Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1154-1159, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-769763

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The robot-assisted approach to distal ureteral reconstruction is increasingly utilized. Traditionally, the robot is docked between the legs in lithotomy position resulting in limited bladder access for stent placement. We examined the use of side docking of the daVinci robot® to perform distal ureteral reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of distal ureteral reconstruction (ureteral reimplantation and uretero-ureterostomy) executed robotically was performed at a single institution by a single surgeon. The daVinci robotic® Si surgical platform was positioned at the right side of the patient facing towards the head of the patient, i.e. side docking. Results: A total of 14 cases were identified from 2011–2013. Nine patients underwent ureteral reimplantation for ureteral injury, two for vesicoureteral reflux, one for ureteral stricture, and one for megaureter. One patient had an uretero-ureterostomy for a distal stricture. Three patients required a Boari flap due to extensive ureteral injury. Mean operative time was 286 minutes (189–364), mean estimated blood loss was 40cc (10–200), and mean length of stay was 2.3 days (1–4). Follow-up renal ultrasound was available for review in 10/14 patients and revealed no long-term complications in any patient. Mean follow-up was 20.7 months (0.1–59.3). Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral reconstruction is safe and effective. Side docking of the robot allows ready access to the perineum and acceptable placement of the robot to successfully complete ureteral repair.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Patient Positioning/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ureter/surgery , Creatinine/blood , Intraoperative Complications , Length of Stay , Operative Time , Perioperative Period , Postoperative Complications , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Replantation/instrumentation , Replantation/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Ureterostomy/instrumentation , Ureterostomy/methods
2.
Rev. venez. urol ; 45(2): 68-71, jul.-dic. 1998.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-252071

ABSTRACT

Entre marzo de 1994 y noviembre de 1997, fueron reimplantados un total de 97 unidades renales por técnicas extravesical según Lich-Gregoir. Todos los casos correspondieron a pacientes pediátricos de ambos sexos portadores de reflujo vesico renal primario. Del total de unidades renales tratados, 4.1 por ciento experimentaron persistencia de reflujo y 9.2 por ciento presentaron hidronefrosis, de las cuales 2 ameritaron nuevo reimplante ureteral. El éxito global en el tratamiento de reflujo se logró en 91 unidades renales (94 por ciento). El porcentaje de hematuria macroscópica y disuria fue significativamente menor (12.5 por ciento) que el observado en las técnicas transvesicales (100 por ciento). Cuarenta y nueve por ciento de los pacientes requirieron cateterismo vesical por 24 horas; 39 por ciento entre 24 y 48 horas y 12 por ciento más de 48 horas. El tiempo de estancia hospitalaria fue menor de 24 horas en 62 por ciento de los casos; entre 24 y 48 horas 26 por ciento y sólo 12 por ciento de los infantes necesitaron 2 o más días de hospitalización antes de ser egresados. Considerando los resultados, recomendamos la utilización de la técnica extravesical de Lich-Gregoir para el tratamiento de reflujo vesico renal primario de III y IV grado ya que ofrece menor morbilidad que las técnicas transvesicales


Subject(s)
Humans , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/complications , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/therapy , Replantation/instrumentation , Replantation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL