Complicaciones por accesos venosos centrales en pacientes adultos / Complications due to central venous access in adult patients

Los accesos venosos centrales son técnicas de uso regular en el ámbito hospitalario, es por ello que la investigación tiene como Objetivo: Establecer la incidencia de complicaciones asociadas a la colocación de accesos venosos centrales en pacientes atendidos en el Hospital Militar Universitario "Dr. Carlos Arvelo". Métodos: estudio prospectivo, de selección intencional de pacientes en el ámbito hospitalario que presenten complicaciones asociadas a la canalización de accesos venosos centrales; a los cuales se les aplicó un cuestionario donde se registraron, además de datos demográficos y clínicos, los resultados del funcionamiento del acceso venoso central. Al séptimo día se retiró o se recambió el acceso venoso central y se tomó muestra para cultivo y antibiograma de la punta de catéter. Los datos fueron tabulados, analizados en gráficos y tablas. Resultados: Uno de los principales hallazgos fueron las complicaciones infecciosas en un 65.93 % y producto de complicaciones mecánicas un 34.05 % del grupo de estudio. Las complicaciones infecciosas fueron atribuibles en su mayoría a Staphylococcus aureus (27,39 %), Pseudomona sp (21,91 %), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (16,44%), Burkholderia cepacia (10,95 %) y Klebsiella pneumonia (5,48 %). En cuanto al porcentaje de éxito de las intervenciones se encontró que el promedio de intentos fue de 5 con una desviación estándar de ± 3 intentos y una duración promedio menor a 30 minutos en 90 de los casos representando el 76,27 % y duración mayor de 30 minutos en 28 casos representando 23,7 %. Conclusiones: Los accesos venosos yugulares internos fueron los procedimientos más frecuentes seguido de los accesos subclavios, sin predilección de lateralidad alguna. Al revisar los hallazgos se puede evidenciar que la punción arterial se convierte en la complicación mecánica más frecuente produciendo hematomas y equimosis con un alto porcentaje de intentos superiores a 30 minutos o un número de intentos mayores a tres, así como las complicaciones infecciosas generadas por el Staphylococcus aureus y sin que dichas complicaciones se encontraran asociadas al tipo de abordaje estudiado, tiempo de intervención u otros factores de carácter demográfico(AU)

Central venous accesses are a technique of regular use in the hospital environment, that is why the objective of this research is: to establish the incidence of complications treated at the University Military Hospital "Dr. Carlos Arvelo". Methods: prospective study, of intentional selection of patients in the hospital setting who present complications associated to the cannulation of central venous accesses; to whom a questionnaire was applied where, in addition to demographic and clinical data, the results of the central venous access operation were registered. On the seventh day, the central venous access was removed or replaced and a sample was taken for culture and antibiogram of the catheter tip. Data were tabulated, analyzed in graphs and tables. Results: One of the main findings was infectious complications in 65.93 % and mechanical complications in 34.05 % of the study group. Infectious complications were mostly attributable to Staphylococcus aureus (27.39 %), Pseudomona sp (21.91 %), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (16.44 %), Burkholderia cepacia (10.95 %) and Klebsiella pneumonia (5.48 %). Regarding the percentage of success of the interventions, it was found that the average number of attempts was 5 with a standard deviation of ± 3 attempts and an average duration of less than 30 minutes in 90 of the cases representing 76.27 % and duration greater than 30 minutes in 28 cases representing 23.7 %. Conclusions: Internal jugular venous accesses were the most frequent procedures followed by subclavian accesses, with no predilection for laterality. When reviewing the findings, it can be evidenced that arterial puncture becomes the most frequent mechanical complication producing hematomas and ecchymosis with a high percentage of attempts longer than 30 minutes or a number of attempts longer than three, as well as infectious complications generated by Staphylococcus aureus and without these complications being associated to the type of approach studied, time of intervention or other demographic factors(AU)

Central venous access devices-related thrombosis in critical ill children: a literature review / 中国实用护理杂志

This paper reviewed three aspects of risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children with central venous access devices, including the child's own factors, catheter-related factors and external factors. It summarized the main research advances of preventive measures such as the strengthen assessment of pre-catheterization, drug and mechanical prevention of thrombosis, control of catheter-related other complications, thrombus screening routinely, risk assessment model is used. It is to provide experience for early clinical identification and formulation of preventive measures, so as to reduce the occurrence of catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children and promote the central venous access device used safely in PICU.

Anatomical Landmark Guided versus Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Subclavian Vein Cannulation in Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Central Venous Access (CVA) is acommon requirement in the critically ill patient for avariety of indications including Central VenousPressure (CVP) monitoring, haemodialysis, placementof pulmonary artery catheters, cardiac pacing and foradministration of drugs especially vasoactive,chemotherapy agents and parenteral nutrition.Traditionally, Central Venous Catheter (CVC)placement is performed using Landmark (LM)technique and is associated with complications likearterial puncture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, airembolism, catheter embolism, and cardiac arrhythmias.Use of Ultrasound (US) is currently indicated forvarious clinical situations to reduce complication rate ofLM technique. Aim and Objectives: The purpose of thisstudy was to determine whether US guidance couldimprove the success rate, number of attempts, and rateof acute complications like inadvertent arterialpuncture, hematoma formation, and pneumothorax ofsubclavian venous catheterization. Material andMethods: Sixty patients in need of central venouscatheter were prospectively randomized in two groupsof 30 each. In the LM group patients were catheterizedusing the LM method and in US group patients werecatheterized by real-time US-guidance. Number ofattempts, success rate, access time and complicationslike accidental subclavian artery puncture, haematomaformation, pneumothorax, were recorded. p values<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results:In the US group 30 (100%) of patients were successfullycannulated with the US guidance while the landmarktechnique was successful in 26 (86.66%) of patients. Inthe US group the success on first attempt was 83.33 %which was a significantly higher from 56.67% achievedin the LM group (p=0.025). The average number ofattempts for successful cannulation in the US group was1.16 ± 0.4, while in the LM group it was 1.56 ± 0.9 withstatistically significant difference (p=0.046). Accesstime was 27.26 ± 04.62 seconds in the US group, whilethe access time was significantly more in the LM group36.56 ± 17.35 seconds (p=0.0062). Conclusion: USguidance during subclavian vein catheterizationincreases overall and first attempt success, improvesaccess time with reduced average number of attemptsand complications.

Accesos vasculares centrales. Complicaciones en pacientes pediátricos

La necesidad de un rápido y eficaz tratamiento por vía intravenosa a pacientes críticamente enfermos y con imposibilidad de tratamiento por otras vías ha hecho imperioso el acceso a través de las vías venosas centrales (CVC), se ha asociado con eventos adversos que prolongan la estancia hospitalaria, aumentan los costos hospitalarios, pueden agregar morbilidad e incluso mortalidad al paciente. Objetivo: analizar complicaciones de los pacientes con acceso vascular central hospitalizados en los servicios de Urgencias, Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Cirugía General y Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales del Hospital de Niños "J.M. de los Ríos", en el período marzo-agosto 2016. Método: Estudio retrospectivo, longitudinal y descriptivo con seguimiento de la evolución según registros de la historia clínica de cada paciente. Se registraron características demográficas, diagnóstico, criterios de indicación, características de los catéteres y su localización, complicaciones infecciosas y no infecciosas, duración y tipo de manipulación del CVC. Resultados: Se estudiaron 54 pacientes en total con CVC determinando que no existe diferencia importante en cuanto al sexo, 52 % masculino frente a 48,1 % femenino. La localización más frecuente fue a nivel de la vena yugular interna derecha en 56 % de casos. En un 41 % no se cumplieron con los criterios de colocación. Se identificó un 37 % de complicaciones de las cuales 22 % fueron de causa no infecciosa destacando la obstrucción como causa más frecuente y un 15 % de etiología infecciosa siendo la bacteriemia la principal causa en un 56 %. Conclusiones: se obtuvo con mayor frecuencia aislamiento de K. pneumoniae y P. aeruginosa. La permanencia de la mayoría de CVC fue mayor de 7 días. No se cumplen con los bundles de inserción ni de mantenimiento. Al analizar los diferentes factores de riesgo para complicación infecciosa, se obtuvo que la duración del catéter incrementa el riesgo de infección.

The need for rapid and effective intravenous treatment of critically ill patients who are unable to treat by other means has made access through the central venous pathways (CVC) imperative, has been associated with adverse events that prolong hospital stay, increase hospital costs, can add morbidity and even mortality to the patient. Objective: To analyze complications of patients with central vascular access hospitalized in the Emergency Services, Pediatric Intensive Care, General Surgery and Neonatal Intensive Care of Children's Hospital "J.M. de Los Rios, in the period March-August 2016. Method: Retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study with follow-up of the evolution according to records of the clinical history of each patient. Patient demographics, diagnosis, indication criteria, catheter characteristics and location, infectious and noninfectious complications, duration and type of CVC manipulation were recorded. Results: A total of 54 patients with CVC were studied, determining that there is no significant difference in sex, 52 % male versus 48.1 % female. The most frequent localization was at the level of the right internal jugular vein in 56 % of cases. In 41 %, the placement criteria were not met. 37 % of complications were identified, of which 22 % were of non-infectious cause, the most frequent cause being obstruction and 15 % of infectious etiology, with bacteremia being the main cause in 56 %. Conclusions: Among the isolated microorganisms K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa were most frequently found. The permanence of the majority of CVC was greater than 7 days. Insertion and maintenance bundles are not met. When analyzing the different risk factors for infectious complication, it was obtained that the duration of the catheter increases the risk of infection.

Biofilm fúngico asociado a dispositivo intravascular de larga permanencia: Complicaciones y dificultades terapéuticas / Fungal biofilm associated with long-term central venous access device: Complications and therapeutic difficulties

Las infecciones fúngicas asociadas a biofilms en dispositivos biomédicos son refractarias al tratamiento antifúngico y habitualmente se requiere del retiro oportuno del dispositivo, así como la administración de antifúngicos sistémicos. Presentamos el caso de una paciente mujer de 36 años que recibe terapia para el dolor administrada por dispositivo intravascular de larga permanencia, catéter Port-A-Cath, y que desarrolló candidemia y endocarditis por Candida parapsilosis asociada al catéter; el cual tuvo que ser retirado mediante toracotomía por persistencia de la infección a pesar de la terapia antifúngica sistémica. Se evidenció extenso biofilm rodeando al catéter, con aislamiento de Candida parapsilosis y se completaron seis semanas de tratamiento antifúngico con evolución clínica favorable

Fungal infections associated with biofilms in biomedical devices are refractory to antifungal treatment and usually require the timely removal of the device, as well as the administration of systemic antifungals. We present the case of a 36-year- old female patient who received pain therapy administered by a Port-A-Cath long-term central venous access device. She developed catheter-related candidemi a and endocarditis caused by Candida parapsilosis. The catheter had to be removed by thoracotomy due to persistent infection despite the systemic antifungal therapy. An extensive biofilm surrounding the catheter was observed and Candida parapsilosis was isolated. Six weeks of antifungal treatment with a favorable clinical evolution were completed

Septic Arthritis and Infective Endocarditis in an Adolescent Hemophilia B Patient with an Inhibitor and a Central Venous Access Device / 임상소아혈액종양

Central venous access devices (CVAD) provide hemophilic patients, particularly children, with prolonged reliable venous access to promote routine factor replacement therapy. However, one of the significant complications of CVAD use is infection. We report the case of a severe hemophilia B patient with an inhibitor who developed septic arthritis and infective endocarditis associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection originating from a CVAD. Our patient had an underlying condition of congenital heart disease, one of the risk factors for infective endocarditis. Unfortunately, the antibiotic therapy did not have a significant effect. An echocardiogram revealed vegetation on the right ventricular moderate band and surgery was determined to be the best course of action. Septic arthritis and endocarditis rarely occur in hemophilia patients, however, they must be taken into account in hemophiliacs with continuing bacteremia.

Cateterización de la vena yugular interna guiada por ecografía: estudio comparativo con la técnica convencional por reparos anatómicos

RESUMEN Introducción: los catéteres venosos centrales son sondas intravasculares que se insertan en los grandes vasos venosos del tórax y abdomen. La técnica comúnmente realizada es la guiada por reparos anatómicos basada en la presunción de la ubicación de los vasos del cuello al identificar estructuras anatómicas externas. El uso de la ultrasonografía ha sido promovido como un método para reducir el riesgo de complicaciones durante la cateterización venosa central. Objetivos: comparar la eficacia de la técnica de inserción de catéteres venosos yugulares internos guiado por ecografía con la realizada por reparos anatómicos. Metodología: estudio experimental realizado en varones y mujeres, mayores de 18 años, en quienes estaba indicada la colocación de acceso venoso central yugular interno en forma programada, internados en las Cátedras de Clínica Médica, Unidad de Cuidados Intermedios y Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital de Clínicas y en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Sanatorio Británico (Asunción). En cada caso fueron medidas las siguientes variables: tasa de éxito de colocación, número de intentos, tiempo de realización y complicaciones (hematomas, punción arterial y neumotórax). Resultados: 149 pacientes fueron considerados en este estudio, realizándose 90 vías venosas yugulares con guía ecográfica y 59 por la técnica habitual por reparos anatómicos. El tiempo de realización y el número de punciones en el grupo con guía ecográfica fue menor (p<0,001). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en éxito del procedimiento entre ambos grupos pero el realizado con guía ecográfica tuvo menor proporción de complicaciones: hematomas (p<0,01) y punción arterial (p 0,01). No se registró neumotórax en ninguno de los dos grupos. Conclusiones: la colocación de vía venosa central bajo guía ecográfica es superior sobre la técnica por reparos anatómicos considerando la menor proporción de complicaciones, la reducción en el número de intentos y menor tiempo de realización. Aunque el éxito del procedimiento sea similar, las implicancias para llegar a dicho objetivo bajo la técnica a ciegas se traducen en un incremento directo en las otras variables ya citadas en detrimento del paciente. Por lo tanto, siempre que esté disponible tanto el equipamiento necesario como el operador capacitado ésta será la técnica de elección.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The central venous catheters are intravascular tubes that are inserted in the major vessels of the thorax and abdomen. The commonly performed technique is the external anatomical landmarks technique based on the presumption of the location of the neck vessels when identifying external anatomical structures. The use of ultrasound has been promoted as a method to reduce the risk of complications during the central venous catheterization. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided insertion technique of internal venous catheters versus the surface anatomy landmark technique. Methodology: This experimental study was carried out in adult men and women in whom the insertion of an internal jugular central venous access was indicated and programmed. They were hospitalized in the Services of Medical Clinic, Intermediate Care Unit and Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital de Clínicas and the Intensive Care Unit of the Sanatorio Británico (Asunción). The following variables were measured: the rate of successful insertions, the number of attempts, the duration of catheterization (from puncture of EJV to external fixation of the catheter) and the complications (hematomas, arterial puncture and pneumothorax). Results: One hundred forty nine patients were included in this study, 90 ultrasound-guided jugular vein catheterizations were made and 59 using the external anatomical landmarks technique. The time of performance and the number of punctures were lower in the ultrasound-guided group (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the success rates but the ultrasound-guided group had less proportion of complications: hematomas (p<0.01) and arterial puncture (p<0.01). Pneumothorax was not registered in any groups. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to the one made using the surface anatomy landmark technique considering the lower proportion of complications, the reduction of the number of attempts and the shorter duration. Although the success of both procedures was similar, the implications for reaching the aim using the surface anatomy landmark technique turned into a direct increase of the above mentioned variables at the expense of the patient. Therefore, whenever both the necessary equipment and a trained operator are available, the ultrasound-guided technique will be the technique of choice.

Whole course management is the safety guarantee for central venous access / 介入放射学杂志

At present,peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and totally implantable access port (TIAP) are most commonly used for the medium-term and long-term ccntral vcnous infusion in China,which is mainly adopted for long-term repeated chemotherapy,nutritional support and other clinical treatments.As an advanced infusion route,this technique needs to be further popularized in clinical practice to benifit the majority of patients.However,in aspect of the implantation,use,maintenance,and the diagnosis and treatment of complications of long-term central venous access,there are still a lot of problems,to which sufficient attention should be paid.Standard implantation and maintenance are of great importance for the safe implantation of central venous access and long-term safe use.This paper aims to make a comprehensive review concerning the problems of long-term indwelling of central venous access,the basic solutions,and the whole course management of central venous access.In order to promote the technique of central venous access to continually develop,the multidisciplinary collaborative team with tacit cooperation,standardized system and regulatory process should be emphasized.

Simplified point-of-care ultrasound protocol to confirm central venous catheter placement:A prospective study / 世界急诊医学杂志（英文）

@#BACKGROUND: The current standard for confirmation of correct supra-diaphragmatic central venous catheter (CVC) placement is with plain film chest radiography (CXR). We hypothesized that a simple point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol could effectively confirm placement and reduce time to confirmation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of patients in the emergency department and intensive care unit who required CVC placement. Correct positioning was considered if turbulent flow was visualized in the right atrium on sub-xiphoid, parasternal or apical cardiac ultrasound after injecting 5 cc of sterile, non-agitated, normal saline through the CVC. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled. POCUS had a sensitivity of 86.8% (95%CI 77.1%–93.5%) and specificity of 100% (95%CI 15.8%–100.0%) for identifying correct central venous catheter placement. Median POCUS and CXR completion were 16 minutes (IQR 10–29) and 32 minutes (IQR 19–45), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound may be an effective tool to confirm central venous catheter placement in instances where there is a delay in obtaining a confirmatory CXR.

Incidents and Complications of Permanent Venous Central Access Systems: A Series of 1,460 Cases

BACKGROUND: Implanted venous access devices or permanent central venous access systems (PCVASs) are routinely used in oncologic patients. Complications can occur during the implantation or use of such devices. We describe such complications of the PCVAS and their management. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 1,460 cases in which PCVAS was implanted in the 11 years between January 2002 and January 2013, including 810 women and 650 men with an average age of 45.2 years. We used polyurethane or silicone catheters. The site of insertion and the surgical or percutaneous procedure were selected on the basis of clinical data and disease information. The subclavian and cephalic veins were our most common sites of insertion. RESULTS: About 1,100 cases (75%) underwent surgery by training surgeons and 360 patients by expert surgeons. Perioperative incidents occurred in 33% and 12% of these patients, respectively. Incidents (28%) included technical difficulties (n=64), a subcutaneous hematoma (n=37), pneumothoraces (n=15), and an intrapleural catheter (n=1). Complications in the short and medium term were present in 14.2% of the cases. Distortion and rupture of the catheter (n=5) were noted in the costoclavicular area (pinch-off syndrome). There were 5 cases of catheter migration into the jugular vein (n=1), superior vena cava (n=1), and heart cavities (n=3). No patient died of PCVAS insertion or complication. CONCLUSION: PCVAS complications should be diagnosed early and treated with probable removal of this material for preventing any life-threatening outcome associated with complicated PVCAS.

A Retrospective Clinical Study: Complications of Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Ports

BACKGROUND: When managing patients who require repeated venous access, gaining a viable intravenous route has been problematic. To improve the situation, various studies on techniques for venous access have been conducted. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of complications following totally implanted central venous access port (TICVAP) insertion. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 163 patients, from December 2008 to March 2013. The occurrence of complications was studied in three separate periods of catheter use: the intraoperative period, postoperative period, and period during the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 165 cases of TICVAP insertions involving 156 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 35 complications (21%) overall. Among these, 31 cases of complications (19%) occurred during the treatment period and the other 4 cases were intraoperative and postoperative complications (2%). There were no statistically significant differences in age and gender of the patients between the two groups to be risk factors (p=0.147, p=0.08). Past history of chemotherapy, initial laboratory findings, and the locations of TICVAP insertion also showed no statistical significance as risk factors (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Because the majority of complications occurred after port placement and during treatment, meticulous care and management and appropriate education are necessary when using TICVAPs.

Comparison of implantations of central venous access ports via the approach of internal jugular vein or subclavian vein / 中华临床营养杂志

Objective To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of two different approaches (i.e.internal jugular vein and subclavian vein) when used for the implantation of central venus access ports (CVAP).Methods We retrospectively analyzed 620 patients who underwent the implantation of CVAP via the approach of internal jugular vein (n =222) or subclavian vein (n =398) and compared the success rate on first attempt as well as the incidences of peroperative and long-term complications.Results The implantation of CVAP was successfully performed in all the 620 patients,with the success rate on first attempt being 97.24％ (387/398) in the subclavian vein group and 89.19％ (198/222) in the internal jugular vein group (U =0.171,P ＜ 0.01).The incidences of perioperative/long-term complications were 0.90％ (2/222) /1.80％ (4/222) in the internal jugular vein group and 1.26％ (5/398) /2.01％ (8/398) in the subclavian vein group,showing no significant differences (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The implantation of CVAP via either the internal jugular vein approach or subclavian vein approach is safe and reliable.Few complications will occur if performed properly.

Accesos venosos centrales guiados por ultrasonido: ¿existe evidencia suficiente para justificar su uso de rutina? / Ultrasound guided central venous access: is there enough evidence to justify its routine use?

Tradicionalmente, el sitio de inserción de las vías venosas centrales se ha determinado mediante la palpación de referencias anatómicas con una relación conocida con la vena a canular. Existe evidencia que señala que esta técnica está asociada a complicaciones. El empleo de ultrasonido para guiar la cateterización de estructuras vasculares, ofrece ventajas teóricas y promete hacer de la instalación de accesos vasculares una técnica precisa y segura, reduciendo las complicaciones y disminuyendo el tiempo de inserción de los catéteres. En Estados Unidos y Gran Bretaña, se han dado recomendaciones con respecto a la utilización del ultrasonido como técnica de rutina. La respuesta a estas recomendaciones, ha sido inconsistente. En el futuro, es probable que la técnica guiada por ultrasonido se conviertan en un estándar de cuidado en la práctica clínica, por lo que los médicos involucrados en estos procedimientos deben familiarizarse con esta técnica.

Traditionally, the site of initial needle insertion during central venous catheters placement is determined by using palpable anatomic structures with known relationships to desired vein as landmarks. Evidence has shown that landmark-guided percutaneous venous catheters insertion is associated with significants complications. The ultrasound guided central venous access technique has been shown to ensure safe and timely catheter placement and to reduce many of the potential complications associated with anatomic landmark methods. In the United Kingdom and the United States, ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous catheterisation is recommended. Response to these recommendations has polarised opinions and implementation has been inconsistent. In the future, probably the ultrasound guided technique will become a standard of care in the clinical practice, clinicians must readily incorporate the ultrasound in clinical practice and enhance venous access performance.

Outcome of Tunneled Infusion Catheters Inserted via the Right Internal Jugular Vein

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of tunneled central venous catheter placement via the right internal jugular vein. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and May 2002, 670 consecutive Hickman catheters were placed in 654 patients via the right internal jugular vein. The procedural complications arising and follow-up data obtained from May to July 2002 were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical success rate for catheter placement was 99.9% (669/670). Procedural complications were limited to eight cases (1.2%), including three pneumothoraces, one early migration of the catheter, one clinically unimportant air embolism, one catheter injury, one catheter kinking and one primary malpositioning in the azygos vein. Catheter dwelling time ranged from 1 to 407 (mean 107.1) days. During the follow-up period, 416 catheters were removed for various reasons: treatment had ended (n=334), patients declined treatment or their drug regimen was changed (n=16), late complications arose (n=53), or other circumstances intervened (n=13). Late complications included 44 cases of catheter-related infection (6.6%), five of catheter migration (0.7%), two of catheter occlusion (0.3%), one of thrombophlebitis (0.15%), and one of catheter-related right atrial thrombosis (0.15%). Only one instance of symptomatic venous thrombosis or stenosis was noted , namely the one case of thrombophlebitis. CONCLUSION: Because the incidence of subsequent symptomatic venous thrombosis or stenosis is lower, the preferred route for tunneled central venous catheter placement is the right internal jugular vein.

