Egg allergy and yellow fever vaccination

Abstract Objective Evaluate biomarkers capable of safely guiding Yellow fever vaccine (YFV) vaccination among individuals suspicious of hen's egg allergy, and identify factors associated with a higher risk for adverse events after immunization (AEAI). Methods Patients underwent skin prick test (SPT) for standardized allergens: whole egg, egg white, egg yolk; YFV (1:10 dilution; Biomanguinhos-Fiocruz), and intradermal test (IDT; YFV 0.02 mL, 1:100 dilution) and positive and negative controls. Serum levels of specific IgE (sIgE) for a whole egg, egg white, egg yolk, egg albumin, ovomucoid, lysozyme, and conalbumin (ImmunoCap®; ThermoFisher®) were obtained. Patients sensitized to YFV were submitted to YFV desensitization, and those negatives received YFV (0.5mL) and remained under surveillance for at least one hour. Results 103 patients were enrolled, 95% under 12 years old. 71% (81/103) of patients had reactions: 80% immediate, 11% mixed, and 9% delayed. There was an association between positive skin test results with YFV and the severity of the reaction (OR:7.64; 95%CI:1.61-36.32; p =0,011). Only the presence of sIgE to ovomucoid was associated with clinical symptoms (p =0,025). Thirty patients underwent the YFV desensitization protocol. Conclusion There is a relationship between the positivity of the egg's components and the severity of the clinical reaction. Furthermore, the relationship between the positivity of the tests with the YFV and egg's components may show a tendency to look at ovomucoid and conalbumin, but it is not a certainty. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm these associations, and for now, the authors still recommend using the vaccine for testing when necessary.

Safety of the yellow fever vaccine in people living with HIV: a longitudinal study exploring post-vaccination viremia and hematological and liver kinetics

ABSTRACT Background: Safety data on the yellow fever vaccine 17DD in People Living with HIV (PLWH) are limited. This study explored the occurrence of post-vaccination 17DD viremia and the kinetics of hematological and liver laboratorial parameters in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants [HIV(-) controls]. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a longitudinal interventional trial (NCT03132311) study that enrolled PLWH and HIV(-) controls to receive a single 17DD dose and were followed at 5, 30 and 365 days after vaccination in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 17DD viremia (obtained throughreal-time PCR and plaque forming units' assays), hematological (neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets counts) and liver enzymes (ALT and AST) results were assessed at baseline and Days 5 and 30 post-vaccination. Logistic regression models explored factors associated with the odds of having positive 17DD viremia. Linear regression models explored variables associated with hematological and liver enzymes results at Day 5. Results: A total of 202 PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/μL and 68 HIV(-) controls were included in the analyses. 17DD viremia was found in 20.0 % of the participants and was twice more frequent in PLWH than in HIV(-) controls (22.8% vs. 11.8 %, p-value < 0.001). Neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets counts dropped at Day 5 and returned to baseline values at Day 30. 17DD viremia was associated with lower nadir of lymphocytes and platelets at Day 5. ALT levels did not increase post-vaccination and were not associated with 17DD viremia. Conclusions: 17DD was safe and well-tolerated in PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/μL. Post-vaccination viremia was more frequent in PLWH than in controls. Transient and self-limited decreases in lymphocytes and neutrophils occurred early after vaccination. 17DD viremia was associated with lower lymphocytes and platelets nadir after vaccination. We did not observe elevations in ALT after 17DD vaccination.

Hesitação da vacina da febre amarela e sua relação com influências contextuais, individuais ou de grupo e questões específicas da vacina: uma revisão de escopo / Yellow fever vaccine hesitancy and its relationship with contextual, individual, or group influences and vaccine-specific issues: a scoping review

Resumo A hesitação vacinal é um fenômeno com potencial para reduzir as taxas de cobertura vacinal, como observado na vacina contra febre amarela (VFA), propiciar epidemias e a reintrodução de doenças imunopreveníveis controladas. O objetivo deste estudo é mapear junto à literatura científica a relação entre a falta de informação, a segurança da vacina e os eventos adversos e a hesitação vacinal da VFA. Foi realizada uma revisão de escopo nas bases Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), SCOPUS, Embase e Web of Science utilizando descritores controlados (DeCS/MeSH) e não controlados. Foram selecionados 11 artigos publicados nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português, sem delimitação de tempo e que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Estiveram relacionados à hesitação vacinal da VFA informações falsas, conhecimento inadequado sobre o imunizante, falta de tempo para se vacinar, aceitação da vacina, insegurança na vacina e medo dos eventos adversos. Este estudo reforça a importância do acesso a informações adequadas, orientações sobre a segurança e os eventos adversos da VFA e pode auxiliar na elaboração de estratégias de saúde pública para mitigar a hesitação vacinal.

Abstract Vaccine hesitancy is a phenomenon with the potential to reduce vaccination coverage rates, as observed with the yellow fever vaccine (YFV), leading to epidemics and the reintroduction of controlled immunopreventable diseases. This study, together with the scientific literature, aims to map the relationship among the lack of information, vaccine safety and adverse events, and vaccine hesitancy concerning YFV. A scoping review was conducted in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), SCOPUS, Embase, and Web of Science databases, using controlled (DeCS/MeSH) and uncontrolled descriptors. In this work, we selected eleven articles, published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, with no time limits, which met the inclusion criteria. False information, inadequate knowledge about the immunizer, lack of time to take a vaccination, acceptance of the vaccine, vaccine safety, and fear of adverse events were related to vaccine hesitancy. This study reinforces the importance of access to adequate information, provides guidance on YFV safety and adverse events, and can aid in the development of public health strategies to mitigate hesitancy.

Eventos adversos imediatos à vacina febre amarela em crianças alérgicas ao ovo / Immediate adverse events to the yellow fever vaccine in egg-allergic children

Introdução: A vacina contra a febre amarela é cultivada em ovos embrionados de galinha e por isso pode estar contraindicada em indivíduos alérgicos ao ovo. Quando indicada, deve ser aplicada com cautela, após atendimento especializado para avaliação de testes e necessidade de dessensibilização. Sua segurança nos alérgicos ao ovo ainda é pouco estudada. Objetivo: Descrever uma população pediátrica encaminhada por alergia ao ovo, com ou sem diagnóstico comprovado, e os casos de eventos adversos do tipo imediata à vacina contra a febre amarela em um centro de referência para imunobiológicos especiais (CRIE). Material e métodos: Estudo transversal realizado com coleta de dados retrospectivos de crianças entre 9 meses e 12 anos de idade, vacinadas contra a febre amarela com história de alergia ao ovo, no período de 2018 a 2019. Resultados: Dentre as 829 crianças, com diagnóstico presumido de alergia ao ovo, foi identificada uma maior prevalência de sintomáticos após exposição ao ovo, com IgE específica detectável para ovo, clara de ovo e/ou ovoalbumina. Testes para vacina febre amarela foram realizados em 25 crianças com suspeita de alergia grave ou anafilaxia ao ovo, sendo 15 (60%) positivos com a vacina aplicada após dessensibilização. Foram evidenciados apenas 11 (1,3%) casos de evento adverso imediato à vacina, todos classificados como evento adverso não grave e com acometimento especial da pele (reação local e exantema ou urticária). A maioria dos eventos ocorreu em menores de 2 anos, nos sintomáticos após ingesta de ovo e naqueles com altos valores de IgE específica para clara de ovo. Conclusão: Este estudo evidencia que a vacina contra a febre amarela pode ser aplicada em crianças alérgicas ao ovo, de forma segura, inclusive naquelas com história de anafilaxia, desde que em ambiente adequado e com profissionais especializados.

Introduction: The yellow fever vaccine is grown in embryonated chicken eggs and may be contraindicated for egg-allergic individuals. When indicated, it should be applied with caution, after testing and desensitization. Its safety in egg-allergic patients is still poorly studied. Objective: To describe a pediatric population referred for egg allergy, with or without a confirmed diagnosis, and cases of immediate-type adverse events to the yellow fever vaccine at a reference center for special immunobiologicals. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study collected retrospective data from children between 9 months and 12 years of age who were vaccinated for yellow fever between 2018 and 2019 and had a history of egg allergy. Results: In the 829 children diagnosed with presumed egg allergy, a higher prevalence of symptoms was identified after egg exposure, with detectable specific IgE for egg, egg white, and/ or egg albumin. Yellow fever vaccine tests were performed in 25 children suspected of severe allergy or anaphylaxis to eggs, and 15 (60%) tested positive to the vaccine after desensitization. Only 11 (1.3%) cases of immediate adverse events to the vaccine occurred, all classified as non-serious events that especially involved the skin (local reaction and rash or urticaria). Most events occurred in children under 2 years of age, those symptomatic after egg ingestion, and those with high levels of specific IgE to egg white. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the yellow fever vaccine can be safely administered to egg-allergic children, including those with a history of anaphylaxis, in an appropriate environment and with specialized professionals.

Prevenção e controle da febre amarela: avaliação de ações de vigilância em área indene no Brasil / Yellow fever prevention and control: assessment of surveillance activities in a previously unaffected area in Brazil / Prevención y control de la fiebre amarilla: evaluación de acciones de vigilancia en un área indemne de Brasil

A partir da reemergência da febre amarela em 2014/2015, o Brasil registrou nos anos sequentes sua maior epidemia de febre amarela das últimas décadas, atingindo principalmente a região sudeste. A febre amarela, doença viral hemorrágica, é causada por um flavivírus, transmitido por mosquitos silvestres (Haemagogus; Sabethes). Na ocorrência do ciclo urbano, erradicado no Brasil desde 1942, a transmissão se dá pelo Aedes aegypti. Primatas não humanos são os principais hospedeiros do vírus e constituem "sentinelas" na vigilância da febre amarela. Este artigo descreve as ações de controle e prevenção desencadeadas durante a epidemia de febre amarela no Estado do Espírito Santo, Brasil, e a implementação da vacinação por meio de um estudo ecológico com abordagem espacial. O estudo evidenciou a falha na detecção de epizootias em primatas não humanos pelos serviços de vigilância do Espírito Santo, sendo simultânea à detecção em humanos. Apresentou a evolução das ações de vacinação, com alcance de 85% de cobertura vacinal geral para o estado em seis meses, sendo heterogênea entre os municípios (de 59% a 122%). Destaca-se que 55% dos municípios com ações de imunização em tempo oportuno, considerando o intervalo adotado para este estudo, não apresentaram casos em humanos. A intensificação das ações de vigilância, interlocução entre as áreas e equipes multidisciplinares na condução da epidemia otimizou a detecção e o diagnóstico dos casos em humanos e viabilizou o controle da epidemia. Foi possível reconhecer avanços, apontar algumas medidas tardias e lacunas na vigilância que necessitam melhorias.

Following the reemergence of yellow fever in 2014/2015, Brazil recorded its largest yellow fever epidemic in recent decades, mainly affecting the country's Southeast region. Yellow fever is a hemorrhagic viral disease caused by a flavivirus transmitted by sylvatic mosquitos (Haemagogus; Sabethes). In the urban cycle, eradicated in Brazil since 1942, the virus is transmitted by Aedes aegypti. Nonhuman primates are the principal hosts of the virus and constitute "sentinels" in yellow fever surveillance. This article describes the control and prevention activities launched during the yellow fever epidemic in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil, and the implementation of vaccination, through an ecological study with a spatial approach. The study revealed the lack of detection of epizootics in nonhuman primates by surveillance services in Espírito Santo, with simultaneous detection in humans. The study presented the evolution of vaccination activities, reaching 85% overall coverage for the state in six months, varying widely, from 59% to 122%, between municipalities (counties). Importantly, 55% of the municipalities with timely immunization, considering the interval adopted for this study, did not present human cases. The intensification of surveillance activities, communication between areas, and multidisciplinary teams in managing the epidemic optimized the detection and diagnosis of human cases and allowed control of the epidemic. The study identifies progress and points to some late measures and gaps in surveillance that require improvements.

A partir del resurgimiento de la fiebre amarilla en 2014/2015, Brasil registró los años siguientes su mayor epidemia de fiebre amarilla de las últimas décadas, alcanzando principalmente la región sudeste. La fiebre amarilla, enfermedad viral hemorrágica, es causada por un flavivirus, transmitido por mosquitos silvestres (Haemagogus; Sabethes). Respecto a la ocurrencia del ciclo urbano, erradicado en Brasil desde 1942, la transmisión se produce por el Aedes aegypti. Primates no humanos son los principales huéspedes del virus, y constituyen "centinelas" en la vigilancia de la fiebre amarilla. Este artículo describe las acciones de control y prevención desencadenadas durante la epidemia de fiebre amarilla en el Estado de Espírito Santo, Brasil, y la implementación de la vacunación mediante un estudio ecológico con abordaje espacial. El estudio evidenció el fallo en la detección de epizootias en primates no humanos por los servicios de vigilancia de Espírito Santo, siendo simultánea a la detección en humanos. Presentó la evolución de las acciones de vacunación, con alcance de un 85% de cobertura en la vacunación general para el estado en seis meses, siendo heterogénea entre los municipios (de 59% a 122%). Se destaca que un 55% de los municipios con acciones de inmunización en tiempo oportuno, considerando el intervalo adoptado para este estudio, no presentaron casos humanos. La intensificación de las acciones de vigilancia, interlocución entre las áreas y equipos multidisciplinarios en la gestión de la epidemia optimizó la detección y diagnóstico de los casos humanos y viabilizó el control de la epidemia. Fue posible reconocer avances, apuntar algunas medidas tardías y lagunas en la vigilancia que necesitan mejorías.

Yellow fever vaccination before and during the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the number of yellow fever vaccine doses administered before and during the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. METHODS This is an ecological, time series study based on data from the National Immunization Program. Differences between the median number of yellow fever vaccine doses administered in Brazil and in its regions before (from April/2019 to March/2020) and after (from April/2020 to March/2021) the implementation of social distancing measures in the country were assessed via the Mann-Whitney test. Prais-Winsten regression models were used for time series analyses. RESULTS We found a reduction in the median number of yellow fever vaccine doses administered in Brazil and in its regions: North (-34.71%), Midwest (-21.72%), South (-63.50%), and Southeast (-34.42%) (p < 0.05). Series showed stationary behavior in Brazil and in its five regions during the covid-19 pandemic (p > 0.05). Brazilian states also showed stationary trends, except for two states which recorded an increasing trend in the number of administered yellow fever vaccine doses, namely: Alagoas State (before: β = 64, p = 0.081; after: β = 897, p = 0.039), which became a yellow fever vaccine recommendation zone, and Roraima State (before: β = 68, p = 0.724; after: β = 150, p = 0.000), which intensified yellow fever vaccinations due to a yellow fever case confirmation in a Venezuelan State in 2020. CONCLUSION The reduced number of yellow fever vaccine doses administered during the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil may favor the reemergence of urban yellow fever cases in the country.

Knowledge and attitude of Indian expatriate working at Gondar, Ethiopia regarding yellow fever vaccination: a survey

Background: Ethiopia is one of the yellow fever endemic country, located in north east Africa. A large number of Indian expatriates are working in Gondar, a city located in Amhara region of country. Though yellow fever vaccination is mandatory to travel to Ethiopia but less information is available about knowledge and attitude of Indian expatriate regarding yellow fever vaccination. This study was, therefore undertaken to determine the knowledge and attitude regarding yellow fever vaccination amongst Indian expatriate working at Gondar, Ethiopia.Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out by dispensing the questionnaire to individual expatriates. 157 responses were collected from expatriate by a pre-designed standardized self-administered questionnaire.Results: The average age of expatriates was 46.62±1.28 years. Most of the expatriate (61%) were not aware of yellow fever before being advised for the vaccination. Many of them have taken the vaccine, because it was mandatory for visa process. 62 % of expatriates are aware about the duration of protection from yellow fever vaccine. Moreover 84 % of the expatriates did not know about the etiology of yellow fever. Many of them (69%) believed that yellow fever vaccine was effective in providing protection, while the remaining didn’t have adequate knowledge about its efficacy.Conclusions: So majority of expatriate didn’t have enough knowledge about yellow fever infection and the vaccination. There is need of creating awareness regarding yellow fever among expatriate.

Serious adverse event: late neurotropic disease associated with yellow fever vaccine / Evento adverso grave: doença neurotrópica tardia associada à vacina da febre amarela

ABSTRACT The yellow fever is a systemic disease that was under control due to the effective campaigns against the vector and promotion of vaccines programs. However, since 1999, outbreaks appeared because of inefficient control of the vector, and led to the need of amplifying the immunization in large scale against the yellow fever virus, and consequently, raising the risk of adverse reactions to the vaccine. We report a case of previously healthy infant, who was referred to our care service, after 3 days with fever, chills, nausea and vomits, he received support therapy and was discharged from the hospital. After 24 hours of supportive measures, he was discharge. The patient returned to our service with general condition decline, strabismus, inability to control of cervical musculature and reduced force of the legs. The patient vaccine had received all vaccines from the calendar, and he was vaccinated for yellow fever 20 days before symptoms. During the hospitalization, liquor was collected, and ceftriaxone and aciclovir were administered. After negative cultures from the liquor, the antibiotics were suspended. The computed tomography of patient's brain showed no alterations. Research for antibodies against yellow fever was requested, being positive for IgM in the liquor, and confirming the neurotropic disease associated with the yellow fever vaccine. On the fifth day of hospitalization, the patient showed improvement on the strabismus, cervical tonus, and musculature force. On the tenth day of hospitalization, patient showed complete improvement, and his laboratory exams no alterations. Subsequently, patient was discharged. The vaccine against yellow fever is safe, efficient and highly recommended, however it is not completely free from serious adverse reactions, including death.

RESUMO A febre amarela é uma doença sistêmica que estava controlada graças às efetivas campanhas de combate ao vetor e aos programas de vacinação. Porém, desde 1999, os surtos reiniciaram-se, devido à ineficácia do controle do vetor, levando à necessidade da imunização em larga escala contra o vírus da febre amarela, gerando aumento do risco de ocorrência de reação adversa à vacina. O presente estudo se propôs a relatar o caso de um lactente previamente saudável, que procurou pronto atendimento, pois, há 3 dias, apresentava febre, calafrios, náusea e vômitos. Em 24 horas após medidas de suporte e alta, evoluiu com queda do estado geral, estrabismo, falta de controle da musculatura cervical e redução da força muscular de membros inferiores. O caderno vacinal encontrava-se completo, tendo recebido vacina contra febre amarela há 20 dias. Durante a internação, foi realizada coleta do liquor, e foram administrados ceftriaxona e aciclovir. Após cultura negativa do liquor, o antibiótico foi suspenso. A tomografia computadorizada de crânio não apresentou alterações. Solicitou-se pesquisa de anticorpos contra o vírus da febre amarela no liquor, sendo positiva para IgM e confirmando a doença neurotrópica associada à vacina da febre amarela. A partir do quinto dia de internação, o paciente evoluiu com melhora do estrabismo, do tônus cervical e da força muscular. No décimo dia de internação, apresentou melhora completa do quadro, sem alterações laboratoriais, recebendo alta. A vacina contra febre amarela é segura, eficaz e fortemente recomendada, porém não está completamente isenta de reações adversas graves, inclusive podendo levar a quadros fatais.

Segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente alérgicos à proteína do ovo / Safety of yellow fever vaccine in egg allergic patients

Introdução: A vacina de febre amarela, recomendada em áreas endêmicas, é contraindicada em alérgicos à proteína do ovo (APO) por ser cultivada em ovos de galinha embrionados. Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi mostrar a segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente APO. Método: Foi realizado estudo prospectivo em hospital quaternário, no período de janeiro a outubro de 2018. Foram incluídos pacientes com APO confirmada por teste de provocação oral (TPO), reação anafilática à proteína do ovo nos últimos 6 meses, ou reação de APO nos últimos 2 meses associada à IgE específica positiva. Todos foram submetidos ao teste de puntura com a vacina na apresentação pura. Se negativo, realizado teste intradérmico (ID) com a vacina na diluição de 1:100. Se ID negativo, vacina aplicada em dose plena. Se teste de puntura ou ID positivo, vacina aplicada fracionada segundo protocolo de dessensibilização. Resultados: Dos 78 pacientes com história presumida de APO, confirmou-se o diagnóstico em 43 (30M:13F, mediana idade 2,7 a): 30 por TPO, 7 com anafilaxia em menos de 6 meses da vacina, e 6 com reação imediata após ingestão do ovo há menos de 2 meses e IgE específica positiva. Durante o TPO, 12 apresentaram anafilaxia, e os demais (18) apresentaram urticária e/ou angioedema ou vômitos. Todos os testes de puntura (43) foram negativos. ID foi negativo em 37 pacientes, que receberam a dose plena da vacina, sem reações. Apenas 6 apresentaram ID positivo e necessitaram dessensibilização para vacina. Metade desses pacientes (3/6) apresentou reações de hipersensibilidade leves e foi tratada com anti-H1 e/ou corticoide oral. O ID positivo foi significativamente relacionado à reação à vacina (p = 0,0016). Conclusão: Concluiuse ser possível vacinar alérgicos a ovo, com um protocolo seguro, mesmo em paciente comprovadamente anafilático. É necessária uma unidade especializada para sua realização, com capacidade de controlar possíveis situações de risco.

Introduction: The yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is recommended in endemic areas, but represents a risk for egg allergic (EA) patients, as it is cultivated in chicken embryos. Objective: This study aimed to describe the outcomes of YFV in patients with confirmed egg allergy. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, from January to October 2018. EA was diagnosed through oral food challenge (OFC) or recent history of anaphylaxis following egg contact in the past 6 months or allergic reaction in the past 2 months with positive specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Skin prick testing (SPT) with YFV was performed in all participants. If SPT was negative, an intradermal test (IDT) was performed at 1:100 dilution. If IDT was negative, a full dose of YFV was administered. If SPT was positive, the YFV was administered using a graded-dose protocol. Results: Among 78 patients with prior history of EA, 43 were confirmed (30 male to 13 female, median age of 2.7 years). Thirty patients had a positive OFC, seven reported recent anaphylaxis, and six had reactions in the past 2 months with positive specific IgE. During OFC, 12 patients had anaphylaxis and 18 had urticaria and/or angioedema or vomiting. SPT with YFV was negative in all patients (43). IDT was negative in 37 patients, who received a full dose of YFV, uneventfully. Six patients had a positive IDT and received the YFV in graded doses; half of them had a mild reaction controlled with antihistamines and three patients received the vaccine without reactions. Positive IDT was significantly related to vaccine reaction (p=0.0016). Conclusion: The YFV using a specific protocol was safe even in anaphylactic patients. An appropriate setting is required in order to control possible adverse events.

Study on stability of live attenuated yellow fever vaccine in China / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志

Objective@#To study the viral titers of live attenuated yellow fever vaccine in China under different storage conditions and time, and to provide data to support the stability of the vaccine.@*Methods@#The viral titers of live attenuated yellow fever vaccines stored at different time points at -20 ℃, 4 ℃, 25 ℃ and 37 ℃ were determined; the viral titers of vaccines stored at different time points at the viral titers of vaccines expired for different time points were determined; the viral titers of vaccines were determined after storing at -20 ℃ after being taken away from the cold-chain during transportation; the titer of the virus was determined at different time points after thawing.@*Results@#The viral titer of the live attenuated yellow fever vaccine stored at -20 ℃ for 24 months (validity period) decreased only by 0.4-0.5 LgPFU/ml; the viral titer decreased by 0.7 LgPFU/ml, 1.0-1.4 LgPFU/ml and 2.3-2.6 LgPFU/ml respectively when the vaccine was stored at 4 ℃, 25 ℃ and 37 ℃ for 8weeks. The viral titers decreased by 0.4-0.6 LgPFU/ml, 0.6-0.7 LgPFU/ml, 0.6-0.7 LgPFU/ml and 0.9 LgPFU/ml respectively 8 months 10 months, 44 months and 76 months after the expiration date. The titer of the virus decreased slightly from 0 to 0.2 LgPFU/ml when the vaccine was stored at 4 ℃ for 2 h, 25 ℃ for 2 h, 37 ℃ for 2 h, then -20 ℃ for 2 weeks. Afterthawing, the titers of virus decreased by 0.1-0.4 LgPFU/ml at room temperature for 120 minutes.@*Conclusions@#The live attenuated yellow fever vaccine in China has good stability and is very stable at the current standard storage temperature -20 ℃. Short time exposure to high temperature, whether in lyophilized state or after being thawed, the viral titer of vaccine remained almost unchanged.

Determinants of Compliance of Travelers with Vaccination and Malaria Prophylaxis at a Travel Clinic

BACKGROUND: Pre-travel medical consultation is essential to reduce health impairment during travel. Yellow fever vaccination (YFV) is mandatory to enter some endemic countries. In this study, we evaluated the factors that affect compliance with appropriate prevention of infectious diseases in travelers who visited clinic for YFV. METHODS: For this retrospective study, chart reviews for 658 patients who visited a travel clinic for YFV before travel were conducted. The period of this study was from January 2016 to September 2018. The associations between appropriate vaccination and factors such as travel duration, destination, time of visiting clinic before departure, and purpose of travel were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 658 patients who got YFV during the study period, 344 patients (52.3%) received additional vaccination or malaria prophylaxis following a physician's recommendation. Travelers who visited the clinic more than 21 days before departure were more compliant than those who visited 14 days or fewer before departure (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–2.93; P = 0.004). Travelers visiting Africa were more compliant than were those traveling to South and Central America (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.34–2.90; P = 0.001). Travelers in age groups of 40-49 years and over 70 years were less compliant than the 18–29 years old population (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.93; P = 0.027 and OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04–0.84; P = 0.03, respectively). Also, those who traveled for tour or to visit friends or relatives were more compliant than those who departed for business (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 1.03–3.56; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: For appropriate vaccination, pre-travel consultation at least 3 weeks before departure is crucial. Travelers should be aware of required vaccination and malaria prophylaxis before visiting South and Central America and Asia. Plans to enhance compliance of the elderly and business travelers should be contrived.

Cutaneous lesions caused by the yellow fever vaccine - have you ever seen them?

SUMMARY The Yellow Fever virus was isolated in 1927 and the disease is considered endemic and epidemic in tropical regions of South America and Africa, with thousands of new cases reported annually. Several side effects of the vaccine have already been reported. Although reports of skin rash secondary to the vaccine range from 0 to 15%, no image or detailed description of the lesions were found in the literature. Here we describe a rash on a toddler vaccinated to travel.

RESUMO O vírus da febre amarela foi isolado em 1927, e a doença é considerada endêmica e epidêmica em regiões tropicais da América do Sul e África, com milhares de novos casos relatados anualmente. Vários efeitos colaterais da vacina já foram relatados. Embora os relatos de erupções cutâneas secundárias à vacina variem de 0% a 15%, nenhuma imagem ou descrição detalhada das lesões foi encontrada na literatura. Aqui descrevemos a erupção de uma criança vacinada para viajar.

Single shot of 17D vaccine may not confer life-long protection against yellow fever

The yellow fever (YF) vaccine has been used since the 1930s to prevent YF, which is a severe infectious disease caused by the yellow fever virus (YFV), and mainly transmitted by Culicidae mosquitoes from the genera Aedes and Haemagogus . Until 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the administration of a vaccine dose every ten years. A new recommendation of a single vaccine dose to confer life-long protection against YFV infection has since been established. Recent evidence published elsewhere suggests that at least a second dose is needed to fully protect against YF disease. Here, we discuss the feasibility of administering multiple doses, the necessity for a new and modern vaccine, and recommend that the WHO conveys a meeting to discuss YFV vaccination strategies for people living in or travelling to endemic areas.

Yellow fever vaccine and risk of developing serious adverse events: a systematic review / Vacuna antiamarílica y riesgo de eventos adversos graves: revisión sistemática / Vacina contra febre amarela e risco de eventos adversos graves: revisão sistemática

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate contraindications and precautions for the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) in risk populations. Methods A literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for "yellow fever vaccine" and "adverse events" (AEs); 207 studies were found, and 43 of them met the inclusion criteria and were included in a systematic review. Results The results for first dose of YFV in elderly patients were conflicting—some showed AEs while some showed benefits. Therefore, precaution and case-by-case decisionmaking for YFV in this population are advised. The same precautions are warranted for YFV in infants 6-8 months, with the vaccine contraindicated in those < 6 months old and safe after 9 months of age. YFV seems safe in the first trimester of pregnancy, and probably throughout gestation, as it was not associated with increased malformations. During breastfeeding, YFV continues to be controversial. The vaccine seems safe in people being treated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, people with immunosuppressive diseases, and solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients; in stem cell transplants, however, a booster dose should only be applied once immunity is recovered. HlV-infected patients with a CD4+ count > 200 cells/mm3 do not have increased risk of AEs from YFV. Egg allergy vaccination protocols seem to provide a safe way to immunize these patients. Conclusions YFV safety has been confirmed based on data from many vaccination campaigns and multiple studies. AEs seem more frequent after a first-time dose, mainly in risk groups, but this review evaluated YFV in several of the same risk groups and the vaccine was found to be safe in most of them.

RESUMEN Objetivos Evaluar las contraindicaciones y precauciones en relación con la vacuna antiamarílica en los grupos de riesgo. Métodos Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica mediante una búsqueda de los términos "yellow fever vaccine" [vacuna antiamarílica] y "adverse events" [eventos adversos] en PubMed; se encontraron 207 estudios, 43 de los cuales cumplían los criterios de inclusión para formar parte de la revisión sistemática. Resultados Los resultados de la primera dosis de la vacuna antiamarílica en adultos mayores fueron contradictorios: en algunos se observaron eventos adversos y en otros, beneficios. Por lo tanto, se recomienda precaución y que la decisión de suministrar la vacuna a este grupo se tome caso por caso. Las mismas precauciones se justifican en los lactantes de 6 a 8 meses; se considera contraindicada en los menores de 6 meses y segura en los mayores de 9 meses. La vacuna antiamarílica parece segura en el primer trimestre del embarazo y probablemente durante toda la gestación, pues no se asoció con un aumento de malformaciones. Durante la lactancia, su uso también es controvertido. Parece segura en personas con tratamiento inmunomodulador o inmunosupresor, personas con enfermedades inmunosupresoras y pacientes con trasplante de visceras macizas y células madre hematopoyéticas; sin embargo, en los trasplantes de células madre solo se debe aplicar una dosis de refuerzo una vez que se recupere la inmunidad. En los pacientes con infección por el VIH con un recuento de células CD4+ superior a 200 células/mm3 no se produjo un aumento del riesgo de eventos adversos por la vacuna antiamarílica. Los protocolos de vacunación contra la alergia al huevo parecen proporcionar una forma segura de vacunar a estos pacientes. Conclusiones La seguridad de la vacuna antiamarílica se ha confirmado sobre la base de muchas campañas de vacunación y múltiples estudios. Los eventos adversos parecen ser más frecuentes después de la dosis inicial, principalmente en los grupos de riesgo. No obstante, en esta revisión se evaluó la vacuna antiamarílica en varios grupos de riesgo y se encontró que es segura en la mayoría de ellos.

RESUMO Objetivos Avaliar contraindicações e precauções para a vacina contra febre amarela em populações de risco. Métodos Foi conduzida uma revisão da literatura com uma busca na base de dados PubMed dos termos "vacina contra febre amarela" e "eventos adversos" (EAs). Foram encontrados 207 estudos, sendo que 43 satisfizeram os critérios de inclusão e foram incluídos na revisão sistemática. Resultados Os resultados para a primeira dose da vacina contra febre amarela em pacientes idosos foram conflitantes, alguns estudos demonstraram EAs enquanto outros demonstraram benefícios. Recomenda-se precaução e avalição caso a caso ao se decidir por vacinar este grupo da população. As mesmas precauções se justificam quanto à vacinação de bebês entre 6 e 8 meses de idade, sendo contraindicada antes dos 6 meses e segura após os 9 meses. A vacina parece ser segura para ser administrada no primeiro trimestre de gestação e provavelmente ao longo de toda a gestação, porque não se verificou associação com aumento da ocorrência de malformações congénitas. A vacinação de mulheres lactantes é ainda controversa. A vacina parece segura para ser administrada em indivíduos em uso de imunomoduladores ou imunossupressores, portadores de doenças imunossupressoras e pacientes submetidos a transplantes de células-tronco hematopoiéticas e de órgãos sólidos. No caso do transplante de células-tronco, a dose de reforço da vacina só deve ser aplicada após ser recuperada a imunidade. Pacientes infectados pelo HIV com contagem de CD4+ >200 células/mm3 não têm um risco maior de EAs com a vacina. Seguir os protocolos de vacinação nos casos de alergia à proteína do ovo é uma forma segura de imunizar esses indivíduos. Conclusões A segurança da vacina contra febre amarela foi confirmada a partir de dados obtidos em campanhas de vacinação e vários estudos. Parece que os EAs ocorrem com maior frequência com a vacinação pela primeira vez, principalmente nos grupos de risco. Porém, esta revisão analisou a vacina em vários grupos de risco e verificou ser segura para a maioria destes grupos.

Controvérsias sobre a ampliação das áreas com vacinação de rotina contra a febre amarela no Brasil / Controversias sobre la ampliación de las áreas con vacunación rutinaria contra la fiebre amarilla en Brasil / Controversies in the expansion of areas with routine yellow fever vaccination in Brazil

Resumo: Febre amarela é uma doença viral potencialmente grave, transmitida por mosquitos Haemagogus, Aedes e Sabethes. A vacinação é a medida mais importante para a sua prevenção e controle. Neste artigo, analisamos as recomendações de vacinação no Brasil, segundo a epidemiologia da doença nas últimas décadas. Considerando a facilidade de deslocamentos de suscetíveis para áreas de risco, e sua tendência de expansão, é provável que eventualmente todo o país tenha de adotar a vacinação rotineira. Porém, no processo decisório de ampliação da população candidata à vacinação, questões relacionadas à segurança vacinal têm sido destacadas. Apresentamos uma análise dos riscos e benefícios da vacinação e das estratégias para o controle da doença e prevenção da sua urbanização nas regiões onde a vacina ainda não é recomendada. Concluímos que a introdução da vacina contra a febre amarela no calendário de vacinação das crianças é uma estratégia proativa, de mais fácil operacionalização, como resposta ao aumento do número de casos de febre amarela silvestre no Brasil e tentativa de prevenção da reurbanização da doença.

Resumen: La fiebre amarilla es una enfermedad viral, potencialmente grave, transmitida por mosquitos Haemagogus, Aedes y Sabethes. La vacunación es la medida más importante para su prevención y control. En este artículo, analizamos las recomendaciones de vacunación en Brasil, según la epidemiología de la enfermedad en las últimas décadas. Considerando la facilidad de los desplazamientos de personas susceptibles hacia zonas de riesgo, y la tendencia de expansión de esta enfermedad, es probable que eventualmente todo el país tenga de adoptar la vacunación rutinaria. No obstante, en el proceso de decisión para la ampliación de la población candidata a la vacunación, se han destacado cuestiones relacionadas con la seguridad de la vacunación. Presentamos un análisis de los riesgos y beneficios de la vacunación y de las estrategias para el control de la enfermedad y prevención de su urbanización en las regiones donde la vacuna todavía no está recomendada. Concluimos que la introducción de la vacuna contra la fiebre amarilla en el calendario de vacunación de los niños es una estrategia proactiva, de más fácil operacionalización, como respuesta al aumento del número de casos de fiebre amarilla silvestre en Brasil, así como una tentativa de prevención frente a la reurbanización de la enfermedad.

Abstract: Yellow fever is a potentially severe viral disease transmitted by mosquitos of the genera Haemagogus, Aedes, and Sabethes. Vaccination is the most important measure for prevention and control of the disease. This article analyzes the immunization guidelines in Brazil based on epidemiology of the disease in recent decades. Considering the ease of human movement into areas at risk of transmission and the tendency for these areas to expand, in time the entire country will probably need to adopt routine vaccination. However, in the decision on expanding the target population for vaccination, vaccine safety issues have been emphasized. We present a risk-benefit analysis of vaccination and strategies for controlling the disease and preventing its urbanization in regions where the vaccine is still not recommended. We conclude that inclusion of the yellow fever vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule is a proactive, easily operationalized strategy as a response to the increase in the number of cases of sylvatic yellow fever in Brazil, and an attempt at preventing re-urbanization of the disease.

Prevalence and titers of yellow fever virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated adults

ABSTRACT Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends one single dose of the Yellow Fever (YF) vaccine based on studies of antibody persistency in healthy adults. We assessed the prevalence and titers of YF virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated persons aged ≥ 60 years, in comparison to younger adults. We also evaluated the correlation between antibody titers and the time since vaccination among participants who received one vaccine dose, and the seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Methods: previously vaccinated healthy persons aged ≥ 18 years were included. YF virus neutralizing antibody titers were determined by means of the 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Results: 46 persons aged ≥ 60 years and 48 persons aged 18 to 59 years were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of YF virus neutralizing antibodies between the two groups (p = 0.263). However, titers were significantly lower in the elderly (p = 0.022). There was no correlation between YF virus neutralizing antibody titers and the time since vaccination. There was no significant difference in seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Conclusions: the clinical relevance of the observed difference in YF virus neutralizing antibody titers between the two groups is not clear.

A randomised double-blind clinical trial of two yellow fever vaccines prepared with substrains 17DD and 17D-213/77 in children nine-23 months old

This randomised, double-blind, multicentre study with children nine-23 months old evaluated the immunogenicity of yellow fever (YF) vaccines prepared with substrains 17DD and 17D-213/77. YF antibodies were tittered before and 30 or more days after vaccination. Seropositivity and seroconversion were analysed according to the maternal serological status and the collaborating centre. A total of 1,966 children were randomised in the municipalities of the states of Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais and São Paulo and blood samples were collected from 1,714 mothers. Seropositivity was observed in 78.6% of mothers and 8.9% of children before vaccination. After vaccination, seropositivity rates of 81.9% and 83.2%, seroconversion rates of 84.8% and 85.8% and rates of a four-fold increase over the pre-vaccination titre of 77.6% and 81.8% were observed in the 17D-213/77 and 17DD subgroups, respectively. There was no association with maternal immunity. Among children aged 12 months or older, the seroconversion rates of 69% were associated with concomitant vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella. The data were not conclusive regarding the interference of maternal immunity in the immune response to the YF vaccine, but they suggest interference from other vaccines. The failures in seroconversion after vaccination support the recommendation of a booster dose in children within 10 years of the first dose.

Tendencias de la mortalidad por fiebre amarilla, Colombia, 1998-2009 / Trends in yellow fever mortality in Colombia, 1998-2009

Introducción. La fiebre amarilla es una enfermedad tropical desatendida, razón por la cual el conocer las tendencias de mortalidad por fiebre amarilla en Colombia, constituye una importante fuente de información para la toma de decisiones y las intervenciones en salud pública. Objetivo. Analizar las tendencias de mortalidad fiebre amarilla en Colombia (1998-2009) y las diferencias que presentan las fuentes de información de morbilidad y mortalidad en el país, que afectan indicadores como el de letalidad . Materiales y métodos. Es un estudio descriptivo de las muertes por fiebre amarilla, según el Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, y de la incidencia de la enfermedad, según el Instituto Nacional de Salud. Se usaron fuentes secundarias de información en el cálculo de proporciones de las características sociodemográficas de los fallecidos y las medidas epidemiológicas de letalidad, incidencia y mortalidad por fiebre amarilla, por departamento de residencia de los fallecidos. Resultados. Las muertes por fiebre amarilla se presentan principalmente en hombres, en edad de trabajar, residentes en zonas rurales dispersas, afiliados al régimen vinculado, residentes en las zonas oriental, suroriental, norte y central del país. Se observaron inconsistencias en los informes reportados que afectan el análisis comparativo. Conclusión. Los habitantes de los departamentos ubicados en los territorios nacionales y en Norte de Santander presentan mayor riesgo de enfermar y de morir por fiebre amarilla, pero esta información pudiera estar subestimada, según la fuente de información utilizada en su cálculo.

Introduction: Yellow fever is a neglected tropical disease, thus, knowing the trends in mortality from this disease in Colombia is an important source of information for decision making and identifying public health interventions. Objective: To analyze trends in yellow fever mortality in Colombia during the 1998-2009 period and the differences in the morbidity and mortality information sources for the country, which affect indicators such as the lethality one. Materials and methods: This is a descriptive study of deaths by yellow fever according to the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística and the incidence of the disease according to the Instituto Nacional de Salud . We used secondary sources of information in the calculation of proportions of socio-demographic characteristics of the deceased and epidemiological measures of lethality, incidence and mortality from yellow fever by department of residence of the deceased. Results: Yellow fever deaths occur primarily in men of working age residing in scattered rural areas, who were members of the regimen vinculado, and who were living in the eastern, southeastern, northern and central zones in the country. We observed inconsistencies in the reports that affect the comparative analysis. Conclusion: The inhabitants of the departments located in national territories and Norte de Santander have an increased risk of illness and death from yellow fever, but this information could be underestimated, according to the source of information used for its calculation.

O que o reumatologista deve saber sobre a vacina contra febre amarela / What a rheumatologist needs to know about yellow fever vaccine

Os pacientes portadores de doenças reumáticas são mais suscetíveis à infecção, quer seja pela própria doença de base ou pelo tratamento empregado. É papel do reumatologista prevenir as infecções nesse grupo de pacientes e, dentre as estratégias empregadas, encontra-se a vacinação. No grupo das doenças infecciosas que podem ser prevenidas está a febre amarela. Sua vacina é segura e eficaz na população em geral, mas, assim como as vacinas contendo organismos vivos atenuados, deve ser evitada sempre que possível em portadores de doenças reumáticas em uso de medicamentos imunossupressores. Sendo a febre amarela endêmica em grande parte do Brasil, e estando a vacinação contra essa doença indicada para a população residente em extensa parte do território nacional (além dos viajantes para essas regiões), torna-se essencial que o reumatologista tenha conhecimento da doença, das indicações e contraindicações da vacina contra a febre amarela. Nosso artigo tem o objetivo de destacar os principais aspectos que o reumatologista precisa conhecer sobre a vacina contra a febre amarela, para decidir por sua indicação ou contraindicação após avaliação do risco-benefício em situações específicas.

Patients with rheumatic diseases are more susceptible to infection, due to the underlying disease itself or to its treatment. The rheumatologist should prevent infections in those patients, vaccination being one preventive measure to be adopted. Yellow fever is one of such infectious diseases that can be avoided.The yellow fever vaccine is safe and effective for the general population, but, being an attenuated live virus vaccine, it should be avoided whenever possible in rheumatic patients on immunosuppressive drugs. Considering that yellow fever is endemic in a large area of Brazil, and that vaccination against that disease is indicated for those living in such area or travelling there, rheumatologists need to know that disease, as well as the indications for the yellow fever vaccine and contraindications to it. Our paper was aimed at highlighting the major aspects rheumatologists need to know about the yellow fever vaccine to decide about its indication or contraindication in specific situations.

Dengue-2 and yellow fever 17DD viruses infect human dendritic cells, resulting in an induction of activation markers, cytokines and chemokines and secretion of different TNF-α and IFN-α profiles

Flaviviruses cause severe acute febrile and haemorrhagic infections, including dengue and yellow fever and the pathogenesis of these infections is caused by an exacerbated immune response. Dendritic cells (DCs) are targets for dengue virus (DENV) and yellow fever virus (YF) replication and are the first cell population to interact with these viruses during a natural infection, which leads to an induction of protective immunity in humans. We studied the infectivity of DENV2 (strain 16681), a YF vaccine (YF17DD) and a chimeric YF17D/DENV2 vaccine in monocyte-derived DCs in vitro with regard to cell maturation, activation and cytokine production. Higher viral antigen positive cell frequencies were observed for DENV2 when compared with both vaccine viruses. Flavivirus-infected cultures exhibited dendritic cell activation and maturation molecules. CD38 expression on DCs was enhanced for both DENV2 and YF17DD, whereas OX40L expression was decreased as compared to mock-stimulated cells, suggesting that a T helper 1 profile is favoured. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α production in cell cultures was significantly higher in DENV2-infected cultures than in cultures infected with YF17DD or YF17D/DENV. In contrast, the vaccines induced higher IFN-α levels than DENV2. The differential cytokine production indicates that DENV2 results in TNF induction, which discriminates it from vaccine viruses that preferentially stimulate interferon expression. These differential response profiles may influence the pathogenic infection outcome.