Re-evaluation of systematic reviews of acupuncture and moxibustion for childhood autism / 中国针灸

OBJECTIVE@#To re-evaluate the systematic review/Meta-analysis of acupuncture and moxibustion for childhood autism (CA), aiming to provide decision-making basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.@*METHODS@#The systematic review and/or Meta-analysis of acupuncture and moxibustion for CA were searched in PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI and Wanfang databases. The retrieval time was from the database establishment to May 5th, 2022. PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) was used to evaluate the report quality, and AMSTAR 2 (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2) was used to evaluate the methodological quality, bubble map was used to construct the evidence map and GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.@*RESULTS@#A total of 9 systematic reviews were included. The PRISMA scores ranged from 13 to 26. The report quality was low, and there was a serious lack in the aspects of program and registration, search, other analysis and funding. The main problems in methodology included not making prespecified protocol, incomplete retrieval strategy, not providing a list of excluded literatures, and incomplete explanation on heterogeneity analysis and bias risk. The evidence map showed that 6 conclusions were valid, 2 conclusions were possible valid and 1 conclusion was uncertain valid. The overall quality of evidence was low, and the main factors leading to the downgrade were limitations, followed by inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias.@*CONCLUSION@#Acupuncture and moxibustion has a certain effect for CA, but the quality of reporting, methodology and evidence in included literature need to be improved. It is suggested to perform high-quality and standardized research in the future to provide evidence-based basis.

Attention Situation of Chinese Patent Medicine for Constipation in Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines/Consensus and National Reimbursement Drug List / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ （AGREE Ⅱ）tool， and to study the attention situation of the included Chinese patent medicines in China's National Reimbursement Drug List in the guidelines/consensus. MethodThe data of CNKI，VIP，Wanfang Data，SinoMed，PubMed and Cochrane from the inception of the databases to October 2021 were searched to collect the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Then，the diagnosis and treatment standards and recommended Chinese patent medicines were extracted. Two researchers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines/consensus with AGREE Ⅱ tool independently. The quality of reports was evaluated by Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare （RIGHT） Statement. The recommended Chinese patent medicines in the guidelines/consensus were compared with those in the National Reimbursement Drug List. ResultEleven consensus and 2 guidelines were included，involving 794 experts. The scores of AGREE II were clarity of presentation（59.0%），scope and purpose（44.0%），stakeholder involvement（23.1%），rigor of development （12.1%），applicability （11.1%），and editorial independence （8.3%） from high to low. Five articles were recommended at B level（recommended after revision） and 8 articles were at C level （not recommended）. The average scores of RIGHT Statement were as follows：basic information （93.59%），background （57.69%），evidence （18.46%），recommendations （20.88%），review and quality assurance （19.23%），funding，declaration and management of interests （0.00%）， and other information （0.00%）. The included guidelines/consensus recommended a total of 27 Chinese patent medicines，among which 20 were included in the National Reimbursement Drug List，with 4 species of Class A and 16 species of Class B， accounting for 74.1% of all recommended Chinese patent medicines. Ten purgative Chinese patent medicines in the National Reimbursement Drug List were recommended by the guidelines/consensus，accounting for 50% of all purgative drugs， and 8 were not recommended. There were prescriptions for purgation， for promoting digestion and removing food stagnation， for clearing heat and purging fire，and for warming the middle and dissipating cold，Tibetan medicine and Mongolian medicine. ConclusionBy the AGREE Ⅱ assessment，the methodological quality of the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation included in this study needed to be improved in the future. The report quality evaluated with RIGHT Statement was low. Most drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List were paid attention in the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Moreover，the drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List could basically fulfill the clinical needs reflexed from the guidelines/consensus recommendations. However， the reasons of some drugs failing to be included in the National Reimbursement Drug List needed to be studied in the future.

