Evaluation of Blood Culture System for Culture of Body Fluids / 임상검사와정도관리

BACKGROUND: Invasive and life-threatening infections such as meningitis, pericarditis, peritonitis, empyema, and septic arthritis are diagnosed via culture of relevant body fluids (BFs). The blood culture system (BCS) has been reported to be a useful alternative for BFs culture to enhance recovery of fastidious microorganisms and reduce detection time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of BCS as compared to conventional culture method (CCM) in terms of culture yield. METHODS: The samples collected between October 2011 and September 2012 were processed using CCM, while those collected between October 2012 and September 2013 were processed using BCS. The 2 processes were compared in terms of total number of requests, recovery rate, turnaround time (TAT), and detection time. RESULTS: The positive rate using CCM was 18.2% (575/3,151), where 845 isolates were recovered from 575 specimens. Using BCS, the positive rate was 28.3% (922/3,260), where 1,472 isolates were recovered from 922 specimens. While comparing the 2 methods on terms of yield of clinically significant isolates, a greater number of fungi (1.2%) and anaerobic bacteria (1.4%) were recovered using BCS as compared to using CCM. The difference in TAT for positive samples was 24 hours and 40 minutes, where BCS had a shorter TAT than CCM. The mean detection time of 951 positive samples by BCS was 19 hours and 56 minutes. Growth of clinically significant isolates was detected within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: BCS for culture of BFs showed an improvement in recovery rate, number of isolates, and TAT as compared to CCM. Thus, BCS is a suitable alternative for culture of BFs.

Evaluation of the MicroScan MICroSTREP Plus Antimicrobial Panel for Testing beta-Hemolytic Streptococci and Viridans Group Streptococci / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: In order to determine the clinical usefulness of the MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA) MICroSTREP plus antimicrobial panel (MICroSTREP) for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) and viridans group streptococci (VGS), we compared the accuracy of MICroSTREP with that of the CLSI reference method. METHODS: Seventy-five BHS and 59 VGS isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to ampicillin, penicillin, cefotaxime, meropenem, erythromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and vancomycin by using MICroSTREP and the CLSI agar dilution method. RESULTS: The overall essential agreement with regard to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (within +/-1 double dilution) between MICroSTREP and the CLSI reference method was 98.2%, and categorical agreement (CA) was 96.9%. For the BHS isolates, the CA for erythromycin was 96.0%, whereas that for cefotaxime, meropenem, levofloxacin, and vancomycin (for ampicillin, penicillin, and clindamycin; 98.7%) was 100%. For the VGS isolates, the CA for penicillin was 84.7% and that for erythromycin, clindamycin, and vancomycin (for meropenem, 86.5%; for ampicillin, 88.1%; and for cefotaxime and levofloxacin, 96.6%) was 100%. All categorical errors of penicillin and ampicillin in the VGS isolates were minor. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of MICroSTREP is comparable to that of the CLSI reference method, suggesting that this panel can be effective for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of BHS and VGS.

Colonization Rate, Serotypes, and Distributions of Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin(B) Resistant Types of Group B Streptococci in Pregnant Women / 대한임상미생물학회지

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neonatal group B streptococcal infection depends mainly on the colonization rate of pregnant women by group B streptococci (GBS). Although the colonization rate of Korean women by GBS is considered lower than in other countries, recent data on the maternal colonization rate of GBS are sparse. METHODS: From August 2008 to June 2009, swab specimens from the anorectus, vagina, and urethral orifice of a sample of 234 pregnant Korean women were placed in new Granada medium (NGM-H), tube medium (NGM-T), commercial NGM (NGM-B), and selective Todd-Hewitt broth (S-THB) for 18~24 hours in 5% CO2 at 35degrees C. Agar dilutional antimicrobial susceptibility tests, serotyping, and PCR were performed for GBS isolates. RESULTS: The colonization rate of GBS in pregnant women was 11.5% (27/234). Of the specimen cultures, 9.8% of anorectal cultures were positive, 8.1% of urethral orifice cultures were positive, and 7.3% of vagina cultures were positive. The detection rate of GBS in the different culture media was S-THB (96.3%), NGM-B (92.6%), NGM-H (88.9%), and NGM-T (85.2%). The distribution of GBS serotypes was as follows: III (29.6%), V and VI (22.2%), Ib and II (11.1%), and Ia (3.7%). 33.3% of GBS isolates were resistant to erythromycin and 44.4% to clindamycin. Among the nine erythromycin-resistant isolates, eight were serotype V and VI, which are erm(B) positive serotypes. CONCLUSION: The colonization of pregnant women by GBS, and the incidence of resistance of the GBS isolates to erythromycin and clindamycin were higher than those previously reported. Serotypes V and VI, GBS serotypes that carry the erm(B), are novel serotypes that have not previously been identified in pregnant Korean women.

Comparison of the MicroScan(R) Combo Panel Synergies plus with the MicroScan(R) Conventional Combo Panel for Diagnostic Performance of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria / 대한임상미생물학회지

BACKGROUND: To access the clinical usefulness of MicroScan(R) Synergies plus Combo Panels (Siemens, USA) for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and Gram-positive cocci (GPC), we compared MicroScan(R) Synergies plus Combo Panels with MicroScan(R) conventional Combo Panels. METHODS: One-hundred four isolates of GNB were simultaneously tested with MicroScan(R) Synergies plus Neg Combo Type 2 Panel (SINC2) and MicroScan(R) Neg Combo Panel Type 44 (NC44). One-hundred isolates of GPC were simultaneously tested with MicroScan(R) Synergies plus Pos Combo 3 Panel (SIPC3) and MicroScan(R) Pos Combo 1A (PC1A). RESULTS: Of the GNB isolates, agreement rate of identification between SINC2 and NC44 were 92.3% to the species level and 93.3% to the genus level. Of the GPC isolates, agreement rate of identification between SIPC3 and PC1A were 85.0% to the species level and 100% to the genus level. Of the GNB isolates, agreement rate of AST according to antimicrobial agents between SINC2 and NC44 ranged from 86.5% to 100%. Among GPC isolates, agreement rate of AST according to antimicrobial agents between SIPC3 and PC1A were higher than 96.0% with the exception of gentamicin and quinupristin-dalfopristin. CONCLUSION: Compared with MicroScan(R) conventional Combo Panels (NC44, PC1A), MicroScan(R) Synergies plus Combo Panels (SINC2, SIPC3) showed high agreement rate of identification and AST, and had the advantage of more rapid reporting.