Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid EBM Reviews, and PubMed was performed for English-language literature about laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), in September 2014. The papers were filtered using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight papers were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The sample comprised a pooled total of 370 patients, of which 210 and 160 patients took PPIs and placebo, respectively. The difference between PPIs and placebo groups in overall improvement of symptoms in adult patients with LPR was not statistically significant (RR=1.22; 95%CI=0.93-1.58; P=0.149). The difference in cough improvement was also not significant between PPIs and placebo groups (RR=0.65; 95%CI=0.30-1.41; P=0.279).

Comparison on Oral versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors for Prevention of Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Lesions / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has been used for the prevention of post endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding, the route of administration has not been confirmed. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous and oral PPI administration for the prevention of delayed post ESD bleeding. METHODS: Total 166 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to 30 mg lansoprazol twice a day (PO group) and 120 mg pantoprazole intravenous injection (IV group) for 48 hours. Finally, 65 patients in PO group and 87 patients in IV group were analyzed. After ESD, all patients underwent follow up endoscopy after 24 hours and were observed the symptoms of bleeding up to 60 days after ESD. RESULTS: Age, sex and use of anticoagulants were not different between groups. At follow up endoscopy after 24 hours, oozing and exposed vessel was noted in 4.6% of PO group and 8.0% of IV group and there was no significant difference. Delayed bleeding occurred in 4 of 65 patients (6.2%) in the PO group and 8 of 87 patients (9.2%) in the IV group (p>0.999). By multivariate analysis, oozing or exposed vessels at follow up endoscopy were risk factors for delayed bleeding (OR=17.5, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the delayed bleeding, length of hospital stay according to the administration route. Bleeding stigmata at follow up endoscopy was risk factor of delayed bleeding. Oral PPI administration can cost-effectively replace IV PPI for prevention of post ESD bleeding.

Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: Pilot Study / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxygen free radicals play an important role in acute pancreatitis. Pantoprazole as a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has pancreatic anti-secretory effect and a pronounced inhibitory reactivity towards hydroxyl radicals. The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of pantoprazole on the course of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized trial involving 40 patients with acute pancreatitis. Patients were divided into two groups. One group received PPI and the other group did not receive PPI. In the PPI group, patients received pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously twice a day for fasting time, and then 40 mg orally twice a day until discharge. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and laboratory markers between two groups. In the pantoprazole group, mean hospital stay was 7.4 days, time to start oral intake was 69.0 hours, and time to pain relief was 59.7 hours. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score was 3.15 at admission day and 2.35 at discharge. On the other hand, in the non-pantoprazole group, mean hospital stay was 7.6 days, time taken to start oral intake was 71.4 hours, and time taken to pain relief was 61.8 hours. APACHE II score was 4.4 at admission and 2.85 at discharge. However, there were no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pantoprazole did not have influence on the clinical course of acute pancreatitis. But, considering it was a pilot study, large scale prospective trials will be needed.

Practice Pattern of Gastroenterologists for the Management of GERD Under the Minimal Influence of the Insurance Reimbursement Guideline: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

The objective of the study was to document practice pattern of gastroenterologists for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) under the minimal influence of the insurance reimbursement guideline. Data on management for 1,197 consecutive patients with typical GERD symptoms were prospectively collected during 16 weeks. In order to minimize the influence of reimbursement guideline on the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), rabeprazole was used for the PPI treatment. A total of 861 patients (72%) underwent endoscopy before the start of treatment. PPIs were most commonly prescribed (87%). At the start of treatment, rabeprazole 20 mg daily was prescribed to 94% of the patients who received PPI treatment and 10 mg daily to the remaining 6%. At the third visits, rabeprazole 20 mg daily was prescribed to 70% of those who were followed and 10 mg daily for the remaining 30%. Continuous PPI treatment during the 16-week period was performed in 63% of the study patients. In conclusion, a full-dose PPI is preferred for the initial and maintenance treatment of GERD under the minimal influence of the insurance reimbursement guideline, which may reflect a high proportion of GERD patients requiring a long-term treatment of a full-dose PPI.

Primary Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Strains and Eradication Rate according to Gastroduodenal Disease in Korea / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was performed to evaluate whether the prevalence rates of primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) isolates and the eradication rate of H. pylori could be different between cancer and non-cancer patients. METHODS: H. pylori were isolated from gastric mucosal biopsy specimens obtained from 269 Koreans, who did not have any eradication therapy history and were diagnosed as one of the following diseases; chronic gastritis, benign gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer or gastric cancer. The susceptibilities of the H. pylori isolates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were examined with the agar dilution method. In addition, eradication rate of H. pylori was evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the primary antibiotic resistance to above eight antibiotics among chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Furthermore there was no difference of antibiotic resistance between cancer and non-cancer patients, and there was no difference of eradication rate of H. pylori according to disease. CONCLUSIONS: Primary antibiotic resistance and H. pylori eradication rate were not different between cancer and non-cancer patients.

A Case of Menetrier's Disease Showing Mucus Bridge Observed during Endoscopy / 대한소화기학회지

Menetrier's disease is a rare entity characterized by large, tortuous gastric mucosal folds. The mucosal folds in Menetrier's disease are often most prominent in the body and fundus. Histologically, massive foveolar hyperplasia (hyperplasia of surface and glandular mucous cells) is noted, which replaces most of the chief and parietal cells. Profuse mucus is usually observed during the endoscopy but there have been few cases that show interesting endoscopic findings such as mucus bridge or water pearl. Herein, we report a case of Menetrier's disease showing mucus bridge by excessive mucus observed during the endoscopy.

Clinical Analysis of Recurrence Rate and Symptom Improvement in Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease Patients / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition, with 50-80% of patients experiencing recurrence within one year following completion of initial treatment. The present study aimed to estimate recurrence rate and treatment response in GERD patients treated with proton pump inhibitor. METHODS: A total of 207 symptomatic GERD patients, which were confirmed by endoscopy from July 2008 till January 2009, were enrolled. They were divided into non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group and erosive reflux disease (ERD) group by endoscopic findings. Patients were treated with lansoprazole 15 mg (NERD group) or 30 mg (ERD group) once daily for 8 weeks. The presence of symptoms was assessed in each patient at baseline and post-treatment using a questionnaire. Subsequent symptomatic recurrence on the cessation of therapy in each improved patients was checked by telephone survey or outpatient interview. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients and 113 patients were first diagnosed with NERD and ERD, respectively. The mean post-treatment follow-up period was 24.4+/-8.5 weeks. Recurrence rate was 40.0% (NERD, 43.8%; ERD, 37.1% (p=0.224)). Recurrence time was 10.1+/-5.8 weeks (NERD 9.6 weeks; ERD, 10.6 weeks (p=0.444)). Regarding the symptom improvement after 8 week therapy with lansoprazole, 89.4% (NERD, 85.1%; ERD, 92.9% (p=0.056)) of total patients were symptomatically improved. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percentage of GERD patients recurred within 6 months following the completion of 8 week therapy with lansoprazole. Recurrence rate, recurrence time, and rate of symptom improvement were not significantly different between NERD group treated with half dose and ERD group treated with full dose lansoprazole.

Itopride and pantoprazole outcomes in diabetic gastroparesis trial (IPOD trial).

The most common cause of gastroparesis is diabetes mellitus. The present study was carried out to asses the combination of itopride and pantoprazole in the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis. The study was an open label, multicentre, conducted in 743 patients with diabetic gastroparesis for a period of 3 weeks. The efficacy parameters included nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain and regurgitation. The patients were evaluated based on the frequency and severity of symptoms and compared with the baseline scores. There were significant improvement in severity as well as the frequency of all the symptom parameters of the disease (p<0.001). The physicians' evaluation to the therapy was rated either excellent or good.

Rabeto plus: a valuable drug for managing functional dyspepsia.

The aim of the study was to evaluate and document the efficacy and tolerability of rabeto plus (FDC of rabeprazole and itopride) in management of functional dyspepsia. It was an open, prospective, non-comparative, multidose study. The patients with functional dyspepsia (NERD or non-erosive reflux disease) attending OPD of a leading, tertiary care, teaching hospital in West Bengal (BS Medical College, Bankura) were inducted in the study. A total of 46 adult patients of either sex with functional dyspepsia and a clinical diagnosis of NERD were given 1 capsule of rabeto plus before breakfast, for up to 4 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were relief from symptoms of heartburn, nausea, vomiting, waterbrash and fullness. Secondary efficacy variables were global assessment of efficacy and toleration by patients and treating physicians. The tolerability was assessed on the basis of record of spontaneously reported adverse events with their nature, intensity and outcome. Out of 55 patients enrolled in the study, 46 completed the study as planned, while 9 patients were lost to follow-up (dropped). Most patients reported near total symptom relief by the end of study. Total symptom score showed remarkable and significant improvement from baseline to end of the study. Importantly, none of the patients reported any side-effect. All participants tolerated the drug well. Moreover, response to study drug was rated as excellent or good by over 93% patients and their treating physicians. This means that 9 out 10 patients receiving rabeto plus reported desired symptom relief from dyspepsia. Thus it was concluded that rabeto plus is a valuable drug for treatment of functional dyspepsia or NERD.

Rabeprazole plus domperidone: the answer for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

To study and document the efficacy and tolerability of rabeprazole and domperidone in the treatment of patients suffering from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), an open, prospective, non-comparative study was carried out among 50 adult patients of either sex attending gastroenterology OPD of a leading, tertiary-care teaching hospital in Mumbai with the clinical diagnosis of GERD. One capsule of rabeprazole and domperidone was swallowed in empty stomach each day for up to 4 weeks by the patients. Rabeprazole and domperidone provided significant and remarkable improvement in symptoms of GERD. Although, the improvement was observed at first follow-up visit (within 2 weeks), continuing treatment for 4 weeks provided additional gains. Almost all patients tolerated the drug well. Most patients (94%) had excellent or good relief as assessed by their physician whilst 86% of patients rated treatment with rabeprazole and domperidone as good or excellent. Rabeprazole and domperidone not only provided desired relief of symptoms of GERD but also is very well tolerated. This combination may also improve the quality of life of patients suffering from GERD.

