any statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in the ROM was not significant when NIFTP was excluded from malignant lesions. In thyroid FNACs, NIFTP/EFVPTCs were mostly classified into indeterminate categories. Therefore, it might be feasible to separate NIFTP/EFVPTC from conventional PTC on FNAC to guide clinicians to conservative management for patients with NIFTP/EFVPTC.

Thyroid Cytology: The Japanese System and Experience at Yamashita Thyroid Hospital

In Japan, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the most important diagnostic modality for triaging patients with thyroid nodules. A clinician (endocrinologist, endocrine surgeon, or head and neck surgeon) generally performs FNA cytology at the outpatient clinic, and ultrasound (US)-guided FNA is widespread because US is extremely common and most clinicians are familiar with it. Although almost all FNA thyroid samples are examined by certified cytopathologists and pathologists, some clinicians assess cytological specimens themselves. In Japan, there are two clinical guidelines regarding the management of thyroid nodules. One is the General Rules for the Description of Thyroid Cancer (GRDTC) published by the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery (JSTS) in 2005, and the other is the national reporting system for thyroid FNA cytology published by the Japan Thyroid Association in 2013 (Japanese system). Although the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (Bethesda system) is rarely used in Japan, both the GRDTC and Japanese system tried to incorporate the Bethesda system so that the cytological diagnoses would be compatible with each other. The essential point of the Japanese system is stratification of follicular neoplasm (FN) into three subgroups based on cytological features in order to reduce unnecessary diagnostic thyroidectomy, and this system has been successful in stratifying the risk of malignancy in FN patients at several high-volume thyroid surgery centers. In Japan, the measurement of thyroglobulin and/or calcitonin in FNA needle washings is often used as an adjunct for diagnosis of possible cervical lymph node metastasis when FNA cytology is performed.

Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Pelvic Masses Using the Risk of Malignancy Index 1 / 대한폐경학회지

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of risk of malignancy index (RMI) 1 to discriminate between benign and malignant pelvic masses. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2010, 547 women with pelvic masses were evaluated. Their medical records are reviewed here retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the cancer antigen (CA) 125 level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the prediction of malignant pelvic masses were calculated and compared individually or combined using the RMI 1. RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of CA 125, the ultrasound score and the RMI 1 were all found to be relevant predictors of malignancy. ROC analysis of the RMI 1, CA 125 serum levels, ultrasound score and menopausal status showed areas under the curves of 0.795, 0.782, 0.784 and 0.594, respectively. The RMI 1 was found to be statistically significantly correlated with menopausal status (P = 0.001), while not statistically significantly correlated with CA 125 (P = 0.628) or the ultrasound score (P = 0.541). The RMI 1 at a cut-off of 150 - with a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity of 81.1%, positive predictive value of 51.7% and negative predictive value of 93.4% - showed the highest performance in determining the malignant tendency of pelvic masses. CONCLUSION: Accepting a RMI 1 cut-off value of 150 results in statistically more significant diagnostic criteria than menopausal status for the discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.

Comparison of four malignancy risk indices in the detection of malignant ovarian masses / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of four risk of malignancy indices (RMI) to detect malignant ovarian tumors. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 100 women admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Gulhane Military Medicine Academy for surgical exploration of pelvic masses. To diagnose malignant ovarian tumors, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of four RMIs (RMI 1, RMI 2, RMI 3, and RMI 4) were obtained. RESULTS: In our study we found that there is no statistically significant difference in the performance of four different RMIs in discriminating malignancy. We think that malignancy risk indices is more reliable than the menopausal status, serum CA-125 levels, ultrasound features and tumor size separately in detecting malignancy. CONCLUSION: We concluded that any of the four malignancy risk indices described can be used for selection of cases for optimal therapy. These methods are simple techniques that can be used even in less-specialized gynecology clinics to facilitate the selection of cases for referral to an oncological unit.

Comparison of the Usefulness of four Risk-of-Malignancy Indices using Ultrasonography in Ovarian masses

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of four Risk-of-Malignancy Indices (RMI) in women with ovarian masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2008, 344 women who visited our hospital for surgical exploration due to an ovarian mass were enrolled in this study. Each RMI was based on the combination of menopausal status, ultrasound findings of ovarian masses, and absolute level of serum CA-125. A cutoff level of 200 was chosen as the threshold for determining between malignant and benign ovarian masses in RMI 1, RMI 2, and RMI 3. A cutoff level of 450 was chosen as the threshold in RMI 4. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. RESULTS: The combination of four malignancy indices is more accurate than menopausal status, ultrasound findings, and serum CA-125 alone, respectively for determining whether a mass is benign or malignant. RMI 1 and RMI 4 were found to be better than RMI 2 and RMI 3. RMI 4 was the most reliable test among them. The relationship between RMI 1 and RMI 4 was not statistically significant. With the cutoff level for RMI 4 at 450, the corresponding, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 72.1%, 88.0%, 56.4%, 93.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: All four RMI were reliable tests for determining whether ovarian masses are malignant or benign, and RMI 4 was the most reliable index among them.

Diagnostic Efficacy of the Risk of Malignancy Index in Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer / 대한산부인과학회지

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a risk of malignancy index (RMI) for early detection of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses. METHODS: The preoperative RMI was obtained from 497 women who have visited our hospital between September 1994 and December 2004. The RMI is based on menopausal status, ultrasonographic findings, and serum CA-125 level. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each variable and the RMI were evaluated to distinguish between malignant and benign pelvic masses. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of RMI was 42.85% and 88.57%. PPV and NPV was 40.74% and 92.11% for the total material. The RMI is more accurate statistically than the menopausal status, serum CA-125 levels separately in diagnosing malignancy, but the ultrasound features is more accurate than RMI in diagnosing malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggests that RMI is not good as a primary screening tool for early detection of ovarian cancer because of its low sensitivity and low NPV than ultrasound. So further study is needed to support the diagnostic efficacy of RMI.