Radiologic Placement of Implantable Chest Ports in Pediatric Patients Under Sedation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the radiologic placement of implantable chest ports under intravenous sedation in pediatric patients with malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2001 and June 2002, 20 chest ports were placed in 19 pediatric patients [13 boys and six girls aged 1-11 (mean, 4.7) years] for the purpose of long-term chemotherapy. In three patients, tunneled central venous catheters had been removed because of catheter extraction, infection, and tearing. Under intravenous sedation, the right internal jugular vein was used for access in 19 cases, and the left internal jugular vein in one. Venipucture was performed using a micropuncture needle with real-time ultrasound guidance. A port chamber was created at the infraclavicular fossa, and to prevent catheter kinking, a smooth-angled tunnel was created between the venipuncture site and the subcutaneous pocket. The catheter tip was positioned under fluoroscopy at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. We observed techincal success, complications arouse during and after the procedure, and duration of catheter use. RESULTS: Implantation of the port system was successful in all cases, though slight hematoma, treated with manual compression, occurred at a chamber pocket in one case. In addition, the port system was removed from one patient because of wound infection leading to dehiscence and catheter malpositiong. A new port system was implanted through the left internal jugular vein. The median period during which catheter use was followed up was 118 (range, 18-274) days. CONCLUSION: For long-term chemotherapy in pediatric patients with malignancy, radiologic placement of an implantable chest port under intravenous sedation shows a high technical success rate, with few complications. This method may thus be used instead of surgical port placement.

Implantable Central Venous Chemoport: Comparision of Results According to Approach Routes and Methods

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results and complications of placement of implantable port according to approach routes and methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2001 and October 2002, a total of 103 implantable chemoport was placed in 95 patients for chemotherapy using preconnected type (n=39) and attachable type (n=64). Puncture sites were left subclavian vein (n=35), right subclavian vein (n=5), left internal jugular vein (n=9), right internal jugular vein (n=54). We evaluated duration of catheterization days, complications according to approach routes and methods. RESULTS: Implantable chemoport was placed successfully in all cases. Duration of catheterization ranged from 8 to 554 days(mean 159, total 17,872 catheter days). Procedure related complications occurred transient pulmonary air embolism (n=1), small hematoma (n=1) and malposition in using preconnected type (n=2). Late complications occurred catheter migration (n=5), catheter malfunction (n=3), occlusion (n=1) and infection (n=11). Among them 15 chemoport was removed (14.5%). Catheter migration was occured via subclavian vein in all cases (13%, p=.008). Infection developed in 10.7% of patients(0.61 per 1000 catheter days). There were no catheter-related central vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Implantation of chemoport is a safe procedure. Choice of right internal jugular vein than subclavian vein for puncture site has less complications. And selection of attachable type of chemoport is convenient than preconnected type. Adequate care of chemoport is essential for long patency.

Central Venous Catheterization: Comparison between Interventional Radiological Procedure and Blind Surgical Procedure

PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness and safety of radiological placement of a central venous catheter by prospectively comparing the results of interventional radiology and blind surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For placement of a central venous catheter, the blind surgical method was used in 78 cases (77 patients), and the interventional radiological method in 56 cases (54 patients). The male to female ratio was 66:68, and the patients' mean age was 48 (range, 18-80) years. A tunneled central venous catheter was used in 74 cases, and a chemoport in 60. We evaluated the success and duration of the procedures, the number of punctures required, and ensuing complications, comparing the results of the two methods. RESULTS: The success rates of the interventional radiological and the blind surgical procedure were 100% and 94.8%, respectively. The duration of central catheterization was 3-395 (mean, 120) days, that of chemoport was 160.9 days, and that of tunneled central venous catheter was 95.1 days. The mean number of punctures of the subclavian vein was 1.2 for interventional radiology, and 2.1 for blind surgery. The mean duration of the interventional radiological and the blind surgical procedure was, respectively, 30 and 40 minutes. The postprocedural complication rate was 27.6% (37 cases). Early complications occurred in nine cases (6.7%): where interventional radiology was used, there was one case of hematoma, and blind surgery gave rise to hematoma (n=2), pneumothorax (n=2), and early deviation of the catheter (n=4). Late complications occurred in 32 cases (23.9%). Interventional radiology involved infection (n=4), venous thrombosis (n=1), catheter displacement (n=2) and catheter obstruction (n=5), while the blind surgical procedure gave rise to infection (n=5), venous thrombosis (n=3), catheter displacement (n=4) and catheter obstruction (n=8). CONCLUSION: The success rate of interventional radiological placement of a central venous catheter was high and the complication rate was low. In comparison with the blind surgical procedure, it is a very safe and useful method.

Cateteres venosos totalmente implantáveis em pacientes com neoplasia hematológica e não hematológica / Totally implantable venous catheters in patients with hematological and non hematological neoplasias

OBJETIVO: Analisar se a presença de neoplasia hematológica acarreta maior risco de complicações para inserção de cateteres totalmente implantáveis e se há diferença de tempo cirúrgico quando o procedimento é realizado por punção ou dissecção venosa. MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 68 pacientes com neoplasia internados no Hospital Santa Rita de Porto Alegre entre fevereiro de 1998 e dezembro de 1999, os quais necessitavam de acesso venoso central para tratamento quimioterápico, sendo 48 do sexo feminino e com idade média de 55,6 anos. Desses, 31 apresentavam neoplasia hematológica. RESULTADOS: Complicações pós-operatórias ocorreram em 13 pacientes (19 por cento), sendo elas: obstrução do sistema (7 por cento), hematoma (6 por cento) e infecção (6 por cento), não havendo diferença quanto ao tipo de neoplasia (p = 0,56). Foram realizadas dissecção e punção venosa em 30 e 38 pacientes, respectivamente, sem diferença em relação ao tempo de implantação do cateter (p = 0,42). CONCLUSÃO: Neoplasias hematológicas não aumentaram o risco de complicações quando do uso de cateteres totalmente implantáveis no presente estudo, além disso, ambas as técnicas cirúrgicas - dissecção ou punção - são exeqüíveis, haja visto o tempo cirúrgico semelhante entre elas, desde que sejam respeitados o valor sérico mínimo de plaquetas (50.000/mL) e a técnica cirúrgica apropriada, com hemostasia rigorosa e curativo compressivo.

BACKGROUND: We analyse whether hematological tumors increase the risk of complications of totally implantable catheters and if there are differences regarding procedure time when it is perfomed through venous dissection or venous puncture. METHODS: We studied 68 patients with neoplasia in Hospital Santa Rita from Porto Alegre, between February 1998 and December 1999, who had required central venous access for chemotherapy. Forty-eight patients were female and the mean age was 55.6 years. Thirty-one patients had hematological tumors. RESULTS: Postoperative complications were observed in 13 patients (7 percent with device obstruction, 6 percent with hematoma and 6 percent with infection), but there was no difference regarding the pattern of the neoplasia (p = 0.56). Venous dissection and venous puncture were performed in 30 and 38 patients, respectively, with no difference concerning surgical time (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Hematological tumors did not increase the risk of complications of totally implantable catheters; furthermore, both surgical techniques (venous dissection or venous puncture) are acceptable choices, with similar surgical times, since one respects minimal platelet count of 50 000/mL and careful hemostasis techniques and compressive dressings.

The clinical application of central venous access / 介入放射学杂志

Objective To advocate the importance of central venous access(CVA), and compare the technical characteristics and clinical values of central venous access constructed trans right subclavian vein (TSCV) and trans the right internal jugular vein (TIJV). Methods Between March 1999 and June 2001, we operated 348 cases of CVA, including 270 TSCV and 78 TIJV. The durations of reserving the accesses were 13～75 day, average 23 days. Results In 270 TSCV, 268 cases were successful, the successful rate was 99%. 11 cases had critical complications, including: 2 cases of pneumothorax, 1 access was constructed into subclavian artery, 3 accesses obstruction, 3 accesses of anomalous transfusion caused by catheter shift, infection of puncture site 2 cases. In 78 TIJV, 75 cases were successful, the successful rate were 96%. The critical complications occurred in 1 case.Conclusions The CVA is safe, easy, and practical, which would provide the special and immediate medical therapy for the tumorous and critical patients. In emergency, the TSCV procedure would be the choice.