Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Rev. cuba. oftalmol ; 34(1): e929, 2021. graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1289535

RESUMEN

La queratitis por Acanthamoeba es una infección corneal de baja incidencia, condicionada por varios factores, pero con manifestación clínica variada y sintomatología típica. En su fase epitelial debe ser diferenciada de otras queratitis, específicamente de la queratitis por herpes simple, por la similitud entre ambas en cuanto a las características de la lesión corneal. La microscopia confocal in vivo constituye una alternativa diagnóstica. Es una biopsia fotográfica en cuyas imágenes podemos describir los quistes y trofozoítos de Acanthamoeba desde etapas iniciales, que nos ayudan a diferenciarla de otros tipos de queratitis e iniciar el tratamiento precoz. Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos publicados, con el objetivo de mostrar las imágenes por microscopia confocal de la fase epitelial de la infección corneal por Acanthamoeba y herpes simple. Se utilizó la plataforma Infomed, específicamente la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud(AU)


Acanthamoeba keratitis is a low-incidence corneal infection caused by several factors and characterized by a variety of clinical manifestations and typical symptoms. In its epithelial phase, it should be differentiated from other keratitis, particularly from herpes simplex keratitis, due to the similar characteristics of the corneal lesion. In vivo confocal microscopy is a diagnostic alternative consisting in a photographic biopsy showing images of Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites since their initial stages, thus allowing differentiation from other types of keratitis and the initiation of early treatment. A search was conducted of published papers with the purpose of showing confocal microscopy images of the epithelial phase of Acanthamoeba and herpes simplex corneal infection. Use was made of the platform Infomed, specifically the Virtual Health Library(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Queratitis Herpética/diagnóstico por imagen , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas
2.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 79(1): 46-52, Jan.-Feb. 2020. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092661

RESUMEN

Abstract Purpose: To compare clinical-epidemiological profile and treatment outcome between culture negative and culture positive keratitis patients. Methods: Patients with suspected infectious keratitis seen at two ophthalmic hospitals in Curitiba, Brazil, between June 2014 and April 2016, were prospectively studied. Ophthalmological exam with corneal scraping and microbiological tests were performed. Data regarding follow up, surgical interventions and treatment outcome were collected after 12 weeks of the first visit trough medical chart review. From the results of the culture, two groups were formed: culture negative keratitis (CNK) and culture positive keratitis (CPK). Results: According to inclusion criteria 21 patients were classified as culture negative keratitis and 20 patients as culture positive keratitis. The number of patients on antibiotic drops at the first visit was greater in CNK group (90.5% versus 60%; p=0.032). Surgical procedures were necessary in 3 patients (15%) in CNK group and in 7 patients (36,8%) in CPK group (p=0.155). Treatment success was achieved by 85% (17/20) of the patients in CNK group and by 61% (11/18) of the patients in CPK group (p=0.144). There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, gender, place of residence, presence of comorbidities, risk factors for infectious keratitis, duration of symptoms and characteristics of corneal ulcer. Conclusions: Previous treatment with antibiotics correlates with negative culture results. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome between culture negative and culture positive keratitis patients.


Resumo Objetivo: Comparar os perfis clinico-epidemiológicos e os desfechos entre pacientes com ceratite com cultura positiva e pacientes com ceratite com cultura negativa. Métodos: Pacientes com ceratite infecciosa, atendidos em dois hospitais oftalmológicos em Curitiba, Brasil, entre junho de 2014 e abril de 2016, foram estudados prospectivamente. Exame oftalmológico, raspado de córnea e exames microbiológicos foram realizados no primeiro atendimento. Os dados quanto a seguimento e desfecho foram coletados após 12 semanas do primeiro atendimento através de revisão de prontuário. A partir dos resultados das culturas, dois grupos foram formados: ceratite com cultura negativa e ceratite com cultura positiva. Resultados: Vinte e um pacientes foram classificados como ceratite com cultura negativa e 20 como ceratite com cultura positiva. O número de pacientes em uso de colírio antibiótico no primeiro atendimento foi maior no grupo de cultura negativa (90,5% versus 60%; p=0,032). Sete pacientes (37%) no grupo cultura positiva precisaram de procedimentos cirúrgicos no manejo da ceratite, versus 3 pacientes (15%) do grupo cultura negativa (p=0,155). Oitenta e cinco por cento (17/20) dos pacientes do grupo cultura negativa alcançaram sucesso no tratamento, contra 61% (11/18) dos pacientes no grupo cultura positiva (p=0,144). Não houve diferença entre os grupos quanto a idade, gênero, local de procedência, presença de comorbidades, fatores de risco, duração dos sintomas e características da úlcera de córnea. Conclusão: Tratamento prévio com colírio de antibiótico correlaciona-se com resultados negativos de cultura. Não houve diferença no desfecho após tratamento entre os pacientes com cultura negativa e cultura positiva.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Queratitis/diagnóstico , Queratitis/microbiología , Queratitis/parasitología , Queratitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratitis/epidemiología , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Acanthamoeba/aislamiento & purificación , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/diagnóstico , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/parasitología , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico
3.
Rev. cuba. oftalmol ; 32(2): e737, abr.-jun. 2019. graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1093699

RESUMEN

RESUMEN El parasitismo es uno de los fenómenos más sorprendentes de los observados en los animales. El número de organismos conocidos de vida parasitaria es muy elevado. Existe una gran cantidad de especies cuya supervivencia está relacionada con la de otras y dependen, en distinta medida, de ellas. Esta dependencia no implica que los animales parásitos sean organismos degenerados o deficientes; al contrario, a la vida parasitaria se ha llegado tras largo tiempo de evolución, en el que los parásitos han ido superando barreras y adaptándose a vivir en, o sobre sus hospedadores. Las queratitis por Acanthamoeba son infrecuentes; pero se describe un aumento a nivel mundial relacionado con el uso creciente de lentes de contacto. El diagnóstico precoz y el tratamiento adecuado deben realizarse para evitar la pérdida de la visión. Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos publicados, con el objetivo de conocer sobre la Acanthamoeba como parásito y su afectación ocular. Se utilizó la plataforma Infomed, específicamente la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud(AU)


ABSTRACT Parasitism is one of the most surprising phenomena among those occurring in animals. The number of known parasitic organisms is very high. There is a large number of species whose survival is related to that of others and depend on them to a greater or lesser degree. Such dependence does not imply that parasitic animals are either degenerate or deficient. On the contrary, parasitic life has been the result of a long process of evolution along which parasites have gradually overcome hurdles and have adapted to live in or on their hosts. Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare disease, but a worldwide increase has been reported due to the growing use of contact lenses. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are required to prevent sight loss. A search was conducted for published papers with the purpose of learning about Acanthamoeba as a parasite and the related eye conditions. Use was made of the platform Infomed, specifically the Virtual Health Library(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Parasitarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Trasplante de Córnea/métodos , Lentes de Contacto/parasitología , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
4.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 34(supl.1): 23-33, abr. 2014. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-712418

RESUMEN

Introducción. La resistencia bacteriana es crítica para la selección de los antibióticos en el tratamiento de las infecciones, por ello es vital conocer su estado actual en nuestro medio. Objetivo. Determinar la sensibilidad antibiótica bacteriana in vitro obtenida de los cultivos de queratitis e infecciones intraoculares. Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio retrospectivo en la Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), entre junio de 2011 y enero de 2012. Resultados. Se examinaron 92 muestras. Se identificaron 110 bacterias, 27 hongos y 12 amebas de vida libre. Del total de bacterias Gram positivas, 1,1 %, 0 %, 1,1 %, 16,9 %, 29,3 % y 85 % fue resistente a imipenem, moxifloxacina, gatifloxacina, levofloxacina, ciprofloxacina y tobramicina, respectivamente, mientras que la resistencia a estos mismos fármacos se presentó, respectivamente, en 0 %, 8,3 %, 0 %, 0 %, 18,2 % y 27,3 % de las bacterias Gram negativas. Los porcentajes de resistencia de los estafilococos positivos para coagulasa resistentes a la meticilina fueron 0 %, 0 %, 0 %, 7 %, 17 % y 100 %, respectivamente, y los porcentajes de los estafilococos negativos para coagulasa resistentes a la meticilina fueron 3 %, 0 %, 0 %, 24 %, 44 % y 100 %, respectivamente. Los porcentajes de resistencia bacteriana globales (tanto para bacterias Gram positivas como para Gram negativas) a imipenem, moxifloxacina, gatifloxacina, levofloxacina, ciprofloxacina y tobramicina fueron 1 %, 1 %, 1 %, 15,1 %, 28 % y 64,5 %, respectivamente. Conclusiones. Los niveles de resistencia bacteriana para imipenem, moxifloxacina y gatifloxacina fueron menores que para levofloxacina, ciprofloxacina y tobramicina. Los niveles de resistencia para la tobramicina fueron muy altos, lo que pone en duda su utilidad clínica en las infecciones oculares en nuestro medio.


Introduction: Bacterial resistance is critical for the selection of antibiotics in the treatment of infections, so it is vital to know its current status in our geographical area. Objective: To determine in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates obtained from keratitis and intraocular infections. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of microbiological tests in Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL) was carried out between June, 2011, and January, 2012. Results: A total of 92 samples were examined and 110 bacteria, 27 fungi and 12 free-living amoebae were identified. Polymicrobial infections constituted 50% of the total; 1.1%, 0%, 1.1%, 16.9%, 29.3% and 85% of Gram-positive bacteria were resistant to imipenem, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin, respectively, while 0%, 8.3%, 0%, 0%, 18.2% and 27.3% of Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to imipenem, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin, respectively. For methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci, resistance percentages to imipenem, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin were 0%, 0%, 0%, 7%, 17% and 100%, respectively. For methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, resistance percentages to imipenem, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin were 3%, 0%, 0%, 24%, 44% and 100%, respectively. Overall bacterial resistance to imipenem, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin, for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative, was 1%, 1%, 1%, 15.1%, 28% and 64.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The levels of bacterial resistance to imipenem, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin were lower than for levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. The levels of resistance to tobramycin were very high, which calls into question its usefulness in this region of our country.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Úlcera de la Córnea/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Endoftalmitis/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/microbiología , Acanthamoeba/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Humor Acuoso/microbiología , Colombia/epidemiología , Córnea/microbiología , Úlcera de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera de la Córnea/epidemiología , Pruebas Antimicrobianas de Difusión por Disco , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Parasitarias del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Parasitarias del Ojo/parasitología , Fundaciones , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuerpo Vítreo/microbiología
5.
Iranian Journal of Parasitology. 2007; 2 (3): 1-6
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-135232

RESUMEN

Amoebic keratitis introduced as a painful corneal infection which sometimes lead to poor vision and blindness. The main goal of this study was to report amoebic keratitis during ten years from 1997-2007 in patients who was suspected to have amoebic keratitis and referred to Parasitology laboratory, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Other aim was to assess the major risk factor for developing this sight-threatening disease. Comparison of lens culture and corneal scrapes culture also was performed. During 1997-2007, 142 patients referred to Dept. of Medical Parasitology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Details of each patient such as age, sex, history of contact lens wear, type of contact lens, clinical symptoms were recorded in questioners. Keratitis was diagnosed on the basis of culture of lenses and/or corneal scrapes on non-nutrient agar overlaid with Escherichia coli and direct microscopy of lenses and/or corneal scrapes. Among 142 patients, 49 [34.5%] had amoebic keratitis. 73.46% of these patients were from Tehran but there were a few cases from other cities. The commonest age was between 15-25 yr [75.5%] and more female [37:12] were identified then male. It is worth to mention that 44 patients [89.79%] were contact lens wearers who among them 41 patients [93.18%] wore soft contact lens and only three patients suffer from amoebic keratitis because of wearing hard contact lens. Other finding of this study demonstrated that the most common sign of the patients was severe pain combined with photophobia. This study indicates that Acanthamoeba keratitis continue to rise in Iran. This is due to increase frequency of lens wearers as well as consideration of ophthalmologist to Acanthamoeba as an agent of keratitis and improvement of laboratory methods. Another finding of this research was the confirmation of soft contact lens as a major risk factor. It is recommended to educate contact lens wearers for regular disinfection. Besides, culture of corneal scrapes was negative in most of cases, so lens culture were performed which had a much better result


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Amoeba , Acanthamoeba , Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA