Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-42430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The stroke unit has been established as a standard care for stroke. However, it has not been widely established in developing countries due to the lack of understanding and limited resources. OBJECTIVE: To compare the complications and mortality of stroke patients admitted in the stroke unit and short-term ward with those admitted in the general medical ward. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors prospectively collected data of acute stroke patients who were admitted after the set up of the stroke unit and stroke short-term ward in 2003, and compared with the data of those who were admitted in a general medical ward in 2001. All acute stroke patients who presented within seven days of the onset were admitted and those who had final diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were studied. Patients in the stroke unit were taken care of by a multidisciplinary team approach under clinical guidelines and a care map. The short-term ward is a part of the general medical ward and stroke patients were treated by a multidisciplinary team followed by homecare treatment. The endpoints were mortality rate, neurological and medical complications during admissions, and the mean length of stay. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-four patients were studied. Three hundred and eighty-seven patients were admitted in 2001 and 407 patients in 2003. Among patients presented 2003, three hundred and one cases were treated in the acute stroke unit whereas 106 were admitted in the short-term ward. There was no difference in stroke risk factors and stroke subtypes between the two groups, except for dyslipidemia and cigarette smoking, which were more prevalent in patients admitted in 2003. Patients in the stroke unit and the short-term ward had significantly less mortality than those in the general medical ward (8.9 and 2.1%). Overall complications in the stroke unit and the short-term ward were 16.8%, compared to 26% of those admitted into the general medical ward. Significantly less brain edema, hemorrhagic infarction, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and pressure sore were also observed. The length of hospital stay of the patients admitted in 2001 and 2003 was 11.26 and 8.09 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combination of organized acute stroke unit and short-term ward with early supported discharge reduces the mortality and complications of ischemic stroke patients during admission as well as the length of stay when compared to the general medical ward. The present study reassures that the combination is useful for hospitals in developing countries, which have limited number of beds in their stroke units.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Aguda , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades Hospitalarias/clasificación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Tailandia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-39430

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin at the starting doses of 10, 20, 40 mg and evaluate the effectiveness of 1 step titrate up regimen. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two hundred and forty two subjects with dyslipidemia were enrolled and assigned the appropriate dose in relation to their individual cardiovascular risk status and baseline LDL-C levels. If the NCEP targets were not achieved, the doses were titrated up at week 4 and the primary efficacy was evaluated at week 8. RESULTS: A majority of subjects (88.8%) achieved their LDL-C goals at week 8. Almost all of the subject's LDL-C levels reached their goals by week 2 and 4 (81.6% and 87.1%, respectively). Only 10.7% (n = 25) required the sole titration. Each dose provided significant decreases in LDL-C (average -46.4%). Only 36 subjects experienced treatment related adverse events, the majority of these were in the high-risk group (n = 22) with only one subject registering a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin is effective and safe for Thai patients with dyslipidemia. The appropriate starting dose has contributed in the achievement of cholesterol reduction.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Ácidos Heptanoicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA