Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 13(3): 98-101, 2020. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1116920

RESUMEN

Los adenomas pituitarios son los tumores hipofisarios más frecuentes siendo una entidad rara cuando se trata de adenomas ectópicos, es decir, sin conexión con la glándula pituitaria. Se cree que derivan de células residuales del tracto de migración embriológico desde la bolsa de Rathke. Su presentación clínica es muy variable porque depende de la producción hormonal y del efecto masa en estructuras adyacentes. Generalmente suponen un reto diagnóstico debido a su baja frecuencia, la clínica variable de presentación y que no presentan características específicas en las pruebas de imagen. Generalmente el diagnóstico se realiza de manera retrospectiva tras la resección quirúrgica. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 56 años que se presentó con unos valores de prolactina de 6647.5 ng/ml (2.2-17.7) con clínica de hipogonadismo aislada que se resolvió con tratamiento médico sin precisar resección quirúrgica, con una disminución de la densidad radiológica y estabilización del tamaño y sin clínica compresiva ni alteración visual.


Pituitary adenomas are the most common hypophyseal tumors being a rare entity when they are ectopic, without connection to the pituitary gland. They are thought to arise from residual cells in the migration tract from Rathke´s pouch. Its clinical presentation is variable depending on the hormonal production and the pressure effect on adjacent structures. They usually are a diagnostic challenge due to their low frequency, wide range of clinical presentation and not showing specific features on imaging techniques. The diagnosis is made usually retrospectively after surgical resection. We report the case of a 56 years old male that presented with a prolactine value of 6647.5 ng/ml (2.2-17.7) and isolated hypogonadism symptoms that resolved with medical treatment without surgery, diminishing the radiological density and stabilizing the size without having compresive symptoms nor visual disturbances.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico , Fosa Craneal Posterior , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenoma , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/tratamiento farmacológico , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico
2.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 13(2): 61-63, 2020. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1095286

RESUMEN

El quiste de la bolsa de Rathke es una lesión epitelial benigna de la región selar, formada a partir de remanentes embrionarios. La mayoría de los casos son asintomáticos, aunque pudiera presentarse con cefalea, disfunción hipofisaria y trastornos visuales, muy infrecuentemente como apoplejía hipofisaria. Se presenta el caso de una paciente que, habiendo presentado amenorrea primaria, se le realiza el diagnóstico de quiste de la bolsa de Rathke con hiperprolactinemia, logrando menarquia luego del tratamiento con cabergolina.


Rathke's cyst is a benign epithelial lesion of the sellar region, formed from embryonic remnants. Most cases are asymptomatic although it could present with headache, pituitary dysfunction and visual disorders, very infrequently as pituitary stroke. We present the case of a patient who, having presented primary amenorrhea, is diagnosed with Rathke's cyst with hyperprolactinemia, achieving menarche after treatment with cabergoline.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Hiperprolactinemia/complicaciones , Quistes del Sistema Nervioso Central/complicaciones , Amenorrea/etiología , Prolactina/uso terapéutico , Hiperprolactinemia/diagnóstico , Hiperprolactinemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Quistes del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico , Quistes del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico
3.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 13(4): 150-153, 2020. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1123620

RESUMEN

Los adenomas hipofisarios ectópicos (EPA) constituyen un reto diagnóstico, dada su escasa prevalencia y variada presentación en la que puede incluirse un síndrome de hipersecreción de hormonas hipofisarias. La clínica suele ser larvada e inespecífica, no presentan ninguna característica radiológica diferencial y el diagnóstico habitualmente es anatomopatológico. Sin embargo, a pesar de ser tumores benignos, pueden presentar un comportamiento agresivo, con invasión ósea y difícil resección completa, por lo que un diagnóstico de sospecha precoz podría resultar en un tratamiento más eficaz y con un menor número de complicaciones. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con un adenoma hipofisario ectópico silente en el seno esfenoidal con inmunohistoquímica positiva para Hormona de crecimiento (GH) y prolactina que presentaba restos tumorales tras la intervención quirúrgica y ha sido manejada con tratamiento médico conservado, con buenos resultados.


Ectopic pituitary adenomas constitute a diagnostic challenge, given their low prevalence and varied presentation in which a pituitary hormone hypersecretion syndrome may be included. Clinical symptoms are usually latent and nonspecific, they have no differential radiological characteristics and the diagnosis is usually anatomopathological. However, despite being benign tumors, they can exhibit aggressive behavior, with bone invasion and difficult complete resection, so a diagnosis of early suspicion could result in more effective treatment and fewer complications. We present the case of a patient with a silent ectopic pituitary adenoma in the sphenoid sinus with positive immunohistochemistry for Growth Hormone (GH) and prolactin who had tumor remnants after surgery and was managed with conservative medical treatment, with good results.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Seno Esfenoidal , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Prolactina/metabolismo , Hormona del Crecimiento/metabolismo , Inmunohistoquímica , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Cintigrafía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico
4.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 63(4): 328-336, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019350

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Acromegalia/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/análogos & derivados , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico , Glucemia/análisis , Brasil , Factor I del Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/análisis , Hormona del Crecimiento/sangre , Adenoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Cabergolina/administración & dosificación
5.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 63(4): 320-327, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019363

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the long term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant (PEGV), and the predictors of treatment response in patients with acromegaly in the real life setting. Subjects and methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegalic patients treated with PEGV in 17 Argentine centers. Results Seventy-five patients (age range 22-77, 51 females) with acromegaly have been treated with PEGV for up to 118 months (median 27 months). Before PEGV, 97.3% of patients had been treated with medical therapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy, two patients had no previous treatment. At that time, all patients had an IGF-1 above the upper normal limit (ULN) (mean 2.4 x ULN ± 0.98, range 1.25-7). At diagnosis of acromegaly 84% presented macroadenomas, prior to PEGV only 23,5% of patients remained with tumor remnant > 1 cm, the remaining showed normal or less than 1 cm images. Disease control (IGF-1 ≤ 1.2 x ULN) was achieved in 62.9% of patients with a mean dose of 11.8 mg/day. Thirty-four patients (45%) received PEGV monotherapy, while 41 (55%) received combined therapy with either somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. Adverse events related to PEGV were: local injection site reaction in 5.3%, elevated liver enzymes in 9.3%, and tumor size growth in 9.8%. Pre-PEGV IGF-I level was the only predictor of treatment response: 2.1 x ULN vs 2.8 x ULN in controlled and uncontrolled patients respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion this long term experience indicates PEGV treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Argentine patients with acromegaly refractory to standard therapies. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(4):320-7


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Acromegalia/tratamiento farmacológico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/análogos & derivados , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico , Argentina , Factor I del Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/análisis , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agonistas de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/administración & dosificación , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Cabergolina/administración & dosificación
6.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 62(2): 236-263, Mar.-Apr. 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-887642

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenomas (approximately 40% of cases), and they represent an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility in both sexes. The magnitude of prolactin (PRL) elevation can be useful in determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia. Indeed, PRL levels > 250 ng/mL are highly suggestive of the presence of a prolactinoma. In contrast, most patients with stalk dysfunction, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia or systemic diseases present with PRL levels < 100 ng/mL. However, exceptions to these rules are not rare. On the other hand, among patients with macroprolactinomas (MACs), artificially low PRL levels may result from the so-called "hook effect". Patients harboring cystic MACs may also present with a mild PRL elevation. The screening for macroprolactin is mostly indicated for asymptomatic patients and those with apparent idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas, particularly cabergoline, which is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. After 2 years of successful treatment, DA withdrawal should be considered in all cases of microprolactinomas and in selected cases of MACs. In this publication, the goal of the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) is to provide a review of the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas, emphasizing controversial issues regarding these topics. This review is based on data published in the literature and the authors' experience.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/terapia , Hiperprolactinemia/diagnóstico , Hiperprolactinemia/terapia , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prolactina/sangre , Brasil , Prolactinoma/terapia , Bromocriptina/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Ergolinas/uso terapéutico , Cabergolina , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico
7.
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies ; : 173-177, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-997860

RESUMEN

@#Growth hormone - secreting pituitary adenomas are the cause of acromegaly in 95% of patients. In rare circumstances, a pituitary adenoma on magnetic resonance imaging cannot be found; hence, a search for an ectopic source of GH production is done. Even rarer is an acromegalic patient without an ectopic source and without imaging evidence of pituitary adenoma. We report a case of acromegaly with no evidence of a pituitary adenoma and no evidence of an ectopic source after imaging studies; who underwent medical therapy with improving biochemical and clinical parameters.


Asunto(s)
Acromegalia , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Adenoma , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Octreótido , Cabergolina
8.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 60(4): 319-322, Aug. 2016. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-792950

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective Prolactin is a multifunctional pituitary hormone. The effect of prolactin on platelet activation is not well understood. Prolactinomas are the most common type of pituitary adenomas, and they are medically responsive to dopamine agonists. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of platelet function and activation. The aim of this study was to evaluate MPV values before and 6 months of cabergoline treatment when normoprolactinemia was achieved. Subjects and methods A total of 101 newly diagnosed prolactinoma patients and 102 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Patients with hematological disorders that affect MPV and those on medications were excluded. Prolactin, platelet count and MPV levels were recorded before and 6 months after the initiation of cabergoline treatment (0.5 to 1 mg, two times a week). Results There was no significant difference in platelet count and MPV before and after 6 months of treatment with cabergoline in patients with prolactinoma compared with the control group (p > 0.05). Conclusion Our results showed that MPV, a marker of platelet function, was unchanged in patients with prolactinoma.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/sangre , Prolactinoma/sangre , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Ergolinas/uso terapéutico , Volúmen Plaquetario Medio , Valores de Referencia , Factores de Tiempo , Prolactinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cabergolina
10.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 74(7): 544-548, tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-787371

