Mid-term study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Asian population with severe aortic stenosis: two-year Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 outcomes

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment for high-risk or inoperative patients with severe aortic stenosis. Given the unique characteristics of Asian populations, questions regarding mid-term outcomes in Asians undergoing TAVI have yet to be addressed. We evaluated the two-year clinical outcomes of TAVI in an Asian population using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This prospective study recruited 59 patients from a major academic medical centre in Singapore. The main outcomes were two-year survival rates, peri-procedural complications, symptom improvement, valvular function and assessment of learning curve.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Mean age was 76.8 years (61.0% male), mean body surface area 1.6 mand mean logistic EuroSCORE 18.7%. Survival was 93.2%, 86.0% and 79.1% at 30 days, one year and two years, respectively. At 30 days post TAVI, the rate of stroke was 1.7%, life-threatening bleeding 5.1%, acute kidney injury 25.0%, major vascular complication 5.1%, and new permanent pacemaker implantation 6.8%. 29.3% of TAVI patients were rehospitalised (47.1% cardiovascular-related) within one year. These composite outcomes were measured: device success (93.2%); early safety (79.7%); clinical efficacy (66.1%); and time-related valve safety (84.7%). Univariate analysis found these predictors of two-year all-cause mortality: logistic EuroSCORE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07; p < 0.001); baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.97; p = 0.048); and acute kidney injury (HR 5.33; p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis identified non-transfemoral TAVI as a predictor of cardiovascular-related two-year mortality (HR 14.64; p = 0.008).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Despite the unique clinical differences in Asian populations, this registry demonstrated favourable mid-term clinical and safety outcomes in Asians undergoing TAVI.</p>

Clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay in 2,756 elderly patients with hip fractures: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical management

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of elderly hip fracture patients who received surgical treatment with those who received non-surgical treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This retrospective study involved 2,756 elderly patients with hip fractures who were admitted over a six-year period. The patients' biodata, complications, ambulatory status at discharge and length of hospital stay were obtained from the institution's hip fracture registry.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among the 2,756 hip fracture patients, 2,029 (73.6%) underwent surgical intervention, while 727 (26.4%) opted for non-surgical intervention. The complication rate among the patients who underwent surgical intervention was 6.6%, while that among the patients who underwent non-surgical intervention was 12.5% (p < 0.01). The mean length of hospital stay for the surgical and non-surgical hip fracture patients was 15.7 days and 22.4 days, respectively (p < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Surgical management of hip fractures among the elderly is associated with a lower complication rate, as well as a reduced length of hospital stay.</p>

Resource consumption in hospitalised, frail older patients

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The objective of this study was to determine factors, other than the Diagnostic Related Grouping (DRG), that can explain the variation in the cost of hospitalisation and length of hospital stay (LOS) in older patients.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>This was a prospective, observational cohort study involving 397 patients, aged 65 years and above. Data collected include demographic information, admission functional and cognitive status, overall illness severity score, number of referral to therapists, referral to medical social worker, cost of hospitalisation, actual LOS, discharge DRG codes and their corresponding trimmed average length of stay (ALOS).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The mean age of the cohort was 80.2 years. The DRG's trimmed ALOS alone explained 21% of the variation in the cost of hospitalisation and actual LOS. Incorporation of an illness severity score, number of referral to therapists and referral to medical social worker into the trimmed ALOS explained 30% and 31% of the variation in the cost and actual LOS, respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The DRG model is able to explain 21% of the variation in the cost of hospitalisation and actual LOS in older patients. Other factors that determined the variation in the cost of hospitalisation and LOS include the degree of illness severity, the number of referral to therapists and referral to medical social worker.</p>

Factors affecting unplanned readmissions from community hospitals to acute hospitals: a prospective observational study

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>While the readmission rate from community hospitals is known, the factors affecting it are not. Our aim was to determine the factors predicting unplanned readmissions from community hospitals (CHs) to acute hospitals (AHs).</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>This was an observational prospective cohort study, involving 842 patients requiring post-acute rehabilitation in 2 CHs admitted from 3 AHs in Singapore. We studied the role of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) organ impairment scores, the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score, the Shah modified Barthel Index (BI) score, and the triceps skin fold thickness (TSFT) in predicting the rate of unplanned readmissions (UR), early unplanned readmissions (EUPR) and late unplanned readmissions (LUPR). We developed a clinical prediction rule to determine the risk of UR and EUPR.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The rates of EUPR and LUPR were 7.6% and 10.3% respectively. The factors that predicted UR were the CIRS-heart score, the CIRS-haemopoietic score, the CIRS-endocrine / metabolic score and the BI on admission. The MMSE was predictive of EUPR. The TSFT and CIRS-liver score were predictive of LUPR. Upon receiver operator characteristics analysis, the clinical prediction rules for the prediction of EUPR and UR had areas under the curve of 0.745 and 0.733 respectively. The likelihood ratios of the clinical prediction rules for EUPR and UR ranged from 0.42 to 5.69 and 0.34 to 3.16 respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Patients who have UR can be identified by the admission BI, the MMSE, the TSFT and CIRS scores in the cardiac, haemopoietic, liver and endocrine/metabolic systems.</p>

Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Intra-articular fractures of the distal radius represent high energy, complex, unstable injuries and the optimal method of treatment remains controversial.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>The aim of the paper is to compare the outcomes of external fixation (EF) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screw fixation in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Thirty-five patients were enlisted from December 2003 to September 2005 after a failure of initial conservative treatment. The patients were randomised into EF or ORIF groups. The patients were followed-up at 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were measured. They were scored using the Green and O'Brien or the Gartland and Wertley score.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 35 patients, 5 defaulted the 6-month follow-up and were excluded. We found that the clinical and radiological outcomes for the 2 groups were not significantly different. Complication rates were also similar.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There is no significant difference in the outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either EF or ORIF.</p>

Botulinum toxin type A for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injured patients in Singapore

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Managing neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) successfully in spinal cord-injured patients is a challenge. The aims of preserving kidney function by achieving safe bladder pressures with anticholinergic medication often leave a significant proportion of patients with side effects. Botulinum toxin type A has been shown to be a promising alternative.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>Spinal cord injury patients who had NDO, on clean intermittent self-catheterisation, and were refractory to oral medications, were recruited. Three hundred units of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) in 30 mL NaCl solution were injected under cystoscopic guidance into the bladder.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Fifteen patients were recruited of whom 9 were tetraplegic and 6 were paraplegic. Eleven (73.3%) had complete injuries. There was a significant reduction in the mean number of leakages from 3.75 +/- 1.79 pre-injection to 0.67 +/- 1.31 and 1.5 +/- 1.5 at 6 and 26 weeks postinjection, respectively (P <0.05). Seventy-five per cent, 37.5% and 50% were completely dry at 6, 26 and 39 weeks post-injection, respectively. The mean maximal catheterisable volume increased from 312.3 +/- 145.6 mL pre-injection to 484.6 +/- 190 mL, 422.3 +/- 157.3 mL and 490.0 +/- 230.4 mL at 6, 26 and 39 weeks post-injection, respectively (P <0.005). Maximum detrusor pressure decreased significantly from 66.3 +/- 22.6 cmH2O to 21.2 +/- 23.1 cmH2O and 33.6 +/- 30.2 cmH2O at 6 and 26 weeks post-injection, respectively (P <0.05). The volume at which reflex detrusor contractions first occurred increased from 127.8 +/- 57.5 mL pre-injury to 305.7 +/- 130.8 mL at 6 weeks and 288.3 +/- 13.0 mL at 26 weeks post-injection (P <0.05). Mean cysometric bladder capacity increased from 187.8 +/- 69.2 mL to 305 +/- 136.4 mL and 288.3 +/- 13.0 mL at 6 and 26 weeks post-injury, respectively (P <0.05). Sixty per cent of patients were completely off medications at 6 and 26 weeks post-injection. One patient had urinary tract infection and 1 experienced autonomic dysreflexia during cystoscopy. Satisfaction levels increased from 4.3 +/- 2.3 pre-injury to 7.2 +/- 1.9 and 7.3 +/- 2.3 at 6 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively. This also correlated with fewer leakages.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Botulinum toxin type A injected into the detrusor is safe and efficacious for spinal cord injured patients with refractory detrusor overactivity. This effect is maintained at 26 weeks post-injection.</p>

Rates of posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery among different races in Singapore

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The aim of this study was to determine if racial differences exist in the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery in Singapore.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>All intraoperative complications during cataract surgery were prospectively reported as part of a clinical audit programme. A retrospective review of all patients who sustained a PCR during cataract surgery between July 1995 and December 1998 was performed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of 8230 consecutive eyes which underwent cataract surgery, 6951 (84.5%) were Chinese, 597 (7.3%) were Malay, 524 (6.4%) were Indian, and 158 (1.9%) were of other races. The overall incidence of PCR was 1.9%. The PCR rates were 1.8% [125 of 6951; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49 to 2.11] in Chinese, 2.0% (12 of 597; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.57) in Malay, 2.7% (14 of 524; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.56) in Indian, and 2.5% (4 of 158; 95% CI, 0.00 to 4.98) in other races. There was no statistical difference between the PCR rates (P = 0.62, chi-square test).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Racial differences in Singapore do not have an effect on the rates of PCR during cataract surgery.</p>