Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
J Postgrad Med ; 1996 Apr-Jun; 42(2): 43-5
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-116295

RESUMO

100 patients with ASA risk I & II and undergoing perianal surgery were studied for anaesthetic effects and postoperative analgesia following either intrathecal pethidine or lignocaine. Saddle block was performed either with intrathecal pethidine 5% (50 mg/ml) 0.5 mg/kg or 1 ml of 5% lignocaine. Sensory and motor block postoperative analgesia, need for additional analgesia were studied. The onset of sensory and motor blockade with lignocaine was faster than pethidine. However the sensory and motor blockade lasted longer with pethidine. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 15.39 +/- 5.14 hours as against duration of postoperative analgesia with lignocaine which was 1.3 +/- 0.53 hours. Only 10% of patients in the pethidine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation whereas 30% of patients in the lignocaine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Anestésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Raquianestesia/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Ânus/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Meperidina/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA