Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. argent. microbiol ; 32(1): 15-19, ene.-mar. 2000.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-332543

RESUMO

We have compared three methods for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in fish: the conventional three-tube MNP method (APHA), the Simplate Method and the Petrifilm Method. Thirty samples of the tilapia's external surface (skin, gills and fin) produced in an artificial pond were collected. Samples were processed individually in buffered peptone water 1, then they were diluted and inoculated in Simplate, Petrifilm and LST tubes. Coliforms were isolated from 100 of the samples. The Simplate and 3M Petrifilm results were obtained after 24 h of incubation. The conventional three-tube MNP method showed results only after 96 hours of incubation. Simplate showed better recovery of coliforms and E. coli than 3 M Petrifilm and APHA method (P < 0.05). 3M Petrifilm and APHA were not significantly different for E. coli recovery.


Assuntos
Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Doenças dos Peixes/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae , Escherichia coli , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/veterinária , Tilápia , Aquicultura , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Extremidades , Água Doce , Brânquias , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Pele
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA