Effectiveness of commercially available denture adhesives on retention of mandibular complete denture in resorbed mandibular ridge: an in vitro study / Efectividad de los adhesivos disponibles comercialmente sobre la retención de prótesis removibles completas mandibulares en el reborde mandibular reabsorbido: un estudio in vitro

Background: Denture adhesives are alternatives used to improve retention, stability, comfort and satisfaction in patients with complete dentures. Evidence on the effectiveness of denture adhesives on resorbed mandibular ridges is scarce. Among the many commercially available denture adhesives, the ideal material for the severely resorbed mandibular ridge remains in dispute. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different quantities of four commercially available denture adhesives on the retention of mandibular complete dentures in severely resorbed ridges. Materials and Methods: A resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge model was manufactured in acrylic resin. A denture base was made and three loops were attached to it. Four commercially available denture adhesives (Fixodent, Perlie White, Fiftydent and Polident) were tested in amounts of 0.2 g, 0.4 g, 0.6 g, 0.8 g and 1.0 g. The acrylic resin model was evenly moistened with 1 ml of water and a weighted amount of adhesive material was applied to the denture base. The universal testing machine engaged the loops fixed on the denture base and applied the vertical displacement force. The maximum vertical displacement force values were recorded for each denture adhesive material at different amounts. Statistical calculation was performed using Kruskal Wallis with Bonferroni post hoc correction. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean values of the vertical displacement force for adhesive amounts of 0.2 g, 0.4 g, 0.6 g and 1.0 g (p<0.05) between the four adhesive materials tested. Statistically significant differences were observed when four denture adhesives were compared to each other in different amounts (p<0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed between different amounts for each of four denture adhesives (p<0.05). Conclusions: Among the four materials tested, Polident showed greater effectiveness at 0.6 g and 0.8 g, Fittydent at 0.6 g, 0.8 g and 1 g, Fixodent at 0.4 g and 0.6 g and Perlie White at 1 g and 0.8g quantity to resist vertical displacement. forces on the severely resorbed mandibular crest. Using an appropriate amount of denture adhesive allows for proper retention of the denture; Replacement of this adhesive is necessary once a day.

Introducción: Los adhesivos para prótesis dentales son alternativas utilizadas para mejorar la retención, la estabilidad, la comodidad y la satisfacción en los pacientes con prótesis completas. La evidencia sobre la efectividad de los adhesivos para prótesis dentales en los rebordes mandibulares reabsorbidos es escasa. Entre los muchos adhesivos para prótesis dentales disponibles comercialmente, sigue estando en disputa cuál es el material ideal para el reborde mandibular severamente reabsorbido. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de diferentes cantidades de cuatro adhesivos para prótesis dentales disponibles comercialmente sobre la retención de prótesis dentales completas mandibulares en reborde mandibular reabsorbido severamente. Materiales y Métodos: Se fabricó un modelo de reborde mandibular edéntulo reabsorbido en resina acrílica. Se hizo una base para la prótesis y se le colocaron tres bucles. Se probaron cuatro adhesivos para dentaduras postizas disponibles comercialmente (Fixodent, Perlie White, Fiftydent y Polident) en cantidades de 0,2 g, 0,4 g, 0,6 g, 0,8 g y 1,0 g. El modelo de resina acrílica se humedeció uniformemente con 1 ml de agua y se aplicó la cantidad correspondiente de material adhesivo sobre la base de la dentadura. La máquina de prueba universal enganchó los bucles fijados en la base de la dentadura postiza y aplicó la fuerza de desplazamiento vertical. Se registraron los valores máximos de fuerza de desplazamiento vertical para cada material adhesivo para dentaduras postizas en diferentes cantidades. El cálculo estadístico se realizó utilizando Kruskal Wallis con corrección post hoc de Bonferroni. Resultado: Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los valores medios de la fuerza de desplazamiento vertical para cantidades de 0,2 g, 0,4 g, 0,6 g y 1,0 g (p<0,05) entre los cuatro materiales adhesivos para prótesis dentales probados. Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas cuando se compararon cuatro adhesivos para prótesis dentales entre sí en diferentes cantidades (p<0,05). Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre diferentes cantidades en los cuatro adhesivos para prótesis (p<0,05). Conclusión: De los cuatro materiales probados, Polident mostró mayor efectividad a 0,6 g y 0,8 g, Fittydent a 0,6 g, 0,8 g y 1 g, Fixodent a 0,4 g y 0,6 g y Perlie White a 1 g y 0,8 g para resistir fuerzas de desplazamiento vertical en la cresta mandibular severamente reabsorbida. El uso de una cantidad adecuada de adhesivo para dentaduras postizas permite una retención adecuada de la dentadura postiza; El reemplazo de este adhesivo es necesario una vez al día.

Effects of enamel adhesives with different components on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:The light curing and fluoride light curing enamel adhesives have a certain sealing effect on the etched enamel surface.The fluoride light curing enamel adhesives can also achieve the anti-caries function by releasing fluoride ions.However,the existing researches lack the long-term tracing of fluoride release effect,especially the amount of local pathogenic bacteria after 1-3 months of local fluoride application. OBJECTIVE:To analyze the changes in the expression of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans in subgingival plaque of the upper anterior teeth adhered by different components of enamel adhesives in adolescent patients with fixed appliance. METHODS:Ninety adolescent patients who received orthodontic treatment in Shanghai Stomatological Hospital from January to December 2016 were enrolled,including 43 males and 47 females,with a mean age of(13.27±1.12)years.These patients were randomly divided into three groups(n=30 per group).In the chemical curing group,Unite? bonding resin was used to bond fixed appliances.In the light curing group,Transbond XT light curing resin was used to bond the fixed appliance.In the fluoride light curing group,GC light curing orthodontic adhesive was used to bond the fixed appliance with cement.The subgingival plaque was collected on the day of bonding,1st,2nd,and 3rd month follow-up reviews.The expressions of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans in subgingival plaque were detected by PCR. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Intragroup comparison:With the increase of bonding time,Porphyromonas gingivalis expression increased significantly in the 3rd month in the chemical curing group(P<0.05).In the light curing group,Porphyromonas gingivalis showed a significant decrease in the 1st month(P<0.05).Porphyromonas gingivalis expression decreased significantly in the 1st and 2nd months compared with initial data in the fluoride light curing group(P<0.05).The expression of Streptococcus mutans was higher in the chemical curing group in the 1st,2nd,and 3rd months compared with the initial data(P<0.05).In the fluoride light curing group,the expression of Streptococcus mutans was lower in the 1st,2nd,and 3rd months compared with the initial data(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the proliferation and expression of Streptococcus mutans during follow-up in the light curing group compared to the initial adhesion(P>0.05).(2)Intergroup comparison:In the 1st month,the expression of Porphyromonas gingivalis was lower in the light curing group and fluoride light curing group than that in the chemical curing group(P<0.05).In the 2nd and 3rd months,the expression of Porphyromonas gingivalis was lower in the fluoride light curing group than that in the light curing group and chemical curing group(P<0.05).In the 1st,2nd,and 3rd months,the expression of Streptococcus mutans was lower in the light curing group and fluoride light curing group than that in the chemical curing group(P<0.05).The expression of Streptococcus mutans was lower in the fluoride light curing group than that in the light curing group(P<0.05).(3)The results show that in the fixed orthodontic process,the use of different components of enamel adhesives has different effects on the proliferation and expression of oral Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans in the short term.Fluoride light curing enamel adhesives at the initial stage can reduce the occurrence of enamel demineralization,caries,and periodontal inflammation.

Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols

Abstract Objective This study aimed to analyze the longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemically characterize the dentin substrate under different acid etching protocols. Methodology Dentin samples were etched with polyacrylic acid 25% (PAA) for 10 seconds (n=3) and phosphoric acid 32% (PA) for 15 seconds (n=3) and analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy - attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) before and after treatment. For collagen degradation, samples (n=12) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Deionized water (control), and analyzed by the quantity of solubilized type I collagen C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides and solubilized C-terminal peptide in relation to total protein concentration (ICTPtp and CTXtp) and by their ultimate tensile strength (UTS). For the adhesive interface analysis, dentin samples (n=72) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Self-etch (SE), and subdivided into 2 groups: 24 h (baseline) and 1 year. The following tests were performed: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) (n=48), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n=12), and nanoleakage (n=12). Results The FTIR of PAA showed lower reduction of the peaks in the phosphate group when compared to PA. For ICTPtp, PA showed a significantly higher value. For CTXtp, PA and PAA groups failed to statically differ from each other. UTS was significantly lower for PA. For μTBS, storage time significantly affected bond strength. The results were unaffected by the etching protocol. For SEM, after 1 year, PA had little evidence of degradation in the upper third of the adhesive interface in comparison to the other groups. Nanoleakage showed no considerable silver impregnation after 1 year in the SE group. Conclusion The use of PAA prior to a universal adhesive (when compared to PA) represents a less aggressive type of etching to dentin. However, self-etching still seems to be the best option for universal adhesive systems that have functional monomers in their composition.

Effect of saliva contamination and different decontamination protocols on microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to dentin / Efeito da contaminação por saliva e de diferentes protocolos de descontaminação na resistência de união ao microcisalhamento de um adesivo universal à dentina

Objective: To evaluate the effect of saliva contamination and different decontamination protocols on the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to dentin. Material and Methods: 84 bovine teeth were divided into three groups according to bonding stage at which salivary contamination occurred; before curing of the adhesive, after curing of the adhesive, and a control group with no salivary contamination. Each group was further subdivided into four subgroups according to the decontamination protocol used (n=7): no decontamination protocol, rinsing then reapplication of the adhesive, grinding with sandpaper silicon carbide grit 600 then reapplication of the adhesive and finally ethanol application then reapplication of the adhesive. Specimens were tested in micro-shear mode. Results: All the decontamination protocols used in this study to reverse effect of salivary contamination before curing significantly improved the bond strength to contaminated dentin (p<0.001). Meanwhile, after curing, ethanol decontamination protocol recorded highest bond strength followed by rinsing and grinding compared to no decontamination (p<0.001). Conclusion: Saliva contamination led to significant deterioration in the bond strength regardless of the bonding stage at which saliva contamination occurred. All decontamination protocols improved the immediate microshear bond strength when contamination occurred before curing of the adhesive, while ethanol seemed to be the most effective both before curing and after curing (AU)

Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da contaminação por saliva e de diferentes protocolos de descontaminação na resistência de união ao microcisalhamento de um adesivo universal à dentina. Material e Métodos: 84 dentes bovinos foram divididos em três grupos de acordo com o passo operatório do protocolo adesivo em que ocorreu a contaminação por saliva: antes da polimerização do adesivo, ou após a polimerização do adesivo e um grupo controle sem contaminação por saliva. Cada grupo foi subdividido em quatro subgrupos de acordo com o protocolo de descontaminação utilizado (n=7): sem protocolo de descontaminação; lavagem seguida da reaplicação do adesivo; lixar a região com lixa de carbeto de silício de granulação 600 e reaplicar o adesivo; aplicar etanol e reaplicar o adesivo. Os espécimes foram testados no modo de micro-cisalhamento. Resultados: Todos os protocolos de descontaminação utilizados neste estudo em busca de reverter o efeito da contaminação do adesivo por saliva melhoraram significativamente a resistência de união à dentina contaminada (p<0,001). Enquanto isso, após a polimerização, o protocolo de descontaminação com etanol resultou na maior resistência de união, seguido pela lavagem, e depois pelo lixamento, em comparação com nenhum protocolo de descontaminação (p<0,001). Conclusão: A contaminação por saliva levou a uma deterioração significativa na resistência de união, independentemente do passo operatório do protocolo adesivo em que ocorreu a contaminação por saliva. Todos os protocolos de descontaminação melhoraram a resistência de união ao microcisalhamento imediato quando a contaminação ocorreu antes da polimerização do adesivo, enquanto o etanol pareceu ser o protocolo mais eficaz nos dois tipos de contaminação (antes e depois da polimerização).

Comparación del grado de microfiltración en tres sistemas restauradores utilizando adhesivos universales: estudio in vitro / Comparison of the degree of microleakage in three restorative systems using universal adhesives: an in vitro study / Comparação do grau de microinfiltração em três sistemas de restauração com adesivos universais: um estudo in vitro

RESUMEN Las resinas compuestas son el material más utilizado para restauraciones en la última década. Para colocarlas es necesario usar un sistema adhesivo que sirva de agente de unión entre la estructura dentaria y la restauración. Es ahí donde se colocan los sistemas adhesivos universales. Sin embargo, uno de los principales problemas en las restauraciones es la microfiltración. Esta se define como el paso de bacterias o fluidos entre el material restaurador y la cavidad preparada. Objetivo: Comparar el grado de microfiltración entre tres sistemas restauradores utilizando adhesivos universales antes y después del proceso de termociclado. Material y métodos: Estudio experimental in vitro cuya muestra fue de 120 piezas anteriores de bovinos. Se utilizaron tres marcas de sistemas restauradores para realizar restauraciones clase V: 3M®, FGM® e Ivoclar®. Cada marca contó con un grupo control y un grupo experimental. Los grupos experimentales fueron sometidos a un proceso de termociclado. Seguido de ello, la totalidad de la muestra fue sumergida en azul de metileno durante 24 horas para su posterior corte y observación en el microscopio. Resultados: El sistema restaurador de la marca Ivoclar® demostró un menor grado de microfiltración en comparación con los sistemas restauradores de las marcas 3M® y FGM®. La prueba de chi-cuadrado demostró diferencia significativa entre los grupos control y experimental. Conclusiones: Existe diferencia significativa en el grado de microfiltración en las restauraciones clase V utilizando tres sistemas restauradores con adhesivos universales antes y después del termociclado.

ABSTRACT Composite resins are the most widely used material for restorations in the last decade. An adhesive system is required to serve as a bonding agent between the tooth structure and the restoration, and universal adhesive systems are used. However, one of the main problems in restorations is microleakage, defined as the passage of bacteria or fluids between the restorative material and the prepared cavity. Objective: To compare the degree of microleakage between three restorative systems using universal adhesives before and after the thermocycling process. Material and methods: Experimental in vitro study with a sample of dental anterior pieces of 120 bovines. Three brands of restorative systems were used for class V restorations: 3M®, FGM®, and Ivoclar®. Each brand had a control group and an experimental group. The experimental groups were subjected to a thermocycling process. After that, the sample was immersed in methylene blue for 24 hours for subsequent cutting and observation under the microscope. Results: The Ivoclar® brand restorative system showed lower microleakage than the 3M® and FGM® brand restorative systems. The chi-square test showed a significant difference between the control and experimental groups. Conclusions: There is a significant difference in the degree of microleakage in Class V restorations using three restorative systems with universal adhesives before and after thermocycling.

RESUMO As resinas compostas são o material mais utilizado para restaurações na última década. Para a sua colocação, é necessário utilizar um sistema adesivo que sirva de agente de ligação entre a estrutura dentária e a restauração. É aqui que são colocados os sistemas adesivos universais. No entanto, um dos principais problemas nas restaurações é a microinfiltração. A microinfiltração é definida como a passagem de bactérias ou fluidos entre o material de restauração e a cavidade preparada. Objetivo: Comparar o grau de microinfiltração entre três sistemas restauradores utilizando adesivos universais antes e depois do processo de termociclagem. Material e métodos: Estudo experimental in vitro com uma amostra de 120 unidades de dentes anteriores de bovinos. Foram utilizadas três marcas de sistemas restauradores para restaurações de classe V: 3M®, FGM® e Ivoclar®. Cada marca tinha um grupo de controlo e um grupo experimental. Os grupos experimentais foram submetidos a um processo de termociclagem. Em seguida, toda a amostra foi imersa em azul de metileno durante 24 horas para posterior corte e observação ao microscópio. Resultados: o sistema restaurador Ivoclar® apresentou um menor grau de microinfiltração em relação aos sistemas restauradores 3M® e FGM®. O teste do Qui-quadrado mostrou uma diferença significativa entre o grupo de controlo e o grupo experimental. Conclusões: Existe uma diferença significativa no grau de microinfiltração em restaurações de classe V utilizando três sistemas de restauração adesivos universais antes e depois da termociclagem.

Efectividad antimicrobiana de los sistemas adhesivos. Una alternativa eficaz: revisión bibliográfica / Antimicrobial effectiveness of adhesive systems. An effective alternative: literature review / Eficácia antimicrobiana dos sistemas adesivos. Uma alternativa eficaz: revisão da literatura

RESUMEN Los sistemas adhesivos se utilizan en la práctica clínica diaria; sin embargo, su principal desventaja es la contracción por polimerización que podría ocasionar la aparición de microfiltraciones, acumulo de placa, caries secundaria e hipersensibilidad. Por este motivo, se han venido incorporando agentes antimicrobianos, como el metacrilato de amonio cuaternario fotopolimerizable, los rellenos de vidrio que liberan iones de flúor, el pirogalol y las nanopartículas de plata, calcio y grafeno fluorado. En los últimos años, algunos de estos han demostrado tener una buena efectividad antimicrobiana, que, a su vez, no interfieren con la adhesión en las restauraciones. De tal manera, estos sistemas adhesivos antimicrobianos podrían favorecer a obtener mejores resultados a largo plazo. Las nanopartículas que presentaron mejores resultados fueron el fosfato de calcio amorfo y las compuestas de plata.

ABSTRACT Adhesive systems are used in daily clinical practice; however, the main disadvantage is polymerization shrinkage, which could lead to microleakage, plaque accumulation, secondary caries, and hypersensitivity. For this reason, antimicrobial agents have been incorporated, such as light-curing quaternary ammonium methacrylate, fluoride ion-releasing glass fillers, pyrogallol, and nanoparticles of silver, calcium, and fluorinated graphene. In recent years, some of these have been shown to have good antimicrobial effectiveness and, in turn, do not interfere with adhesion in restorations. Thus, these antimicrobial adhesive systems could contribute to better long-term results. The best-performing nanoparticles were amorphous calcium phosphate and silver nanoparticles.

