Utility of Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy Using a Multibending Ultraslim Endoscope for Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones

Background/Aims@#Treatment options for difficult bile duct stones are limited. Direct peroral cholangioscopy (POC)-guided lithotripsy may be an option. A newly developed multibending (MB) ultraslim endoscope has several structural features optimized for direct POC. We evaluated the utility of direct POC using an MB ultraslim endoscope for lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones. @*Methods@#Twenty patients with difficult bile duct stones, in whom stone removal using conventional endoscopic methods, including mechanical lithotripsy, had failed were enrolled from March 2018 to August 2019. Direct POC-guided lithotripsy was performed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy. The primary outcome was complete ductal clearance, defined as the retrieval of all bile duct stones after lithotripsy confirmed by balloon-occluded cholangiography and/or direct POC. @*Results@#The technical success rate of direct POC was 100% (20/20), and the free-hand insertion rate was 95% (19/20). Direct POC-guided lithotripsy, attempted by electrohydraulic lithotripsy in nine patients (45%) and laser lithotripsy in 11 patients (55%), was successful in 95% (19/20) of the patients. Complete ductal clearance after direct POC-guided lithotripsy was achieved in 95% (19/20) of patients. Patients required a median of 2 (range, 1–3) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions for complete stone removal. Adverse event was observed in one patient (5%) with hemobilia and was treated conservatively. @*Conclusions@#Direct POC using an MB ultraslim endoscope was safe and effective for lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones.

A Retrospective Study on the Decision to Prohibit Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients with Premenarcheal Cancer in a University Hospital

OBJECTIVE: Whether to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) is not only a medical problem but also a decision that should be made carefully with self-autonomy in accordance with life values. We conducted a retrospective observational study to identify the characteristics of current CPR and DNR at a practical level. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from medical records with regard to the clinical status of DNR decision in 356 patients with cancer who expired between October 2014 and September 2015 in Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital. RESULTS: DNR was decided significantly more frequently in patients with solid cancers than in patients with hematological cancer (87.7% vs. 71.4%, P=0.003). No other significant factor influenced the DNR decision in this study. The main persons who signed the DNR consent form were mostly sons or daughters (60.7%), never the patients themselves. The median time from the DNR order to death was longer in the ward than in the intensive care unit (ICU; 3.0 days vs. 1.0 days). The mean time from the DNR order to death was 6.6 days (median, 2 days). Among the patients with a DNR order, 110 (36.7%) were hospitalized in the ICU and 73 (24.3%) were treated with ventilator support. CONCLUSION: Most patients expired 6.6 days after DNR permission was given and could not decide their treatment plan by themselves. For better end-of-life care, the sensitive DNR decision with consideration of the individualized environment of the patient for life-sustaining treatment should be settled in Korea.

Association of nasal inflammation and lower airway responsiveness in schoolchildren based on an epidemiological survey

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to increase our understanding of the rhinitis-asthma relationship and improve strategies for the treatment of patients with these diseases. The aim of this study was to identify a connection between upper airway inflammation and lower airway responsiveness. METHODS: We counted eosinophils on nasal smears, and performed spirometry, allergic skin tests, and methacholine challenge tests in 308 schoolchildren plus a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20 0.05). No difference in BHR was detected when comparing subjects with and without nasal eosinophils. There were significant differences in the PC20 between subjects with greater than 50% nasal eosinophils and without nasal eosinophils (11.01 +/- 2.92 mg/mL vs. 17.38 +/- 0.61 mg/mL; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that nasal eosinophilic inflammation might contribute to lower airway responsiveness in schoolchildren, based on an epidemiological survey.