Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
J Postgrad Med ; 1996 Apr-Jun; 42(2): 43-5
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-116295

RESUMEN

100 patients with ASA risk I & II and undergoing perianal surgery were studied for anaesthetic effects and postoperative analgesia following either intrathecal pethidine or lignocaine. Saddle block was performed either with intrathecal pethidine 5% (50 mg/ml) 0.5 mg/kg or 1 ml of 5% lignocaine. Sensory and motor block postoperative analgesia, need for additional analgesia were studied. The onset of sensory and motor blockade with lignocaine was faster than pethidine. However the sensory and motor blockade lasted longer with pethidine. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 15.39 +/- 5.14 hours as against duration of postoperative analgesia with lignocaine which was 1.3 +/- 0.53 hours. Only 10% of patients in the pethidine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation whereas 30% of patients in the lignocaine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Anestésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Ano/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Meperidina/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA