Résumé
A arbitragem no campo esportivo define o campeão, e sua atuação vem sendo cada vez mais valorizada e, paradoxalmente, questionada. Esta pesquisa objetiva identificar se há ou não diferenças entre a compreensão que árbitros(as) brasileiros(as) de Ginástica Artística possuem sobre as regras e como elas são aplicadas. A amostra foi de 58 árbitros(as), de nível nacional e internacional, atuantes no período de 2017-2020. O instrumento foi o questionário, com análise quantitativa dos dados. Identificou-se que há diferenças entre a compreensão e a aplicação das regras estabelecidas pelo Código de Pontuação (CP), gerando reflexões sobre a melhor estruturação do CP e do processo de formação dos(das) árbitros(as) para sanar as lacunas causadas por essas diferenças (AU).
Judging in the sports field defines the champion, and its performance has been increasingly valued and, paradoxically, questioned. This research aims to identify whether or not there are differences between the understanding that Brazilian Artistic Gymnastics judges have about the rules and how they are applied. The sample consisted of 58 judges, national and international level, working in the period 2017-2020. The instrument was a question-naire, with quali-quantitative analysis of the data. It was identified that there are differences between the understanding and applica-tion of the rules established by the Code of Points (CoP), generat-ing reflections on the better structuring of the CoP and the judges' training process to solve the gaps caused by these differences (AU).
El arbitraje en el ámbito deportivo define al campeón, y su actuación ha sido cada vez más valorada y cuestionada. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo identificar si existen o no dife-rencias entre la comprensión que los árbitros de gimnasia artística brasileña tienen sobre las reglas y cómo se aplican. La muestra fue de 58 árbitros, de ámbito nacional e internacional, que trabajaron en el periodo 2017-2020. El instrumento fue el cuestionario, con análisis cuali-cuantitativo de los datos. Se identificó que existen di-ferencias entre la comprensión y la aplicación de las reglas estable-cidas por el Código de Puntuación (CP), generando reflexiones sobre la mejor estructuración del CP y el proceso de formación de los árbitros para remediar las lagunas causadas por estas diferencias (AU).
Sujets)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Sports , Compréhension , Athlètes , Mentorat , Gymnastique , Brésil , Études d'évaluation comme sujetRésumé
A arbitragem no campo esportivo define o campeão, e sua atuação vem sendo cada vez mais valorizada e, paradoxalmente, questionada. Esta pesquisa objetiva identificar se há ou não diferenças entre a compreensão que árbitros(as) brasileiros(as) de Ginástica Artística possuem sobre as regras e como elas são aplicadas. A amostra foi de 58 árbitros(as), de nível nacional e internacional, atuantes no período de 2017-2020. O instrumento foi o questionário, com análise quantitativa dos dados. Identificou-se que há diferenças entre a compreensão e a aplicação das regras estabelecidas pelo Código de Pontuação (CP), gerando reflexões sobre a melhor estruturação do CP e do processo de formação dos(das) árbitros(as) para sanar as lacunas causadas por essas diferenças.
Judging in the sports field defines the champion, and its performance has been increasingly valued and, paradoxically, questioned. This research aims to identify whether or not there are differences between the understanding that Brazilian Artistic Gymnastics judges have about the rules and how they are applied. The sample consisted of 58 judges, national and international level, working in the period 2017-2020. The instrument was a question-naire, with quali-quantitative analysis of the data. It was identified that there are differences between the understanding and applica-tion of the rules established by the Code of Points (CoP), generat-ing reflections on the better structuring of the CoP and the judges' training process to solve the gaps caused by these differences.
El arbitraje en el ámbito deportivo define al campeón, y su actuación ha sido cada vez más valorada y cuestionada. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo identificar si existen o no diferencias entre la comprensión que los árbitros de gimnasia artística brasileña tienen sobre las reglas y cómo se aplican. La muestra fue de 58 árbitros, de ámbito nacional e internacional, que trabajaron en el periodo 2017-2020. El instrumento fue el cuestionario, con análisis cuali-cuantitativo de los datos. Se identificó que existen diferencias entre la comprensión y la aplicación de las reglas establecidas por el Código de Puntuación (CP), generando reflexiones sobre la mejor estructuración del CP y el proceso de formación de los árbitros para remediar las lagunas causadas por estas diferencias.
Résumé
Objective To evaluate the short-term effect of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia by high resolution CT semi quantitative score. Methods 32 cases of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia were treated with conventional treatment, combined with glucocorticoids, the use of high resolution CT semi quantitative score, the short-term efficacy of its accurate judgement. Results The analysis shows that high resolution CT semi quantitative score below 20％ idiopathic interstitial pneumonia patients with hospital mortality period is only 5.26％, and the high resolution CT semi quantitative score during the high fatality rate of 38.46％ hospitalized patients with 20.00％ or more, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of high resolution CT semi quantitative score of received corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic interstitial pneumonia patients with curative effect to give accurate judgment to the doctor for the future development of drug treatment and guarantee its prognosis are of positive significance.
Résumé
Resumo: O artigo analisa o protagonismo do Poder Judiciário no enfrentamento da questão social, no bojo dos processos de interdição de pessoas com transtornos mentais. A judicialização da questão social se dá a partir da transferência de responsabilidades do Poder Executivo para o Judiciário no que se refere à garantia de direitos sociais, levada a cabo no processo de interdição, o que acaba privando os interditados do gozo dos direitos civis e políticos. Tal procedimento revela, sob uma nova roupagem, a face conservadora e coercitiva do Estado.
Abstract: This article aims at analyzing how the Judicial Department deals with the social issue, in the processes of adjudication of insanity. Judging the social issue is accomplished by transferring the Executive Department's responsibilities to the Judicial Department as to guarantee the social rights in the process of adjudication, which ultimately deprives the interdicted of the enjoyment of their civil and political rights. We have concluded that such a procedure reveals the state's conservative and coercive aspect, under a new guise.
Résumé
0.05).But a positive correlation was found between them(r =0.6943,P
Résumé
The objective of this study was to evaluate college students' dietary and health behaviors in relation to their Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality preferences. Dietary and health behaviors were surveyed for 444 college students who performed the MBTI personality test. Only 6.1% of the subjects regularly had three meals a day, while 27.1% ate breakfast every day. Fifty-six point nine percent of the students took less than 15 minutes to eat a meal and had the habit of eating fast. The number of food groups they ate was, on average, 2.74 and was eaten mainly at dinner. This showed that college students did not eat a large variety of foods. Eighty-two percent of the subjects drank alcoholic beverages, 21.4% smoked, and 69.3% exercised. In addition, 73.9% of them were not satisfied with their body image, but they were not eager to try weight control. There were not many significant differences between Extraversion (E)-Introversion (I), Sensing (S)-iNtuition (N), and Thinking (T)-Feeling (F) in their dietary and heath behaviors, although some gender differences existed. Significantly better dietary and health behaviors were shown in subjects preferring Judging (J) rather than Perceiving (P). There behaviors included eating breakfast, regularly eating three meals a day, smoking less, exercising more and having a lower tendency to night-eating. The personality preference of J-P could be useful index for nutritional education and counseling or behavior modification programs for obese people.