Effect of strength training versus raloxifene on bone weight, blood glucose, lipid and antioxidant profile in ovariectomized rats

We compared the effect of the treatment with strength training (ST) and raloxifene (RALOX) on bone weight, blood glucose, lipid, and antioxidant profile in ovariectomized rats. Twenty-four Wistar rats were distributed into four groups: ovariectomy + VEHICLE (control); ovariectomy + RALOX; ovariectomy + ST; ovariectomy + RALOX + ST. Thirty days after ovariectomy, the animals underwent the treatment with RALOX (750 µcg day-1) and/or ST (three sessions week-1). Thirty days after, all groups were scarified, tibia and femur were weighed, and the blood was collected for analysis of the lipid profile, glucose, and antioxidants catalase (CAT) and glutathione (GSH). The ST group showed greater femur weight (0.82 ± 0.18 g) and RALOX + ST had greater tibia weight (0.61± 0.17 g) than CONTROL with femur weight of 0.65 ± 0.08 g and tibia of 0.49 ± 0.08 g with no differences between treatments (p > 0.05). ST group showed significantly higher catalase (181.7 ± 15.4 µM g-1) compared to the other groups. In contrast, the GSH value was lower in ST group (89.2 ± 8.1 µM g-1) compared to RALOX (175.9 ± 17.1 µM g-1) and RALOX + ST (162.8 ± 12.1 µM g-1), but the values of these two groups did not differ from CONTROL(115.3 ± 21.1 µM g-1). Total cholesterol did not differ between groups (p > 0.05), but exercise alone(54.3 ± 2.5 mg dL-1) or with RALOX (53.0 ± 1.5 mg dL-1) resulted in higher HDL cholesterol than CONTROL (45.5 ± 2.5 mg dL-1). Only RALOX+ST presented lower glucose (140.3 ± 9.7 mg dL-1) values than CONTROL (201.7 ± 30.6 mg dL-1). In conclusion, ST promotes similar benefits on bone and metabolic parameters compared to pharmacological treatment in ovariectomized rats.(AU)

Effects of raloxifene combined with low-dose conjugated estrogen on the endometrium in menopausal women at high risk for breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of low-dose conjugated estrogen (CE), raloxifene, and the combination thereof on the endometrium of postmenopausal women. METHODS: Postmenopausal women between 45 and 60 years of age, with Gail score≥1.67 and no endometrial disorders, were randomly assigned to receive low-dose CE (0.3 mg), raloxifene (60 mg), or combined therapy for 1 year. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed at baseline and every 3 months; the Kupperman Index was assessed at baseline and every 6 months. Endometrial biopsies were performed if endometrial thickness (ET) was ≥5 mm or if vaginal bleeding occurred. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ET≥5 mm over the one-year period. RESULTS: Seventy-three women were randomly assigned and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Eight, three, and four women in the CE, raloxifene, and combination groups, respectively, exhibited ET≥5 mm. No genital bleeding was reported in the combination group. Endometrial biopsy revealed atrophy or polyps in all groups, with one patient in the CE group exhibiting a proliferative endometrium without atypia. At 6 months, there was a progressive increase in mean ET in the CE group, but not in the other two groups, with statistically significant differences at 6, 9, and 12 months. Mean scores for vasomotor symptoms and Kupperman Index favored the CE and combination groups over raloxifene. CONCLUSION: Combined raloxifene and low-dose CE decreased the severity of menopausal symptoms to a similar extent as CE alone and had similar effects as raloxifene alone on the endometrium.

Eficácia e segurança da Teriparatida comparada aos bifosfonados orais e Raloxifeno para prevenção de fraturas em osteoporose: revisão rápida de evidências / Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of Teriparatide compared to oral biposphonates or Raloxifene for osteoporotic fracture prevention: rapid review of evidence

Tecnologia: Teriparatida, comparada a bifosfonados orais ou Raloxifeno. Indicação: prevenção de fraturas em pessoas com osteoporose. Pergunta: A Teriparatida é mais eficaz e segura que os bifosfonados orais ou o Raloxifeno para tratamento da osteoporose e prevenção de fraturas secundárias à osteoporose? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado na base de dados PUBMED, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2). Resultados: Foram selecionadas 2 revisões sistemáticas, que atendiam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Para a população em geral com osteoporose, a Teriparatida evita mais fraturas vertebrais que o Alendronato de sódio ou Risedronato de sódio, mas efeito similar para fraturas não vertebrais. Teriparatida previne mais fraturas vertebrais e não vertebrais que Raloxifeno. Teriparatida tem maior efeito sobre a massa óssea corporal que o Risedronato de sódio e o Raloxifeno, mas tem efeito similar ao Alendronato de sódio. Na população masculina com osteoporose, a terapia com bifosfonados orais é mais eficaz que suplementação nutricional ou placebo para prevenir fraturas. Já o tratamento com Teriparatida não é mais eficaz que a suplementação nutricional ou placebo

Teriparatide compared to oral bisphosphonates or Raloxifene. Indication: prevention of fractures in people with osteoporosis. Question: Is Teriparatide more effective and safer than oral bisphosphonates or Raloxifene for treating osteoporosis and preventing fractures secondary to osteoporosis? Methods: Bibliographic survey was carried out in the PUBMED database, following predefined search strategies. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews was carried out using the tool Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2). Results: Two systematic reviews were selected, which met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion: For the general population with osteoporosis, Teriparatide prevents more vertebral fractures than Alendronate or Risedronate sodium, but has similar effect for non-vertebral fractures. Teriparatide prevents more vertebral and non-vertebral fractures than Raloxifene. Teriparatide has a greater effect on body bone mass than Risedronate sodium and Raloxifene, but it has a similar effect to Alendronate sodium. In the male population with osteoporosis, oral bisphosphonates is more effective than nutritional supplementation or placebo to prevent fractures. Treatment with teriparatide is no more effective than nutritional supplementation or placebo

Debería usarse Denosumab para la prevención y tratamiento de fracturas osteoporóticas en la mujer postmenopáusica? / Should Denosumab be used for the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women?

CONTEXTO: La osteoporosis es un trastorno esquelético caracterizado por resistencia óssea comprometida, predisposición pacientes a un mayor riesgo de fractura. La prevalência aumenta del 6% de las mujeres de edad 50 a 59 años a más del 40% de las mujeres de edad 80 años y mayores.1 Consecuencias de mantener una fractura puede ser grave e incluir un aumento riesgo de fracturas posteriores, hospitalización o institucionalización, disminución de la calidad de vida, y mortalidad prematura, con una carga relacionada com el sistema de salud. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LA TECNOLOGÍA: El denosumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que inhibe la resorción ósea producida por los osteoclastos. Fue comercializado en 2010 para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. En estos años se han identificado varios efectos adversos potencialmente graves: predisposición a infecciones, cáncer, reacciones de hipersensibilidad, transtornos autoinmunes, e incremento de la incidencia de múltiples fracturas vertebrales espontáneas al suspender el tratamiento. En este número revisamos estas novedades. TECNOLOGÍAS ALTERNATIVAS: Los agentes antirresortivos como los bifosfonatos orales son el estándar tratamiento para la osteoporosis posmenopáusica, en conjunto con medidas no farmacológicas y sobre todo el énfasis en la prevención de las caídas. Otras opciones de tratamiento incluyen un bisfosfonatos intravenoso (ácido zoledrónico), un agente formador de hueso (teriparatida) y un modulador selectivo del receptor de estrógeno (raloxifeno). MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica utilizando las siguientes bases de datos bibliográficas: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, y PubMed. Aplicaron filtros metodológicos para evaluaciones de tecnología sanitaria, estudios económicos, revisiones sistemáticas, metanálisis, y ensayos controlados aleatorios (ECA). La búsqueda también se limitó a Idioma en Inglés y humanos. Se excluyeron los resúmenes de congresos en los resultados de búsqueda. Se identificó la literatura gris (literatura que no se publica comercialmente) fue identificado mediante la búsqueda de secciones relevantes de la Lista de verificación de Grey Matters (http://www.cadth.ca/en/resources/grey-matters). Google y otros motores de búsqueda de internet fueron se utiliza para buscar en la web adicional materiales Estas búsquedas se complementaron con revisar las bibliografías de documentos clave y a través de contactos con expertos apropiados. ESTRATEGIA DE BÚSQUEDA: Se realizó una búsqueda con última fecha 26/08/2019 en diversas bases de datos, incluidas PubMed y Embase, así como la biblioteca Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov y bases de datos de revisiones sistematicas Epistemonikos. La búsqueda sólo incluyó documentos escrito en ingles y espanol. RESULTADOS: Denosumab comparado con placebo para pacientes con osteoporosis. El riesgo en el grupo de intervención (y su intervalo de confianza del 95%) se basa en el riesgo asumido en el grupo de comparación y en el efecto relativo de la intervención (y su intervalo de confianza del 95%). Eficacia frente a bifosfonatos: comparaciones directas. Se evalúa el perfil de evidencia GRADE donde se evidencia el metaanálisis entre cuatro ECA 5-8 que comprendieron 2071 participantes con un rango de seguimiento de 12 a 24 meses y compararon el uso de Denosumab con bifosfonatos orales (Alendronato,Etidronato). Existe incertidumbre en el efecto de denosumab sobre el riesgo de fracturas en comparación con bifosfonatos. La certeza em la evidencia va desde BAJA A MUY BAJA considerando la presencia de imprecisión muy seria y el potencial riesgo de sesgo de publicación. Eficacia frente a bifosfonatos: comparaciones indirectas. No se han encontrado en la literatura comparaciones directas entre Denosumab y otros fármacos distintos. Esta recomendación de cobertura otorga más peso a la incertidumbre en la eficacia comparada con bifosfonatos, al potencial impacto presupuestario de su uso y la potencial reducción de la equidad; que a la preferencia de los pacientes respecto de la forma de administración de las drogas para osteoporosis.

Efeito do pré-tratamento do treinamento de força e raloxifeno na periestropausa sobre a cicatrização óssea / Effect of pre-treatment of strength training and raloxifene in periestropause on bone healing

Há evidências de que o treinamento de força (TF) e raloxifeno (Ral) durante a periestropausa promove melhor qualidade óssea. No entanto, nos perguntamos se os benefícios esqueléticos do TF ou Ral realizados durante a periestropausa persistiriam após a fratura. Portanto, o presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar a influência do pré-tratamento de TF e administração de Ral durante o período de periestropausa na cicatrização óssea após osteotomia unilateral total. Durante 120 dias, ratas Wistar senescentes (18 a 21 meses completos) realizaram TF em escada três vezes por semana, receberam Ral (2,3mg/Kg/dia) via gavagem, ou realizaram TF associado ao tratamento com Ral. Após este período, os tratamentos foram interrompidos e a osteotomia total foi realizada na tíbia esquerda em todos os animais, que foram eutanasiados 1 ou 8 semanas após a cirurgia. A administração de Ral durante a periestropausa piorou o perfil bioquímico e oxidativo, diminuiu a expressão gênica de marcadores relacionados à reabsorção e remodelação óssea, que afetaram negativamente as propriedades físicoquímicas, levando a alterações na microarquitetura e massa dos calos ósseos, bem como na diminuição da resistência do calo à deformação torcional, resultando em menor qualidade do tecido durante a cicatrização óssea. Por outro lado, o TF realizado antes da osteotomia resultou em melhor cicatrização óssea, melhorando o perfil bioquímico e oxidativo, alterando o perfil genético em favor da formação e reabsorção óssea, bem como as propriedades físico-químicas do calo. Essas alterações levaram a uma melhor microarquitetura e massa óssea e aumentaram a resistência do calo à deformação torcional, confirmando seu efeito benéfico na qualidade do tecido ósseo, proporcionando aceleração da consolidação óssea.A combinação de terapias, nessa intensidade de exercício e dosagem da droga, o efeito negativo de Ral, superou o efeito positivo do TF, levando à diminuição da qualidade do tecido no processo de cicatrização óssea. Portanto, os resultados indicam que, além de excelente terapia não farmacológica e ação na prevenção da osteoporose, o TF realizado no período de envelhecimento pode aumentar a qualidade óssea no início da cicatrização e proporcionar melhor consolidação óssea. Além disso, o efeito anti-reabsortivo de Ral mostrado neste modelo atrasou o processo de reparo ósseo, trazendo considerável preocupação clínica(AU)

There is evidence that strength training (ST) and raloxifene (Ral) treatment during periestropause promotes better bone quality. We wanted to determine whether the skeletal benefits of ST or Ral treatment, performed during periestropause, would persist after fracture. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the influence of pretreatment with ST and administration of Ral during periestropause on bone healing after total unilateral osteotomy. Senescent female Wistar rats between 18­21 months of age, performed ST on a ladder three times per week, were administered Ral by gavage (2.3 mg/kg/day), or an association of both. After 120 days, the treatments were interrupted, and a total osteotomy was performed on the left tibia in all animals. They were euthanized 1 and 8 weeks post-osteotomy. The administration of Ral during periestropause worsened the biochemical and oxidative profile, decreased gene expression of markers related to bone resorption and remodeling, which negatively affected the physicochemical properties; this lead to changes in the bone callus microarchitecture and mass, as well as a decrease in callus resistance to torsional deformation, resulting in lower tissue quality during bone healing. In contrast, ST performed prior to the osteotomy resulted in better bone healing, improvement of the biochemical and oxidative profile, alteration of the genetic profile in favor of bone formation and resorption, as well as the physicochemical properties of the callus. These changes led to better microarchitecture and bone mass and increased callus resistance to torsional deformation, confirming its beneficial effect on the quality of bone tissue, providing acceleration of bone consolidation. The combination of therapies at this exercise intensity and drug dosage showed a negative interaction, where the negative effect of Ral overcame the positive effect of ST, leading to decreased tissue quality in the bone healing process. This study indicates that in addition to excellent nonpharmacological therapy and action in the prevention of osteoporosis, ST performed during the aging period may increase bone quality at the onset of healing and provide improved bone consolidation. Furthermore, the anti-osteoclastogenic effect of Ral shown in this model delayed the bone repair process, resulting in considerable clinical concern(AU)

LC-UV method to assay raloxifene hydrochloride in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

A specific, precise, and accurate LC-UV method was developed and validated to assay raloxifene hydrochloride in rat plasma. Raloxifene was analyzed after liquid-liquid extraction and quantified by reversed phase liquid chromatography (C18 column) using acetonitrile and ammonium acetate buffer 0.05 M (pH 4.0) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL.min-1 and UV detection at 287 nm. Retention times of raloxifene and internal standard (dexamethasone) were approximately 11 min and 14 min, respectively. Linearity was checked for a concentration range between 25 ng.mL-1 and 1000 ng.mL-1. Intra- and inter-day precision had relative standard deviation lower than 10% and 15%, respectively. Recovery from plasma was higher than 90%. Accuracy values were 98.21%, 99.70%, and 102.70% for lower, medium, and upper limits of quantification, respectively. Limit of quantification was 25 ng.mL-1. Drug stability was analyzed at room temperature using plasma kept in a freezer at -80 °C for 45 days after processing for 6 h and three freeze-thaw cycles. The advantages of the method developed include stability under different conditions and low limit of quantification. Its applicability was confirmed by the analysis of raloxifene levels in plasma samples in a designed pharmacokinetic study in rats after intravenous administration (5 mg.kg-1).

Manejo diagnóstico-terapéutico de las lesiones mamarias atípicas / Diagnostic-therapeutic Management of Atypical Breast Lesions

Las lesiones mamarias se dividen histológicamente en dos grandes grupos, malignas y benignas. Las lesiones malignas pueden ser de origen ductal o lobulillar, siendo el carcinoma ductal infiltrante la neoplasia invasiva más frecuente. Las lesiones benignas se clasifican en no proliferativas, proliferativas sin atipias y proliferativas con atipias. Dentro de los dos últimos grupos se encuentran entidades que conllevan un alto riesgo de desarrollar carcinoma de mama, como pueden ser la hiperplasia ductal atípica, la cicatriz radial o la neoplasia lobular. Revisamos en qué consisten dichas entidades y cuáles son sus características principales en imagen, fundamentalmente en mamografía y ecografía. Si tras realizar una biopsia se obtiene uno de esos diagnósticos histológicos, es importante analizar las características imagenológicas y el tipo de procedimiento realizado (número de cilindros obtenidos, calibre de aguja...), para realizar un adecuado manejo posterior. En algunos casos la actitud a seguir será la extirpación quirúrgica completa de la lesión, mientras que en otros se podrá realizar una extirpación percutánea (mediante biopsia con aguja de vacio), o incluso seguimiento estricto por imagen. Mediante diferentes casos mostraremos nuestra experiencia y analizaremos la literatura vigente para recordar esas entidades y llegar a un consenso adecuado sobre el manejo de las mismas.

Breast lesions are divided histologically into two large groups, malignant and benign. Malignant lesions may be of ductal or lobular origin, with infiltrating ductal carcinoma being the most frequent invasive neoplasm. Benign breast lesions are classified as proliferative, proliferative without atypia and proliferative with atypia. Within the last two classifications are entities that carry a high risk of developing breast carcinoma, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, radial scar or lobular neoplasia. We review what these entities consist of and what are their fundamental characteristics in image, fundamentally in mammography and ultrasound. When we perform one of these histological diagnoses after a biopsy, it is important to analyze the radiological characteristics and the type of procedure performed (number of cylinders, needle gauge ...) to perform an appropriate posterior management. In some cases the attitude to be followed will be the complete surgical removal of the lesion, while in others a percutaneous excision (through vacuum needle biopsy) or even strict image follow-up may be performed. Through different cases we will show our experience and analyze current literature to remember these entities and reach an adequate management consensus.

A SERM increasing the expression of the osteoblastogenesis and mineralization-related proteins and improving quality of bone tissue in an experimental model of osteoporosis

Abstract Raloxifene is an antiresorptive drug, selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Objective To evaluate proteins related to bone repair at the peri-implant bone in a rat model of osteoporosis treated with raloxifene. Material and Methods 72 rats were divided into three groups: SHAM (healthy animals), OVX (ovariectomized animals), and RLX (ovariectomized animals treated with raloxifene). Raloxifene was administered by gavage (1 mg/kg/day). Tibial implantation was performed 30 days after ovariectomy, and animals were euthanized at 14, 42, and 60 days postoperatively. Samples were collected and analyzed by immunohistochemical reactions, molecular analysis, and microtomographic parameters. Results RLX showed intense staining of all investigated proteins at both time points except for RUNX2. These results were similar to SHAM and opposite to OVX, showing mild staining. The PCR gene expression of OC and ALP values for RLX (P<0.05) followed by SHAM and OVX groups. For BSP data, the highest expression was observed in the RLX groups and the lowest expression was observed in the OVX groups (P<0.05). For RUNX2 data, RLX and SHAM groups showed greater values compared to OVX (P<0.05). At 60 days postoperatively, microtomography parameters, related to closed porosity, showed higher values for (Po.N), (Po.V), and (Po) in RLX and SHAM groups, whereas OVX groups showed lower results (P<0.05); (BV) values (P=0.009); regarding total porosity (Po.tot), RLX group had statistically significant lower values than OVX and SHAM groups (P=0.009). Regarding the open porosity (Po.V and Po), the SHAM group presented the highest values, followed by OVX and RLX groups (P<0.05). The Structural Model Index (SMI), RLX group showed a value closer to zero than SHAM group (P<0.05). Conclusions Raloxifene had a positive effect on the expression of osteoblastogenesis/mineralization-related proteins and on micro-CT parameters related to peri-implant bone healing.

The Beneficial and Adverse Effects of Raloxifene in Menopausal Women: A Mini Review

OBJECTIVES: The present mini review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the beneficial and adverse effects of raloxifene in menopausal women. METHODS: This study is a review of relevant publications about the effects of raloxifene on sleep disorder, depression, venous thromboembolism, the plasma concentration of lipoprotein, breast cancer, and cognitive function among menopausal women. RESULTS: Raloxifene showed no significant effect on depression and sleep disorder. Verbal memory improved with administration of 60 mg/day of raloxifene while a mild cognitive impairment risk reduction by 33% was observed with administration of 120 mg/day of raloxifene. Raloxifene was associated with a 50% decrease in the need for prolapse surgery. The result of a meta-analysis showed a significant decline in the plasma concentration of lipoprotein in the raloxifene group compared to placebo (standardized mean difference, −0.43; 10 trials). A network meta-analysis showed that raloxifene significantly decreased the risk of breast cancer (relative risk, 0.572; 95% confidence interval, 0.327–0.881; P = 0.01). In terms of adverse effects of raloxifene, the odds ratio (OR) was observed to be 1.54 (P = 0.006), indicating 54% increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) while the OR for pulmonary embolism (PE) was 1.05, suggesting a 91% increase in the risk of PE alone (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene had no significant effect on depression and sleep disorder but decreased the concentration of lipoprotein. Raloxifene administration was associated with an increased risk of DVT and PE and a decreased risk of breast cancer and pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.

Influência do treinamento de força associado ou não ao raloxifeno sobre o perfil transcricional e microestrutural ósseo de ratas Wistar naturalmente envelhecidas / Influence of strength training associated or not with raloxifene on transcriptional and microstructural bone profile of naturally aged female Wistar rats

A ocorrência de doenças crônicas e degenerativas é significativamente maior nos organismos durante o envelhecimento, dentre elas, a osteoporose, que resulta em aumento no número de fraturas. As fraturas são as consequências mais dramáticas da osteoporose, sendo que do colo do fêmur é a mais severa, com maior incidência de morbidades e mortalidade. A menor concentração plasmática de estrogênio nas mulheres menopausadas, exerce ação primordial no desenvolvimento desta doença. Desta maneira, o objetivo deste estudo foi estudar a prevenção da osteoporose em decorrência do envelhecimento reprodutivo feminino, especificamente no período de periestropausa, utilizando treinamento de força (TF), raloxifeno (Ral) ou combinação de TF e Ral. Durante 120 dias, ratas Wistar no período do envelhecimento (18 a 21 meses) realizaram TF em escada três vezes por semana, receberam Ral (1mg/Kg/dia) por gavagem, ou realizaram TF associado ao tratamento com Ral. Microarquitetura óssea cortical e trabecular, densidade mineral óssea areal (DMOa), força óssea, imunoistoquímica (OCN, TRAP e SOST) e superfície de osteoclastos do colo do fêmur foram avaliadas, além de PCR (Runx2, Sp7, Alp, Bsp, Ocn, Rank, Rankl, Opg, Trap e Ctsk) e Western Blot (p-ERα e TRAP) do tecido ósseo de todo o fêmur. Os resultados demonstram que os tratamentos modularam o ciclo de remodelamento ósseo de maneiras diferentes: TF estimulou RNAm de marcadores osteoblásticos e osteoclásticos, enquanto Ral diminuiu marcadores osteoclásticos e TF associado a Ral aumentou marcadores osteoblásticos e diminuiu osteoclásticos. Ambos tratamentos resultaram em melhora da microarquitetura trabecular do colo do fêmur de ratas na periestropausa, todavia, apenas o TF foi capaz de melhorar além da microarquitetura trabecular, a cortical e força óssea. Desta maneira, sugerimos que a realização de TF, utilização de Ral ou a associação de TF e Ral durante a periestropausa são intervenções válidas na prevenção de osteoporose em decorrência do envelhecimento reprodutivo feminino, porém os efeitos do TF parecem ser superiores. Levando em consideração que a carga mecânica gerada pelo TF age também em tecidos não esqueléticos, concluímos que TF pode ser intervenção sistêmica para osteoporose. Esses resultados adicionam novas informações à literatura sobre terapêuticas preventivas para osteoporose e fornecem informações relevantes para estudos pré-clínicos(AU)