RESUMO Os sistemas adesivos são utilizados na prática clínica diária; no entanto, a principal desvantagem é a contração da polimerização, que pode levar a microinfiltração, acumulação de placa, cáries secundárias e hipersensibilidade. Por este motivo, foram incorporados agentes antimicrobianos, como o metacrilato de amónio quaternário fotopolimerizável, cargas de vidro que libertam iões de flúor, pirogalol e nanopartículas de prata, cálcio e grafeno fluorado. Nos últimos anos, algumas destas substâncias demonstraram ter uma boa eficácia antimicrobiana e não interferem com a adesão nas restaurações. Assim, estes sistemas adesivos antimicrobianos poderiam conduzir a melhores resultados a longo prazo. As nanopartículas com melhor desempenho foram o fosfato de cálcio amorfo e as nanopartículas de prata.

Mecanismos preventivos de la degradación de la capa híbrida / Preventive mechanisms of the degradation of the hybrid layer

Uno de los mayores retos de la odontología actual es lograr una adhesión duradera y estable entre los materiales de restauración y los tejidos dentales. Los protocolos adhesivos han ido cambiando a lo largo del tiempo para cumplir con dicho objetivo, tratando de mantener la integridad de la capa hibrida, por lo que se revisaron los factores que provocan la degradación de la capa hibrida y los mecanismos propuestos para prevenir esta degradación. Se realizó una investigación y recopilación de información bibliográfica especializadas en el tema, en buscadores científicos como PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc, Medigraphic y Scopus. Para los criterios de inclusión se consideraron años de publicación entre el año 2002 al 2022, enfocados en trabajos de investigación relacionados con la degradación de la interfaz de unión resina-dentina y mecanismos para prevenir esta degradación en la capa híbrida. El mecanismo mas estudiado a corto y largo plazo es la aplicación de clorhexidina, la cual se utiliza después del ácido fosfórico y antes del adhesivo, inhibe la actividad proteolítica de las metaloproteinasas de la matriz (MMPs) y retarda la degradación de las fibras colágenas, consiguiendo de esta manera una mayor vida de las restauraciones adhesivas.

One of the biggest challenges in dentistry is to achieve a long-lasting and stable bond between restorative materials and dental tissues. The adhesive protocols have been changing over time to meet this objective, trying to maintain the integrity of the hybrid layer, so the factors that cause the degradation of the hybrid layer and the mechanisms proposed to prevent this degradation were reviewed. An investigation and compilation of specialized bibliographic information on the subject was carried out, in scientific search engines such as PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc, Medigraphic, Scopus, among others, as well as books. For the inclusion criteria, years of publication between 2002 and 2022 were considered, focused on research works related to the degradation of the resin-dentin bonding interface and mechanisms to prevent this degradation in the hybrid layer. The placement of CHX is used after the application of phosphoric acid and before the adhesive, it inhibits the proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the degradation of collagen fibers, thus achieving a longer life of resin dental restorations.

Bond strength of composite resin/universal adhesive to dentin submitted to radiotherapy / Fuerza de unión de resina compuesta/adhesivo universal a dentina sometida a radioterapia

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin submitted to radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human teeth were divided into two groups (n = 30): without radiotherapy (control); with radiotherapy, according to the adhesive protocol (n=15): ER-etch-and-rinse (acid + Single Bond Uni-versal); SE-self-etch (Single Bond Universal). The analyzes were shear bond strength (SBS) (n=10), failure pattern (n=10) and scanning electron microscopy (n=5). Data was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (α =0.05). Results: The radiotherapy decreased SBS of the restorative material to dentin (p<0.0001). The ER protocol provided lower bond strength values (p<0.001). The predominant type of fracture without radiotherapy was mixed (SE), cohesive to the material (ER). Both protocols presented adhesive failures with radiotherapy. Teeth had a hybrid layer and long resin tags (without radiotherapy) and few tags (with radiotherapy). Conclusions: The SE adhesive mode favors the shear bond strength of resin to dentin in teeth submitted to radiotherapy.

Objetivo: Evaluar la fuerza de adhesión de un sistema adhesivo universal a la dentina sometida a radioterapia. Materiales y Métodos: Sesenta dientes humanos extraídos se dividieron en dos grupos (n = 30): sin radioterapia (control); con radioterapia, según protocolo adhesivo (n=15): ER-grabado y enjuague (ácido + Single Bond Universal); autograbado SE (Single Bond Universal). Los análisis ejecutados fueron resistencia al cizallamiento (SBS) (n=10), patrón de falla (n=10) y microscopía electrónica de barrido (n=5). Los datos se sometieron al test de ANOVA de dos vías (α =0,05). Resultados: La radioterapia disminuyó la SBS del material restaurador a la dentina (p<0,0001). El protocolo ER proporcionó valores de fuerza de unión más bajos (p<0,001). El tipo de fractura predominante sin radioterapia fue mixta (SE), cohesiva al material (ER). Ambos protocolos presentaron fallas adhesivas con radioterapia. Los dientes tenían una capa híbrida y colas de resina largas (sin radioterapia) o pocas colas de resina (con radioterapia). Conclusión: El modo adhesivo SE favorece la resistencia al corte de la resina a la dentina en dientes sometidos a radioterapia.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of polidocanol combined with low-dose tissue glue occlusion in the treatment of F3 type esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis / 中国医师杂志

Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of polidocanol combined with low-dose tissue glue occlusion in the treatment of F3 esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis.Methods:Retrospective analysis was made on 42 patients with cirrhosis type F3 esophageal varices admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2020 to June 2021. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into the observation group and the control group, with 21 cases in each group. The observation group received endoscopic injection of polidocanol combined with low-dose tissue glue occlusion, while the control group received endoscopic injection of polidocanol. The differences in the effectiveness (remission rate of varices) and safety (incidence of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative rebleeding, incidence of ectopic embolism, incidence of esophageal ulcer, incidence of esophageal perforation, incidence of esophageal stricture) of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:The total effective rate of relieving esophageal varices in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group [95.2%(20/21) vs 61.9%(13/21), χ 2=6.929, P=0.008]. There were no cases of ectopic embolism in both groups; The intraoperative bleeding rate in the observation group was 4.8% (1/21), significantly lower than the 38.1% (8/21) in the control group (χ 2=6.929, P=0.008); There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative rebleeding rates between the two groups [33.3%(7/21) vs 23.8%(5/21), χ 2=0.467, P=0.495]; The incidence of esophageal ulcers in the observation group was higher than that in the control group [23.8%(5/21) vs 0, χ 2=5.676, P=0.017], mainly caused by glue discharge ulcers; There were no cases of esophageal perforation and esophageal stricture in both groups. Conclusions:Endoscopic injection of polidocanol combined with low-dose tissue glue occlusion for the treatment of F3 esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis is safe, can greatly reduce the occurrence of intraoperative bleeding, and has a better one-time variceal eradication effect.

