Actualización en fibrosis quística: uso de exacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor/en pacientes con fibrosis quística port-trasplante pulmonar / Use of exacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in cystic patients post lung transplantation

El uso de moduladores de CFTR en pacientes con fibrosis quística post trasplante pulmonar es un tema todavía controversial. Varias publicaciones reportan los beneficios del modulador elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor en los síntomas extrapulmonares de la fibrosis quística, especialmente enfermedad sinusal, síntomas gastrointestinales y diabetes. Un número alto de pacientes debe discontinuar el tratamiento por mala tolerancia, sin embargo, no se describen interacciones de importancia con el tratamiento inmunosupresor. Se debe considerar para su uso los riesgos versus beneficios en forma individual en cada paciente.

The use of CFTR modulators in patients with cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation is still a controversial issue. Several publications report the benefits of the use of the modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on extrapulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis, especially sinus disease, gastrointestinal symptoms and diabetes. A high number of patients must discontinue treatment due to poor tolerance; however, no significant interactions with immunosuppressive treatment have been described. The individual risk-benefit of each patient should be considered for its use.

Moduladores mejoran la función pulmonar en la mutación más frecuente de la fibrosis quística / Proteine modulators improve pulmonary function in the most common cystic fibrosis mutation

Un tópico de análisis crítico es un resumen estandarizado que se organiza en torno a una pregunta clínica estructurada, realiza una revisión crítica y resalta la relevancia de sus resultados aplicados a nuestra realidad. El estudio analizado evalúa en 1100 pacientes de 12 años o más portadores de fibrosis quística (FQ) homocigotos para la mutación más frecuente phe508del CFTR, la terapia combinada de dos moduladores de la proteína CFTR, comparado con placebo, la que mostró mejoría significativa de la función pulmonar (VEF1) de 2.6 a 4 puntos porcentuales 1. Estos resultados proponen un tratamiento curativo al 50 por ciento de los pacientes en USA y al 15 por ciento en nuestro país, una vez superado los costos.

A CAT is a standardized summary of research evidence organized around a clinical question, aimed to provide a critique of the research and a statement of the clinical relevance of results. In the analyzed paper, the authors evaluated 1100 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) 12 years and older with two copies of phe508del CFTR genetic mutation, the combination therapy of two CFTR modulators led to mean absolute improvements in lung function (VEF1) between 2.6 and 4 percentage points, which was statistically significant. These results are promising for the 50 percent of the USA CF population and 15 percent of the CF Chilean population.

In vivo growth-inhibition of Sarcoma 180 by piplartine and piperine, two alkaloid amides from Piper

Piplartine {5,6-dihydro-1-[1-oxo-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-2-propenyl]-2(1H)pyridinone} and piperine {1-5-(1,3)-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-oxo-2,4-pentadienyl]piperidine} are alkaloid amides isolated from Piper. Both have been reported to show cytotoxic activity towards several tumor cell lines. In the present study, the in vivo antitumor activity of these compounds was evaluated in 60 female Swiss mice (N = 10 per group) transplanted with Sarcoma 180. Histopathological and morphological analyses of the tumor and the organs, including liver, spleen, and kidney, were performed in order to evaluate the toxicological aspects of the treatment with these amides. Administration of piplartine or piperine (50 or 100 mg kg-1 day-1 intraperitoneally for 7 days starting 1 day after inoculation) inhibited solid tumor development in mice transplanted with Sarcoma 180 cells. The inhibition rates were 28.7 and 52.3 percent for piplartine and 55.1 and 56.8 percent for piperine, after 7 days of treatment, at the lower and higher doses, respectively. The antitumor activity of piplartine was related to inhibition of the tumor proliferation rate, as observed by reduction of Ki67 staining, a nuclear antigen associated with G1, S, G2, and M cell cycle phases, in tumors from treated animals. However, piperine did not inhibit cell proliferation as observed in Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis. Histopathological analysis of liver and kidney showed that both organs were reversibly affected by piplartine and piperine treatment, but in a different way. Piperine was more toxic to the liver, leading to ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes, accompanied by microvesicular steatosis in some areas, than piplartine which, in turn, was more toxic to the kidney, leading to discrete hydropic changes of the proximal tubular and glomerular epithelium and tubular hemorrhage in treated animals.