Atención inicial al politraumatizado maxilofacial: evaluación, conducta terapéutica y prevención / Initial care of maxillofacial polytrauma patients: evaluation, therapeutic management and prevention

Introducción: las fracturas maxilofaciales requieren tratamiento de urgencia y de un personal altamente calificado. Pueden aparecer complicaciones que ocasionen la pérdida de la vida del paciente. Objetivo: realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre la atención al politraumatizado maxilofacial, enfatizando aspectos del soporte vital avanzado de trauma como el manejo del déficit neurológico, de la exposición del paciente y del control de la temperatura, anexos a la valoración primaria, valoración secundaria, tratamiento definitivo, lesiones asociadas, equipo multidisciplinario del trauma, traumatismos maxilofaciales con características distintivas, condiciones que influyen en el manejo del trauma y prevención. Métodos: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica entre diciembre de 2014 y enero de 2015. Se evaluaron revistas de impacto de Web of Sciencies (39), 1 cubana y 5 libros. Se consultaron las bases de datos de los sistemas MEDLINE, PubMed y SciELO. Se utilizaron como descriptores: maxilofacial trauma, advanced trauma life support, secondary survey, associated injuries, multidisciplinary team of trauma, prevention y sus equivalentes en español. Se incluyeron artículos en inglés y español, publicados preferentemente en los últimos 5 años. Se obtuvieron 141 artículos. El estudio estuvo circunscrito solo a 51, que enfocaban estas temáticas de forma más integral. Análisis e integración de la información: al analizar el comportamiento de los artículos atendiendo a su representatividad en las revistas científicas, encontramos que 5,9 por ciento correspondían a la Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. Conclusiones: es imprescindible que los cirujanos maxilofaciales que se desempeñan en la atención de emergencia puedan reconocer, diagnosticar y establecer el manejo básico de un traumatismo maxilofacial. La falta de diagnóstico y de correcto manejo puede conducir a la pérdida de funciones y al desarrollo de deformidades secundarias difíciles de corregir luego. Esta corrección también podría inducir resultados decepcionantes, que podrían comprometer la vida del paciente(AU)

Introduction: maxillofacial fractures require emergency treatment by highly qualified personnel. Complications may occur which may cause the death of the patient. Objective: carry out a bibliographic review about the care of maxillofacial polytrauma patients, highlighting the following aspects of advanced trauma life support: management of neurological deficit, exposure and temperature control, annexes to primary assessment, secondary assessment, definitive treatment, associated injuries, multidisciplinary trauma team, maxillofacial traumas with distinctive characteristics, conditions influencing trauma management and prevention. Methods: a bibliographic review was conducted from December 2014 to January 2015. The evaluation included high impact journals from the Web of Sciences (39 journals), as well as one Cuban journal and five books. The databases MEDLINE, PubMed and SciELO were consulted, using the search terms maxillofacial trauma, advanced trauma life support, secondary survey, associated injuries, multidisciplinary trauma team, prevention, and their Spanish counterparts. The review included papers in English and Spanish, preferably published the last five years. Of the 141 papers obtained, the reviewers selected the 51 which approached the study topics in a more comprehensive manner. Data analysis and integration: analysis of the representativeness of papers in scientific journals revealed that 5.9 percent corresponded to the Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. Conclusions: it is indispensable for emergency maxillofacial surgeons to be able to recognize, diagnose and determine the basic management of maxillofacial trauma. Lack of a diagnosis or inappropriate management may lead to the loss of functions and the development of secondary deformities difficult to correct in the future. Such correction could also lead to disappointing results which may risk the patient's life(AU)

The advantages of early trauma team activation in the management of major trauma patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy

PURPOSE: Trauma team activation (TTA) has been shown to have fundamental impact on trauma patients' outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of use of a new TTA protocol in the management of major trauma patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy. METHODS: The medical records of trauma patients who had been treated by the new TTA protocol (NT) over 18 months were compared with those of trauma patients treated by the old TTA protocol (OT) over 18 months. Comparisons between the two groups in terms of the time interval between accident and emergency room (ER) arrival, between ER arrival and CT scanning, between ER arrival and operating room (OR) presentation, between accident and OR presentation, mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mean hospital stay, mortality within 24 hours, mean mortality within one month, and overall mortality were performed using the Pearson chi-squared test and Student t-test. RESULTS: The time interval between accident and ER arrival, between ER arrival and CT scanning, between ER arrival and OR presentation, and between accident and OR presentation was found to have decreased significantly with the use of NT compared to OT. However, the mean ICU stay, mean hospital stay, mortality within 24 hours, mortality within one month, and overall mortality were found not to have improved. CONCLUSION: While initiation of early TTA can shorten the time interval in the management of trauma patients, it may not improve patient outcomes.

Comparison of the Mortality Rate according to the Presence of Trauma Team in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients with Pelvic Ring Injury / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of hemodynamically unstable patients diagnosed with pelvic ring injury according to the presence of a trauma team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture were enrolled in the study and were divided into two groups: Group I, patients who were managed before March 2009, when there was no trauma team; and Group II, patients who were managed after March 2009, when emergent trauma team began to work. Data were collected regarding the time the trauma team began patient management, the treatment modality used to control bleeding, transfusion requirement, and patient mortality. RESULTS: The time when the trauma team began patient management was five hours and 48 minutes in Group I and 57 minutes in Group II. The time to definitive treatment in order to control bleeding in Group I and Group II was 14.4 hours and 4.2 hours, respectively. The amount of the transfusion was 41.1 unit in Group I and 13.2 unit in Group II patients. In Group I, four patients (57.1%) died, although only one of the seven patients in Group II (14.3%) died. CONCLUSION: Using a multidisciplinary approach, the trauma team has only a short amount of time to determine their treatment strategy and to achieve prompt management of bleeding, with the final objective to decrease the mortality rate in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Before and After the Trauma Team's Establishment: Treatment Outcomes and Lengths of Stay in the Emergency Department

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of a trauma team's management. METHODS: A total of 181 patients with severe trauma were retrospectively divided into two groups. Of these 181 patients, 81 patients without a trauma team admitted between April and October 2008 were assigned to Group 1, and 100 patients with a Trauma team admitted between April and October 2009 were assigned to Group II. We compared general characteristics, the length of stay in the emergency department (ED) and treatment outcomes (24-h packed RBC transfusion, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, 24-h mortality) between these two groups. RESULTS: The length of stay in the ED was significantly reduced in Group II compared to Group I (p=0.025). No significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, in-hospital mortality and 24-h mortality between the two groups. However, Group II had a lower amount of 24-h packed RBC transfusion and a shorter length of ICU and hospital stay than Group I, although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Through the establishment of a trauma team, the length of stay in the ED can be reduced remarkably. Furthermore, the need for 24-h packed RBC transfusions and the length of stay in the ICU and hospital were found to be decreased in patients managed by a trauma team.

Effect of the Emergency Trauma Team's Management on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Severe Trauma

PURPOSE: We performed this study to determine how the emergency trauma team affects the treatment of patients with multiple severe trauma and to discuss the effect and the direction of the emergency trauma team's management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 518 patients who visited our emergency department with severe trauma from August 2006 to July 2008. We divided the severe trauma patients into 2 groups : patients before and after trauma team management (Group 1 and Group 2). Then, we compared demographic characteristics, mechanisms of injury, and treatment outcomes (lengths of stay in the ED, admission ratio, and in-hospital mortality) between the 2 groups. In the same way, patients with multiple severe trauma were divided into 2 groups, that are patients before and after trauma team management (Group 3 and Group 4) and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference, except mean age, between groups 1 and 2. In group 4 patients, compared to group 3 patients, the lengths of stay in the ED were lower (p value < 0.001), and the admission ratio were higher (p value = 0.017), but there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality between the groups 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: When patients with multiple severe trauma visit the ED, the emergency trauma team's management can decrease the lengths of stay in the ED and increase the admission ratio, but does not produce a decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate. Further investigations of emergency trauma team management are needed to improve treatment outcomes for patients with multiple severe trauma.

Effectiveness of Simple Trauma Team Activation Criteria on Prognosis of Severe Trauma Patients

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the outcome of the after trauma team (AfterTT) group to the before trauma team (BeforeTT) group. METHODS: All trauma patients who visited to emergency room (ER) between July 1, 2006 and February 29, 2008 based on trauma registry, with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or GCS < 9 were included in this study. We compared the amount of packed RBC transfusion, the ER stay time, the ER visit to CT evaluation time, the ER visit to operation time, the length of ICU stay, the length of hospital admission and the survival discharge rate between the AfterTT group and the BeforeTT group. Patients with brain injuries had little chance of survival. Burn patients, who visited the ER 24 hours after injury and patients who were dead on arrival (DOA) were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Total of 93 patients were included in this study: 42 in the AfterTT group and 51 in the BeforeTT group. The AfterTT group and the Before TT group showed no differences in Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and mean age. The amount of packed RBC transfusion was lower in the AfterTT group, but no statistically significant difference was noted (AfterTT 11+/-11units, BeforeTT 16+/-15units, p=0.136). The ER visit to operation time was shorter in the AfterTT group, but there were no statistically significant difference between the groups (AfterTT 251+/-223 minutes, BeforeTT 486+/-460 minutes, p=0.082). The length of ICU stay was shorter in the AfterTT group, but the difference was not statistically significant (AfterTT 11+/-12 days, Before TT 15+/-30 days, p=0.438). The length of Hospital admission was shorter in the AfterTT group (AfterTT 43+/-37 days, BeforeTT 68+/-70 days, p=0.032), but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Simple Trauma team activation criteria decreased the amount of packed RBC transfusion and the hospital admission duration. Hemodynamic instability (SBP < 90 mmHg) and decreased mental state (GCS <9) are good indices for activating the trauma team.

The Importance of the Trauma Surgeon: A Reflection on the Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Trauma Patients

PURPOSE: Pelvic trauma is a serious skeletal injury with high mortality. Especially in cases of severe injury trauma, treatment outcomes depend on early diagnosis and intervention. We expect trauma surgeon to play an important role in the management of severe multiple trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on pelvic trauma patients with hemodynamic instability between March 2005 and September 2009. We divided the time period into period I (March 2005~Feburary 2009) and period II (March 2009~September 2009). The trauma surgeon and team started to work from period II. Data were collected regarding demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, type of pelvic fracture, ISS (injury severity score), treatment modality, transfusion requirement, time to definitive treatment, and mortality. RESULTS: During period I, among 7 hemodynamically unstable patients, 4(57.1%) patients died. However during Period II, only one of 6(16.6%) patients died. The demographic data and injury scores showed no differences between the two time periods, but the time to definitive treatment was very short with trauma team intervention( 14.4 hrs vs. 3.9 hrs). Also, the amount of transfusion was less(41.1 U vs. 13.9 U). With arterial embolization, early pelvic external fixation led to less transfusion and made patients more stable. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of the trauma surgeon and the trauma team in cases of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma. Even with the same facility and resources, an active trauma team approach can increase the survival of severely injured multiple trauma patients.