The association of aging with osteoporosis results in an increased number of fractures. In these fractures, the femoral neck is involved in 75% of affected women and is one of the most dramatic possible consequences. The aim of this study was to prevent female osteoporosis using strength training (ST), raloxifene (Ral) or a combination of ST plus Ral during the natural female aging process, specifically in the periestropause period. For 120 total days, aging female Wistar rats at 18-21 months of age performed ST on three times per week, and Ral was administered daily by gavage (1mg/kg/day). Bone microarchitecture, areal bone mineral density (aBMD), bone strength of the femoral neck, immunohistochemistry, western blotting (p-ERα and TRAP) and RT-PCR were assessed. We found that the treatments modulate the bone remodeling cycle in different ways. Both ST and Ral treatment resulted in improved bone microarchitecture in the femoral neck of rats in late periestropause. However, only ST improved cortical microarchitecture and bone strength in the femoral neck. In addition, ST stimulated mRNA levels of osteoclastic and osteoblastic markers, while Ral decreased mRNA levels of osteoclastic markers. The combined ST plus Ral therapy increased osteoblastic markers and decreased osteoclast markers. In this way, we suggest that SF, the use of Ral or the association of ST and Ral during periestropause are valid interventions in the prevention of osteoporosis due to female reproductive aging, but the effects of ST seem to be superior, taking into account that the mechanical load generated by ST also acts on nonskeletal tissues, we conclude that ST can be a systemic intervention for osteoporosis. These results add new information to the literature on preventive therapies for osteoporosis and provide relevant information for preclinical studies(AU)

Combination Therapy of Raloxifene and Alendronate for Treatment of Osteoporosis in Elderly Women

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of raloxifene and alendronate with those of monotherapies in elderly women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Sixty-two postmenopausal women (mean age 63.5 ± 0.5 years) attending gynecologic osteoporosis clinics with established osteoporosis were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups and monitored for 3 years. All patients enrolled in this study, including those in the control group (n = 14), received 1.0 g elemental calcium and 400 units of vitamin D per day. The raloxifene group (n = 16) received raloxifene 60 mg (Evista®) per day; alendronate group (n = 17) received low-dose (5 mg) alendronate with calcitriol 0.5 µg (Maxmarvil®) per day; and the combination therapy group (n = 15) received both raloxifene 60 mg and low-dose (5 mg) alendronate with calcitriol 0.5 µg. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine and hip before and after 3 years of treatment. RESULTS: In patients who received the combined therapy, BMD increased in the lumbar spine and the hip by 7.2% (P<0.001) and 4.8% (P<0.001) at 3 years. For patients in the alendronate group, the increases were 6.7% (P<0.001) and 3.1% (P<0.01) respectively, for the raloxifene group, the increases were 4.36% (P<0.001) and 1.9% (P<0.05) in the vertebrae and femora, respectively; however, the BMD of patients in the control group decreased by 1.81% (P<0.05) and 1.6% (P<0.05), respectively, after 3 years. Patients who received the combination therapy had significantly higher BMD in both the vertebrae femora (P<0.01) in comparison to that in those treated with raloxifene or alendronate individually. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-year randomized study showed the improved effects of alendronate and raloxifene combination on spine and hip BMD in elderly postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.

Erratum to: Raloxifene Administration in Women Treated with Long Term Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist for Severe Endometriosis: Effects on Bone Mineral Density

The author and author's affiliation should be corrected.

Effects of a combination therapy of sclerostin antibody III and raloxifene on bone formation markers in ovariectomized rats

Objective: To determine the systemic effect of sclerostin monoclonal antibody [Scl-AbIII] administration on markers of bone formation and compare it with a combination of sclerostin antibody and raloxifene

Study Design: Experimental study

Place and Duration of Study: Medical College Animal House at King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January to November 2014

Methodology: Forty-five female rats were divided into 5 groups equally; 1 control group and 4 groups of ovariectomized [OVX] rats: control OVX rats and OVX rats treated by Scl-AbIII, raloxifene or Scl-AbIII+raloxifene one month after ovariectomy, continued for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, serum levels of Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase [BSAP], alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 [IGF-1], Parathyroid Hormone [PTH], Ca[2+] and phosphorus were measured. Uterus was weighed and body weight change was calculated

Results: Scl-AbIII or raloxifene treatment produced significant increase of serum BSAP, osteocalcin, IGF-1, PTH and Ca[2+] levels. Raloxifene, either alone or combined with Scl-AbIII attenuated the decrease in uterus wet weight, and the increase in body weight seen in OVX rats. Combination therapy of Scl-AbIII, and raloxifene produced significant increase of serum alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and IGF-1 levels than treatment with either Scl-AbIII or raloxifene alone

Conclusion: Combination therapy of Scl-AbIII and raloxifene is an attractive strategy to enhance bone formation and can offer better gain over treatment with either one of them alone. Confirmation of these preliminary observations must await careful long-term studies

