The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in a General Population in South Korea: Results from a National Survey in 2006

The purpose of this survey was to obtain information on the prevalence, costs, and patterns of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a general population in the Republic of Korea. In 2006, we conducted nationwide and population- weighted personal interviews with 6,021 adults ranging from 30 to 69 yr of age; the final sample consisted of 3,000 people with a 49.8% response rate. In addition to their general socio-demographics, the respondents were asked about their use of CAM during the previous 12-month period, costs, sources of information, and reasons for use. The prevalence of use overall was 74.8%, while biologically based CAM therapies were the most likely type of use (65.4%). The median annual out-of-pocket expenditures for CAM therapies was about US$203. The primary reason for using CAM was for disease prevention and health promotion (78.8%). The main source of advice about CAM therapies use was most likely to be from family and friends (66.9%). Our study suggests that CAM use has been and continues to be very popular in South Korea. Conventional western medical doctors and governments should obtain more evidence and become more interested in CAM therapies.

An Analysis of Cost-Effective Screening Interval for HCC in Korean Hepatitis B Virus Carriers

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening tests (AFP and US) for early detection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its optimal screening interval in Korean hepatitis B virus carriers. METHODS: Data relating to tumor incidence, efficacy of screening tests, tumour growth times and various cost for detecting HCC were obtained from reviews of Korean literature. Decision analysis technique was used to calculate the efficacy of these screening tests and screening interval. RESULTS: When the doubling time of HCC was 6 months, the most cost-effective screening interval of each AFP and US was 6 months, respectively. The optimal screening intervals of AFP and US were 3 and 5 months for each, respectively, and 7 months for both when a detection rate of 80% was expected. These results were significantly altered when the different tumour growth times reported in other literatures were applied. CONCLUSION: If the doubling time of HCC was 6 months, the optimal screening interval was 7 months on using both tests. Because the tumour doubling time alters the optimal screening interval, further evaluation on the doubling time of Korean hepatoma is needed.