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The purpose of this case series is to report eight patients with giant prolactinomas emphasizing presentations and a treatment complication. The study group included six men and two women. The median age was 29 years (18–54 years); median serum prolactin level was 4,562 ng/ml (1,543–18,690 ng/ml); three patients (37.5%) had panhypopituitarism; median tumor diameter was 50 mm (41–60 mm). Five patients (62.5%) had visual field defects and three had improvement during treatment; six patients (75%) reached prolactin normalization, with a median time of 10.5 months (7–84 months) and median dose of 2.0 mg/week (1.0 to 3.0 mg/week). One patient presented as a true incidentaloma. One patient presented a cerebrospinal fluid leakage during medical treatment and refused surgery, however this resolved with conservative measures. This case series illustrate a rare subtype of macroprolactinomas, the importance of considering unusual presentations at the diagnosis, the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment and its possible complications.


RESUMO O objetivo desta série de casos é relatar oito pacientes com prolactinomas gigantes enfatizando as formas de apresentação e uma complicação do tratamento. O estudo incluiu seis homens e duas mulheres. A mediana de idade foi 29 anos (18–54); e dos níveis de prolactina foi 4.562 ng/ml (1.543–18.690); três pacientes (37,5%) apresentaram pan-hipopituitarismo; a mediana do máximo diâmetro tumoral foi 50 mm (41–60 mm). Cinco pacientes (62,5%) apresentaram alterações no campo visual e três tiveram melhora durante o tratamento; seis pacientes (75%) alcançaram normalização da prolactina em 10,5 meses (7–84) com dose mediana de cabergolina de 2,0 mg / semana (1,0 a 3,0). Um paciente se apresentou como um verdadeiro incidentaloma. Um paciente apresentou uma fistula liquórica durante o tratamento medicamentoso e recusou correção cirúrgica. No entanto a fistula foi resolvida com medidas conservadoras. Esta série de casos ilustra um subtipo raro de macroprolactinomas, a importância de considerar apresentações incomuns no diagnóstico, a eficácia do tratamento farmacológico e suas possíveis complicações.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/terapia , Prolactinoma/patología , Prolactinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Prolactina/sangre , Silla Turca/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Carga Tumoral , Ergolinas/uso terapéutico , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/patología , Cabergolina , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico
11.
Rev. bras. cir. plást ; 31(2): 143-147, 2016. ilus
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1551

RESUMEN

INTRODUÇÃO: Galactorreia e formação de galactocele após mamoplastia de aumento é uma complicação descrita na literatura, porém a causa permanece desconhecida. MÉTODOS: Apresentamos um caso de uma paciente de 28 anos que foi submetida à cirurgia de mamoplastia de aumento via sulco inframamário, com implante colocado no plano subfascial, que evoluiu, no 7º dia pós-operatório, com galactorreia exteriorizada pela incisão, e propomos um algoritmo para diagnóstico e tratamento de galactorreia após mamoplastias. RESULTADOS: A complicação foi tratada com o uso de agente supressor da lactação, a cabergolina, apresentando boa evolução. CONCLUSÃO: Galactorreia é uma complicação incomum após mamoplastias de aumento, que deve ser sempre lembrada em casos de drenagem de secreção pela incisão por tratar-se de um diagnóstico diferencial com infecção.


INTRODUCTION: Galactorrhea and galactocele formation after breast augmentation are complications reported in the literature, but the cause remains unknown. METHODS: We present a case of a 28-year-old patient who underwent breast augmentation surgery via the inframammary fold with an implant placed in the subfascial plane, which developed galactorrhea from the incision on the seventh postoperative day, and we propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of galactorrhea after mammoplasties. RESULTS: The complication was treated with the use of a lactation suppressor, cabergoline, presenting good outcomes. CONCLUSION: Galactorrhea is an uncommon complication after augmentation mammoplasties, which should always be considered in cases of secretions from an incision because it is a differential diagnosis for infections.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Historia del Siglo XXI , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Succión , Lactancia , Mamoplastia , Implantación de Mama , Ergolinas , Cabergolina , Galactorrea , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Succión/métodos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Ergolinas/uso terapéutico , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico , Galactorrea/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA