ABSTRACT
Objective To research the correlation between the visual acuity ratio and pattern reversal visual evoked potential （PRVEP） P100 waveform amplitude ratio of both eyes. Methods Forty-seven volunteers were selected, and the visual chart visual acuity of both eyes was measured. The visual acuity ratio of the eye with poor vision to the eye with better vision was calculated by five grade notation method. The amplitudes of P100 waveforms of both eyes were recorded respectively by using black-and-white checkerboard PRVEP and chosing 1°, 15' stimulating visual angle, and the ratio of amplitudes between the two eyes was also calculated. SPSS 20.0 software was used to analyze the correlation between the visual acuity ratio and the ratio of P100 waveform amplitudes between the two eyes. Return test and linear regression analysis with the binocular ratio of P100 waveform amplitudes as the independent variable （x） and the binocular visual acuity ratio as the dependent variable （y） were made. Results There was a positive correlation between the binocular visual acuity ratio and the ratio of P100 waveform amplitudes under 15' stimulating visual angle （Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.62, P=0.000）. The fitting linear regression equation was y=0.090 x+0.846 （F=20.954, P=0.000）. There was no significant correlation between the binocular ratio of visual acuity and the binocular ratio of P100 waveform amplitudes under 1° stimulating visual angle （P>0.05）. Results of return test showed that there was no statistical significance in the difference between visual acuity estimated by equation and actual detected visual acuity. Conclusion In forensic appraisal of monocular injury, fitting linear regression equation of binocular visual acuity ratio and the binocular ratio of P100 waveform amplitudes under 15' stimulating visual angle, is helpful for visual acuity level estimation of the injured eye to some extent.
Subject(s)
Humans , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Eye/physiopathology , Regression Analysis , Vision, Ocular , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine whether pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potential (PRVEP) is affected in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Participants aged ≥ 60 years diagnosed as MCI were invited to participate in a study together with a group of controls. PRVEP was measured using A RETI-port/Scan 21 and stimuli of large and small checks sizes, 1° (60 min of arc) and 0.25° (15 min) respectively were used to obtain responses. The amplitude and implicit times of the MCI and control groups were then compared. A total of 18 MCI participants (age 65.7 ± 3.1 years) and 18 controls (65.1 ± 3.8 years) consented to participate in the study. The amplitude and implicit times for the MCI group using the target sizes of 60 min of arc were 9.80 ± 4.06 μV and 108.83 ± 7.63 ms and for 30 min of arc were 11.00 ± 7.44 μV and 123.96 ± 6.18 ms respectively. Consecutively for the control groups the amplitudes and implicit times were 8.96 ± 3.52μV, 105.85 ± 3.60 ms and 11.97± 6.11 μV, 122.57 ± 8.28 ms. PRVEP results did not reveal significant differences in P100-wave amplitude nor implicit time between the two groups under investigation. This study concluded that the visual pathway of MCI participants may be unaffected in the early part of the disease process.
Subject(s)
AgedABSTRACT
Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive bilateral optic neuropathy which disturbs the structural or functional integrity of the optic nerve that causes characteristic atrophic changes in it, which leads to specific visual field defects over time with loss of visual function. Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of glaucoma in India and is fast emerging as a major cause of bilateral blindness. This rural hospital based study was conducted to evaluate whether glaucomatous visual field defects particularly the mean defect of Humphrey visual field could be related to VEP parameters of patients having POAG. Visual field by Humphrey perimeter and simultaneous recordings of pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) were assessed in 100 patients with POAG. There was a significant (P<0.05) negative correlation of P100 latency, N155 latency and P100 duration and a highly significant (P<0.001) positive correlation of P100 amplitude with mean deviation (index of global visual field damage, MD) of Humphrey visual field in the subjects of POAG in various age groups. N70 latency showed a non-significant positive correlation with MD. The VEP changes observed by us in POAG patients were consistent with the progressing mean defect quantitatively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the VEP parameters can be useful quantitative indices in the evaluation of glaucomatous visual function damage.
ABSTRACT
Background: To compare the usefulness of the traditional pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) with multifocal VEP (mfVEP) and Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry in the evaluation of the ocular abnormalities induced by acute or subacute optic neuritis (ON). Materials and Methods: The test results of 24 ON patients were compared with those obtained in 40 normal control subjects. MfVEP recordings were obtained by using an Optoelectronic Stimulator that extracts topographic VEP using a pseudorandom m-sequence stimulus. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine the sensitivity and specificity of abnormal values. Results: The frequency of the abnormal ocular findings differed in the ON patients according to the used technique. Reduced visual sensitivity was demonstrated in 12 eyes (54.5%) using FDT perimetry; 17 eyes (77.2%) showed decreased amplitude and/or an increase in the implicit time of the P1 wave in mfVEP and 20 eyes (90.9%) showed an abnormal decrease in the amplitude and/or an increase in the latency of the P100 peak at VEP examination. The areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.743 to 0.935, with VEP having the largest areas. The VEP and mfVEP amplitudes and latencies yielded the greatest sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: The mfVEP and the FDT perimetry can be used for the evaluation and monitoring of visual impairment in patients with ON. The most sensitive and practical diagnostic tool in patients with ON is, however, the traditional VEP. The mfVEP can be utilized in those cases with doubtful or negative VEP results.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Absolute or relative increase in the latency of the major surface positive component is almost invariably found in patients with demyelination optic neuropathy. Using the pattern- reversal method, our study illustrates the significant changes in the latency of the P100 component when refractive errors are introduced to defocus in normal person. METHOD: Four women and ten men aged 20 to 27 years were selected after a thorough ophthalmological assessment. Visual acuity (VA) was 6/6 or better in all subject and none had dyschromatopsia or significant astigmatism. Refractive errors were created by the combined standard lenses. RESULTS: The mean value of P100 latency were as follows: 93.74 +/- 3.30 msec, naked eyes; 98.14 +/- 7.37 msec, the +2/+x 90 lens; 96.50 +/- 3.76 msec, the +1/ +1 x90 lens; 94.55 +/- 4.20 msec, the -1/ -1x90; 96.29 +/- 2.88 msec, the -2/ -2 x90 lens. The P100 latencies showed singnificant standard lens except with -1/ -1 x90 lens. The P100 latency was prolonged according to the progression of refractive error. CONCLUSION: Because a relative or absolute prolongation of P100 latency is often found in cases of suspected multiple sclerosis, and because of their similarity to the findings of our study, we would emphasize that refractive errors should be reduced or eliminated to minimize the false-positive results.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Astigmatism , Demyelinating Diseases , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Multiple Sclerosis , Optic Nerve Diseases , Refractive Errors , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
The human pattern reversal retinal potential(PRRP) is a bioelectrical response that reflects neural activity generated in the proximal retina. Visual diseases which affect the retinal ganglion cells and the optic nerve often produce signifjcant reductions in the amplitude of the PRRP. PRRP amplitude reductions are freguently obseved in the patients with primary open angle glaucoma. This study was designed to determine whether patients with ocular hypertension whieh are at risk of developing glaucoma also exhibit PRRP amplitude reductions. 1. As compared to the control group the glaucoma patients showed decreased P1-N2 amplitude and a significant delay of Visual evoked potential(VEP) latency. The retinocortical time was delayed(72%) and PRRP P1-N2 amplitude was decreased in 30 percents of the ocular hypertensive patients. 2. In the glaucoma and ocular hypertension, VEP P1 latency has more diagnoic value than PRRP P1 latency. 3. VEP and PRRP show more diagnostic values and these tests are essential for early diagnosis in the glaucoma.