Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness

Purpose: To compare readings of intraocular pressure (IOP) taken with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the non?contact tonometer (NCT), and the rebound tonometer (RBT), and to compare their correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: This was a prospective, cross?sectional, observational study to which patients above 18 years of age were enrolled. A total of 400 eyes of 200 non?glaucomatous patients underwent IOP recordings using the GAT, NCT, and RBT, and CCT was also noted. Informed consent of the patients was taken. The IOP readings taken via the three methods were compared and correlated with CCT. Paired t test was used to compare the two devices. Simple and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to study the relationship between factors. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Correlation was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and a Bland–Altman graph was plotted. Results: Mean IOP measured by the NCT was 15.65 ± 2.80 mmHg, by the RBT was 14.23 ± 3.05 mmHg, and by the GAT was 14.69 ± 2.97 mmHg. The mean CCT was 510.61 ± 33.83 microns. The difference between mean IOP recorded by the NCT and that by the RBT was 1.41 ± 2.39 mmHg, between the NCT and GAT was 0.95 ± 2.03 mmHg, and between the GAT and RBT was 0.45 ± 2.22 mmHg. The difference between the IOP values was statistically significant (P < 0.005). All tonometers showed a statistically significant correlation with CCT, but it was observed that the NCT had a stronger correlation (0.4037). Conclusion: The IOP readings taken by all the three methods were comparable; however, RBT values were closer to GAT values. CCT did influence the IOP values, and this should be kept in mind while evaluating.

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS USING DIFFERENT TONOMETERS IN PATIENTS OF VARIOUS REFRACTIVE ERRORS

Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP)is an important ?rst indicator of probability and suspicion of Glaucoma. The virtual IOP status is grossly in?uenced by multiple factors including Refractive errors ,corneal biomechanics ,central corneal thickness(CCT) and Scleral rigidity. To compare relative IOP measurements and Aim: its variability in Emmetropes, myopic and hypermetropic patients using Schiotz, Goldmann Applanation(GAT)and I-Care Rebound tonometer to establish an equation between virtual and real time IOP. This observational Materials and Methods: prospective study comprised of 100 subjects above the age of 18 years inclusive37 Emmetropes , 31 Hypermetropes and remaining 32 belonged to myopia . Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS for Windows Statistical Analysis : version 17.0 to calculate the demographic characteristics of the study cohort. The data were expressed as mean values including the standard deviation (SD) and the 95% con?dence interval (CI). Mean IOP measurements between Schiotz, I-Care and GAT were compared by One way ANOVA along with Individual pair wise comparison by applying Post Hoc Tukey Test for comparison of IOP measurements using a particular method of Tonometry in individuals of myopia, hypermetropia and emmetropia. The highest mean value of CCT 536.667 mum was in Hypermetropes whereas the lowest CCT value of Results: 507.031mum was in myopic eyes with statistically signi?cant (P<0.05). The mean value for IOP in Emmetropes was16.665 mm Hg for Schiotz , 15.027 Hg for GAT and 15.081 mm Hg for I –Care .Whereas Hypermetropes revealed mean value of 15.055 mm Hg for Schiotz , 14.323 mm Hg for GAT and 14.065 mm Hg for I –Care . The mean value for IOP in Myopic eyes was 16.875 mm Hg for Schiotz , 14.375 mm Hg for GAT and 14.688 mm Hg for I –Care . The study had revealed higher mean Conclusion : value of IOP in Myopic eyes as compare to Emetropic and Hypermetropic subjects.IOP measurements by the Schiotz tonometer were signi?cantly higher as compare to GAT and I-Care tonometer. Whereas recordings by GAT and I Care tonometers were almost in agreement .De?nitive correlation could not be established between pachymetry readings and adjusted IOP following GAT and I –Care tonometry .

The effectiveness of a three-step sterilization method for Goldmann tonometer prism: A cross-sectional study

Purpose: To propose a three?step sterilization method for Goldmann tonometer prism (GTP) and to analyze the sterilization effects of each step. Methods: 120 patients (240 eyes) who underwent Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP measurement were enrolled in this study. GTPs were used individually for each patient and wiped by swabs soaked with 75% ethyl alcohol, ofloxacin eye drops, and 75% ethyl alcohol for at least 5 s. GTPs were directly pressed onto the surface of agar plates before (W0) and after three?step sterilization (W1, W2, and W3). All the agars were sent to the laboratory in 2 h and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Subsequently, the growth of microbial species was assessed through visual inspection of the colonies at the inoculation points on the agar surface. Results: Staphylococcus. epidermidis was the most frequently isolated bacterium and was observed in 23.33% of all prisms. Most of the bacteria were eliminated at W3 except Staphylococcus. epidermidis and Kocuria roseus in one case. The isolation rates of Staphylococcus genus and Staphylococcus. epidermidis were significantly decreased (both with P < 0.001). The number of bacteria types isolated from prisms at time point W2 and W3 had a statistically significant difference compared with W1 and W (both with P < 0.05), while W2 and W3 exhibited no significant difference. Conclusion: This three?step sterilization method for GTP proved to be effective and safe for repeated use. We recommend using ofloxacin to prevent the transmission of pathogens based on ethyl alcohol, which could also bring some economic benefits.

Variation of intraocular pressure comparing rebound (TONOVET Plus®) and applanation (TONO-PEN VET®) tonometry in New Zealand rabbits treated with Amlodipine® / Variación de la presión intraocular comparando la tonometría de rebote (TONOVET Plus®) y aplanación (TONO-PEN VET®) en conejos de Nueva Zelanda tratados con Amlodipino® / Variação da pressão intraocular comparando a tonometria de rebote (TONOVET Plus®) e de aplanação (TONO-PEN VET®) em coelhos da Nova Zelândia tratados com Amlodipina®

Abstract Rabbits have played an important role in ophthalmological research processes, however in the environment there has been a deficiency of sensitive equipment in measurement of intraocular pressure for this species. To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with rebound (TONOVET Plus®) and applanation (TONO-PEN VET®) tonometry in healthy New Zealand rabbits treated with Amlodipine. Twelve healthy male New Zealand white rabbits, 5 months old; two groups with 6 individuals were used in this study. The experimental group was given Amlodipine® at a dose of 5 mg/kg, once a day for a month. Blood pressure and intraocular pressure were measurement before treatment and 6 h after treatment in a period of one month. A trend is noted where the group of animals treated with amlodipine® presents lower values than the control group, both in systolic and diastolic pressure. The systolic pressure of the control group showed an average of 116.5 ± 7.9 mmHg and 117.4 ± 8.9 mmHg and the treatment group showed an average of 113.6 ± 7.9 mmHg and 111.8 ± 10.0 mmHg (pretreatment and posttreatment respectively). Tonometry: the values obtained using the TONOVET Plus® (19 ± 3 mmHg) are on average higher than the values obtained using the TONO-PEN VET® (17 ± 3 mmHg). It was possible to demonstrate the relationship between systemic blood pressure and intraocular pressure in New Zealand white rabbits. Rebound tonometry showed less variability in results than applanation tonometry. This study confirmed that both tonometers are reliable for measuring IOP in rabbits.

Resumen Los conejos han jugado un papel importante en los procesos de investigación oftalmológica, sin embargo, en el medio ha existido una deficiencia de equipos sensibles en la medición de la presión intraocular para esta especie. Para comparar la presión intraocular (PIO) medida con la tonometría de rebote (TONOVET Plus®) y aplanación (TONO-PEN VET®) en conejos Nueva Zelanda sanos y tratados con Amlodipino, fueron usados doce conejos Nueva Zelanda, machos, sanos, de 5 meses de edad y distribuidos en dos grupos con 6 individuos cada uno. El grupo experimental recibió Amlodipino® en una dosis de 5 mg/kg, una vez al día durante un mes. La presión arterial y la presión intraocular se midieron antes del tratamiento y 6 h después del tratamiento en un período de un mes. Se observa una tendencia donde el grupo de animales tratados con amlodipino® presenta valores más bajos que el grupo control, tanto en presión sistólica como diastólica. La presión sistólica del grupo control mostró un promedio de 116,5 ± 7,9 mmHg y 117,4 ± 8,9 mmHg y el grupo de tratamiento mostró un promedio de 113,6 ± 7,9 mmHg y 111,8 ± 10,0 mmHg (pretratamiento y postratamiento respectivamente). Tonometría: los valores obtenidos con el TONOVET Plus® (19 ± 3 mmHg) son en promedio superiores a los valores obtenidos con el TONO-PEN VET® (17 ± 3 mmHg). Fue posible demostrar la relación entre la presión arterial sistémica y la presión intraocular en conejos blancos Nueva Zelanda. La tonometría de rebote mostró menos variabilidad en los resultados que la tonometría de aplanamiento. Este estudio confirmó que ambos tonómetros son confiables para medir la PIO en conejos.

Resumo Os coelhos têm desempenhado um papel importante nos processos de pesquisa oftalmológica, porém no meio tem havido uma deficiência de equipamentos sensíveis na medida da pressão intraocular para esta espécie. Comparar a pressão intraocular (PIO) medida com tonometria de rebote (TONOVET Plus®) e de aplanação (TONO-PEN VET®) em coelhos saudáveis da Nova Zelândia tratados com Amlodipina®. Foram utilizados neste estudo doze coelhos brancos da Nova Zelândia, machos saudáveis, 5 meses de idade; distribuído em dois grupos com 6 indivíduos cada um. O grupo experimental recebeu Amlodipina® na dose de 5 mg / kg, uma vez ao dia durante um mês. A pressão arterial e a pressão intraocular foram medidas antes do tratamento e 6 horas após o tratamento em um período de um mês. Nota-se uma tendência onde o grupo de animais tratados com amlodipina® apresenta valores inferiores ao grupo controle, tanto na pressão sistólica quanto na diastólica. A pressão sistólica do grupo controle apresentou média de 116,5 ± 7,9 mmHg e 117,4 ± 8,9 mmHg e o grupo tratamento apresentou média de 113,6 ± 7,9 mmHg e 111,8 ± 10,0 mmHg (pré-tratamento e pós-tratamento, respectivamente). Tonometria: os valores obtidos com o TONOVET Plus® (19 ± 3 mmHg) são em média superiores aos valores obtidos com o TONO-PEN VET® (17 ± 3 mmHg). Foi possível demonstrar a relação entre a pressão arterial sistêmica e a pressão intraocular em coelhos brancos da Nova Zelândia. A tonometria de rebote mostrou menos variabilidade nos resultados do que a tonometria de aplanação. Este estudo confirmou que ambos os tonômetros são confiáveis para medir a PIO em coelhos.

Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients

Purpose: To compare corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in normal and glaucomatous patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 426 eyes (213 normal eyes and 213 glaucomatous eyes) of 426 patients by tonopachy followed by GAT and ultrasound pachymetry. IOP was corrected for CCT by in-built formula in tonopachy and Ehlers correction factor for Goldmann tonometer. Limits of agreements were assessed using Bland朅ltman plots. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the absolute agreement between single and average measurements of IOP and CCT of tonopachy with that of Goldmann tonometer and ultrasound pachymetry respectively. Results: Mean corrected IOP measured with tonopachy and GAT in glaucomatous eyes was 17.63 � 5.04 mmHg and 19.42 � 5.83 mmHg, and in controls it was 13.4 � 2.5 mmHg and 16.2 � 3.1 mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement ranged from �63 to +9.25 mmHg for total population (mean = 2.31), �01 to +9.59 mmHg (mean = 1.79) for glaucoma group and �99 to +8.65 mmHg (mean = 2.83) for controls. Intraclass correlation coefficient for IOP measurement between tonopachy and Goldmann tonometer was 0.84 for total population, 0.85 for glaucoma group, and 0.63 for controls, respectively. Conclusion: Corrected IOP obtained by tonopachy showed moderate agreement with GAT and it is more in glaucoma patients than controls. Thus, tonopachy can be used as a screening tool, but cannot replace GAT.

The Difference in Intraocular Pressure before and after Visual Field Test Measured by Rebound Tonometer

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a visual field (VF) test on intraocular pressure (IOP) and relevant parameters in a normal group and an open-angle glaucoma group, and to determine the appropriate time of IOP measurements.METHODS: The IOP was measured by a rebound tonometer before and after a VF test for the normal, normal-tension glaucoma, and high-tension glaucoma groups, and IOP differences after the VF tests were compared among groups. Parameters including age, sex, axial length, central corneal thickness, IOP before the VF test, the VF index, mean deviation, VF test duration, and usage of IOP lowering medications were investigated, and the correlations of these parameters with IOP changes after VF tests were determined using linear regression analyses.RESULTS: A total of 232 participants (232 eyes) included 55 normal subjects, 131 normal-tension glaucoma patients, and 46 high-tension glaucoma patients. The IOP differences after VF tests were not statistically significant in the normal and high-tension glaucoma groups, and the difference was 0.31 mmHg in the normal-tension glaucoma group (p = 0.013). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that axial length (p = 0.005) and IOP before the VF test (p < 0.001) were relevant factors in the total number of patients, and the axial length (p = 0.017), IOP before the VF test (p = 0.001), and duration (p = 0.029) were found to be significantly associated with IOP differences in the normal-tension glaucoma group.CONCLUSIONS: The IOP changes after VF tests using the rebound tonometer were significant in the normal-tension glaucoma group, but were within an acceptable range. The IOP value measured after a VF test is clinically valid in clinical practice.