Comparison of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Rate in Patients with Non-ulcer Dyspepsia and Peptic Ulcer Diseases according to Proton Pump Inhibitors / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Conflicting results have been reported whether patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) respond differently to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment compared with patients with peptic ulcer diseases (PUD). The aim of this study was to evaluate any difference in H. pylori eradication rates between patients with NUD and PUD according to each proton pump inhibitor (PPI). METHODS: From September, 2004 to April, 2007, we retrospectively reviewed 2,297 patients with NUD (1,050 patients) or PUD (1,247 patients) infected with H. pylori. All patients received a standard 1 week triple therapy comprising of one of the five PPIs (pantoprazole, esomeprazole, omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole), clarithromycin and amoxicillin. The follow-up H. pylori test was performed 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the eradication rates between the two groups. In comparison of eradication rates according to PPI, omeprazole- based triple therapy group showed higher eradication rate than other groups in patients with NUD, but not in patients with PUD. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to show any difference in H. pylori eradication rate between patients with NUD and PUD. There is no convincing evidence that the eradication rate may be affected by different PPI.

Esophageal Thermal Injury by Hot Adlay Tea

Reversible thermal injury to the esophagus as the result of drinking hot liquids has been reported to generate alternating white and red linear mucosal bands, somewhat reminiscent of a candy cane. This phenomenon is associated with chest pain, dysphagia, odynophagia, and epigastric pain. Here, we report a case of thermal injury to the esophageal and oral cavity due to the drinking of hot tea, including odynophagia and dysphagia. A 69-year-old man was referred due to a difficulty in swallowing which had begun a week prior to referral. The patient, at the time of admission, was unable to swallow even liquids. He had recently suffered from hiccups, and had consumed five cups of hot adlay tea one week prior to admission, as a folk remedy for the hiccups. Upon physical examination, the patient's oral cavity evidenced mucosal erosion, hyperemia, and mucosa covered by a whitish pseudomembrane. Nonspecific findings were detected on the laboratory and radiological exams. Upper endoscopy revealed diffuse hyperemia, and erosions with thick and whitish pseudomembraneous mucosa on the entire esophagus. The stomach and duodenum appeared normal. We diagnosed the patient with thermal esophageal injury inflicted by the hot tea. He was treated with pantoprazole, 40 mg/day, for 14 days, and evidenced significant clinical and endoscopic improvement.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Either Famotidine or Pantoprazole for the Prevention of Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported to have a higher bleeding rate than conventional methods. However, there are few reports on whether a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine2-receptor antagonist is the more effective treatment for preventing bleeding after ESD. In a prospective trial, patients undergoing ESD due to gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to pantoprazole or famotidine. Both drugs were given intravenously for the first 2 days, thereafter by mouth. Eighty-five in the pantoprazole group and 79 in the famotidine group were included for analysis. Primary outcome measure was the delayed bleeding rate. Clinical characteristics were not different between the two groups. The delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in the pantoprazole group compared with the famotidine group (3.5% vs. 12.7%, p=0.031). On multivariate analysis, the preventive use of pantoprazole (relative hazard: 0.220, 95% CI: 0.051- 0.827, p=0.026) and the specimen size (> or =34 mm, relative hazard: 4.178, 95% CI: 1.229-14.197, p=0.022) were two independent factors predictive of delayed bleeding. There were no significant differences in en bloc and complete resection rate between the two groups. In conclusion, pantoprazole is more effective than famotidine for the prevention of delayed bleeding after ESD.

Efficacy of clarithromycin-based triple therapy for treating Helicobacter pylori in Thai non-ulcer dyspeptic patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance of H. pylori is problematic because it reduces the efficacy of eradication therapy. The objective of the present study was to assess the eradication rates of triple therapy against clarithromycin-sensitive and clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori in Thai non-ulcer dyspeptic patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between September 2002 and December 2003 were included. The patients who had positive urease test and culture were enrolled for antimicrobial resistance. Isolates were considered resistant when the MIC was more than 1 mcg/ml for clarithromycin. The patients received a combination of pantoprazole 40 mg BID, clarithromycin MR 1 gm OD, and amoxicillin 1 gm BID, for 7 days. Urea [14C] breath test was performed for evaluation of H. pylori eradication at least 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 470 patients, H. pylori were identified by positive rapid urease test in 282 patients (69.0%). Of these, cultures for H. pylori were achieved in 113 patients (54.6%) and E-tests for clarithromycin were successfully placed in 69 isolations. There were 29 males and 40 females, mean age was 38.7 +/- 13.3 years. Primary H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin was observed in 16 of 69 patients (23.2%). The eradication rates were 90.6% (48/53) and 56.3% (9/16) in patients with clarithromycin sensitive and clarithromycin resistant H. pylori strains, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The authors reported a high rate of clarithromycin resistant H.pylori isolates in Thailand. Pretreatment resistance to clarithromycin has a significant impact on treatment failure with clarithromycin-based regimen.