Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 62-65, 2014.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-450572

Résumé

Objective To investigate the comparative analysis between single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery with jackknife position and laparoscopic Miles surgery with lithotomy position for low rectal cancer.Methods Retrospectively analyzed 36 patients with low rectal cancer (TNM stage:Ⅱ-Ⅲ) undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision.Patients were divided into two groups.Lithotomy position group:laparoscopic Miles surgery with lithotomy position.Jackknife position group:single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery with jackknife position.The operation time,blood loss,postoperative recovery,postoperative complication,postoperative recurrence and survival rate were observed.Results Blood loss of perineal position in jackknife position group was less than that in lithotomy position group [(31.5 ± 22.4) ml vs.(53.5 ± 25.6) ml] (P =0.01),and removal of drainage tube in jackknife position group was earlier than that in lithotomy position group [(6.7 ± 1.9) d vs.(9.8 ± 1.7) d] (P < 0.01).However,the operation time,blood loss in abdomen,blood loss,postoperative out-of-bed activity time,recovery of gastrointestinal function time,dermal sutures out time,postoperative hospital stay,complication,postoperative recurrence in 2 years and survival rate between two groups had no significant difference (P >0.05).Conclusions Single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery is safe and feasible with better surgical outcome and cosmetic benefits.Furthermore,the blood loss and postoperative exudation at perineal region is less than that in traditional lithotomy position.

2.
Korean Journal of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery ; : 57-62, 2011.
Article Dans Coréen | WPRIM | ID: wpr-163987

Résumé

Since 2008, various single-port access laparoscopic surgeries in gynecologic diseases have been performed in Korea. Single-port laparoscopic surgery has some advantages. It has less visible scars, less pain, and a faster recovery. Single-port laparoscopic surgery also has a drawback that is hard to handle instruments compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. However, single-port laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely by practitioners who have experiences in single-port laparoscopic techniques. Based on experiences of gynecologic single-port laparoscopic surgery for 1000 cases in Incheon St. Mary's Hospital until August 2011, we describe techniques for single-port access laparoscopic surgery.


Sujets)
Femelle , Cicatrice , Maladies de l'appareil génital féminin , Corée , Laparoscopie , Ombilic
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche