ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the clinical value of single-hole laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure operation using a Kirschner wire assisted double-hook water-injection hernia needle in treating complicated pediatric oblique inguinal hernia.Methods:The clinical data of 366 children with oblique inguinal hernia treated in the Department of Urology Surgery, Children′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2020 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical methods, the children were divided into the ordinary crochet needle group and the Kirschner wire assisted group.Children treated by a single-port laparoscopic double hook water-injection hernia crochet needle (309 cases) were classified into the ordinary crochet needle group.Children treated by a single-port laparoscopic Kirschner wire assisted double hook water-injection hernia crochet needle (57 cases) were included in the Kirschner wire assisted group.The independent sample t-test and rank sum test was used to compare the relevant clinical indicators between the two groups. Results:Compared with the ordinary crochet needle group, children in the Kirschner wire assisted group were younger at surgery[(2.87±1.88) years vs.(4.91±2.39) years] and had larger hernia sacs [17 303.89(8 622.49, 37 295.42) mm 3vs.9 650.97(3 849.24, 17 539.51) mm 3]. The differences in the age at surgery and hernia sac volume were statistically significant ( t=-5.407, Z=-4.218; all P<0.001). There was no significant difference in body mass index between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Taking hernias with sac volume >10 000 mm 3 as huge hernias, there were 70.18%(40/57 cases) and 47.25%(146/309 cases) of huge hernias in the Kirschner wire assisted group and the ordinary crochet needle group, respectively.The overall operation time of the Kirschner wire assisted group was significantly longer than that of the ordinary crochet needle group[(20(15, 20) min vs.15(15, 20) min] ( Z=-2.842, P<0.05). However, the operation time for huge oblique hernias with sac volume >10 000 mm 3 was not statistically significant between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). No recurrence in both groups was found during 6-16 months of follow-up. Conclusions:For complicated oblique inguinal hernia in children with a huge hernia or obvious retroperitoneal folds at the internal ring and heavy scar adhesion between the hernia sac and abdominal wall, the insertion of a Kirschner wire can help the hernia crochet needle to traverse the vas de-ferens and spermatic cord vessels smoothly.As a single port laparoscopic operation, the Kirschner wire assisted hernia crochet needle requires no addition of trocar holes and leaves only a small surgical scar.With good feasibility and safety, it is applicable for clinical popularization.
ABSTRACT
The use and application of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been regarded as a first-choice treatment option for benign gallbladder disease, even if patients have situs inversus totalis. Furthermore, surgical procedures in general are becoming less invasive, because of both patient and surgeon preferences for reduced trauma and improved cosmetic outcomes attributable to minimized incisions. A 37 years old man was aware of situs inversus totalis with chronic cholecystitis. The operation was successfully performed without any specific complications. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in an experienced operator, is possible even in patients with situs inversus totalis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Gallbladder Diseases , Situs InversusABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone either non-solo-SPLA (n = 150) or solo-SPLA (n = 150). Several devices were utilized for complete, skin-to-skin solo-SPSA, including a Lone Star Retractor System and an adjustable mechanical camera holder. RESULTS: Operating times were not significantly different between solo- and non-solo-SPLA (45.0 +/- 21.0 minutes vs. 46.7 +/- 26.1 minutes, P = 0.646). Most postoperative variables were also comparable between groups, including the necessity for intravenous analgesics (0.7 +/- 1.2 ampules [solo-SPLA] vs. 0.9 +/- 1.5 ampules [non-solo-SPLA], P = 0.092), time interval to gas passing (1.3 +/- 1.0 days vs. 1.4 +/- 1.0 days, P = 0.182), and the incidence of postoperative complications (4.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.153). Moreover, solo-SPLA effectively lowered the operating cost by reducing surgical personnel expenses. CONCLUSION: Solo-SPLA economized staff numbers and thus lowered hospital costs without lengthening of operating time. Therefore, solo-SPLA could be considered a safe and feasible alternative to non-solo-SPLA.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesics , Appendectomy , Hospital Costs , Incidence , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To study conventional laparoscopic instruments line single hole peritoneoscope gallbladder excision and three hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery efficacy and safety.Methods 140 cases patients with gallbladder stones in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were selected as the research subjects.All patients need to be treated with cholecystectomy.All the patients according to the random number table were randomly divided into two groups,respectively for single hole group and three group.Single hole group using a single hole peritoneoscope gallbladder excision,triplex group use three hole laparoscopic gallbladder resection.The surgical effect,hospitalization costs and complications were compared between the two groups after treatment.Results Hole group operation time (87.89 ± 12.81) min,longer than the three-hole group (53.89 ± 8.91) min,but the hospital stay was (1.28 ± 0.21) d and total hospital costs (11 241.21 ± 23.91) yuan,were lower than three-hole group,P ＜ 0.05,the difference was statistical significance in the amount of bleeding in the two groups were not statistical significance,P ＞ 0.05;two groups of patients had complicatiom,but have been treated better,and two concurrent disease (1.43％ vs 2.86％) incidence was no significant difference,P ＞ 0.05.Conclusion Single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduce the hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses,surgical trauma is smaller,postoperative recovery is faster,and the safety is high,it is worthy of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Currently the substantial clinical benefits of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) over conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) are equivocal. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between SLA and CLA in children with acute appendicitis. METHODS: A single blind prospective randomized single center study was performed to compare the surgical outcomes of SLA and CLA. A total of 105 patients were randomized and various parameters were analyzed, 52 patients with SLA and 53 patients with CLA between July 2013 and March 2014. Patients with sonographically confirmed acute appendicitis were randomly assigned to receive either SLA or CLA. The outcome measurements were operating time, wound complication, and intraperitoneal morbidities, postoperative pain score and cosmetic result score. RESULTS: Operating time is significantly longer in SLA (70.4+/-26.7 minutes vs. 58.0+/-23.4 minutes; p=0.016). There were no significant differences in the postoperative wound complication rate and intraperitoneal morbidities between two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative resting pain score (6.6+/-2.5 vs. 6.3+/-2.5; p=0.317) and activity pain score (6.9+/-2.4 vs. 6.3+/-2.5; p=0.189), and the cosmetic result score (9.2+/-1.1 vs. 9.1+/-1.4; p=0.853). CONCLUSION: Although SLA would be a safe and feasible procedure in children, SLA could not demonstrate the clear benefit over CLA.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Appendectomy , Appendicitis , Pain, Postoperative , Prospective Studies , Wounds and InjuriesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Colorectal surgeries by single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) are increasing. While recent studies have reported results that are similar with the idea of conventional laparoscopy, SPLS is considered superior to conventional laparoscopy with regard to cosmetic aspects. We investigated the question of whether length of incision and postoperative recovery are different depending on the method of anastomosis in patients who underw ent SPLS right hemicolectomy (RHC). METHODS: Data on patients who underwent SPLS RHC from May 2011 to April 2012 at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively collected. Among 117 patients, 31 received functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) while 86 received isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis (ISSA). RESULTS: Operation time was shorter in FEEA compared to ISSA (152+/-42 vs 172+/-35 min, p=0.01). Neither group required an additional port. Although wound extension for specimen delivery tended to be frequent in loop type specimen after FEEA, the result was statistically insignificant (58.1 vs 43.0%, p=0.15). No difference in wound length was observed (4.4+/-1.0 vs 4.5+/-1.5 cm). Length of stay was longer in ISSA compared to FEEA (6.3+/-2.1 vs 7.9+/-4.3 days, p=0.01), and there was no difference in first gas passage (2.5+/-0.9 vs 2.8+/-0.9 days, p=0.26). Although three patients (9.7%) with FEEA and 19 patients (22.1%) with ISSA had postoperative complications, the difference was insignificant. CONCLUSION: Theoretically, delivery of a tube shaped specimen after ISSA is expected to reduce unnecessary wound extension and possible tumor dissemination compared to loop shape specimen after FEEA. However, results of our study showed no advantage in recovery period and wound length. We suggest that future prospective study might reveal more valuable conclusions on the subject.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cosmetics , Imidazoles , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , Nitro Compounds , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical value of the trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic operation with routine apparatus in treatment of hepatobiliary diseases. Methods From Mar 2010 to Sep 2012, 415 patients with hepatobiliary disease, splenic disease, abdominal cavity disease or combine hysteromyoma were performed by trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic operation with routine apparatus. The clinical data of 415 cases were analyzed respectively.Result All patients except one patients who was added one port for hysterectomy, were performed successfully trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic operation with routine apparatus without conversion to laparotomy or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions The trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic operation with routine apparatus is safe and effective in treatment of hepatobiliary diseases. Limited by the anatomy position, the trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic operation with routine apparatus can cure most hepatobiliary diseases. So the operator must have the experience both in single-port laparoscopic operation and traditional laparoscopic operation. With the improvement of rotatable equipment, the practical procedure is expected to be generalized in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical value of transumbilica single-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of bilateral varicocele.Methods From Jan. 2010 to Sep. 2010,42 patients with bilateral varicocele underwent laparoscopic high ligation of bilateral spermatic vein.Of these patients,20 were treated with transumbilica single-port laparoscopic surgery,22 with traditional laparoscopic surgery.The two groups of patients were compared for the parameters such as intraoperative blood loss,testicular artery preservation,operating time,time of activities after surgery,time of intestinal function recovery and hospitalization duration.The semen quality 1 year after the surgery was compared with that before treatment.At the out-patient re-examination at 1,3,6months and 1 year after the surgery,the incision,scrotum,spermatic cord,testis were checked for possible complications.The relief of discomfortness in the scrotum was also followed up.Results Both operation procedures were successful,without severe complications.In the single-port laparoscopic surgery produced blood lose ( [ 5 ± 1 ] ml vs.[ 5 ± 1 ] ml,t =- 0.452,P ＞ 0.05 ),the operating time ( [ 41 ± 7 ] min vs.[ 39 ± 3 ] min,t =0.686,P ＞ 0.05 ),postoperative intestinal function recovery time ( [ 11 + 1 ] h vs.[ 11 + 2 ] h,t =- 1.631,P ＞0.05 ) and postoperative hospital stay ( [ 3.1 + 0.7 ] d vs.[ 3.4 + 0.7 ] d,t =- 1.447,P ＞ 0.05 ) which were all comparable to that from conventional laparoscopic surgery.There was significant difference in the population using analgesics,single-port laparoscopic surgery vs.conventional laparoscopic surgery ( 1 case [ 5.0％ ] vs 7case [ 31.8％ ].The difference was statistically significant (x2 =4.886,P ＜ 0.05 ).The single-port laparoscopic surgery produced neglectable scar at the incision.All of the patients were questionaired for their satisfaction with the incision 1 year after the surgery.The difference was statistically significant (x2 =7.636,P ＜ 0.01 )Conclusion Single-port laparoscopic high ligation of bilateral spermatic vein produces comparable outcomes to that of conventional laparoscopic surgery,but it is a more microinvasive procedure producing good aesthetic appearance,representing the trend of laparoscopic technique.
ABSTRACT
Heterotopic pancreas is an uncommon condition that commonly occurs in the gastrointestinal tract such as the stomach and small bowel. It is defined as the presence of pancreatic tissue outside its usual location and lacking anatomical and vascular continuity with the pancreas. A heterotopic pancreas is usually found incidentally and is mostly silent; however, it rarely causes abdominal pain, weight loss, bleeding, or ileus. A 49-year-old male presented with intermittent abdominal pain for 4 weeks. We report a case with submucosal features of a jejunal heterotopic pancreas with the aid of capsule endoscopy and a histological confirmation through a single port laparoscopic segmental jejunectomy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Abdominal Pain , Capsule Endoscopy , Gastrointestinal Tract , Hemorrhage , Ileus , Jejunum , Pancreas , Stomach , Weight LossABSTRACT
Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is a newly emerged and rapidly evolving, minimally invasive treatment method. Transumbilical SPLS produces minimal parietal injury and can achieve cosmetic advantages by reducing additional trocar placement. The in-line or chopstick arrangement of laparoscopic instruments can make the operative procedures somewhat strange and inconvenient at first, but experienced laparoscopic surgeons can achieve the same coverage as conventional laparoscopic surgery with time. Here, we report the first case of transumbilical SPLS anterior resection (SPLS-AR) with transanal retrieval of aspecimen and intracorporeal single stapling anastomosis. The operating time was 270 min. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Transumbilical SPLS resulted in a 1.5-cm wound with early recovery. Transumbilical SPLS-AR with transanal retrieval and intracorporeal anastomosis for sigmoid colon cancer is feasible by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons based on careful evaluation and selection of patients. This operation fulfills both oncological principles and cosmetic demand.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colon, Sigmoid , Colonic Neoplasms , Cosmetics , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Sigmoid Neoplasms , Surgical Instruments , Surgical Procedures, OperativeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly advancing technique in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently limited evidence on the learning curve for this procedure. The aim of this study was to estimate the number of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomies required until improvement in the performance of the technique ceases. METHODS: This is a descriptive, single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 70 patients who underwent single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy between May 2009 and June 2010 at Dong-A University Medical Center in Busan, Korea. The review includes the mean operating time, conversion cases, intra-operative GB perforation, post-operative wound infection and mean hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean operating time of the first 30 cases (the learning period) was 91.83 minutes. After 30 operations (the experience period), it plateaued to an average of 75.25 minutes, which remained steady in the next 40 operations - a reduction of more than 16%. Reduction in the operating time was significant (P<0.001) between the learning period and the experience period. Other factors including additional ports, intraoperative gall bladder perforation, mean hospital stay, post-operative wound infection were not significantly different between the two periods. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the learning curve for single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be around thirty cases for a surgeon with prior conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience and for self-taught single port technique.
Subject(s)
Humans , Academic Medical Centers , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Korea , Laparoscopy , Learning , Learning Curve , Length of Stay , Urinary Bladder , Wound InfectionABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has recently emerged as a method to improve the morbidity and cosmetic benefit of conventional laparoscopic surgery. We describe our experience of SPLS for an anterior resection (AR). The results of a prospective series of single-port laparoscopic anterior resection procedures are presented. METHODS: Anterior resections were performed on 16 cases using a single-port laparoscopic technique between March 2009 and March 2010. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were recorded on a prospective database. RESULTS: Sixteen (8 women) unselected patients (eight males, eight females), aged 43~82 years (median 66.5 years), underwent a SPLS anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancers (median 16 cm above AV, range 13~27). All patients were alive at 30 days. The surgery time ranged from 150~415 min (median 242 min) and the median wound incision length was 2.4 cm (range 1.5~4.0 cm). The median hospital stay was 7.5 days. Pathological reports from the resected specimens revealed adenocarcinoma in 15 patients and mucinous carcinoma in one. There was one case of an anastomotic leak that required reanastomosis. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 27.5 (range 10~56). CONCLUSION: SPLS is a possible approach to an anterior resection with the potential for minimal access. A SPLS anterior resection is feasible and safe when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon and team. On the other hand, the technique and oncologic safety warrants further prospective randomized studies.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Adenocarcinoma , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Anastomotic Leak , Colon , Colon, Sigmoid , Colonic Neoplasms , Cosmetics , Hand , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , Lymph Nodes , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic single-port transumbilical renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection (TRPLD) for treatment of chyluria. Methods Nine cases of chyluria underwent laparoscopic single-port TRPLD. In all cases a 2-3 cm single inverted Ushaped supraumbilical incision was made, two 5-mm and one 12-mm trocars were inserted, and a medical rubber glove was sutured surrounding the three trocars and incision was made for gas proofing.Conventional straight and flexible instruments were used for dissection. Results All laparoscopic operations were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 135 (96-178) minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 126 (50-250) ml. Chyluria disappeared in all patients after operation and did not reoccur during the follow-up (1 - 6 months).Conclusions Laparoscopic single-port transumbilical TRPLD represents a feasible and novel mini-invasive option for patients with chyluria.
ABSTRACT
Minimally invasive surgery and laparoscopic surgery have been used for more than 30 years, and are now popular even for some malignant diseases. There have been two developments in technology; one is robotic surgery and the other is less minimally invasive surgery like natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single port laparoscopic surgery. NOTES, using the current platform of a conventional fiberscope and side channel instruments for surgery, suffers many limitations, including image quality, flexibility of the fiberscope, size of the side channel, and difficulty of closing the opening. Due to the above-mentioned limitations, single port laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over. This review aims to define single port laparoscopic surgery and describe its terminology and technology. To perform single port laparoscopic surgery efficiently, new instruments (e.g., a laparoscopic camera, ports, laparoscopic instruments) and combining other innovative methods into surgery are both helpful. Even though there have been many developments in laparoscopic cameras, ports, and laparoscopic instruments to enhance single port laparoscopic surgery, further improvements are needed. Motorized instruments or using a robotic platform in combination with single port laparoscopic surgery will be another way to overcome the limitations of current single port laparoscopic surgery. Single port laparoscopic surgery is a technique that has recently emerged, but will be performed in a wider range of surgical procedures based on developments in laparoscopic cameras, ports and laparoscopic instrument technology.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , PliabilityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard procedure for cholelithiasis. However, with the advance of minimal invasive surgery, much research has recently been performed into single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS).1 The aim of this study is to evaluate single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) in comparison to the classical method (three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TPLC) through our initial experience. METHODS: This study was performed retrospectively by a review of medical charts and phone calls to patients. We checked for chronic calculous cholecystitis or cholesterol polyps in 56 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy between April 2009 and February 2010. We divided into two groups the patients who had undergone SPLC and TPLC. We then checked the sex, age, hospital day, operating time, mobilization time, pain scale, cosmetic satisfaction, surgical wound infection and BMI for each patient. RESULTS: Cosmetic satisfaction with SPLC was higher than with the classical method, but this was not significant. Hospital day and mobilization time of SPLC were shorter, but this was also not significant. There was no difference in patient age, hospital day, mobilization and BMI between SPLC and TPLC. The operating time and pain scale with TPLC were less than with SPLC. CONCLUSION: SPLC has the benefit of cosmetic satisfaction and relatively fewer complications. However, the operating time and pain scale of SPLC are higher than those of TPLC. Therefore, SPLC requires much concentration and effort from the surgeon to compensate for its deficiencies.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cholecystectomy , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Cholelithiasis , Cholesterol , Cosmetics , Laparoscopy , Polyps , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound InfectionABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is more commonly performed than transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA). In this report, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing the outcomes of LA and TUSPLA. METHODS: Between April 14, 2009 and June 10, 2009, 40 patients who required laparoscopic appendectomies were randomly selected to receive either a TUSPLA or a LA. None of these patients had perforation or abscess. Twenty of the patients received a LA and the other 20 received a TUSPLA. The clinical outcomes and visual analog pain scores (VAS) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The TUSPLA procedures were performed successfully in every indicated patient. Clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups. The TUSPLA group showed a significantly higher VAS score 24 hours postoperatively than the LA group. CONCLUSION: Compared with LA, TUSPLA was technically feasible and safe in patients with non-complicated appendicitis. However, the patients in the TUSPLA group reported more postoperative pain than those in the LA group.
Subject(s)
Humans , Abscess , Appendectomy , Appendicitis , Pain, Postoperative , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgeries worldwide. In recent years, successful attempts to reduce the number of conventionally-used three ports have been reported. Specifically, two-port techniques, hybrid approaches and single-port assisted techniques have been described. In this article, we report on the feasibility, safety and cosmesis of trans-umbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: The procedure was performed using a single 15-mm-diameter umbilical incision. Under general anesthesia, an Alexis O wound retractor (Applied medical resources Co., Ltd., rancho Santa Margarita) was inserted through the umbilicus. After the appendix and meso-appendix were dissected with a Harmonic scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., USA), the base of the appendix was ligated with two Endo-loops (SEOJONG medical Co., Ltd., Korea). The appendix was withdrawn into the wound protector and removed from the abdominal cavity. RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled 70 patients (36 females and 34 males with a mean age of 29.0+/-15.0 years). The mean operative time was 49.0+/-13.9 min. There was no mortality. There were five complications in five patients (7.1%) and the median hospital stay was 3.5+/-1.4 days. CONCLUSION: This is a safe, minimally invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results. Compared with other trans-umbilical appendectomy techniques, single port laparoscopic appendectomy has the advantages of feasibility without extensive endoscopic skills and an acceptable operative time. Technical refinements and accumulated experience probably will enable its wider use for more patients with acute appendicitis.