Influence of bioceramic intracanal medication on the bond strength of bioceramic root canal sealer

Abstract To investigate the influence of the remaining volume of a new intracanal medication based on bioceramic compounds on the bond strength (BS) and formation of an adhesive interface between calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. For this purpose, the specimens were distributed according to the intracanal medication (n = 26): Bio-C Temp (BCT) and Ultracal XS (UXS). The roots were scanned in microCT, and after 7 days, the medication was removed. Then a new scan was performed to evaluate the volume of medication remaining. Subsequently, 40 specimens were redistributed into 2 subgroups (n = 10) and filled according to the sealer used: AH Plus (AHP) and Bio-C Sealer (BCS), to assess the bond strength by using the push-out test, and the adhesive interface by confocal laser fluorescence microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The t test showed a smaller remainder of BCT (1.77 ± 0.86) compared with UXS (10.47 ± 5.78), irrespective of the root third evaluated. The BS showed that teeth with BCT + BCS had higher bond strength values (3.70 ± 1.22) when compared to the other groups: BCT + AHP (2.15 ± 1.07), UXS + BCS (3.18 ± 1.09) and UXS + AHP (2.11 ± 1.02) (p<0.001). The cervical third had higher BS when compared with the middle and apical thirds (p < 0.001), and higher number of adhesive failures. The adhesive interface in SEM and CLSM images showed better adaptation for the association between BCT + BCS. Intracanal medication and silicate-based endodontic sealer appeared to interact chemically by forming a biomineralizing layer, allowing for an increase in the bond strength and forming an adhesive interface between the materials, with no or less gap formation.

Is the adhesive or mechanical behavior of glass ceramics influenced by the adhesive layer application after etching and silanization? A literature review

Aim: This review investigated the effect of applying an adhesive after surface treatment of glass-ceramics on the bonding, mechanical or clinical behavior. Methods: Studies comparing the adhesive, mechanical or clinical behavior of glass-ceramics, with or without adhesive application after surface treatment, were included. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases (January 2022), resulting in 15 included studies. Results: Regarding the evaluated outcomes, 13 studies assessed bond strength, 2 studies assessed biaxial flexural strength and 1 study assessed fatigue failure load, while no study evaluating clinical outcomes was included. It was possible to observe that the adhesive application after ceramic surface treatment was unfavorable or did not influence the evaluated outcomes. Conclusion: Most of the evidence available in the literature shows that the adhesive application after surface treatment does not improve the adhesive and mechanical behavior of glass-ceramics

Efecto del pretratamiento con clorhexidina en la resistencia de unión a dentina desmineralizada

Objetivo: Analizar la resistencia de unión a dentina sana y desmineralizada, en forma inmediata y a los 6 meses, utilizando un pretratamiento de clorhexidina (CHX) 2%. Método: 40 terceros molares sanos con desarrollo radicular incompleto se desgastaron exponiendo dentina. Las piezas fueron sometidas a ciclado de pH. Se dividieron aleatoriamente en 2 grupos: con y sin CHX. En dentina se crearon 4 botones de resina utilizando adhesivo universal mediante autoacondicionamiento. Las muestras se almacenaron en agua destilada a 37ºC hasta su análisis. El microcizallamiento se ejecutó a las 24 horas y a los 6 meses de envejecimiento. Resultados: El grupo de dentina sana, sin CHX inmediato presentó mayor resistencia adhesiva (23,37±1,84). El grupo de dentina desmineralizada, sin CHX, envejecido presentó la menor resistencia adhesiva (8,87±1,51). Conclusiones: La CHX al 2% previo a la aplicación del adhesivo no mejora los valores de resistencia de unión a dentina sana ni desmineralizada a corto o largo plazo.

Objetivo: Analisar a resistência de união à dentina hígida e desmineralizada, imediatamente e após 6 meses, utilizando um pré-tratamento com (CHX) a 2%. Método: 40 terceiros molares hígidos com desenvolvimento radicular incompleto foram desgastados expondo a dentina. As peças foram submetidas a ciclagem de pH. Eles foram divididos aleatoriamente em 2 grupos: com e sem CHX. Em dentina, foram criados 4 botões de resina utilizando adesivo universal em modo autocondicionante. As amostras foram armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC até a análise. O microcisalhamento foi realizado às 24 horas e aos 6 meses de envelhecimento. Resultados: O grupo de dentina saudável, sem CHX imediata apresentou maior resistência adesiva (23,37±1,84). O grupo de dentina desmineralizada, sem CHX , envelhecida apresentou a menor resistência adesiva (8,87±1,51). Conclusões : A CHX antes da aplicação do adesivo não melhoraria os valores de resistência de união em dentina saudável ou desmineralizada a curto ou longo prazo.

Objective: To analyze the bond strength to healthy and demineralized dentin, immediately and after 6 months, using a 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) pretreatment. Method : 40 healthy third molars with incomplete root development were abraded exposing dentin. The pieces were subjected to pH cycling. They were randomly divided into 2 groups: with and without CHX. In dentin, 4 resin buttons were created using universal adhesive in self-etching mode. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37ºC until analysis. Micro shearing was carried out at 24 hours and at 6 months of aging. Results: Healthy dentin group, without immediate CHX presented higher bond strength (23.37±1.84). (Demineralized dentin group, without CHX, aged) presented the lowest bond strength (8.87±1.51). Conclusions : CHX prior to adhesive application doesn't improve bond strength values to healthy or demineralized dentin in short nor long term.

Evaluation of short- and long-term bond strength of zirconia after different surface treatments / Avaliação da resistência de adesão de curto e longo prazo de zircônia após diferentes tratamentos de superfície

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the short and long-term effects of different surface treatments on the bond strengths of zirconia. Material and Methods: 225 blocks of sintered zirconia samples (4 x 4 x 3 mm) were divided into five groups and subjected to different surface treatments: control group (without surface treatment), alumina group (sandblasting [25-µm-aluminum-oxide]), alumina+Ambar Universal-APS (AU) group, CoJet group (silica-coated [30-µm silica-modified aluminum particles]), and CoJet+AU group. Subsequently, zirconia samples were cemented against resin samples (total dimensions: 8x8x6mm) and assigned to three storage conditions: dry, humid (artificial saliva at 37°C for 30-days) or thermocycling [100.000-cycles] (n=15 per group). The microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was determined using a universal testing machine. The failure modes were observed and analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Normality tests, descriptive statistics, and two-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc comparisons, were performed to evaluate the effect of surface treatments and storage conditions on µTBS (α=0.05). Results: µTBS was influenced by surface treatment in the short and long-term (P<0.0001). The highest values were found in CoJet+AU in dry (33.51 ±2.48 MPa), humid (32.87 ±2.68 MPa) and thermocycling (21.37 ±1.68 MPa) storage conditions compared with others. Interestingly, no significant differences in µTBS were found among alum +AU and CoJet alone under any of the three storage conditions. Adhesive failure increased in all groups after thermocycling, but CoJet+AU had the lowest values of adhesive failure compared with others. Conclusion: The combination of CoJet and Ambar universal as a surface treatment for zirconia specimens provides significantly higher short and long-term bond strengths of adhesive cementation (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar os efeitos de curto e longo prazo de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência de adesão da zircônia. Material e Métodos: 225 blocos de amostras de zircônia sinterizada (4 x 4 x 3 mm) foram divididos em cinco grupos e submetidos a diferentes tratamentos de superfície: grupo controle (sem tratamento de superfície), grupo de alumina (jateamento de 25 µm de óxido de alumínio), grupo alumina+Ambar Universal-APS (AU), grupo CoJet (partículas de alumínio modificadas por sílica de 30 µm), e grupo CoJet+AU. Posteriormente, as amostras de zircônia foram cimentadas em amostras de resina (dimensões totais: 8x8x6mm) e designadas para três condições de armazenamento: seco, úmido (saliva artificial a 37°C por 30 dias) ou ciclagem térmica (100.000 ciclos) (n=15 por grupo). A resistência de adesão de microtensão (µTBS) foi determinada usando uma máquina de teste universal. Os modos de falha foram observados e analisados usando um estereomicroscópio. Testes de normalidade, estatísticas descritivas e ANOVA de duas vias, seguidas de comparações pos-hoc, foram realizados para avaliar o efeito dos tratamentos de superfície e das condições de armazenamento na µTBS (α=0.05). Resultados: A µTBS foi influenciada pelo tratamento de superfície a curto e longo prazo (P<0.0001). Os valores mais altos foram encontrados em CoJet+AU nas condições de armazenamento a seco (33.51 ±2.48 MPa), úmido (32.87 ±2.68 MPa) e ciclagem térmica (21.37 ±1.68 MPa) em comparação com os outros. Curiosamente, não foram encontradas diferenças significativas na µTBS entre alum +AU e CoJet sozinho em nenhuma das três condições de armazenamento. A falha adesiva aumentou em todos os grupos após a ciclagem térmica, mas CoJet+AU teve os valores mais baixos de falha adesiva em comparação com os outros. Conclusão: A combinação de CoJet e Ambar Universal como tratamento de superfície para espécimes de zircônia proporciona resistências de adesão significativamente mais altas a curto e longo prazo para cimentação adesiva. (AU)

Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objectives This is a double-blind, split-mouth, randomized clinical study that aims to evaluate the influence of bulk-fill composite packaging presented in syringes (BSy) and capsules (BCa), and the effect of selective enamel etching (SEE) on the clinical performance of class I and II bulk-fill resin composite restorations after 24 months. Methodology A total of 295 class I or class II restorations were performed on 70 patients. One universal adhesive was applied in all restorations. SEE was used in 148 restorations and self-etching mode (SET) in 147 restorations. After the adhesive application, cavities were restored with Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative in syringes (BSy), Filtek One Bulk-fill in capsules (BCa), or Filtek Supreme Ultra in syringes with the incremental technique (In). All restorations were evaluated using the FDI criteria after one week and after six, 12, and 24 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Pearson's Chi-square test were used (α=0.05) for statistical analysis. Results After 24 months, 62 patients were evaluated and four restorations were lost due to fracture (one for SEEBSy, two for SEEIn, and one for SETIn). No significant differences in the fracture and retention rate were found between groups (p>0.05). SEE showed significantly fewer marginal adaptation defects than SET (p<0.05). BCa and BSy groups showed fewer marginal discrepancies compared to In (p<0.05). Restorations performed with BCa showed less color mismatch than BSy or In (p<0.05). Conclusion Although all restorations exhibited satisfactory clinical performance after 24 months of clinical service, the clinical behavior of class I and II restorations' improved when performed with a bulk-fill composite in capsules, mainly when associated with a universal adhesive applied with SEE.

Influence of the combined effect of desensitizing dentifrices and universal adhesives on dentin bond strength under erosive conditions

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of desensitizing dentifrices containing obliterating agents can affect bond strength of eroded/abraded dentin. Methodology A total of 100 dentin samples were obtained from human molars. The teeth were cut into 3 mm-thickness discs and allocated in five groups (n=20), according to the toothpaste used: WoF - abrasion with fluoride-free toothpaste (Cocoricó); Arg - toothpaste containing arginine (Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief); Nov - calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste (Sensodyne Repair and Protect); SnF - fluoride-containing toothpaste (AmF/SnCl2/SnF2 - Elmex Erosion); and Control (no erosive/abrasive process). The erosive/abrasive cycle consisted of immersion in citric acid (1%, pH 2.6, 5 min, 4×/day) and abrasion (2×/day, 120-20 sec abrasion, 100 sec immersion) with each toothpaste. During intervals, samples were immersed in artificial saliva. This cycle was performed for five days. Two resin cylinders (2 mm in diameter) were constructed on each sample for the shear bond strength test using a universal adhesive system. The self-etch and etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Universal) strategies were employed, each in half of the total sample (n=10). Bond strength (MPa) was measured in a shear test and failure modes were assessed with a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests (p<0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was found between the adhesive strategies tested (p<0.001), with the self-etching form showing higher values than the etch-and-rinse. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between the tested toothpastes (p=0.750) and interactions (p=0.438). Conclusion The use of toothpaste containing obliterating agents does not affect bond strength to dentin subjected to erosive/abrasive conditions when a universal adhesive is used. However, the self-etch strategy might be preferred for eroded/abraded dentin.

Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies / Resistência de união de sistemas adesivos universais à dentina humana usando diferentes estratégias

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of two universal adhesive systems: Single Bond Universal (SBU) and Ambar Universal , used in different adhesion strategies. Materials and Method: Thirty-six human teeth were prepared (n=6) and treated following different adhesive strategies: G1: SBU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G2: SBUetch- and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G3: SBU-self-etching; G4: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G5: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G6: AU-self-etching. The specimens were submitted to μTBS test, failure analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p<0.05). Results: Microtensile bond strength was significantly lower in G1 than G2 and G3. AU adhesive performed worse than the SBU system, except in G5. Cohesive and mixed failures predominated in G1 and G2, while adhesive failures predominated in G3 and G5. Conclusions: Universal adhesives are an interesting innovation, but there are still doubts about their performance, mainly regarding the different protocols provided by the manufacturers. The conventional adhesive strategy on moist dentin demonstrated higher μTBS for both adhesives. The use of the selfetching strategy with the SBU showed promising results.

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união à microtração (μTBS) de dois sistemas adesivos universais: Single Bond Universal (SBU) e Ambar Universal , utilizados em diferentes estratégias de adesão. Materiais e método: 36 dentes humanos foram preparados (n=6) e tratados seguindo diferentes estratégias adesivas: G1: SBU-condicionamento e enxágue, aplicado sobre dentina seca; G2: SBU-condicionamento e enxágue, aplicado sobre dentina úmida; G3: SBU-autocondicionante; G4: AU-condicionamento e enxágue, aplicado em dentina seca; G5: AU-condicionamento e enxágue, aplicado sobre dentina úmida; G6: AU-autocondicionante. Os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de μTBS, análise de falhas e microscopia eletrônica de varredura (SEM). Os dados foram analisados com os testes ANOVA e Tukey (p<0,05). Resultados: A resistência de união à microtração de G1 foi significativamente menor que G2 e G3. O adesivo AU teve um desempenho pior que o sistema SBU, com exceção do G5. Falhas coesivas e mistas predominaram em G1 e G2 enquanto G3 e G5 apresentaram predominância de falhas adesivas. Conclusões: Os adesivos universais representam uma inovação interessante, mas ainda há dúvidas sobre seu desempenho, principalmente em relação aos diferentes protocolos fornecidos pelos fabricantes. A estratégia adesiva convencional em dentina úmida demonstrou maior μTBS para ambos os adesivos. O uso da estratégia autocondicionante com a SBU apresentou resultados promissores.

Resistencia de cerámicas de disilicato de litio adheridas con dos adhesivos diferentes / Strength of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded with two different adhesives

Introducción: la cerámica de disilicato de litio es una excelente opción en rehabilitación, confeccionado con la técnica de inyección o maquinadas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia de dos sistemas adhesivos sobre los valores de resistencia de unión en cerámicas de disilicato de litio inyectado y maquinado. Métodos: se utilizó discos de disilicato de litio, IPS e. Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Swiss), de 10mm de diámetro y 1mm de espesor embebidos en tubos de PVC. Se distribuyó en 4 grupos de trabajo, 2 en cerámica de litio inyectadas y 2 en maquinada, se aplicaron los adhesivos Palfique Bond y Tetric N-bond Universal según la distribución de grupos, luego se fotopolimerizó durante 10 segundos con lámpara luz led, se colocaron los tubos Tygon® para el relleno con resina fluida; una vez retirado los tubos Tygon®, se llevaron las muestras a una máquina de ensayo universal donde se realizó la prueba de micro cizallamiento. Resultados: los valores de resistencia de unión más significativos fueron encontrados en las cerámicas de disilicato de litio adherida con el adhesivo Palfique Bond y Tetric Bond teniendo una diferencia significativa (p= 0.001), los valores de resistencia de unión del adhesivo Palfique Bond y Tetric Bond en cerámica inyectada no tuvieron diferencia significativa. Conclusión: las cerámicas de disilicato de litio maquinadas presentan mejores valores de resistencia de unión al micro cizallamiento.

Introduction: lithium disilicate ceramics are an excellent choice in rehabilitation, made with the technique of injection or machining. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two adhesive systems on the values of binding resistance in injected and machined lithium disilicate ceramics. Methods: lithium disilicate disks, IPS e. were used Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Swiss), 10mm in diameter and 1mm in thickness embedded in PVC tubes. Was distributed in 4 working groups, 2 in injected lithium ceramics and 2 in machined, Palfique Bond and Tetric N-bond Universal adhesives were applied according to the group distribution, then photopolymerized for 10 seconds with led light bulb, Tygon® tubes were placed for filling with fluid resin; once the Tygon® tubes were removed. The samples were taken to a universal testing machine where the micro-spraying test was performed. Results: the most significant binding resistance values were found in lithium disisilicate ceramics adhered with the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive having a significant difference (p= 0,001), the bond strength values of the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive in injected ceramic did not differ significantly. Conclusion: machined lithium disilicate ceramics have better values of binding resistance to micro-spraying.

Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial

Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol

Clinical follow-up at 18 months of two bulk fill occlusal composite resins: a double-blind randomized clinical study / Seguimiento clínico a 18 meses de dos resinas compuestas oclusales bulk fill: estudio clínico aleatorio doble ciego

Objetive: To compare the clinical behavior of two types of Bulk Fill composite resins and a nanohybrid resin at 18 months in occlusal restorations. Material and Methods: Three occlusal restorations were performed in each one of the 55 participants. They were randomly distributed into three groups, TN: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, FK: Filtek Bulk-Fill, and Z350: Filtek Z350XT. Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions for each restorative material used. In TN and FK an increment of 4mm was applied, and in Z350 increments of ≤2mm depth were applied. Two calibrated operators evaluated the restorations at baseline and at 18 months using the FDI World Dental Federations system (1: excellent, 2: good, 3: satisfactory, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: poor) for clinical marginal staining (MS) properties, fracture-retention (FR), superficial texture (ST), marginal integrity (MI), postoperative sensitivity (PS) and caries (C). Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon were used to compare the 3 groups at 18 months (5% significance). Results: 38 patients with a total of 114 restorations were assessed, being evaluated with excellent clinical behavior; MI, 78.9% in Z350, 89.51% in TN and 81.6% in FK; ST 73.5% in Z350, 86.8% in TN, and 84.2% in FK; MS 84.2% in Z350, 84.2% in TN, and 91.2% in FK; PS 100% in Z350 and 97.3% in TN and FK; in C and FR, 100% in the 3 groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The three resins studied presented a good clinical performance at 18 months without showing significant differences in the clinical properties evaluated.

Objetivo: Comparar el comportamiento clínico a 18 meses en restauraciones oclusales entre dos tipos de resinas compuestas Bulk Fill y una resina nanohíbrida. Material y Métodos: En 55 participantes se realizaron 3 restauraciones oclusales en cada paciente, distribuidas aleatoriamente en 3 grupos, TN: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, FK: Filtek Bulk-Fill y Z350: Filtek Z350XT. Las técnicas adhesivas y procedimientos restauradores fueron realizados según las instrucciones de los fabricantes de cada material restaurador utilizado. En TN y FK se aplicó un incremento de 4mm y en Z350 se aplicó incrementos ≤ 2 mm de profundidad. Dos operadores calibrados evaluaron las restauraciones al baseline y a los 18 meses mediante el sistema FDI World Dental Federations (1: excelente, 2: aceptable, 3: suficiente, 4: insatisfactorio, 5: inaceptable) en las propiedades clínicas de tinción marginal (TM), fractura-retención (FR), textura superficial (TS), integridad marginal (IM), sensibilidad postoperatoria (SP) y caries (C). Se utilizó Kruskal-Wallis y Wilcoxon para la comparación de los 3 grupos a 18 meses (significancia de 5%). Resultados: Se controlaron 38 pacientes con un total de 114 restauraciones, siendo evaluados con comportamiento clínico excelente; IM, 78.9% en Z350, 89.51% en TN y 81.6% en FK; TS 73.5%, en Z350, 86.8% en TN y 84.2% en FK; TM, 84.2% en Z350, 84.2% en TN y 91.2% en FK; SP 100% en Z350 y 97,3% en TN y FK; en C y FR 100% en los 3 grupos. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los 3 grupos (p>0,05). Conclusión: Las 3 resinas estudiadas presentaron un buen desempeño clínico a 18 meses sin mostrar diferencias significativas en las propiedades clínicas evaluadas.

Uso efectivo de los adhesivos de octava generación / Effective use of eighth generation adhesives

Introducción: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica con el objetivo de conocer, analizar y comparar los diferentes tipos de adhesivos de octava generación que se encuentran en el mercado y la diferencia que existe entre cada uno. Los adhesivos universales han demostrado mejoras en su resistencia, sobre todo en las técnicas de aplicación y en las propiedades de estos materiales, al mejorar la fuerza adhesiva para que el odontólogo pueda brindar tratamientos restaurativos exitosos. Objetivo: conocer, analizar y comparar los diferentes tipos de adhe- sivos de la octava generación empleados en odontología. Material y métodos: se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos electrónicas PubMed, BVS, Redalyc y ScienceDirect. Se utilizaron 32 artículos que cumplieron con los criterios predeterminados y la especificidad reque- rida para la pregunta de investigación. Conclusiones: se demostró que la tecnología cada día avanza, sobre todo en el área de los adhesivos, ya que éstos son de mucha utilidad en el día a día del odontólogo; es importante conocer cada uno de éstos, puesto que es un poco complejo seleccionar el correcto, mas no el uso. En la actualidad, existen diversas opciones por las que el odontólogo puede optar, es por ello que el pro- fesional debe estar capacitado sobre cada una de las diferentes marcas existentes y, de acuerdo al tratamiento, debe elegir cuál es mejor utilizar en una rehabilitación. Es importante para el odontólogo conocer estos materiales, ya que esto lo beneficiará al momento de llevar un plan de tratamiento restaurador (AU)

Introduction: a bibliographic review was carried out to learn about, analyze, and compare the different types of eighth-generation adhesives on the market and the difference between each one. Universal adhesives have demonstrated improvements in their resistance, especially in the application techniques and properties of these materials, improving the adhesive strength so that the dentist can provide successful restorative treatments. Objective: to know, analyze and compare the different types of eighth-generation adhesives used in dentistry. Material and methods: a search was made of the following electronic databases: PubMed, BVS, Redalyc, ScienceDirect. Finally, 32 articles that met the predetermined criteria and the specificity required for the research question were used. Conclusions: it was demonstrated that technology is advancing every day, especially in the area of adhesives since these are very useful in the daily life of the dentist. It is important to know each one of these since it is a little complex at the moment of selecting the correct one, but not the use. Currently, there are several options that the dentist can choose, which is why the professional must be trained on each of the various existing brands and according to the treatment which is the best to use at the time of rehabilitation. The dentist needs to know these materials since they will benefit him/her when carrying out a restorative treatment plan (AU)