Raloxifene neutralizes bone brittleness induced by anti-remodeling treatment and increases fatigue life through non-cell mediated mechanisms / El raloxifeno invierte fragilidad ósea inducida por el tratamiento anti-remodelación y aumenta la resistencia a la fatiga a través de mecanismos mediados no celulares

Pre-clinical data have shown that tissue level effects stemming from bisphosphonateinduced suppression of bone remodeling can result in bone that is stronger yet more brittle. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce bone brittleness through non-cellular mechanisms. The goal of this work was to test the hypothesis that raloxifene can reverse the bone brittleness resulting from bisphosphonate treatment. Dog and mouse bone from multiple bisphosphonate dosing experiments were soaked in raloxifene and then assessed for mechanical properties. Mice treated with zoledronate in vivo had lower post-yield mechanical properties compared to controls. Raloxifene soaking had significant positive effects on select mechanical properties of bones from both vehicle and zoledronate treated mice. Although the effects were blunted in zoledronate bones relative to vehicle, the soaking was sufficient to normalize properties to control levels. Additional studies showed that raloxifene-soaked bones had a significant positive effect on cycles to failure (+114%) compared to control-soaked mouse bone. Finally, raloxifene soaking significantly improved select properties of ribs from dogs treated for 3 years with alendronate. These data show that ex vivo soaking in raloxifene can act through non-cellular mechanisms to enhance mechanical properties of bone previously treated with bisphosphonate. We also document that the positive effects of raloxifene soaking extend to enhancing fatigue properties of bone. (AU)

Los datos preclínicos han demostrado que los efectos a nivel de tejido que se derivan de la supresión del remodelado óseo inducida por bifosfonatos puede dar como resultado un hueso que es más fuerte pero más frágil. Está comprobado que el raloxifeno reduce la fragilidad ósea a través de mecanismos no celulares. El objetivo de este trabajo fue probar la hipótesis de que el raloxifeno puede revertir la fragilidad ósea resultante del tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Se emplearon huesos de perro y ratón de múltiples experimentos con diferentes dosis de bifosfonatos los cuales fueron sumergidos en raloxifeno y luego se evaluaron sus propiedades mecánicas. Ratones tratados con zoledronato in vivo mostraron propiedades mecánicas post-rendimiento más bajas en comparación con los controles. Luego de sumergirlos en raloxifeno se observaron efectos positivos significativos en algunas propiedades biomecánicas tanto en los huesos de ratones tratados con vehículo como con zoledronato. Aunque los efectos se atenuaron en los huesos tratados con zoledronato en relación con los tratados con vehículo, el raloxifeno fue suficiente para normalizar las propiedades a niveles basales. Estudios adicionales mostraron que los huesos sumergidos en raloxifeno tuvieron un efecto positivo significativo en los ciclos de fractura (+ 114%) en comparación con los huesos de ratón sumergido en vehículo. Finalmente, el raloxifeno mejoró significativamente las propiedades de costillas de perros tratados durante 3 años con alendronato. Estos datos muestran que la inclusión ex vivo en raloxifeno puede actuar a través de mecanismos no celulares para mejorar las propiedades mecánicas de huesos previamente tratado con bifosfonatos. También documentamos que los efectos positivos del raloxifeno mejoran las propiedades de fatiga del hueso. (AU)

Using agents that suppress bone remodeling to treat or prevent joint disease: quo vadis?

Treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with antiremodeling agents has had a mixed record of results. It is likely that remodeling suppression is only effective when used in the early phases of OA, before significant progression. Animal and human studies largely bear this out. Treatment of young mice with a RANKL inhibitor suppresses bone resorption and prevents OA progression. Likewise, bisphosphonate treatments in rodents and rabbits with induced injury or inflammatory arthritis, reduced cartilage degeneration when administered preemptively, but later administration did not. The increased prevalence of OA in women after the menopause, and presence of estrogen receptors in joint tissues, suggests that treatment with estrogens or Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators may be effective. However, in clinical trials of knee and hip, results show decreased or increased risk for OA, or no effect. Raloxifene had positive effects in animal models, but no effect in human studies. More recent potential treatments such as strontium ranelate or cathepsin-K inhibitors may be effective, but may work directly on the cartilage rather than through their well-known effects on bone. The conclusion from these studies is that anti-remodeling agents must be administered pre-emptively or in the very early stages of disease to be effective. This means that better imaging techniques or identification of early structural changes in bone that occur before progressive cartilage destruction must be developed. (AU)

Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Drug in Postmenopausal Women with Spinal Compression Fracture: Combined Consecutive Therapy of Teriparatide and Raloxifene versus Bisphosphonate Single / 대한신경손상학회지