Priorização de projetos de recursos hídricos sob a perspectiva de modelos de apoio à decisão multicritério: uma revisão sistemática / Prioritization of water resources projects from the perspective of multicriteria decision aid models: a systematic review

Resumo Este estudo apresenta a análise da literatura científica quanto à aplicação de modelos de apoio à decisão multicritério na priorização de projetos de recursos hídricos, por meio de uma revisão sistemática. Metodologicamente, a pesquisa caracteriza-se como diagnóstico-descritiva. Para a realização da revisão sistemática, seguiu-se o protocolo Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. No que tange à análise dos dados, após o levantamento do portfólio bibliográfico, realizou-se uma bibliometria com o auxílio dos softwares VOSviewer e UCINET 6 em conjunto com o NetDraw, e posteriormente se procedeu à metassíntese. Como principais resultados, percebeu-se: (i) uma carência na produção científica sobre o tema investigado (23 artigos); (ii) a recorrente aplicação de métodos de apoio à decisão multicritério na priorização de projetos de recursos hídricos; (iii) o destaque para o governo e companhias de saneamento com setores de maior interesse em projetos de recursos hídricos; (iv) a falta de informação sobre os atores envolvidos na priorização dos projetos e as técnicas que apoiam o consenso da decisão; e (v) além da preocupação econômica, a importância que vem sendo dada às dimensões social e ambiental. A contribuição prática deste estudo é dada pelo conhecimento gerado para as companhias e instituições que desejem realizar a priorização de projetos de recursos hídricos, uma vez que são exibidas metodologias, técnicas, dimensões e critérios que vêm sendo considerados cientificamente na priorização de projetos no setor de recursos hídricos. Já a contribuição teórica é realizada por meio da apresentação de um panorama atual do tema objeto de estudo, de forma a permitir a identificação de lacunas e apontando áreas em desenvolvimento para pesquisas futuras.

Abstract This study presents the analysis of the scientific literature on the application of multicriteria decision aid models in the prioritization of water resources projects through a systematic review. Methodologically, the research is characterized as descriptive diagnosis. For the systematic review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was followed. Regarding data analysis, after surveying a bibliographic portfolio, a bibliometry was carried out with the aid of VOSviewer and UCINET 6 software, in addition to NetDraw software; subsequently, a metasynthesis was performed. As main results, the following aspects were observed: (i) lack of scientific production on the investigated topic (23 articles); (ii) recurring application of multicriteria decision aid methods in prioritizing water resource projects; (iii) emphasis on the government and sanitation companies with sectors of greatest interest in water resources projects; (iv) lack of information about the actors involved in the prioritization of projects and the techniques that support the decision consensus; and (v) in addition to the economic concern, the importance that has been given to social and environmental dimensions. The practical contribution of this study consists in the knowledge generated for companies and institutions that intend to prioritize water resource projects, as this study presents the methodologies, techniques, dimensions, and criteria that have been scientifically considered in the prioritization of projects in the water resources sector. The theoretical contribution consists in the presentation of a current overview of the topic under study, in such a way to allow the identification of gaps and indicating areas under development for future research.

Report Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines of Rehabilitation Based on RIGHT / 中国康复理论与实践

@#Objective To evaluate the quality of reporting of clinical practice guidelines of rehabilitation.Methods A comprehensive retrieve was performed in electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, China Biology Medicine disc, Wanfang data, etc., from January 1, 2017 to January 11, 2020. Supplementary searches had been done on relevant websites. Two researchers reviewed literatures and assessed the reporting quality independently by using Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), and any disagreements needed to be discussed in a consensus meeting.Results A total of 16 guidelines were included, with an average reporting rate of (44.8±27.9)%. Among the seven domains of RIGHT, basic information was reported the highest (57.3%), and evidence (31.3%) and other information (31.3%) was the lowest. The reporting rate was less as the guidelines published in China than in foreign contries (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.56-1.16), in original version than in update version (OR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.54-1.16); and higher as developed by various societies or associations than developed by non-societies or associations (OR = 1.15, 95%CI 0.82-1.61), however, no statistically significant difference was found in above comparisons.Conclusion Current clinical practice guidelines of rehabilitation reported with low quality. It is proposed that future guideline developers should report guidelines after RIGHT statements, including key information and content, in order to improve the quality of reporting guidelines.

Normativity of overview report of the systematic review of acupuncture and moxibustion at home and abroad based on PRIO-harms scale / 中国针灸

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate and compare the normativity of overview report of systematic review (Overviews) of acupuncture and moxibustion at home and abroad so as to further improve the report quality of Overviews of acupuncture and moxibustion in China and provide reliable evidences.@*METHODS@#The articles relevant with Overviews of acupuncture and moxibustion at home and abroad were retrieved by computer from the databases of CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, China BioMedical Literature database (SinoMed), PubMed, Embase and Conchrane Library, dated from the time of establishment to February 12, 2019. The preferred reporting items for Overviews (PRIO-harms) was adopted to evaluate their normativity and make the comparison of the articles between China and foreign countries.@*RESULTS@#A total of 13 articles of Overviews of acupuncture and moxibustion were included, 9 articles of them were of Chinese version and the rest were of English version. The results of PRIO-harms indicated that the proportions of the item numbers related to adequate, partial and inadequate adherence of Chinese version were 3.7%, 63.8% and 32.5%, and those of English version were 12.0%, 57.4% and 30.6% respectively. The reports on the item 10 "additional search for primary studies", the item 12 "data items" and the item 26 "Dual/(co-)authorship" were inadequate adherence by 100% in the articles of both Chinese and English version.@*CONCLUSION@#The overall information of English article report is better than Chinese one, but the reports of either Chinese or English articles are not so satisfactory. It is suggested that the Overviews report should be in reference to the specification in PRIO-harms and the Chinese researchers should study the advantages of English article report and improve the normalization and report quality so as to obtain the high-quality evidences in evidence-based medicine.

Evaluation of methodological and reporting quality of the clinical practice guidelines on Henoch-Schonlein purpura by AGREEII and RIGHT / 解放军医学杂志

Objectives To evaluate the current methodological and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) for providing the reference for the development of high quality HSP clinical practice guidelines. Methods Databases as PubMed, NICE, Medlive, WHO, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP and CBM were electronically searched to collect the clinical practice guidelines on HSP from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the methodological and reporting quality by using appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation Ⅱ (AGREEⅡ) and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) tools, respectively. Results A total of five HSP clinical practice guidelines were included, three of which are evidence-based guidelines, and the remaining two are based on expert consensus; and three guidelines for clinical practice in traditional Chinese medicine and two for western medicine were selected for evaluation. The AGREEⅡevaluation showed that the HSP guidelines had higher scores in terms of "scope and purpose" (67.8%) and "clarity of presentation" (57.2%), while the average scores were lower in another four areas, i.e. stakeholder involvement (25.6%), rigor of development (33.3%), applicability (9.2%) and editorial independence (43.3%). The RIGHT evaluation showed that, for five HSP guidelines, the corresponding reporting rates of "basic information", "background", "evidence", "recommendations", "review and quality assurance", "funding and conflict of interest statement and management" and "other information" accounted for 0%, 20%, 20%, 0%, 0%, 0% and 0%. A total of 75 recommendations of HSP clinical practice guidelines were classified into 7 for the diagnosis and 68 for the treatment. Conclusions The methodological and reporting quality of HSP clinical practice guidelines are still to be improved. The guidelines should be developed in strict accordance with AGREEⅡand RIGHT.

Efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists in the treatment of acute migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: This study determined the efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists in the treatment of acute migraine.Methods: Seven randomized, controlled trials were included. Outcome measures used were pain freedom and pain relief two hours after treatment.Results: The difference in pain freedom 2 hours post-dose significantly favored gepants 140/150 mg (OR=2.39, 95% CI=1.93-2.96, PConclusion: With regard to pain freedom and pain relief two hours post-dose, CGRP antagonists are more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of acute migraine but there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate superior efficacy of CGRP antagonists over triptans.

Efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists in the treatment of acute migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective@#This study determined the efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists in the treatment of acute migraine.

Infratemporal fossa approach: the modified zygomatico-transmandibular approach / 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지

BACKGROUND: The infratemporal fossa (ITF) is an anatomical lateral skull base space composed by the zygoma, temporal, and the greater wing of the sphenoid bone. Due to its difficult approach, surgical intervention at the ITF has remained a heavy burden to surgeons. The aim of this article is to review basic skull base approaches and ITF structures and to avoid severe complications based on the accurate surgical knowledge. METHODS: A search of the recent literature using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and other online tools was executed using the following keyword combinations: infratemporal fossa, subtemporal fossa, transzygomatic approach, orbitozygomatic approach, transmaxillary approach, facial translocation approach, midface degloving, zygomatico-transmandibular approach, and lateral skull base. Aside from our Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) trial, there have been very few randomized controlled trials. The search data for this review are summarized based on the authors’ diverse clinical experiences. RESULTS: We divided our results based on representative skull base approaches and the anatomy of the ITF. Basic approaches to the ITF include endoscopic endonasal, transzygomatic, orbitozygomatic, zygomatico-transmandibular, transmaxillary, facial translocation, and the midfacial degloving approach. The borders and inner structures of the ITF (with basic lateral skull base dissection schemes) are summarized, and the modified zygomatico-transmandibular approach (ZTMA) is described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: An anatomical basic knowledge would be required for the appropriate management of the ITF pathology for diverse specialized doctors, including maxillofacial, plastic, and vascular surgeons. The ITF approach, in conjunction with the application of microsurgical techniques and improved perioperative care, has permitted significant advances and successful curative outcomes for patients having malignancy in ITF.

Reporting items of agreement evaluation using Bland-Altman Method:RiBAM / 医学研究生学报

With the promotion and application in medicine and sanitary fields,the reporting quality of Bland-Altman agreement evaluation is worrying.This study aimed at developing a set of reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as the guidance for proper application to improve the reporting quality.A research group was launched to work on reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation,and all the requirements for personnel on various levels were made clear.Early in the study,we carried out articles reviews,regular meetings,expert consultations,literary evaluation,item integration and extraction.Then,we invited a multi-disciplinary panel of experts to improve overall design,evaluate reporting items and form the first draft by brainstorming method.Multiple rounds of expert consultations were also conducted with reference to Delphi method to integrate expert advice and form the basic framework of reporting items.Finally,through the thorough analysis and demonstration,we proposed the reporting items for the agreement evaluation of Bland-Altman method (RiBAM) as the recommended report.A list of recommended items called RiBAM was formed,which consisted of 17 first-level items and 23 secondary-level items.RiBAM is more comprehensive and systematic as an important reference for improving the quality of reports by avoiding the omission of reporting contents and achieving the clarity,integrity and transparency of the report.RiBAM recommended items can be a guide for authors in reporting Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as well as a basic reference for journal editors,peer reviewers and readers.

Attach importance to implication of "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" in ophthalmology / 中华实验眼科杂志

As a part of evidence-based medical practice to obtain high-level evidence through summarizing previous studies,systematic review and meta-analysis have been paid more and more attention.The number of papers published is increasing recently.However,many relevant published papers in biomedical sciences revealed low quality,such as non-uniform and incomprehensive items,and even unclear narrative in many portions of review.These problems reduced the evidence-based role of systematic review and Meta-analysis paper,and affected the interpretation and effective availability of summarized evidence.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is a report standard,but it has not been well-known in ophthalmology of China.The systematic review and meta-analysis published by Chinese ophthalmologists are less guided by PRISMA.Learning PRISMA is helpful not only for improving quality of papers,but also for acquainting the key elements of high-level clinical research,even for standardizing the medical code of conduct,which are important to make it better for conduct evidence-based research in ophthalmology.