Estudo comparativo entre as medidas da pressão ocular dos tonômetros de rebote, pneumático e de Goldmann / Comparative study between ocular pressure measurements made by rebot tonometer, pneumatic tonometer, Goldmann tonometry

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar o resultado entre dois tipos de tonômetros, tendo como padrão ouro a tonometria de aplanação, relacionando com a espessura corneana e suas validações como instrumentos de rastreio populacional. Métodos: Estudo transversal comparativo, realizado com 400 olhos do ambulatório de oftalmologia da Adachi Oftalmologia, em Macapá (Amapá), entre os valores médios da pressão ocular medidos pelo tonômetro Icare®, o Tonômetro Pneumático e o Tonômetro de Aplanação de Goldmann em função da espessura corneana. Foram divididos conforme a ECC em 3 grupos. Grupo 1: 260 olhos com ECC< 530µ; grupo 2: 217 olhos com ECC entre 530µ e 590µ; e, grupo 3: 157 olhos com ECC>590µ. Resultados: A ECC média obtida na paquimetria foi de 557µ, variando de 651µ a 477µ (desvio padrão de 32.9). A PIO média obtida pela TP foi de 19,4 mmHg (com desvio padrão de 2,32); pelo Icare® foi de 16,7mmHg (desvio padrão de 2,12); e, na TAG foi de 15.5 mmHg (desvio padrão de 2,02). Para paquimetrias inferiores a 530µ e superiores a 590µ a PIOm não diferiu significativamente entre a TAG e Icare® (p = 0,232), sendo estatisticamente significativa diferença obtida para córneas com ECC entre 530 e 590 µ. A PIOm obtida pelo TP foi significativamente maior do que a pressão ocular média dos TAG e Icare® (p < 0,001 para ambos) em todos os grupos. Conclusões: Os três métodos podem ser utilizados em campanhas de rastreamento, porém o Icare® se mostrou mais confiável que a TP, com valores obtidos estatisticamente mais confiáveis quando comparados à TP. Existe suficiente concordância entre o Icare e a TAG para recomendar o seu uso.

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the result between two types of tonometres, using as gold standard the aplanation tonometry, relating to the corneal thickness and its validations as instruments of population screening. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out with 400 eyes from the ophthalmology clinic of Adachi Ophthalmology, in Macapá (Amapá), between the mean values of ocular pressure measured by the Icare® tonometro, the Pneumatic Tonometer and the Goldmann Flattening Tonometro as a function of corneal thickness. They were divided according to ECC in 3 groups. Group 1: 260 eyes with ECC <530µ; group 2: 217 eyes with ECC between 530µ and 590µ; and, group 3: 157 eyes with ECC> 590µ. Results: The mean ECC obtained in pachymetry was 557µ, ranging from 651µ to 477µ (standard deviation of 32.9). The mean IOP obtained by PT was 19.4 mmHg (with a standard deviation of 2.32); by Icare® was 16.7mmHg (standard deviation of 2.12); and in the TAG it was 15.5 mmHg (standard deviation of 2.02). For pachymetry less than 530µ and greater than 590µ, PIOm did not differ significantly between TAG and Icare® (p = 0.232), and a statistically significant difference was obtained for corneas with ECC between 530 and 590 µ. The IOP obtained by the PT was significantly higher than the mean ocular pressure of the TAG and Icare® (p <0.001 for both) in all groups. Conclusions: All three methods can be used in screening campaigns, but Icare® proved to be more reliable than TP, with values obtained statistically more reliable when compared to TP. There is sufficient agreement between Icare and TAG to recommend its use.

Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometer and ICare rebound tonometer / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To analyze the accuracy of non-contact tonometer(NCT)and ICare rebound tonometer(RBT)in measuring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. <p>METHODS:A retrospective proportional control study. Totally 113 patients(185 eyes)with glaucoma were studied. Intraocular pressure was measured by RBT, NCT and Goldmann Applanation tonometer(GAT)at 9:00 and 16:00 and recorded as two sets of data, respectively. Their accuracy is evaluated by the rank sum test, and the international standard 8621 guide, Bland-Altman consistency analysis analyzed the consistency of the two groups of measurements, and the data were divided into two groups: abnormal intraocular pressure group(<10mmHg or >21mmHg)and normal intraocular pressure group(10-21mmHg). The consistency was analyzed between different groups. The spearman correlation analysis is adopted to analyze the correlation between ophthalmotonometers.<p>RESULTS: There were differences among the GAT, NCT and RBT measurements(<i>P</i><0.01). There was a strong correlation between the intraocular pressure measured value obtained by GAT and measured values obtained by RBT and NCT(<i>rs</i>=0.71, 0.77, <i>P</i><0.001). The measured values of NCT and GAT are close to each other without statistically significant differences(<i>P</i>=0.92). Compared with GAT, RBT has a higher intraocular pressure measured value, and there are significant differences(<i>P</i><0.05). However, compared with GAT, both NCT and RBT have a wide range of limits of agreement, and they are(-6.2-6.0mmHg)and(-5.2-7.6mmHg)respectively. In normal intraocular pressure groups, the ranges of limits of agreement are(-5.9-5.9mmHg)and(-4.3-7.5mmHg)respectively. In abnormal intraocular pressure groups, the ranges of limits of agreement are(-7.3-6.4mmHg)and(-7.5-5.6mmHg)respectively. The evaluation carried out in accordance with ISO 8612 guides indicates that the abnormal values more than the 95% of consistency restriction of NCT and RBT in the three groups are(3.9%, 11.3%, 12.2%)and(26.3%, 11.3%, 12.2%)respectively.<p>CONCLUSION: Both NCT and RBT cannot simply replace the GAT to measure the intraocular pressure of glaucoma patients. In glaucoma patients, with the deviation of the measured value from the normal intraocular pressure range, the measurement error of NCT and RBT also increase.

Análise da microbiota em tonômetros de aplanação de Goldmann / Analysis of the microbiota in Goldmann applanation tonometers

RESUMO Objetivos: Analisar a prevalência da microbiota nos tonômetros de aplanação de Goldmann nos consultórios do SUS e definir o grau de contaminação dos tonômetros e a eficácia da assepsia do cone do tonômetro de aplanação. Métodos: Estudo transversal em que foi realizado a coleta de 60 "swabs", divididos nos três tonômetros de aplanação dos ambulatórios do SUS em dois momentos distintos. No primeiro realizou-se a coleta no início dos atendimentos e no segundo momento, a coleta foi realizada ao final de todos os atendimentos. Todos "swabs" foram colhidos no meio Stuart e foi realizada a cultura em meio de bactérias. Resultados: Das 60 amostras, apenas uma apresentou crescimento de agente patogênico, a Escherichia coli. Conclusão: Independente dos vários métodos que o oftalmologista escolher para realizar a assepsia, a mesma é imprescindível para a manutenção de uma boa saúde ocular do paciente, evitando assim a transmissão e propagação de patógenos por meio do exame oftalmológico e concluímos também que o método utilizado pelo nosso serviço parece ser eficaz nesta profilaxia.

ABSTRACT Objective: Analyze the microbiota prevalence in the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the clinic of the SUS to define the contamination of the tonometers and the efficacy of asepsis of the applanation tonometer cone. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out to collect 60 "swabs" divided into the three aplanation tonometers of SUS clinics at two different times. In the first one, the collection will be performed at the beginning of the visits and at the second moment, the collection will be performed at the end of all the visits. All swabs will be harvested in the Stuart medium and culture was carried to sow bacteria. Results: Of the 60 samples, only one showed pathogen growth, Escherichia coli. Conclusion: Regardless of the various ways the ophthalmologist chooses to perform asepsis, it is essential for the maintenance of good patient eye health, thus avoiding the transmission and propagation of pathogens through ophthalmologic examination, and we also conclude that the method used by our patient seems to be effective in this prophylaxis.

The 24 - hour pattern of intraocular pressure in suspected glaucoma patients / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To analyze the value of 24 - hour intraocular pressure ( IOP) monitoring in suspected glaucoma patients. METHODS: Totally 48 suspected glaucoma (96 eyes) were selected for 24 - hour IOP monitoring by using Accupen tonometer (24 - 3000) and non - contact tonometer (NCT, CT-80A) from 9 30 to 7 30 next day (once in 2h). During 07 30 to 21 30, patients were measured in sitting position,while during 23 30 to 05 30 in both sitting and supine position. RESULTS:A morning peak of IOP was shown at 7 30 in traditional position by using two measures with 22.05士3 608mmHg of NCT and 19.79士4.147mmHg of Accupen tonometer. The peak IOP in habitual position appeared in 5 30 with 21.64士4.814mmHg. The lowest IOP occurred in both position at 21 30 with 15. 73士3. 649mmHg. Both positions showed IOP trend of going up at night and then declining in the morning. CONCLUSION: The peak IOP in suspected glaucoma occurs mostly at early morning. Supine IOP of sleeping time is higher than that of sitting position.

Rebound Tonometers versus Other Tonometers: Agreement among Readings and the Effects of Axial Length, Ocular Pulse Amplitude, and Central Corneal Thickness on Readings

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained via rebound tonometry (RBT, the I-care instrument), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT, PASCAL), and the TonoPen to investigate the consistency of readings among methods and the influence of ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), axial length (AL), and central corneal thickness (CCT) on RBT data. METHODS: We prospectively studied 123 eyes. IOP was measured via RBT, GAT, NCT, DCT, and the TonoPen. In addition, OPA was measured via DCT, AL, and CCT. Correlations among measurements using the various methods were evaluated, as were the effects of OPA, AL, and CCT on RBT data. RESULTS: RBT data were significantly correlated with data obtained via GAT, NCT, DCT, and the TonoPen; the highest correlation was with GAT. OPA was significantly correlated with IOP measured via GAT but not with IOP measured via RBT. Both AL and CCT were significantly correlated with IOP data obtained via RBT and GAT. CONCLUSION: Significant correlations were evident among IOP measurements obtained via RBT and other tonometry methods. However, the influence of AL and CCT on IOP measurements obtained via RBT requires careful consideration and interpretation. Although the IOP values obtained by GAT were correlated with OPA values obtained by DCT, this was not true of IOP data obtained by RBT. This might be associated with characteristic of RBT which has the relatively short corneal contact time.

Agreement of intraocular pressure measured by noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer : a Meta-analysis / 中华实验眼科杂志

Background Noncontact tonometer (NCT) is a common application in clinical ophthalmology,while its measured value is influenced by corneal parameter.In recent years,there existed some clinical trials discussing the agreement between NCT and gold standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT),but there was still lack of evidence.Objective This study was to evaluate the agreement between NCT and GAT by applying evidence based medicine (EBM) method.Metbods A systematic literature retrieval was conducted from the MEDLINE,EMbase,CBM disc and CNKI database with the limitation of publishing time until June 2016.The literatures were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The sample size,average age,sample characteristics and follow-up time were extracted.The value of intraocular pressure measured by NCT and GAT were analyzed.The overall effect size was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 (from The Cochrane Collaboration) as weighted mean difference (WMD).There existed heterology in this study.Radom effect mode was used to evaluate and compare the difference between NCT and GAT value.Results Twenty four articles were retrieved.Six comparison studies incorporated with 478 eyes were included for Meta analysis.After random effects model was performed for correction.Intraocular pressure measured by NCT was 0.02 mmHg larger than that by GAT (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa).There was no significant difference in the measurement value of IOP between the two instruments (WMD =0.02,95％ CI:-0.59 to 0.63,P =0.95).Funnel chart method showed that literature publication bias existed in this study.Conclusions Normal persons' IOP obtained from NCT and GAT showed a good reproducibility.More comparison studies are needed to support this result.

Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice.

Context: Precise intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is important in glaucoma practise. Various instruments are available today to accurately measure IOP. Thus, the question arises about which instrument to use and whether all of them can be used interchangeably. Aims: To assess the agreement between noncontact tonometer (NCT), rebound tonometer (RBT), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) in measuring IOP. Subjects and Methods: 499 eyes of 250 patients were evaluated during a period of 24 months from September 2010 to August 2012 and measurement of IOP by NCT, RBT, GAT, and DCT was done in the given sequence. The agreement was assessed by use of the Bland–Altman plot keeping GAT as a gold standard technique. Results: The mean IOP value of NCT, RBT, GAT, and DCT was 15.9 ± 5.5, 15.9 ± 5.8, 15.9 ± 4.9, and 16.0 ± 4.7 mm of Hg, respectively. The limits of agreement of GAT with DCT, NCT, and RBT were found to be +5.4 to −5.2, −4.7 to +4.6, and −5.2 to +5.1 mm of Hg, respectively. Conclusions: A positive and strong correlation was found between newer tonometers and GAT, but the limit of agreement was clinically unacceptable. The use of a single tonometer should be practised at a glaucoma clinic for a patient at each follow‑up.

The relationship between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, a systematic review and Meta-analysis / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in healthy and glaucomatous eyes of adults. To make up to date summary of the results of studies done on the association of central corneal thickness measurements and intraocular pressure measurements in Glaucoma patients and in healthy subject. ●METHODS: To identify relevant studies a search of MEDLINE and Science Direct databases for studies investigating the relationship between central corneal thickness ( CCT ) and intraocular pressure ( lOP ) was conducted. The Search period was from Sep. 10th to Oct. 28th of 2015. Search key words included: central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, exfoliative glaucoma, applanation tonometry, pachymetry, primary open angle glaucoma, Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ln addition, a manual search of “The Year Book of Ophthalmology” Journals 2004 to 2006 lssues in the Southern Medical University Library English language section was done. The following exclusion criteria applied:1) non-English media studies;2 ) studies done before 2005; 3 ) case series and case reviews; 4 ) studies involving treatment protocols or surgical techniques; 5 ) studies comparing glaucomatous eyes with other conditions such as diabetes, hypertension or cardiovascular disease as secondary variables; 6 ) studies with children as study subjects; 7 ) studies with animal subjects. ●RESULTS: There were 12 observational studies and 1 case control study included. Compared to control subjects, patients had significantly increased lOP ( SMD:0. 50, 95% Cl:0. 30~0. 70, Z=4. 88, P ● CONCLUSION: It has been established that glaucomatous eyes tend to have thinner CCT and higher lOP compared to normal eyes.

Reactivation of Ocular Toxoplasmosis – A Case Report

Ocular toxoplasmosis is the commonest cause of posterior uveitis and is usually the result of an acquired infection caused by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii,here we present report of case of spontaneous reactivation of toxoplasmosis in a 14-yr old girl. with reactivation o oocular toxoplasmosis.

Correction of intraocular pressure measured by Schi(o)tz、 Perkins and Rebound tonometers in rabbits by multiple regression equation / 中华实验眼科杂志

Background Rabbits are commonly used as animal models for the evaluation of drugs and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (IOP).The accuracy of IOP measurement is therefore critical in the analysis of data and subsequent extrapolation to humans.An accurate method to measure rabbit IOP is intracameral manometry,but it is an invasive way.Schi(o)tz,Perkins and Rebound were often used in clinic.However,their accuracy in measuring rabbit IOP in experimental study is unclear.Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of IOP measured by Schi(o)tz tonometer,Perkins tonometer and Rebound tonometer relative to intracameral manometry in New Zealand white rabbits.Methods The central corneal thickness (CCT),corneal curvature (CC),axial length (AL),anterior chamber depth (ACD),lens thickness (LT) and scleral thickness (ST) were respectively measured in 8 eyes of 8 healthy New Zealand white rabbits with lenstar900 and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM).The actual IOP was measured with a 24G needle inserted the anterior chamber and connected to a pressure transducer under the general anesthesia,the IOP gradient was set with a 24G needle inserting the vitreous cavity and connecting to a container with balanced salt solution(BSS).Then,comparative measurements at the same pressures were performed with three types of tonometers.The IOP values from Schi(o)tz tonometer,Perkins tonometer and Rebound tonometer were calibrated based on actual IOP from intracameral manometry and eyeball physiological parameters by multiple regression equation.Results The mean of CCT,CC,AL,ACD,LT and ST was (338.96 ±21.52) μm,(51.68±1.66) D,(14.63±0.19) mm,(2.22±0.04) mm,(6.15±0.10) mm and (339.80±47.41) μm.Compared with the intracameral manometry value (IMV),the error range was (17.08± 11.22) mmHg in the Schi(o)tz tonometer value (STV),(25.81±12.43) mmHg in the Perkins tonometer value (PTV) and (22.50±11.47) mmHg in the Rebound tonometer value (RTV),with significant differences between them (t =10.54,14.39,13.59,all at P＜ 0.05).Compared with IMV,the 95％ limits of agreement of three portable tonometer values is larger,and three portable tonometer values had the greater measurement error with elevated IOP gradient.The regression equations was IOP =141.015 + 1.570 × STV + 0.122 × CCT-3.480 × CC between actual IOP and STV (R =0.92,P =0.00),IOP =-33.323+1.914×PTV+0.133×CCT between actual IOP and PTV(R =0.88,P=0.00),IOP=160.395+1.866×RTV+ 0.201×CCT+34.554×LT-2.649×CC+0.063×ST between actual IOP and RTV (R=0.95,P=0.00).Conclusions The physiological parameters of rabbit eyeball are obviously different from human.The STV,PTV and RTV have a great measuring error in comparson with actual IOP,and therefore it is necessary to correct STV,PTV and RTV based on the ocular physiology parameters in experimental study.

