Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 54: e04542020, 2021. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1155531

RESUMEN

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Leishmaniasis Mucocutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Antimoniato de Meglumina/uso terapéutico
2.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 54: e0514-2020, 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1155581

RESUMEN

Abstract A 31-year-old male patient developed an ulcer on the glans penis that evolved for three months without healing. We diagnosed it as leishmaniasis using polymerase chain reaction. No immunosuppression or associated diseases were observed. The patient was treated with meglumine antimoniate that cured the lesion in a month post-treatment. Here, we report this case of cutaneous leishmaniasis lesion at the unusual location of glans penis in an immunocompetent individual. The lesion likely developed due to the bite of a vector, highlighting the need for considering cutaneous leishmaniasis among differential diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases in areas endemic for leishmaniasis.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Antimoniato de Meglumina/uso terapéutico , Genitales , Meglumina/uso terapéutico
3.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 51(6): 769-780, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-977099

RESUMEN

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Favorable responses in American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) patients to treatment with 5 mg Sbv/kg/day meglumine antimoniate (MA) has been reported in Rio de Janeiro, but little is known regarding the therapeutic response to low doses in patients from other locations. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted to compare the therapeutic response to 5 mg Sbv/kg/day MA treatment among 36 patients who acquired ATL in Brazilian states other than Rio de Janeiro (OS group) and 72 patients from Rio de Janeiro (RJ group). RESULTS: One course of 5 mg Sbv/kg/day MA cured 72.8% of 81 cutaneous (CL) and 66.6% of 27 mucosal (ML) leishmaniasis-infected patients: 70% in the CL/RJ group, 81% in the CL/OS group, 50% in the ML/RJ group, and 80% in the ML/OS group. After up to two additional treatment courses at the same dose, 88.9% and 85.2% of the CL and ML patients were cured, respectively. Adverse events were observed in 40% of patients in the CL/RJ group, 57% of the CL/OS group, 58% of the ML/RJ group, and 80% of the ML/OS group. No significant differences were observed in the cure rates or adverse effects between the RJ and OS groups. No patients required permanent discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ATL acquired in both RJ and OS may respond to low-dose MA. While high-dose MA should remain the standard treatment for ATL, low-dose MA might be preferred when toxicity is a primary concern.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimoniato de Meglumina/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/patología , Geografía , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Med. leg. Costa Rica ; 35(1): 52-64, ene.-mar. 2018.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-894338

RESUMEN

Resumen La leishmaniasis es una enfermedad parasitaria crónica endémica en muchas partes del mundo. La variabilidad de cepas, su clínica y respuesta a tratamiento ha hecho que se clasifique en dos grandes grupos: la leishmaniasis del Nuevo Mundo y la del Viejo Mundo. Según esto, varían las recomendaciones respecto a manejo y seguimiento. En esta revisión se hace énfasis a la leishmaniasis de nuestro medio, revisando opciones terapéuticas y posibilidades principalmente en la población pediátrica.


Abstract Leishmaniasis is a chronic parasitic disease endemic in many parts of the world. The variability of strains, their clinic and response to treatment has led to their classification into two major groups: New World leishmaniasis and Old World leishmaniasis. According to this, the recommendations regarding management and follow-up vary. In this review, emphasis is placed on leishmaniasis in our environment, reviewing therapeutic options and possibilities mainly in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Parasitarias , Pediatría , Pentamidina/uso terapéutico , Paromomicina/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis/clasificación , Leishmaniasis Mucocutánea , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea , Costa Rica , Antimoniato de Meglumina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA