Factors Associated with Adherence to Allergen Specific Subcutaneous Immunotherapy

PURPOSE: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is known to be the only therapeutic modality to alter the natural course of allergic diseases. However, at least 3 years of treatment is recommended for achieving long-term disease modifying effect. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with immunotherapy non-adherence in real practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis, and received AIT to common allergens such as house dust mite and/or pollens from January 2007 to August 2014. In this study, non-adherence was defined as not completing 3 years of AIT. RESULTS: Among 1162 patients enrolled, 228 (19.6%) failed to complete 3 years of AIT. In multivariate analysis, age less than 20 years [odds ratio (OR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70–5.69] and 20 to 40 years (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17–3.43), cluster build-up (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.05–3.02) and ultra-rush build-up schedules (OR 5.46, 95% CI 2.40–12.43), and absence of visit to other departments in the same hospital (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.05–3.32) were independently associated with immunotherapy non-adherence. Disease duration of 5–10 years was negatively associated with non-adherence compared to shorter disease duration of less than 5 years (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.94). Although male sex and commercial product of AIT, Tyrosine S®, compared to Novo-Helisen® were non-adherent factors in univariate analysis, no statistical significances were identified in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Various factors are associated with immunotherapy adherence affecting the utility of immunotherapy. Clinicians should be aware of factors associated with adherence to maximize the utility of allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Alergia a veneno de himenópteros na criança / Hymenoptera venom allergy in children

Objetivos: A alergia a veneno de himenópteros pode condicionar a vida da criança de forma significativa. Pretende-se, com a exposição de dois casos clínicos e uma breve revisão do tema, salientar a importância da referenciação dessas crianças a consultas especializadas, para início de dessensibilização.Descrição dos casos: Duas crianças, aos três e aos seis anos, tiveram anafilaxia a picada de vespa e abelha, respectivamente. Em ambas, após a determinação de IgE específica e confirmação alergológica, iniciou-se dessen-sibilização com veneno de himenópteros em esquema ultra-rush, sem intercorrências relevantes, apenas edema no local da injeção. Após doze meses de injeções a cada quatro semanas, recebem agora manutenção com injeções a cada seis semanas. No primeiro caso, a criança foi picada por vespa aos dez meses de imunoterapia, desencadeando apenas reação local diminuta.Conclusões: Em ambos os casos, a imunoterapia específica subcutânea com veneno em esquema ultra-rush foisegura e eficaz, oferecendo o conforto de um menor número de injeções e de deslocamentos ao hospital na fasede indução. A manutenção da terapêutica já demonstrou efeito protetor na reexposição ao veneno em uma dascrianças.

clinical cases and a brief review on the topic, emphasizing the importance of referral of these children to specialized care for early desensitization.Cases description: Two children, at three and six years, had anaphylactic reaction to wasp and bee stings, respectively. In both cases, after the determination of specific IgE and allergologic confirmation, desensitization with hymenoptera venom in ultra-rush regimen was done, without relevant side effect apart from swelling at the injection site. After twelve months of injections every four weeks, the children are now receiving maintenance injections every six weeks. In the first case, the child was stung by wasp at ten months of immunotherapy, triggering only small localreaction.Conclusions: In both cases, the subcutaneous venom immunotherapy with ultra-rush regimen was safe and effective, providing the comfort of a smaller number of injections and hospital visits during the induction phase. Maintenance therapy has demonstrated a protective effect on re-exposure to the poison in one child.

Safety and efficacy of the ultra-rush immunotherapy with extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in children / 소아과

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy is accepted as the only treatment of allergic disease that can modify the natural course of the disease and ameliorate symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultra-rush therapy using Dermatophagoides extracts in children. METHODS: Of children older than four years who had visited Bundang CHA Pediatric Allergy Clinic, those showing positive reactions only to Dermatophagoides in the skin prick test and to the nasal provocation test were included. In all, 11 and 12 patients respectively preferred conventional and ultra-rush immunotherapy. We elevated allergen concentrations diluted to 1,000:1 of the end strength by 2-3 times with 30-minute intervals and checked oxygen saturation, pulse rate, blood pressure, and systemic reactions every 15 minutes. Immunotherapy effectiveness was valued by changes in nasal provocation test scores before and after immunotherapy. RESULTS: The average ages of patients in the conventional and ultra-rush immunotherapy groups were 8.3+/-2.3 and 9.2+/-2.8 years, respectively. Systemic reactions were observed in six in the ultra-rush group (50%) without anaphylaxis and one (9%) in the conventional group. The average scores in the nasal provocation test before and after treatment in the conventional group were 8.2+/-1.5 and 4.6+/-2.1, respectively (P=0.043). In the ultra-rush immunotherapy group, the scores changed from 6.2+/-2.2 to 3.7+/2.5 (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Ultra-rush immunotherapy using Dermatophagoides in children is effective for treating allergic disease but can induce systemic effects rather than conventional immunotherapy.