Comparison of two methods of tonometry in glaucoma patients:Goldmann applanation tonometer and non-contact tonometer / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

? AlM: To compare the two methods for the measurement of glaucoma patients' intraocular pressure ( lOP) between Goldmann applanation tonometer ( GAT) and non-contact tonometer ( NCT) and find the laws of the two methods.?METHODS: The lOP of 108 glaucoma patients ( 206 eyes) were measured by GAT and NCT respectively.?RESULTS: ln 108 glaucoma patients, the average lOP of 206 eyes was 29. 77 ± 10. 27mmHg by GAT and 24. 59 ± 8. 58mmHg by NCT. There was significant difference between GAT and NCT (P<0. 01). The higher of lOP, the difference between GAT and NCT was greater.?CONCLUSlON: The measurement results with NCT were lower than that of GAT. The higher of lOP, the difference between GAT and NCT was greater. lt's better to measure lOP by GAT for the glaucoma patients, in order to avoid the misdiagnosis and mistreatment of glaucoma.

Comparative study on the intraocular pressure measurement with three tonometer / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of ICARE rebounder tonometer (RBT) by comparing the measurement results of ICARE RBT,applanation tonometer (AT) and non-contact tonometer (NCT).Methods This study included 100 glaucoma suspect cases (100 eyes) with their day and night intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement in Beijing Tongren Hospital from May to November,2014.IOP of each eye was measured by two experienced examiners using RBT,AT and NCT for three times respectively and the mean values were recorded as the final result.Results IOP was measured by RBT,AT,NCT,the values were (19.1s5.7),(18.9±5.0),(15.2±5.0) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),respectively.The difference between RBT and AT was (0.2±1.8) mmHg,and the difference between NCT and AT was-(3.8±2.6) mmHg.There was no significant difference in the values between RBT and AT,t=-1.136,P＞0.05.There was significant difference in the values between NCT and AT,t=14.714,P＜0.01.The results measured by RBT,NCT and AT had correlation,r=0.948,0.822;P＜0.01.The relevant value was 0.973 in two examiners with RBT,which consisted with the result with AT.Conclusion RBT meets the clinical needs and can be widely used in clinical work.

Reliability Comparison of Rebound Tonometer at the Upright and Supine Position

PURPOSE: Rebound tonometer has been used to measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in the supine as well as normal upright positions. We investigated the reliability of IOP measurements using the rebound tonometer in the upright and supine positions. METHODS: IOP was measured in 30 patients (60 eyes) with open-angle glaucoma who had no history of ocular surgery and no anterior segment pathology, in both the upright and supine positions using rebound tonometer (IcarePRO; Icare Finland Oy, Finland). The average IOP value after 6 measurements was recorded. We measured IOP repeatedly until 3 reliable values within normal limits of the measurement's variation were obtained. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation, and number of repeated measurements necessary to obtain 3 reliable IOP values in each position as measured by one examiner. RESULTS: ICC values for IOP measurements were 0.852 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.784-0.903; p < 0.001) in the upright position and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.563-0.784; p < 0.027) in the supine position. Coefficient of variation was 8.7 +/- 0.1% in the upright position and 24.0 +/- 0.1% in the supine position. An average of 3.3 times of repeated measurements in the upright position and 6.2 times in the supine position were necessary to obtain 3 reliable IOP values within the normal range of standard deviation. CONCLUSIONS: When measuring IOP using the IcarePRO rebound tonometer, the measurement reliability was different between the upright and supine positions. Reproducibility of IOP measurements was lower in the upright than the supine position.