RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-operative shivering is one of the potential complications for any surgical patient. Its incidence varies from 5% to 65%, and many preventive and treatment modalities have been reported. For the effective prevention of post-anesthetic shivering by using intravenous clonidine or meperidine, randomized controlled studies were reviewed. The overall incidence of shivering after clonidine or meperidine administration, and the anti-shivering effect of clonidine and meperidine were evaluated. METHODS: DATA SOURCES: Medline search from 1978 to March 1998. DATA SELECTION: We selected studies that had investigated the preventive anti-shivering effect of intravenous clonidine or meperidine by randomized controlled trials. Ten clinical trials were evaluated. RESULTS: The pooled odd ratio of the patients who received clonidine was 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.22~0.47) and it seemed to be effective. But these studies showed little evidence of significant homogeneity (P=0.01). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled odd ratio of group A (early administration or intra-operative infusion group) was 0.47 (95% CI 0.31~0.72) evidenced effectiveness but failed to prove homogeneity (P=0.047). But group B (the late intra-operative administration group) had a pooled odd ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.05~0.22) and showed homogeneity (P=0.98). In meperidine trials, the pooled odd ratio was 0.20 (95% CI 0.07~0.55). CONCLUSION: We present quantitative evidence based on a meta-analysis of pooled effect size from randomized trials that clonidine is more beneficial for the prevention of post-anesthetic shivering and more effective than meperidine when it is administrated during later period of surgery.
Assuntos
Humanos , Clonidina , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação , Incidência , Meperidina , EstremecimentoRESUMO
BACKGOUND: The barrier can be altered by a number of insults to the brain (e.g., hypertension, freezing, trauma, drug). But the effect of the blood brain barrier distruction immediately after the neural change is unknown. In the present study, we focused on the BBBD after cervical sympathetic chain block. METHODS: 13 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (N=7) was blocked with 0.5% bupivacaine on the right cervical sympathetic chain and group 2 (N=6) was blocked with 0.5% bupivacaine on the bilateral cervical sympathetic chain. All rats received 37degrees C, 25% mannitol (1.75 g/kg) via right carotid artery and then, the effect of cervical sympathetic chain block on blood-brain barrier disruption of four cerebral compartment using 99mTc-human serum albumin and Evans blue was evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups showed blood-brain barrier disruption and there was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in the anterior and posterior hemisphere of the right side brain. But group 2 showed significant blood-brain barrier disruption than group 1 in anterior and posterior hemisphere of the left brain (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This results suggest that cervical sympathetic chain block can increase the degree of mannitol-induced blood-brain barrier disruption via neural arch or blood flow change.