Supervisión de ensayos clínicos en hospitales del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú: enfoque administrativo y regulatorio / Supervision of clinical trials in Social Health Insurance at Peruvian Hospitals: administrative and regulatory approach

RESUMEN El objetivo del estudio fue describir las características de los ensayos clínicos (EC) supervisados por el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación en EsSalud entre el 2015 y 2018 y las principales observaciones de las supervisiones realizadas. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de 82 ensayos clínicos supervisados entre 2015 y 2018. La mayoría de los ensayos clínicos fueron estudios de fase III (81,7%), la vía de administración más frecuente de los productos de estudio fue oral (47,6%) y la mayoría fueron patrocinados por la industria farmacéutica (96,3%). Las observaciones más frecuentes fueron las relacionadas al contrato de estudio (83,8%), al pago por concepto de overhead (57,3%) y a la falta de documentos regulatorios (47,6%). Estos hallazgos permiten la identificación de oportunidades de mejora en la regulación y gestión de la investigación.

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of the Clinical Trials (CT) supervised by the Institute of Health Technology Assessment and Research carried out in EsSalud between 2015 and 2018 and the main observations of the supervisions completed. A descriptive study of 82 supervised clinical trials was conducted between 2015 and 2018. Most of the clinical trials were phase III studies (81.7%); the most frequent route of administration of the study products was oral (47.6%), and most were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry (96.3%). The most frequent observations were those related to the study contract (83.8%), overhead payment (57.3%), and the lack of regulatory documents (47.6%). These findings allow the identification of opportunities for improvement in research regulation and management.

Declaración de la Academia Chilena de Medicina sobre el Título V de la Ley 20. 850 (Ley Ricarte Soto) y su proyecto de reglamento "De los ensayos clínicos de productos farmacéuticos y elementos de uso médico" / Declaration of the Chilean Academy of Medicine of Law 20. 850 "On clinical trials of pharmaceutical products and medical devices" and of the bylaw that will regulate its application

In Chile, high cost treatments required by selected medical conditions are financed by the State, according to Law 20.850. A bylaw under discussion by the Senate regulates clinical trials, posing complex issues that will endanger local interest in front-line research: 1) The exclusive and mandatory control bestowed to the Institute of Public Health during all stages of the trials and also the surveillance of institutions performing clinical trials, overriding their Clinical Research Review Boards; 2) The 10 year period during which any adverse event is assumed to have been caused by the medication or devise evaluated by the trial, unless the contrary is proven in a judicial process; 3) Individuals submitted to the trials are entitled to free post trial access to the treatment received during the study, financed by the trial supporting entities and as long as the drug or devise is considered to be useful. While agreeing with the need to have a National Registry of Clinical Trials, we predict that the mentioned critical issues in the bylaw will lead to difficulties and unnecessary judicial processes, thus limiting clinicians’ interest in performing research. We propose to modify the bylaw, excluding responsibilities on events associated with the natural evolution of the medical condition, with patients’ ageing or with comorbidities and clinical events considered unpredictable when the protocol was accepted. We recommend that the free post trial access should be a joint decision involving the patient and the attending physician, taking in consideration that the volunteer has been exposed to risks and burdens, or when discontinuation of treatment entails a vital risk until the treatment under study has been approved and becomes available in the national market.

En Chile los tratamientos de alto costo requeridos por seleccionadas condiciones médicas son financiados por el Estado, de acuerdo a la Ley 20.85, que se hizo efectiva en noviembre de 2015. Un reglamento de esta ley -actualmente en discusión por el Senado- incluye la regulación de los ensayos clínicos y plantea importantes aspectos que van a poner en riesgo la realización de investigaciones clínicas avanzadas: 1) El control exclusivo y mandatorio otorgado al Instituto de Salud Pública durante todas las etapas de los ensayos y la vigilancia de las instituciones que los realizan, que sobrepasa las atribuciones de los Comités de Ética Científica Institucionales; 2) El período de hasta 10 años después de la aparición de cualquier efecto adverso, durante el cual se asume causado por el medicamento o dispositivo evaluado en el ensayo, mientras no se demuestre lo contrario en un proceso judicial; 3) Los participantes de los estudios tienen derecho a continuar con el tratamiento recibido durante el estudio una vez terminado este, financiado por las entidades que patrocinan los estudios y mientras el fármaco o dispositivo se consideren útil. Estamos de acuerdo con la necesidad de contar con un Registro Nacional de Ensayos Clínicos. Sin embargo, predecimos que los aspectos críticos del reglamento causarán dificultades y procesos judiciales innecesarios, lo que limitará el interés de los clínicos en realizar investigación. Proponemos que el reglamento debe modificarse a fin de excluir responsabilidades sobre eventos asociados con la evolución natural de la condición clínica, el envejecimiento del paciente, comorbilidades y eventos clínicos no predecibles cuando se aceptó el estudio. Recomendamos que el acceso gratuito posterior al estudio debe constituir una decisión conjunta del paciente y su médico tratante, considerando los riesgos y la carga a que se expuso el paciente, o al riesgo vital secundario a la suspensión del tratamiento del estudio mientras no esté disponible en el mercado nacional.

Declaración de la Academia Chilena de Medicina sobre el Título V de la Ley 20. 850 (Ley Ricarte Soto) y su proyecto de reglamento “De los ensayos clínicos de productos farmacéuticos y elementos de uso médico” / Declaration of the Chilean Academy of Medicine of Law 20. 850 On clinical trials of pharmaceutical products and medical devices” and of the bylaw that will regulate its application

In Chile, high cost treatments required by selected medical conditions are financed by the State, according to Law 20.850. A bylaw under discussion by the Senate regulates clinical trials, posing complex issues that will endanger local interest in front-line research: 1. The exclusive and mandatory control bestowed to the Institute of Public Health during all stages of the trials and also the surveillance of institutions performing clinical trials, overriding their Clinical Research Review Boards; 2.The 10 year period during which any adverse event is assumed to have been caused by the medication or devise evaluated by the trial, unless the contrary is proven in a judicial process; 3. Individuals submitted to the trials are entitled to free post trial access to the treatment received during the study, financed by the trial supporting entities and as long as the drug or devise is considered to be useful. While agreeing with the need to have a National Registry of Clinical Trials, we predict that the mentioned critical issues in the bylaw will lead to difficulties and unnecessary judicial processes, thus limiting clinicians’ interest in performing research. We propose to modify the bylaw, excluding responsibilities on events associated with the natural evolution of the medical condition, with patients’ ageing or with comorbidities and clinical events considered unpredictable when the protocol was accepted. We recommend that the free post trial access should be a joint decision involving the patient and the attending physician, taking in consideration that the volunteer has been exposed to risks and burdens, or when discontinuation of treatment entails a vital risk until the treatment under study has been approved and becomes available in the national market.

Standard operating procedure for audio visual recording of informed consent: An initiative to facilitate regulatory compliance.

The office of the Drugs Controller General (India) vide order dated 19th November 2013 has made audio visual (AV) recording of the informed consent mandatory for the conduct of all clinical trials in India. We therefore developed a standard operating procedure (SOP) to ensure that this is performed in compliance with the regulatory requirements, internationally accepted ethical standards and that the recording is stored as well as archived in an appropriate manner. The SOP was developed keeping in mind all relevant orders, regulations, laws and guidelines and have been made available online. Since, we are faced with unique legal and regulatory requirements that are unprecedented globally, this SOP will allow the AV recording of the informed consent to be performed, archived and retrieved to demonstrate ethical, legal and regulatory compliance. We also compared this to the draft guidelines for AV recording dated 9th January 2014 developed by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Our future efforts will include regular testing, feedback and update of the SOP.

New regulations on compensation for injury and death in drug trials.

In 2005, the government amended Schedule Y of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and Rules, 1945, to liberalise the conduct of global drug trials in India. Proponents of this policy had asserted that we needed less, and not more, regulation, in order to expand the business of drug trials. Many from the medical profession, the bioethics community and civil society groups have been critical of this policy.

Rol del estado en los ensayos clínicos / Role of government in clinical trials

La regulación de los ensayos clínicos por el Estado es un proceso en constante cambio y adecuación, cuyo reto actual consiste en salvaguardar la seguridad de los participantes y equilibrar la carga administrativa. El desarrollo y la regulación de los ensayos clínicos en los distintos países varían según la realidad, el contexto, su ejecución nacional o multinacional, condicionando que la regulación puramente nacional resulte insuficiente y se precise conocer parte de la regulación internacional. El objetivo de esta publicación es mostrar una visión global del rol de Estado en la regulación de los ensayos clínicos en distintas realidades. Para ello, se ha realizado una revisión de la regulación en la Unión Europea, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica y algunos países de Latinoamérica, para llegar finalmente al Perú. La tendencia actual en la regulación de los ensayos clínicos, se caracteriza por el incremento en los estándares de calidad, el garantizar la seguridad de los participantes, promover la transparencia, la disminución de los procesos burocráticos y el fortalecimiento de los comités de ética, en el marco de procesos democráticos abiertos, que convoquen e integren a todos los interesados en procesos dinámicos basados en el conocimiento actual y los cambios que se suceden. El reto actual es promover el desarrollo de ensayos clínicos desde el Estado (universidades, centros de investigación, institutos especializados, hospitales, etc.) para los aspectos que el país necesita, incluidos medicamentos huérfanos, enfermedades prevalentes y abandonadas, y el uso terapéutico de los principios activos originarios.

The regulation of clinical trials by the Government is a process of continuous change and adaptation, current challenge is to ensure the safety of participants and get balance of administrative procedures. Development and regulation of clinical trials in different countries vary according to the situation, context national or international execution, determining the insufficiency of national regulation requiring review of international regulation. The aim of this publication is to present a comprehensive overview of the role of Government in the regulation of clinical trials in different realities. It includes a review of the regulation in The European Union, The United States and some Latin American countries and finally the regulation in Peru. Contemporary trends in the regulation of clinical trials, are characterized by increasing standards of quality, ensuring the safety of the participants, promote transparency, lower bureaucratic processes and strengthening ethics IRB committees in the framework of open democratic processes, involving all stakeholders in dynamic processes based on current knowledge and changing tendencies. The challenge is to promote the development of clinical trials from the government institutions (universities, research centers, institutes, hospitals, etc.) priorizing local needs including orphan drugs, prevalent and neglected diseases, and therapeutic use of active components of local native plants.

Rol del estado como autoridad reguladora de ensayos clínicos en el Perú / Role of the state as regulatory authority of clinical trials in Peru

El artículo hace una revisión histórica del proceso regulatorio de ensayos clínicos hasta llegar a la publicación del Reglamento de ensayos clínicos en el Perú, mediante Decreto Supremo 017-2006-SA. En menos de un año se modificó parte del Reglamento, teniendo muchas críticas entre ellas las de la Defensoría del Pueblo. Por otra parte, se hace un recuento de los logros como autoridad reguladora que han fortalecido su rol rector y su principal objetivo de protección de los derechos, seguridad y bienestar de los participantes en ensayos clínicos. Estos logros son los siguientes: el registro interno de ensayos clínicos, fortalecimiento de las inspecciones a todos los actores de la investigación, el sistema de notificación de eventos adversos serios (REAS-NET), la publicación de la Guía de aspectos éticos, legales y metodológicos de los ensayos clínicos para su uso por los comités de ética, que mereció un premio internacional, el primer puesto en la categoría de Fiscalización y cumplimiento de la ley, por la buena práctica de gestión pública: “Protegiendo los derechos de las personas participantes en estudios experimentales”, la publicación del nuevo Manual de procedimientos de ensayos clínicos y el Plan de implementación de la Red Nacional de Bioética en el Perú.

This article sheds the light on historical review of the clinical trials regulatory process to the publication of the Clinical Trials Regulation in Peru, by Supreme Decree 017-2006-SA. In this context, that Regulation was amended within one year, with many critics including from the Ombudsman. It also considers the achievements as a regulatory authority that has strengthened its steering and its main objective of protecting the rights, safety and welfare of human subjects in clinical trials. Those achievements are: the internal register of clinical trials, strengthening inspections on all stakeholders that take part in research, the Notification System of Serious Adverse Events (REAS-NET), the publication of the Guideline: “Ethical, Legal and methodology in clinical trials for use of the Ethical Review Board “ which won an international award; the 1st prize in the category of fizcalization and accomplishment of the law by the Good Practice of Public Management: “Protecting the rights of human subjects in experimental studies”, the publication of the new Manual of Procedures for Clinical Trials and the implementation Plan of the National Bioethics Network in Peru.

Clinical trial regulation in Argentina: overview and analysis of regulatory framework, use of existing tools, and researchers' perspectives to identify potential barriers / Reglamentación de ensayos clínicos en la Argentina: panorama y anßlisis del marco normativo, uso de los instrumentos existentes y perspectivas de los investigadores para identificar posibles obstáculos

OBJECTIVE: To review and analyze the regulatory framework of clinical trial registration, use of existing tools (publicly accessible national/international registration databases), and users' perspectives to identify possible barriers to registration compliance by sponsors and researchers in Argentina. METHODS: Internationally registered trials recruiting patients in Argentina were found through clincialtrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (ICTRP) and compared with publically available clinical trials registered through the National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Devices (ANMAT). A questionnaire addressing hypothesized attitudinal, knowledge-related, idiomatic, technical, economic, and regulatory barriers that could discourage or impede registration of clinical trials was developed, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample of researchers (investigators, sponsors, and monitors) in Argentina. RESULTS: A response rate of 74.3 percent (n = 29) was achieved, and 27 interviews were ultimately used for analysis. Results suggested that the high proportion of foreign-sponsored or multinational trials (64.8 percent of all protocols approved by ANMAT from 1994-2006) may contribute to a communication gap between locally based investigators and foreign-based administrative officials. A lack of knowledge about available international registration tools and limited awareness of the importance of registration were also identified as limiting factors for local investigators and sponsors. CONCLUSIONS: To increase compliance and promote clinical trial registration in Argentina, national health authorities, sponsors, and local investigators could take the following steps: implement a grassroots educational campaign to improve clinical trial regulation, support local investigator-sponsor-initiated clinical trials, and/or encourage local and regional scientific...

OBJETIVO: Examinar y analizar el marco normativo del registro de ensayos clínicos, el uso de los instrumentos existentes (bases de datos de registro nacionales o internacionales de acceso público), y las perspectivas de los investigadores para determinar posibles obstßculos al cumplimiento del registro por los patrocinadores y los investigadores en la Argentina. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en el sitio web clinicaltrials.gov y en la Plataforma Internacional de Registro de Ensayos Clínicos (ICTRP) de los ensayos clínicos registrados en el ßmbito internacional que reclutan pacientes en la Argentina y los resultados se compararon con los ensayos clínicos incluidos en el registro de acceso público de la Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT). Se elaboró un cuestionario que abordaba los hipotéticos obstßculos relacionados con la actitud hacia el registro y el conocimiento de este, así como obstßculos idiomßticos, técnicos y económicos que podrían desalentar o dificultar el registro de los ensayos clínicos, y se llevaron a cabo entrevistas semiestructuradas exhaustivas en una muestra de investigadores seleccionada para este fin (investigadores clínicos, patrocinadores y monitores) en la Argentina. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo una tasa de respuesta de 74,3 por ciento (n = 29) y finalmente se analizaron 27 entrevistas. Los resultados sugieren que la proporción elevada de ensayos clínicos con patrocinadores extranjeros o los ensayos multinacionales (64,8 por ciento de los protocolos aprobados por la ANMAT entre 1994 y el 2006) pueden contribuir a una deficiencia de comunicación entre los investigadores locales y los funcionarios administrativos ubicados en el extranjero. También se identificaron como factores limitantes para los investigadores y los patrocinadores locales la falta de conocimiento de los recursos internacionales disponibles para el registro y el escaso reconocimiento de la importancia del registro...

Comités de ética independientes para la investigación clínica en la Argentina: Evaluación y sistema para garantizar su independencia / Independent ethics committees for clinical research in Argentina: An evaluation and a system to guarantee their independence

La Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica de la República Argentina (ANMAT) exige para la ejecución de protocolos de investigación de nuevos fármacos en seres humanos, que éstos sean previamente evaluados y aprobados por un denominado comité de ética independiente de los patrocinadores e investigadores. Sin embargo, esta evaluación es lucrativa y la elección del comité de ética independiente es realizada por el patrocinador y/o investigador, lo que convierte la supuesta independencia en una relación del tipo "prestador de servicio - cliente". El Consejo de Revisión Institucional de Estudios de Investigación del Hospital Privado de Comunidad de Mar del Plata evaluó, entre los años 2005 y 2006, treinta y tres protocolos (con sus correspondientes hojas de información al paciente y consentimientos informados) aprobados previamente por un comité de ética independiente no institucional. La mediana de objeciones relevantes realizadas por este Consejo de Revisión a los mencionados protocolos, que obligaron a que sean modificados para luego ser aprobados, fue de tres por protocolo. La acreditación de los Comités de Ética Independiente exige un sistema que garantice la real independencia de éstos de los patrocinadores y/o investigadores a la vez que mecanismos de control de gestión que incluyan una eventual pérdida de la acreditación. Este trabajo propone algunas medidas concretas para corregir las deficiencias del sistema actual.

The Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica de la República Argentina (ANMAT) requires that an independent ethics committee of sponsors and/or researchers must previously evaluate and approve all the new pharmacological research protocols carried out on human beings. However, due to the lucrative nature of the evaluation, and because the selection of the Independent Ethics Committee is carried out by the sponsors and/or researchers, the assumed autonomy of the former can be reduced to merely a relationship of "service provider-customer". The Institutional Review Board of the Mar del Plata's Community Hospital has evaluated, between 2005 and 2006, thirty three research protocols (with their corresponding information sheets for patients and informed consent forms) previously approved by a non-institutional Independent Ethics Committee. The median number of objections made by the Institutional Review Board, which prompted the previously mentioned protocols to be modified in order to be approved, was of three per protocol. In other words, the accreditation of an Independent Ethics Committee requires a system that guarantees actual independence from the sponsors and/or researchers, as well as management control mechanisms that may lead them into an eventual loss of accreditation. Several measures are proposed in order to correct the deficiencies of the present system.

O processo de consentimento na pesquisa clínica: da elaboração à obtenção / The process of consent in clinical trials: from elaboration to accomplishment

O termo de consentimento é um documento recomendado por declarações internacionais, códigos de ética, resoluções e leis específicas para ser utilizado no cotidiano de pesquisas em saúde. A prática ou a obtenção do consentimento informado no exercício da medicina e da pesquisa em seres humanos é própria das últimas décadas e caracteriza o aperfeiçoamento da ética biomédica, constitui um requerimento legal e ético na pesquisa clínica envolvendo seres humanos. O principal desafio do processo de consentimento é garantir a compreensão adequada do indivíduo, entretanto os aspectos sociais, culturais e intelectuais dos indivíduos, ou mesmo a relação existente entre médico e paciente, às vezes, podem comprometer esse processo. O objetivo desse trabalho é apresentar critérios importantes no processo de consentimento que merecem ser destacados e abordados de acordo com normas e resoluções específicas.

Clinical trial practices: methodological and ethical aspects

The objective of this article is to review the methodology of controlled clinical trial, the protocol construction stages and their various ethical aspects. Controlled clinical trial is an experiment plant in which two contemporary groups of patients are compared in a forward-looking way, the first one is treated by the reference treatment [controlled group] and the other one if treated by the new treatment [tested group]. The allocation of treatments must be unpredictable and the follow-up of the patients makes blind with regard to the received treatment. These principles constitute the methodological frame of the controlled clinical trial which can not be approached under its only methodological or statistical angle. But also through an ethical serious reflexion worldwide especially with the fast progress of biologic sciences and medical techniques. In Morocco, the rule of the medicines is governed mainly by the Ministry of Health which has to assure security and the sanitary safety of the citizens. It is responsible for all the politics of medicines in Morocco and all their aspects. The realization of the bio equivalence and bio availability trials are two criteria which are darkened from the at present current texts. The accompanying measures of the implementation of these trials for example: universal principles in person's protection, the Good Practices of Medicine's manufacture, the Good Clinical Practices, the Good Practices of Laboratory are not foreseen either by the current rule