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonate, a typical bone resorption inhibitor, is an important first-line drug for treating osteoporosis. Recent studies show a novel paradigm in stimulating bone formation. Teriparatide, which is composed of recombinant human parathyroid hormone, stimulates osteoblasts and induces bone regeneration. Bone mineral density (BMD) that was used before and after the treatment with anti-osteoporosis drug was compared for the effectiveness in therapy between a combination of teriparatide and selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and bisphosphonate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 85 postmenopausal women who were concurrently diagnosed with osteoporosis and spinal compression fracture between November 2008 and January 2015. The targeted group were treated with teriparatide and SERM (TS group, n=26) and bisphosphonate (B group, n=59). RESULTS: In both groups, BMD of femur neck was not improved after the medication. In the TS group, on the other hand the BMD and T-score of lumbar spine has significantly improved. BMD ratio of lumbar spine was prominently higher than those of TS group. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of teriparatide and SERM was very effective in treating the lumbar spine, compared to that of bisphosphonate. Although the period of teriparatide treatment has been relatively short, the preventive effects of compression fracture were considerable. Thus, combination therapy of teriparatide and SERM is highly recommended for patients who are concerned with spinal compression fracture from osteoporosis.

Cost-effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Interventions to Prevent Osteoporotic Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia

BACKGROUND: To assess the cost-effectiveness of drug therapy to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Korea. METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation was conducted for lifetime with a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal women with osteopenia and without prior fractures. They were assumed to receive calcium/vitamin D supplements only or drug therapy (i.e., raloxifene or risedronate) along with calcium/vitamin D for 5 years. The Markov model includes fracture-specific and non-fracture specific health states (i.e. breast cancer and venous thromboembolism), and all-cause death. Published literature was used to determine the model parameters. Local data were used to estimate the baseline incidence rates of fracture in those with osteopenia and the costs associated with each health state. RESULTS: From a societal perspective, the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the base cases that had T-scores between -2.0 and -2.4 and began drug therapy at the age of 55, 60, or 65 years were $16,472, $6,741, and -$13,982 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, respectively. Sensitivity analyses for medication compliance, risk of death following vertebral fracture, and relaxing definition of osteopenia resulted in ICERs reached to $24,227 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: ICERs for the base case and sensitivity analyses remained within the World Health Organization's willingness-to-pay threshold, which is less than per-capita gross domestic product in Korea (about $25,700). Thus, we conclude that drug therapy for osteopenia would be a cost-effective intervention, and we recommend that the Korean National Health Insurance expand its coverage to include drug therapy for osteopenia.

Pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis

The objectives of this article are to review current pharmacologic approaches for the treatment of osteoporosis in Korea. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are necessary for osteoporotic patients with inadequate calcium intake and low vitamin D nutritional status, which is a risk factor of osteoporosis. Several pharmacologic therapies are available for treatment of osteoporosis. Antiresorptive agents, bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, denosumab, estrogens, and tibolone are the basis of therapy. Antiresorptive medications reduce the rates of bone remodeling. Several drugs have shown their ability to reduce vertebral and/or nonvertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates that reduced bone loss and fragility are usually the mainstay of the treatment of osteoporosis. The recently registered denosumab shows similar anti-fracture efficacy by neutralizing receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, however, marked differences in reversibility can be observed between the two drugs. The anabolic agents, teriparatide, stimulates new bone formation, increases bone density, and reduces fractures. Other treatment options such as hormone replacement therapy, tibolone, raloxifene, and bazedoxifene are also reviewed in this article. Pharmacologic treatments of osteoporosis are associated with adverse effects, but the benefits generally far surpass the risks.

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are now being used as a treatment for breast cancer, osteoporosis and postmenopausal symptoms, as these drugs have features that can act as an estrogen agonist and an antagonist, depending on the target tissue. After tamoxifen, raloxifene, lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene SERMs have been developed and used for treatment. The clinically decisive difference among these drugs (i.e., the key difference) is their endometrial safety. Compared to bisphosphonate drug formulations for osteoporosis, SERMs are to be used primarily in postmenopausal women of younger age and are particularly recommended if there is a family history of invasive breast cancer, as their use greatly reduces the incidence of this type of cancer in women. Among the above mentioned SERMs, raloxifene has been widely used in prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures, and clinical studies are now underway to test the comparative advantages of raloxifene with those of bazedoxifene, a more recently developed SERM. Research on a number of adverse side effects of SERM agents is being performed to determine the long-term safety of this class of compouds for treatment of osteoporosis.

Raloxifene Administration in Women Treated with Long Term Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist for Severe Endometriosis: Effects on Bone Mineral Density

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of raloxifene in preventing bone loss associated with long term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administration. METHODS: Twenty-two premenopausal women with severe endometriosis were treated with leuprolide acetate depot at a dosage of 3.75 mg/4 weeks, for 48 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at admission, and after 12 treatment cycles. RESULTS: At cycle 12 of GnRH-a plus raloxifene treatment, lumbar spine, trochanter femoral neck, and Ward's BMD differed from before the treatment. A year after treatment, the lumbar spine and trochanter decreased slightly, but were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the administration of GnRH-a plus raloxifene in pre-menopausal women with severe endometriosis, is an effective long-term treatment to prevent bone loss.